A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Richard Tolman
 Sockless  Soviet America
 Speakers Line  The Sheridans
 The Baron  The Claw
 Warp  Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Fall of Aquileia
President Ferraro
Baron Jean de Batz
Upper Carolina
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Comrade Stalin 3
Defenestration of Prague
Margaret of Anjou
Comrade Stalin 4
Nova Roma
Nixon killed
President Heston dies
Happy Endings 20
POTUS Howard Baker
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
Concert of Europe
King Henry IXth
Farthest West
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Fed Lost Cause 4
Fed Lost Cause 3
James Bond
Happy Endings 25
American Napoleon
Nieuw Zwolle
Steve Jobs, Google CEO
Battle of Lincoln
VP Herter
Plessy v. Ferguson
Malcolm X
Council of Pisa
Happy Endings 24
President Seward II
Breckinridge dies
President Seward
Fed Lost Cause 8
Mayor for Life
President Fonda
Fed Lost Cause 10
Madeleine Albright
Fed Lost Cause 7
Fast Heinz
Lewis and Clark
Fed Lost Cause 6
The Candyman
Fed Lost Cause 9
PM Beckett
Ellsberg Sentenced
PM Halifax
FBI Dir Burns
Fed Lost Cause 5
Sic semper tyrannis!
Lavoisier Survives
Monty in Berlin
Ethiopia Falls
3-term Truman
Fed Lost Cause 2
Orson Welles born
Happy Endings 23
The Oyster
Happy Endings Part 22
49th State, Redux
Birth of Flashman
Lake Peipus
Mission STS-51-L
Escape from Loch Leven Castle
Conte di Savoia
Fed Lost Cause 1
President Thornburgh
We, the People..
Maryland Secedes

Site Meter


November 14



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the GOP ticket set-up the next generation of leaders for success? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2012, on this day failed GOP President candidate Mitt Romney announced the formation of a permanent, political action super-committee of elite donors.

Romney GroupAttributing the reason for his defeat to "Gifts" he argued that President Obama had abused his office by using policy announcements to pander to the interests of minority groups. A co-ordinated continuity of effort was therefore required in order to guarantee success in 2016. And the best vehicle for achieving that was to avoid the need for the next nominee to spend so much time fund-raising rather than forming hard policies alternatives and strategically campaigning in winnable swing states.

Of course there was an element of narcissism to the proposal, and yet there was clearly merit in retaining such an infrastructure. This allowed Romney to maintain a position of influence, participate in the development of public policy and ultimately find a meaningful next step away from the disappointment of failure.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Barack Obama, John Boehner, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality he expressed an interest in participating in public policy and try to keep the donors together "to meet perhaps annually, and to keep in touch with a monthly newsletter or something of that nature".


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-11-16 01:41:00 ~ Perhaps he could hand out Groupons. EVERYONE likes Groupons! Thus, instead of just handing out contraceptives, for instance, he could give young women Groupons for a 50 percent discount for a year's supply.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-11-16 03:43:46 ~ The funny thing is, he might just be contemplating doing something like this IRL.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-11-16 07:39:55 ~ Chris might be right, and others in, and new power, could be eyeing similar ideas. I often wonder what Clinton has up her sleeves for 2016?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Pre-Columbian plague never happened? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1527, on this day the Spanish Explorer Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca became the first European to set eyes upon the great American city of Cahokia [1].

Mississippians welcome de Vaca ExpeditionAlthough a chief officer in name, originally, his role was simply that of treasurer of the Narváez expedition of six hundred men. But only four made it ashore at Tampa Bay in La Florida and the raft of Narváez himself was lost during a hurricane at the mouth of the Mississippi River.

The tiny party was joined by indigenes of the upper Gulf Coast. About forty men including the three Spaniards made it to Cahokia with de Vaca at the head. By that stage he had developed such a remarkable reputation as a faith healer that his indigenous companions regarded the companions as "children of the sun", endowed with the power to both heal and destroy. For now it was unclear which of the those two powers would prevail. And their sense of awe was surpassed by the spectacle of the great plaza, larger and more sophisticated than any comparable metropolis in Europe.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Cabeza de Vaca, Cahokia, America, Spain, Mississippi.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this post with Mike McIlvain we have repurpose content from Wikipedia. In reality the city was abandoned, and the party actually traveled to Texas. In this AH we imagine that the Pre-Columbian plague never happened.


Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-11-13 22:42:26 ~ The true power of the central Americas can finally be revealed...

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-11-14 00:29:14 ~ Wonder if they got any Ole Miss football season tickets while they were in town? ;)

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-11-14 01:30:10 ~ Certainly, Cabeza de Vaca would have been much better known than he became, and maybe eventually gotten a better gig later on than he did in South America. And, we would have probably known more about the native Americans than we do. It is one of those "it would have been better" things that just did not happen that way. And yes, things could have been very different had it not been for just a few germs, and bacteria...

Readers Comment Sailorbarsoom commented on 2012-11-14 01:54:49 ~ "Today at the tsung-kee World Cup Tournament..."

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-11-14 02:46:35 ~ If there was gold there, the Spaniards would be back...

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-11-16 18:03:41 ~ Still, the question of firearms remains. North America could've ended up carved up like India, Africa, or China.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if William III had survived his fatal accident in 1702? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1650, on this day William Henry of Orange was born in The Hague in the Dutch Republic. He was the only child of stadtholder William II, Prince of Orange, and Mary, Princess Royal. Mary was the eldest daughter of King Charles I of England, Scotland and Ireland, and sister of King Charles II and King James II & VII.

King Billy survives the Velvet Coated AssassinFrom 1672 he governed as Stadtholder William III of Orange (Dutch: Willem III van Oranje) over Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht, Gelderland, and Overijssel of the Dutch Republic. From 1689 he reigned as William III over England and Ireland. By coincidence, his regnal number (III) was the same for both Orange and England.

At the age of fifty-two, he narrowly avoided a serious injury when his favourite horse Sorrel stumbled into a mole's burrow at Windsor Park. Had he perished at the hands of this so-called "Velvet Coated Assassin" then his successor under the Bill of Rights would have been his late wife's sister Anne Stuart. But when she died childless a dozen years later, the succession then passed to Electress Sophia and her issue. Determined to prevent the rise of an Anglo-German Royal House of Hanover, William married again in order to have children that would be his legal successors.

His son William IV would be the driving force behind the Act of Anglo-Dutch Union that ensures the territories of Britain and the Netherlands would not drift apart due to a ridiculous accident of fate.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: House of Origin, William and Mary, Glorious Revolution, Holland, Britain.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this post we repurpose content from Alternate History, Wikipedia and "William and Mary: Heroes of the Glorious Revolution" by John John Van der Kiste. William died of pneumonia, a complication from a broken collarbone following a fall from his horse, Sorrel. Because his horse had stumbled into a mole's burrow, many Jacobites toasted "the little gentleman in the black velvet waistcoat".






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Martians landed in New Jersey and offered humans an alliance? muses Chris Oakley Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1938, on this day Princeton University astronomy professor Richard Pearson, one of the first Western scientists to make contact with the Martians following the landing at Grover's Mill, was seriously injured at his office in what was initially thought to have been a failed robbery but later determined to have been an assassination attempt by Gestapo agents who had recently infiltrated the Princeton campus.

Part Seven of Parley Knowing the value of Professor Pearson's work in relation to the larger human effort to understand Martian culture and technology, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover personally took charge of the Pearson case and instructed the FBI's New York City field office to make the Gestapo agents' capture its top priority.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Parley Source: Wikipedia Labels: War of the Worlds, Mars, Martians, Alliance, New Jersey.





Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Benjamin Franklin called for peace? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, in the St. James Chronicle, English citizen Benjamin Franklin, originally from Pennsylvania, published his "Letter to the English Speaking Peoples on Account of Unity".

Benjamin Franklin Calls for Peace Three years before, he had written a satirical essay entitled "Rules By Which A Great Empire May Be Reduced To A Small One," ridiculing the heavy (and seemingly inept) hand of government between England and her colonies. While the Americans had been on a track toward revolution from unfair taxation without representation, Franklin had been in England, climbing social ladders, even to the point of securing his son the position as governor of the colony of New Jersey.

In 1773, a series of letters from Governor Thomas Hutchinson of Massachusetts were given to Franklin anonymously as he was representative from the colonies. The letters depicted a draconian call to order by stripping colonists of their rights "by degrees" and an "abridgement" of liberties. Franklin sent the letters to Boston to inform them of their governor's thoughts, and they were published in the Boston Gazette. Uproar broke out in Boston, and Hutchison was sent back to England. The government began an investigation to find the source of the leak, eventually discovering Franklin as he stepped forward to protect innocents. In January 1774, he would be reprimanded and humiliated before the Privy Council, quashing many of Franklin's ambitions.

A new story by Jeff ProvineBy 1775, Franklin was prepared to leave London forever, returning to his beloved home and participating in the coming of a new age there. However, as spring came, he suffered a vicious attack of his gout, and Franklin was forced to spend the summer in the English countryside rather than risking a painful voyage. He rested with his aged friend Lord Chatham, William Pitt the Elder, and read the news from the colonies, where war broke out at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts Colony. Franklin knew that there would be no return to America with war, and so he determined to help his people whatever way he found. Discussing the war with the Whigs, especially Pitt's son, Franklin determined that the war must end and the British Empire be reunited as well as reformed.

Hope for peace grew dim as the Crown sent increasing numbers of troops and the Colonists returned with small victories, but the signing of the Declaration of Independence affirmed the Americans' will to fight no matter concessions. Franklin imagined that, if he had been there, he might have signed it himself, but several key wordings would have been changed. Instead, in England, he encouraged William the Younger and routinely addressed the English to begin diplomacy, as he wrote in the St. James Chronicle.

Despite his cries, the war would drag on. While the Americans would find allies with the Dutch, finances could not take the place of warships, which they hoped to derive from a French Alliance. Unfortunately for the colonies, no American ambassador, even the acclaimed Thomas Jefferson, seemed able to intrigue the French Court into more than loans and guns. The British controlled the seas, but the American colonial forces gradually chased them off land. With the flexibility of the navy, however, the British army could be spirited away from one point and set upon a new invasion elsewhere, as seen at the disastrous Siege of Yorktown in 1781. By the mid-1780s, broke and facing counter-revolution, the Continental Congress began to give up.

Feeling victory, George III and like-minded Parliamentarians pressed for a scourging of the colonies in retribution, but Franklin called for a peaceful reuniting. Appealing to the tale of the Prodigal Son, Franklin showed that the colonies needed to be met with love. Reform would change the hearts of the colonists, though there were several bad apples to be taken from the barrel, such as Samuel Adams and John Hancock, who would live out their days imprisoned in England. George Washington would remain in house arrest at his much-reduced plantation, while Thomas Jefferson led expatriates to France, finding sanctuary there.

In the 1790s, a wave of revolution would wash across Europe; many would blame it on Jeffersonian influence. While France turned to a republic, most nations underwent softer reforms, especially Britain under the leadership of William Pitt the Younger. During the Napoleonic Wars, England and her colonies would be reaffirmed as a new generation of colonists fought against French troops along the Mississippi frontier.

Franklin himself would remain in Britain the rest of his life, though his preserved body would be sent back to Philadelphia in 1790. There was some discussion of burying him in Westminster for his work preserving the Empire, but his will stated that he was to return home "now that the house is in order".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Benjamin Franklin, 1776, War of Independence, America, 1776.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the fallout from the Hutchison Letters drove Franklin back to America. On November 14, 1776, the St. James Chronicle wrote, "The very identical Dr. Franklyn, whom Lord Chatham so much caressed, and used to say he was proud in calling his friend, is now at the head of the rebellion in North America", confirming Franklin?s position as a leader among the Americans. Franklin would be instrumental in discerning and navigating the French Court to establish relations ultimately giving the United States its most important alliance.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-11-19 00:36:11 ~ It might just have been...

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-19 00:46:55 ~ Interesting. Can you elaborate on what exact POD resulted in Franklin not being driven back to America ITTL?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-19 06:12:44 ~ The gout. Never had it myself, but from people I know that have, it really knocks out any urge to do anything, much less a weeks-long sea voyage.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2010-11-19 15:52:28 ~ Odds are that BNA is either cut loose as it's own kingdom anyway or comes to wag the English dog, but we all knew that.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-11-20 08:41:30 ~ Wouldn't have required much really. Kick the can down the road for a few more years and France and England would have gone to war over something else. Neither France nor Spain regarded the peace of 1763 as acceptable and both were rapidly rearming for a rematch. So if the North American mess can be kept on simmer until 1779-80 some clash or other in the Indian Ocean or West Indies is the war trigger at which point getting the British cousins to kiss and make up becomes much easier.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Canadian hero Terry Fox had survived his marathon of hope to begin a new, cross-America run in 1985? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1985, running alongside the Potomac River in the bright November sunshine, brother Terry Fox completed his second "Marathon of Hope", an incredible cross-America run that would generate hundreds of millions of dollars of sponsorship funding for cancer research.

Marathon of Hope 2At the White House, Fox was greeted by the fortieth President of the United States, Ted Kennedy, his twenty-four year old son and Four Seasons' CEO Isadore Sharp who had pledged $10,000 to the marathon and challenged 999 other corporations to do the same.

"Terry Fox is like a meteor passing in the sky, one whose light travels beyond our view, yet still shines in the darkest night" said Sharp.

Of course Kennedy Junior fully understood the meteor's moment of triumph. In 1973, when he was twelve, a form of bone cancer called osteosarcoma was diagnosed in his right leg. The leg was surgically amputated on November 17, 1973. On that same day his father had escorted Kennedy's cousin Kathleen Hartington Kennedy - the eldest child of Robert F. Kennedy - down the aisle at her wedding and rushed back to the hospital.

In Canada, the thirtieth annual run occurred on September 19, 2010. Since 1981, $550 million has been raised by 35 million participants in more than 40 countries around the world who have laced up for the event. Terry Fox is no longer with us, but across his beloved Canada, his light shines on.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Terry Fox, Edward Kennedy, Cancer, Marathon, Hope.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Terrance Stanley "Terry" Fox CC OD, (July 28, 1958 - June 28, 1981) was a Canadian humanitarian, athlete, and cancer research activist. In 1980, with one leg having been amputated, he embarked on a cross-Canada run to raise money and awareness for cancer research. Although the spread of his cancer eventually forced him to end his quest after 143 days and 5,373 kilometres (3,339 mi), and ultimately cost him his life, his efforts resulted in a lasting, worldwide legacy. The annual Terry Fox Run, first held in 1981, has grown to involve millions of participants in over 60 countries and is now the world's largest one-day fundraiser for cancer research; over C$500 million has been raised in his name.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-11-14 06:11:43 ~ Even with the Chappaquiddick girl-drowner in the White House, this would have been nice.

Facebook Comment Comment from Amanda Caron on Facebook: That would have been terrific! However if he did.. it might have not gotten as big as it did.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2010-11-15 03:30:31 ~ The ultimate sacrifice isn't always necessary in order to grab the world's attention. A living activist is a much more eloquent spokesperson than a dead one.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-15 16:53:41 ~ Major medical investment between this and Ted Kennedy's presidency. It'd be a very different 2010 around hospitals.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Lenin had been exposed as a German Spy prior to the truce being agreed in the Central Executive Committee? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1917, on this day the Left Socialist Revolutionaries triggered the "third Russian revolution" by purging Bolshevik elements from the government of soviets.

Neither War Nor PeaceLenin's authority in the Central Executive Committee had been broken by the damning proof of treason. To wit, that he had been infiltrated back into the country by the German Government in the hope of hampering the war effort. And so when Lenin insisted that the first priority of the government of soviets was to secure an armistace on any terms, Left Socialist Revolutionaries came to the shattering realisation that the German Government's tactic's would now pay off.

Differences were more a matter of strategy, than tactics. Because the Left Socialist Revolutionaries asserted that the best way of inspiring revolution in the West was to appeal to the Russian people to fight a guerrilla war against the German invaders.

"[Bolshevik plans were] destructive to the international proletarian movement, and deeply harmful to the interests of Russian workers, the revolution, and the Russian economy in general"Denouncing Lenin as a German Spy, the new Government rejected the Bolsheviks plans as "destructive to the international proletarian movement, and deeply harmful to the interests of Russian workers, the revolution, and the Russian economy in general".

Somewhat cynically though, the new strategy would be based on a catchy phrase from Trotsky who had proposed a declaration to the Central Powers that the Government of Soviets sought "neither war nor peace".

Not that Trotsky benefitted from this piece of imaginative thinking. The Left Socialist Revolutionaries had also discovered that Trotsky had been living stylishly in New York, staying rent-free at a luxury apartment with a chaffeured limousine provided ex gratia by the Standard Oil Company. Arrested by Canadian Immigration Authorities at Halifax Novia Scotia, Trotsky had been carrying $10,000 of funding from Wall Street Capitalists who planned to overthrow central authority in Russia to develop their own oligarchies.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © "The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk", published in the March 2008 Edition of History Today Magazine.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: History Today Magazine Labels: Lenin, Stalin, Russia, 1917, Revolution.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that to explore this controversial issue, extensive amounts of content have been repurposed from the source article. In OTL, the phrase "Neither Peace nor War" was coined later at Brest Litovsk; and the charge "destructive to.." was allegedly planted in the Petrogradskoe Ekho by the Left Socialist Revolutionaries.


Facebook Comment Comment by Jeff Mayers on Facebook: Hmmm...I would think that the past century of Russian and world history would have been changed since if the Bolsheviks never gained power then there probably would have been a second world war, but very different that what actually occured, there also may not have been a cold war and everything that came out of that...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-14 06:46:24 ~ I'd think that once the rest of the world's war had quieted down, someone or other would take Russia in hand...

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-11-14 08:11:26 ~ I don't see it. It does solve either the land question or the fact that the army did not want to fight. It also ignored German reactions.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-11-14 15:48:29 ~ Only a token effort was actually made by Western powers to "take Russia in hand" in OTL--though the abortive 1918 intervention, intended to overthrow the Bolsheviks in favor of a government willing to rejoin the fight against Germany, was enough to help the Bolsheviks fuel anti-Western paranoia among Russians. And once the war had ended altogether, the nations involved had lost their taste for foreign adventures, at least for a time. Moreover, I suspect that if the Left Socialists had defeated and destroyed the Bolsheviks, they in turn would have been identified as the political Antichrist by Western conservatives and would have been treated just as the Bolsheviks were. Even today, in the U.S. and elsewhere, one finds people who argue that political liberals are the same as socialists, who in turn are the same as Communists--so it wouldn't be much of a stretch for the LR's to have been demonized if they had prevailed. One critical difference in this timeline, though, stems from the possibility that the LR's might not have executed the Romanovs. If instead they'd simply exiled them, as the Germans did the Kaiser after World War I in our history, anti-LR's might have coalesced around the banished royals and perhaps even plotted to restore them to power--and if the LR regime ever fell, the descendants of Tsar Nicholas might indeed have regaained their throne, though perhaps only on a figureehead basis.


US Secretary of State

On this day in 1941, US Secretary of State Cordell Hull imposed a deadline of November 28th for Japan to agree with a ceasefire with the Soviet Union and a withdrawal of Japanese troops from mainland China; after that, Hull warned ominously, 'things are automatically going to happen'.

US Secretary of State - Cordell Hull
Cordell Hull

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Barbarossa41 Source: Wikipedia Labels: World War 2, Operation Barbarossa, Fascism, Georgi Zhukov, Axis Powers.



In 1979, President Jimmy Carter of the U.S. froze all Iranian assets in America and American-controlled banks. This bargaining chip was what allowed him to negotiate the release of the 63 American hostages that Iranian students had taken at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. The release of these hostages in mid-1980 guaranteed Carter's reelection.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1993, the U.S. commonwealth of Puerto Rico approved a referendum on statehood, prompting the island's governor to begin negotiations in earnest with the American government to give it independence. The negotiations continue to this day; influential Puerto Ricans, despairing of America's willingness to grant them their freedom, have organized a boycott of U.S. products throughout the Caribbean, which has finally led to the U.S. drawing up the final plans for the island's independence.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1889, Nellie Bly, a reporter for the New York World, attempted to travel around the world in less than 80 days, inspired by the popular novel by Jules Verne. With the newspaper covering her expenses, Bly hopped across the globe in one adventure after another. However, a broken ankle while she was traveling through India delayed her just enough to where she missed her deadline, arriving back at her New York embarkation point 81 days after she left.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 4004 BCE, the Presence isolated a small group of people in the middle east and began indoctrinating them with the values of the main galactic civilization. The people, known as Hebrews, were converted from a polytheistic religion to a monotheistic one, and many confusing dietary and cultural restrictions were placed on them.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1966, Lyndon Baines Johnson received an alarming update regarding the two deep-underground nuclear detonations. Scientists were confident that the detonations were the result of the Tunguska Event in 1908. A singularity had penetrated the Earth, causing an explosion that flattened 20 miles of Tunguska in central Siberia. An elliptic course had been pursued by the singularity for fifty-eight years. As a result, they believed the singularity would re-emerge on the Eastern Seaboard during 1971.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Crises Source: Wikipedia Labels: Nuclear Testing, Underground, Israel, South Africa, Nuclear Club.





November 13



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Royalist army had forced their way into London? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1642, on this fateful day a Parliamentarian army under the command of the Earl of Essex was defeated by a smaller Royalist force at the Battle of Turnham Green.

Stunning Royalist Victory at Turnham GreenAfter the Battle of Edgehill King Charles had captured Banbury and was greeted by cheering crowds as he arrived in Oxford. His nephew and cavalry commander, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, then swept down the Thames Valley, capturing Abingdon, Aylesbury and Maidenhead, from where he captured Windsor [1].

With the last remaining defending force defeated, the Royalist army's unstoppable march to London had opened the gates to the city and the Parliamentarians were staring defeat in the face. But the reaction from Londoners was fierce. Although the twelve thousand man Royalist army was short of ammunition and by normal standards too small to attack the 24,000 strong Parliamentarian army, the King had ignored advice that to engage such an oddly assorted army containing what was obviously a large contingent of armed civilians (namely the Trained Bands under Philip Skippon) would provoke a massive reaction from the populace. And so it proved.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Turnham Green, Royalist, Parliamentarian, Earl of Essex, King Charles I.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this post we have repurpose content from Wikipedia which suggest - the engagement resulted in a standoff between the forces of King Charles I and the much larger Parliamentarian army under the command of the Earl of Essex. However, in successfully blocking the Royalist army's way to London, the Parliamentarians gained an important strategic victory because the standoff forced Charles and his army to retreat to Oxford for secure winter quarters.
[1] In OTL although he failed in that attempt because of Parliamentary strength there. After this, many officers wanted to open peace negotiations, contrary to Rupert's desire to carry on to London, but the king agreed with the officers and so the Earl of Essex managed to overtake them and reach London with his Parliamentary army by 8 November.


Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-02-03 14:43:49 ~ Quite a gamble, but stranger things have happened.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Elizabeth Tailboys had been acknowledged as the King' daughter? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1520, on this day Henry VIII's illegitimate daughter Elizabeth was born to his long-time lover Bessie Blount.

Birth of Elizabeth Tailboys, Queen of EnglandEven though her mother's arranged marriage to Gilbert Talboys, 1st Baron Tailboys of Kyme did not occur until two years later, she adopted her stepfather's surname.

Of course her brother Henry FitzRoy, 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset, 1st Earl of Nottingham was the King's only acknowledged illegitimate child. It was even suggested that he should be named the legal Tudor heir. But his death from consumption aged seventeen stopped such a succession plan.

Nevertheless all was not lost because at this desperate juncture, Blount had convinced the King that his wives fertility problems was due to something desperately wrong in his marriages. She managed to get her daughter acknowledged and the result was that Elizabeth Tailoys succeeded to the throne after the death of Queen Mary in 1558. Needless to say, this triggered an immediate challenge from Elizabeth, the daughter of Anne Boleyn. And as England descended into Civil War, King Phillip of Spain began to amass his armada.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Bessie Blount, Henry FitzRoy, Gilbert Talboys, Elizabeth Tailboys, Henry VIII.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this post we have repurpose content from Daily Mail and Wikipedia which suggest - Elizabeth Tailboys would have changed the course of English history had the King acknowledged her as his


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-11-13 11:42:16 ~ But she would still be an acknowledged bastard, like the Duke of Monmouth, and therefore could not succeed. Hopefully, she would not make as much trouble as Monmouth did, before he was executed for leading his revolt.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-11-14 02:30:04 ~ She'd have more strikes against her than Elizabeth Tudor did in OTL, and unless she was a greater genius, wouldn't last long. If nothing else, her half sister(s) would be after her...with knives.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-11-14 06:10:53 ~ To have had a tabloid scandal sheet in London in those days. No, that might have gotten one to the Tower just to lose their head, but the times they were racy.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-11-14 16:54:34 ~ Well, Mike, one would-be humorist was hung, drawn and quartered for the following commentary: "The cat, the rat and Lovell the Dog rule all England under the Hog." And the Hog was Richard III, whose emblem was a wild bore. Anyway, it was a tough audience.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-11-16 18:01:18 ~ Would one side join with Philip? A clear landing zone could've changed everything. Then again, an outside threat could've united them.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Jacobites won the Battle of Sheriffmuir? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1715, on this day John Erskine, 6th Earl of Mar led the Jacobite rebels to a glorious victory at the Battle of Sheriffmuir fought near Dunblane in Scotland.

Battle of Sheriffmuir
By Ed and Jared Myers
Both the Scots and the English hated King George, the foreign monarch who sat on the English throne but who spoke no English. But only the Jacobites sought a restoration of the Stuart kings to the thrones of England and Scotland.

When the Earl of Mar was seen as a political threat to the King, he was snubbed, and his response was to turn his support to the Jacobite cause.

Now the standard-bearer for the cause, he mustered Highland chiefs and on 6 September declared James Francis Edward Stuart (the "Old Pretender") as King of Scots. With a huge army of about twelve thousand men Mar proceeded to take Perth, and commanded much of the northern Highlands. Following unsuccessful skirmishes against John Campbell, 2nd Duke of Argyll (based at Stirling), Mar was eventually persuaded to lead his full army south, on 10 November. Spies informed Argyll of Mar's actions, and he moved his army of about four thousand to Sheriffmuir, near Dunblane. The two armies met on the battlefield on 13 November where the Jacobites won a decisive victory under his command.

Argyll was seriously outnumbered by the Jacobite army and his left wing, commanded by General Whetham, was far shorter than the Jacobites' opposing right. Argyll's right wing attacked, and tried to drive the Highlanders back, while Whetham's soldiers were overpowered by a much larger force.

Forced to withdraw from the field, Argyll would eventually surrender to the Jacobite rebels at Preston. And the continued survival of the Hanoverian monarchy was placed on a knife-edge.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sheriffmuir, Scotland, England, Rebel, Jacobite.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the result was tactically inconclusive, strategic victory for the government. Please note that we have repurposed significant amounts of content from the source article in Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2011-11-08 17:46:35 ~ If Argyll surrendered at Preston, does this mean Mar lifted the Siege of Preston prior to the Argyll's surrender?

Readers Comment Todayinah Ed. commented on 2011-11-08 22:34:37 ~ Comment from Rich Rostrom on Google Groups: Rubbish. George assumed the British throne by the choice of the British parliament in the Act of Settlement. George was a nebbish, who was content to enjoy the throne without imposing his will in any significant way. This was welcomed by the British political elite, which was thus able to rule the country without royal interference. He'd done nothing to alienate the average Englishman, who didn't care at all. Nor the average Scot - there hadn't been a "native" king of Scotland since James II. I don't say there was any great enthusiasm for George, but there was plenty of hostility to the Catholic Stuarts, and there was no other "legitimate" heir.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-11-13 06:11:07 ~ To make a Stuart victory stick, the Pretender (Old or Young) would have to publicly and apparently-fervently embrace Protestantism; if James II had been Protestant, he'd have reigned through his life.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-11-14 00:54:43 ~ Good point by Mr. Oppen. If not, we might run into another Parliamentary seizure like the Civil War.

Google Discussion Group Comments Please click hyperlink for Google Groups Discussion comments.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Lincoln had dismissed McClellan after just two weeks in post? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1861, after not even two weeks of being General-in-Chief of the Union Armies, General George B. McClellan was dismissed from his position after repeated faux pas.

Lincoln Dismisses McClellan after Insult President Abraham Lincoln, Secretary of State William H. Seward, and presidential secretary John Hay came by McClellan's house for a strategy meeting. The general was out, so the men waited. An hour later, McClellan returned but did not acknowledge them, and, after another half hour, his servant finally told the president that McClellan had gone on to bed. Lincoln was initially very calm, as he would typically be despite the trials of his presidency, and at first determined "better at this time not to be making points of etiquette and personal dignity". When word slipped that McClellan had privately referred to Lincoln as a "baboon" and "gorilla" and Seward as an "incompetent little puppy," Lincoln's uncustomary temper rose, and he fired his general-in-chief, demoting McClellan simply to commander of the Army of the Potomac.

A new story by Jeff ProvineLincoln, however, put himself into dire straits. His military was hardly ready, but the populace was unsure whether a war to keep the Union united would be worth it, and he needed victories to keep the people in ready. General Winfield Scott, who had served with the US Army since before the War of 1812, had retired October 31 due to "health reasons" of being seventy-five years old. Other commanders might have been available, but Lincoln needed someone he was certain would be brash and wield the available army to the fullness of its effect. He recalled meeting Colonel William Tecumseh Sherman, one of the most effective commanders at the Battle of Bull Run that June. Lincoln had been so impressed that he promoted Sherman to brigadier general of volunteers.

Sherman, however, was unnerved by the war. The defeat by Confederates had caused him to question the abilities of Union soldiers as well as his own competency as a commander, despite his bravery even after taking grazing bullet wounds to his shoulder and knee. He had been assigned to Robert Anderson in the Department of the Cumberland and that October had replaced Anderson due to ill health. Sherman had been promised by Lincoln not to be given such authority so suddenly, and it began to wear on him. He was increasingly paranoid of Confederate resources and sent constant requests for more supplies from Washington. After a review by Secretary of War Simon Cameron, the press turned against him, noting his pessimism and what would be later described by psychology as a "nervous breakdown". He was relieved of command and sent to St. Louis, where he would receive his summons to Washington by Lincoln as a new general-in-chief to concoct the strategy for defeating the South.

Sherman arrived in Washington and immediately pleaded with Lincoln (directly as well as through his brother, Senator John Sherman) that he was unfit for command. Lincoln recalled his reservations about McClellan's ability to be both general-in-chief while still operating as an army commander, to which McClellan assured him, "I can do it". The president was tired of generals who questioned his decisions as commander-in-chief, and Lincoln wrote Sherman a direct order to take command. Sherman committed suicide December 23, 1861, under the pressure.

It would be a severe strike against Lincoln's administration and public opinion about the war. Further, Lincoln was once again stuck without a commander. Fr&eacut;mont had proven overly aggressive in Missouri that November, turning Lincoln to the third most senior general in the Army, Henry Halleck, who had just replaced Fr&eacut;mont in Missouri. Halleck soon arrived in Washington and proved an able administrator, though Lincoln would be frustrated over his lack of action in the next years, referring to Halleck as "little more than a first rate clerk". The Union struggled to make any progress in the East, but the Western theater with its eager General Ulysses S. Grant returned numerous victories. Winfield Scott's "Anaconda Plan" eventually began to choke out the South, who suffered Pyrrhic losses in its invasion of Pennsylvania under Lee, and Grant was made the new general-in-chief in 1864 with Halleck being "kicked upstairs" to Chief of Staff.

Grant put forward Lincoln's plan of total war to break down Southern infrastructure and keep potential reinforcements pinned. The taking of Atlanta by General George Henry Thomas on October 2, 1864, came just in time to guarantee Lincoln's second election, and Thomas would lead the careful and slow demolition of Southern communication, transport, and industry. However, shortly after the end of the war with Lee's surrender in June of 1865, the superficial damage would be easily repaired. Lincoln's assassination came as a harsh blow to the South, but Thomas's gentlemanly use of Army resources to enable Southern rebuilding did much to aid feelings in Reconstruction after the notions of him being a "traitor" to his native Virginia faded.

Andrew Johnson battled through the rest of Lincoln's term, and in 1868 Grant would win the presidency. While dealing mainly with the issues of the South, he would also be notably genial toward Native Americans. His use of treaties restricting buffalo hunts came too late to preserve the food supply entirely, but he would continue his overall attitude toward Natives as "harmless" and "peaceful" until "put upon by the whites" and prevent as many armed altercations as he could.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Lincoln , McClellan , Confederacy, Civil War, Union.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Lincoln allowed McClellan to continue as general-in-chief until the failure of the Peninsular Campaign. Sherman would be given leave not long after the Cincinnati Commercial referred to him as "insane" on December 11, 1861. He soon return recuperated, taking up service under Grant, whom he would aid in victories such as that at Chattanooga. When Grant became general-in-chief, he gave Sherman command to take Atlanta and approved the later March to the Sea, which saw scorched earth tactics of utterly laying waste to the South from Atlanta to Savannah. After the war, Sherman would be put in charge of the Military Division of the Missouri, where he would write to Grant that "hostile savages like Sitting Bull and his band of outlaw Sioux ... must feel the superior power of the Government" and "we must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to their extermination, men, women and children".


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-08-26 12:01:54 ~ My understanding is that McClellan was actually a pretty good general when it came tp preparing an army to fight; it was only in actual combat that his weaknesses, in particular a constant unrealistic fear that theSouth had him outnumbered, became evident.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-08-26 12:09:27 ~ My own opinion about McLellan was that, with as much damage as he did to the Union, he was obviously a Confederate agent...

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-08-26 12:29:37 ~ He was a great organizer, he built the Army of the Potomac out of nothing. But he was too cautious and allowed Confederate cavalry to run circles around him during the Peninsular campaign. (Oddly, two of McClellan's aides were the rightful king of france, for real, and his brother the duke -- of, chartres, not of bilgewater.)

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-08-26 17:21:34 ~ McClellan belonged in the army, but as an organizer; he lacked the killer instinct that a general has to have to succeed. When Lee attacked him, and threatened his precious Army of the Potomac, all of a sudden he was a ferocious fighter. That said, if they'd let him put the army together (armies of that size had _NEVER_ been seen in the US before and nobody really could have done it better) and then put others in field command, it'd have been better.

Readers Comment Timothy McFadden commented on 2011-08-26 21:28:31 ~ Apparently in this timeline, the Penninsular campaign never took place? That would explain why Lee is never even mentioned. His role in the war would probably be restricted to the latter half, commanding the defenses of Richmond. Sherman seems kind of an odd choice though. There were a lot of senior officers who would have seemed more natural choices - Reynolds or Burnside leaps to mind, Burnside wasn't much as a field commander but as General in Chief, his organizational skills might have shone more brightly. I can't see "Little Mac" lasting long as a subordinate to anyone, however.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Martians landed in New Jersey and offered humans an alliance? muses Chris Oakley Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1938, on this day the United States and Great Britain jointly initiated a crash atomic weapons development program meant to counter the German-Italian A-bomb effort.

Part Six of Parley Dubbed "the Manhattan Project" because its main U.S. offices were initially housed in a Manhattan U.S. Army Corps of Engineers building, the Anglo-American program's main goal was to produce a working atom bomb before the Axis powers did; one of its key additional purposes was to harness atomic energy as a power source for the heat ray batteries being constructed along the U.S. and British coasts.

One of the first scientists recruited for the Manhattan Project was a UCLA graduate student named Clayton Forrester (pictured). As the nuclear race between the West and the Axis accelerated, Dr. Forrester became one of the most important scientific figures in America; by the time war finally broke out between the Western alliance and the Axis nations Forrester was the de facto number two man on the project's scientific team. After the Third Reich collapsed and the anti-monarchist uprising on Mars was crushed, he became a physics professor at Harvard and continued his research on atomic energy. Dr. Forrester would go on to win the 1953 Nobel Physics Prize.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Parley Source: Wikipedia Labels: War of the Worlds, Mars, Martians, Alliance, New Jersey.

Readers Comment Steven Fisher commented on 2011-11-13 01:18:35 ~ Huzzah for America and her allies! Victory over the Fascists and Communists. Now for the only problem left. How democratic are these monarchist Martians. If they aren't very, then this could be a problem




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if France had retained Quebec? muses Chris Oakley reflecting on an article in the New Statesman magazine. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1772, a group of American independence advocates met in Boston to form the Brotherhood of Liberty.

Double Jeopardy Part 4
Formation of Brotherhood of Liberty
The most radical American political organization that had been established up to that time, the Brotherhood called for the citizens of the 13 colonies to engage in an armed insurrection similar to the rebellion that had been going on in Quebec for over two years; although at first the organization's numbers were small, they would steadily and swiftly expand in the face of Quebecois successes against the British occupation forces in Quebec and British acts of repression against American citizens. By the time the Quebec Rebellion ended in the summer of 1773 the Brotherhood had branches in every one of the 13 colonies, with the largest number of chapters operating in Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

Prior to the start of the American Revolution, the Brotherhood's most dramatic act of opposition to British colonial rule was the Boston Tea Party in August of 1773, when crowds of anti-British protestors stormed three British merchant ships and threw crates of tea into Boston Harbor. Outraged over this blatant act of defiance to the crown's authority(not to mention the loss of tons of high-quality tea), British colonial officials declared martial law throughout all of Massachusetts and sent troops to hunt down the Brotherhood's leaders. The hunt was still going on when the Revolution broke out in the spring of 1775.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Double Jeopardy Source: New Statesman Magazine Labels: Plains of Abraham, Quebec, Canada, America, Britain.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, inspired by inspired by one of Dominic Sandbrook's articles in New Statesman


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-19 05:56:26 ~ They'd probably oppose the Quebeckers---Americans at that time were UTTERLY PARANOID about "Papism."

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-03-19 13:49:00 ~ Some of them still are.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-03-19 15:47:21 ~ Use 'em as allies, then turn against them, preferably conquering. It's the American Way.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Al Gore had won the 2000 election? muses Christopher Hitchens in Newsweek Magazine. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2010, on this day Christopher Hitchens wrote this article in Newsweek Magazine ~ It's a fantasy to believe a Gore presidency would have looked nothing like the Bush presidency.

Be Careful What You Wish For I used to play a guilty-pleasure game with a fellow leftist, in which we asked ourselves which American election would have been best decided "the other way". The most appalling unintended conclusion we reached was that Nixon really ought to have beaten Kennedy in 1960. After all, there'd be a sporting chance that the proven anticommunist Nixon would not have felt such a strong need to prove himself at the Bay of Pigs, or in Indochina. We would have also been spared much mushy "Camelot" sentimentality. Kennedy could have got the treatment for Addison's disease that he so clearly needed, instead of getting by on drug cocktails furnished by "Dr. Feelgood". Conceivably, a Richard Nixon who did not darkly believe that the Kennedy clan had paid to help steal the vote would be a Richard Nixon with fewer demons. And, at the very worst, Tricky Dicky would have been a retired politician by the end of January 1969. My friend and I looked at each other with a sudden access of horror, and then went back to hating Nixon and all his works all over again.

So the business of remolding history nearer to the heart's desire is a very vertiginous one. And you have to decide what price you are prepared to pay for what you want. To take what you might call a macro-example: how best to stop the rise of Adolf Hitler? The only way to make absolutely certain is to let the British and French lose the First World War, or at least to make a deal with Germany by 1916 (in which case you would never have had to hear about a communist seizure of power in Moscow, either). To offer a more recent and less epochal instance: if you want Barack Obama in the Oval Office, be glad that you didn't vote to send Sen. John Kerry there last time.

What you can't do is change only one thing, or have it both ways at once. In his Intruder in the Dust William Faulkner describes the fantasy of every white Southern boy: that somehow the fatal order for Pickett to charge Little Round Top at Gettysburg was countermanded at the last moment. Without that self-inflicted calamity, so the faithful believe, the Confederacy would have been within a short march of Washington. But the sheer fact is that the South could never have outgunned or outproduced the Union, and the cause of slavery was doomed even in the medium run. I once read a very clever "what if?" essay by the historian Christopher Hollis, who argued that if the British had not so cruelly shot the Irish rebel leadership--Connolly, Pearse, and the other firebrands--after the Easter Rising of 1916, Ireland might have become pacified. He completely forgot to mention that if these popular leaders had not been executed, they would have still been alive!

With some of this in mind, what of the millennial election? Picture, if you will, that hairbreadth contest being decided the other way. The Republicans at once become entitled to claim that an incumbent vice president who couldn't carry his own state, or any other Southern one, after eight years in office, shouldn't get the benefit of a technical "tie". Whoever has "won," there is a good case for saying that Gore has not. Then picture the rancid resentment about the withdrawal of his election-night concession, the judge-shopping in Florida, and all the rest of it. Nixon's rage about Cook County in Illinois in 1960 is replicated, but on a more than personal scale. At the very least this means that the new president is confronted with a very malcontent Republican wing of Congress. The Kyoto treaty has already failed to attain the ratification of the Senate (or to be fair, even to get close to doing so), but now it's well and truly toast. Nor would I wager much of my own money on any Supreme Court nominees that the White House cares to advance.

This is relatively small-change partisan stuff, perhaps (unless you think that Al Gore would somehow have found a way to preempt it all), but the Qaeda death squads are already well inside the territory of the United States, and on September 11 they pull off their devastatingly simple plan. The president is not at a school in Florida. Let's say he's at a groundbreaking for some establishment that is going to make solar panels. It makes little difference: the Secret Service still takes over and spirits him away, with the result that he looks weak and frightened on the very day he most needs to look tough. Now, you have to picture the pressure from the already infuriated right. The new president has already backed his predecessor's Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, putting many extraordinary powers in the hands of our police and security agencies. He's made many a harsh speech on the subject of Middle Eastern terrorism. He and his vice president from Connecticut have between them the most solid history of pro-Israel voting in the whole United States Senate. It is not a time to look wimpish. The mind begins--does it not?--to boggle. It's even possible to doubt that Afghanistan would have gone uninvaded, or that suspected terrorists would be tried in courts in downtown Manhattan. Might well not have happened ..

Gore does have an overwhelming trump card to play against the Republican drumbeaters. In all the 2000 presidential debates with his now-defeated Texan rival, he has stuck up for the use of American troops in nation-building overseas, and deflected Bush's critical questions about the Clinton-Gore administration's use of "secret evidence" in terrorism trials. (This is worth looking up, by the way.) Moreover, and since breaking ranks to vote for the Desert Storm operation in 1991, he has often said in public that the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq will have to go sooner or later, and perhaps sooner. He is associated with those in the Senate who passed the Iraq Liberation Act, making this objective into official American policy. With a deftly calculated counterstroke, ably supported by fighting speeches from his vice president, Gore preempts and defangs the hawks and seizes the high ground of "America versus the terrorists". This high ground also happens to constitute the long-cherished "middle ground". The president's principal point--that terrorists will find no refuge and that states that even look at us the wrong way will be on the receiving end of retaliation--swiftly becomes baptized as "the Gore doctrine". As a well-known advocate and friend of the United Nations, the chief executive has little difficulty in reminding the world body of its long and shameful record of unenforced resolutions in the matter of Mesopotamia.

Now I look back to the naughty game I used to play with my old comrade, and review what I have just written, and I can't for the life of me see the element of "what if?" in any of the above.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Christopher Hitchens Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Christopher Hitchens writing in Newsweek Magazine
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Newsweek Magazine Labels: Al Gore, George W. Bush, Election, Impeachment, Presidency.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-11-13 00:35:06 ~ Afghanistan happens. Iraq does not. We can argue whether Tora Bora still gets botched forever. Part of the problem was specifically Rumsfeld but we do not know who Gore would have picked and what flaws they would have had. part was specific institutional flaws in Franks, Centcom and the US military.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-13 00:59:50 ~ I'm with Mr. Palter on this one--assuming 9/11, or something like it, really does happen. I think it's reaching to assume it was inevitable. As for "Nixon's rage about Cook County"--when, oh, when is this old chestnut going to get roasted? Check the electoral-college math for 1960: even if Nixon had won by unanimous vote in Illinois, he'd still have lost in the electoral college if all else remained unchanged. He knew it, too, which was why he had people fighting thew results in half a dozen other states, including Texas. When he came up dry on these challenges, he set his sour band of sore-loser aplogists to promoting the myth that it had all come down to corruption in Cook County, and too many people, including some on the left, bought it. "Nixon's rage" had nothing to do with Cook County, and everything to do with the simple fact that he'd been denied something he wanted and therefore felt entitled to.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-11-13 06:54:39 ~ Nixon might have let the guys at the Bay of Pigs have the air support they needed, which would have likely turned the tables---the BoP was a lot nearer-run thing than a lot of people believe.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-13 17:49:50 ~ The inflexibility of the timeline always impresses me. Chaos Theory is one thing, but sometimes the cards are just laid out.


In 1979, Ronald Reagan, former governor of California, declares his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination. In the speech announcing his run, Reagan blasts President Carter for "abandoning America's friends in embattled Indochina and liberated Cuba".

Reagan DeclaresPresident Orlando Bosch of Cuba, who had succeeded Fulgencio Batista following the latter's death in 1973 and had won a 1974 election generally regarded as rigged with the assistance of the U.S. occupation forces which had been in Cuba since the Bahia de Cochinos intervention of April 1961, praises Reagan for his hard-line stance.

Also favorable is the response of President Nguyen Van Thieu of the United Republic of Vietnam. Both Bosch and Thieu are battling Communist insurgencies, Cuba's led by deposed president Fidel Castro and Vietnam's by General Vo Nguyen Giap of the former "Democratic Republic of Vietnam," AKA North Vietnam.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Linebacker Source: Wikipedia Labels: Seventies, Vietnam, Cold War, America, Soviet Union.





Todayinah Editor Editor says, What if Barack Obama's father had survived his 1982 car crash in Nairobi? We explore an even more stellar career, examining the importance of fatherhood in our development.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2015, on this day the UN Secretary General Barack Hussein Obama II arrived at the United States deep-water naval base at Pearl Harbour. The former Kenyan President would have absolutely no time to reflect on the personal significance of this odd home-coming, rather he had to focus all his attention on an international showdown with the forty-fourth US President, Hillary Rodham Clinton.The Barack Obama Story, Part 3 - Homecoming Showdown

The crisis had begun the day before Clinton's election in 2008 when General Toshio Tamogami (pictured) lost his job as chief of staff for Japan's Air Self-Defense Force after saying in an essay entitled True Perspective of Modern and Contemporary History that "it is certainly a false accusation to say that our country was an aggressor nation [in World War Two]".

The state-run China Daily commented that "The denial of the aggression history by Toshio Tamogami comes in as an element of disharmony, Yet, as long as the Japanese government has a right attitude to this question, the smooth development of ties between the two neighbors will not be derailed by such discordant notes".

However since his election as Prime Minister of Japan during the summer, Tamogami now was the head of government in Tokyo.

Clinton had spent much of her Presidency building good relations with China and was determined to bring Tamogami and Japan's recently rediscovered belligerence to heel.

Yet in Washington, neoconservatives were eyeing the November 2016 election with glee. Retired General David Petraeus had formed a Presidential Committee. Perhaps Tamogami was the strong man that America needed in the region, combatting both the inexorable rise of China, and also the war on terror with the Islamic forces in Indonesia. Because the hanging of Saddam Hussein had taught the neocons a big lesson about the geopolitical value of such regional strong men. America had been forced to watch the great nation of Iran fill the power vacuum created by his departure ...


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Watch the Video Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Obama Source: CNN Labels: Barack Obama, Kenya, America, Hillary Clinton, Presidency.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, The Tamogami controversy was real, reported in CNN.com Asia on November 3rd 2008 - Japan fires military chief over WWII denial.
Wikipedia reports ~ Tamogami was dismissed due to an essay he published on October 31, 2008, arguing that Japan was not an aggressor during World War II and rather was drawn into the war by Chiang Kai-shek and Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had allegedly been manipulated by the Comintern. The essay also criticized the war crimes trials which followed the war and stated that Japan's occupation of parts of China, Taiwan, and Korea had benefited the populations of those countries.[1] Following this publication, Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada removed Tamogami from the post and ordered him to retire, since this viewpoint contradicted the government position and was likely to anger Japan's regional neighbors.
We've used this controversy as a lever to explore an America without Obama, one that is both different, and also, very similiar in outlook.


Readers Comment Gerry Shannon commented on 2008-11-07 02:11:04 ~ Talk about from bad to worse! Are Obama and Clinton again not too fond of each other in this reality? That the neoconservatives would look to Tamogami as their best hope for the region wouldn't well for bi-partisan relations with the Dems and Clinton. Are there plans to continue this?

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2008-11-07 02:23:28 ~ It's only barely inconceivable to think of Japan denying its role as a monster in WWII, since they've spent so much time since then trying to reform their image. Some people (I'm looking at you, Republicans) just don't like remembering that they're the bad guys...

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2008-11-07 02:32:24 ~ Very nice mix of current events along with the Obama vs Clinton business. More detail about how China would react, should Tamogami ever become Japanese PM, would have been nice. Maybe this can be looked at in the next installment ;)

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2008-11-07 02:46:50 ~ An interesting, slightly-alternate take on things. I wonder how Obama would do as Pres't. of Kenya?

Readers Comment Zach Timmons commented on 2008-11-07 03:54:20 ~ My take : 1. This assumes that the neocons will have any influence left by 2016. 2. Something serious events would have to happen to allow Toshio to take power after being dismissed; I don't see this happening in a culture like Japan's. 3. No offense, Robbie, but are you implying that Republicans turn a blind eye to Japanese war crimes?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2008-11-07 14:32:25 ~ I'd like to know more about how Tamogami would go from having been forced out of his government post to being elected Prime Minister. What political developments after 2008 would have brought that about?

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2008-11-07 15:26:53 ~ The irony is Obama and Clinton will probably fight less in this timeline than they did in OTL. :D




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Sam Cooke was innocent? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1964, the King of Soul Sam Cooke gave a press conference in Los Angeles, in which he claimed that he had been the victim of an attempted mob hit just two days before.

Sam Cooke SetupIn being one of the first African American musicians to attempt to take control of his own destiny, Cooke attended to the business side of his musical career and in so doing clashed with the rocket label, the mob and the Nation of Islam. He had abandoned his backers and some shadowy people were severely out of pocket.

The hit had been carefully stage managed. He had checked into the the Hacienda Hotel, a cheap hotel where he could meet with new potential backers. Whilst showering, all of his clothes had been stolen from the room. Cooke had approached the Motel Manager wearing just a towel, and she had immediately began to scream rape. Whereupon two men set upon Cooke who barely escaped with is life. Police investigations could not trace either the Motel Manager or the two guests, which Cooke believed was further evidence of a setup.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Epinions Labels: Sam Cooke, Hacienda Hotel, Murder, Rape, Mob Hit.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-13 18:01:53 ~ Would've changed a good deal of Soul and perhaps ended blaxploitation earlier with careers in African Americans' own hands.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-11-13 18:09:33 ~ This might have set off riots in black areas; there was already a great deal of resentment at the way that crime above the bread-and-butter level was in non-black hands in those neighborhoods.


In 2004, Chelsea Perkins has her first meeting with the Council of Wisdom, where her father has been forced to bring her. The Council is very rude to Chelsea, who is rude right back. This impresses the people on the Council, who agree with Terrence Perkins that her learning must be accelerated so that she can face the danger that is coming for her.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 2002, the robot ship carrying Professor Thomas and Air Force Captain Trent Laughlin surges to the very edge of the sensors Dr. Courtney and his fleet are able to use to track them. Dr. Courtney commands one of his ships to break off pursuit and head to earth, so that at least someone will return from this mission. The other two ships follow him.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1974, the Kerr-McGee nuclear power plant in Crescent, Oklahoma suffers a horrific meltdown, killing all of the workers inside the plant as well as half the population of Crescent. The radiation spreads across Oklahoma and reaches as far as southwestern Mexico, causing cancer rates to skyrocket and killing many animals as well as people. The owners of Kerr-McGee, who had been suspected of negligence, are now jailed for it; small comfort to the people injured by their plant.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1969, a demonstration against the war in Vietnam provoked President Nixon into a personal confrontation with peace marchers who were carrying posters with the names of the 45,000 dead from the war. When the march came the White House, Nixon met the leaders and began berating them, calling them communists and dupes. When the crowd grew ugly, only the swift action of Secret Servicemen was able to keep Nixon from being attacked. The incident was hideously embarrassing for Nixon, and weakened the rest of his single term in office.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1890, after a long night of torture by Charles Brigman's rebel Mormon band, Colonel Beauregard T. Jackson is brought before Brigman. "Beg me for your life, Colonel", Brigman demands Jackson. When Jackson refuses, Brigman says, "Then you can measure your life in hours. We will execute you at sunrise".

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1969, after a rip in the space/time continuum threw him into his own future, Corporal Jeffrey Thompson of California returns to Vietnam and re-enlists for another tour of duty. He eventually leaves the country with a silver star for bravery, and goes back home to college and a career as a real estate speculator. He also became a philanthropist, giving millions to homeless shelters across the state.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1789, President George Washington ended his disastrous tour of the states that had recently ratified the constitution by slinking back to his home in Mount Vernon, Virginia. Washington had taken several slaves with him during the tour, and their presence had incited many crowds to boo the new president in the free states.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1998, Friday the 13th proved to be good luck for President William Clinton - the sexual harassment lawsuit against him was dismissed as "without merit", in the judge's decision. The rest of Clinton's presidency went from triumph to triumph as he outmaneuvered the Republican Congress and managed to engineer his succession by his Vice-President, Al Gore, and a new Democratic majority in both houses of Congress in the elections of 2000.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1921, Thomas Edison's Dynamic Pictures released The Shiek, starring Carla Lambert and Italian-born actor Rudolph Valentino. Valentino immediately becomes a sex symbol, although one detractor accused him of "the effeminization of the American male".

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1312, Pope Edward III was born. Edward's mother and father contested the papacy bitterly, and Edward was crowned at 14 when his father was deposed. Although his mother effectively reigned as Pope during most of his teen years, Edward came into his own when he reached manhood, and faced many challenges during his reign of the Holy British Empire, not the least of which was the devastation of the Black Death.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Todayinah, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: 2nd Coming Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Holy British Empire, Robbie A. Taylor, Estelle Gerard, Pope, Catholic England.



On this day in 1962, Soviet troops and missile crews began withdrawing from Cuba under the terms of the cease-fire pact that ended the Florida Coast War.                        

Crisis Over
Crisis Over - Armwrestling
Armwrestling

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Cuba62 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Cuban Missiles Crisis, Cuba, ExComm, John F Kennedy, Nikita Khruschev.



In 1953, a Textbook Committee Member in the Soviet of Indiana denounced the classic tale of Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott as being "a piece of imperialist, counter-revolutionary trash", and threatened to ban references to it in the soviet's textbooks. Mrs. Fiona White was voted down by other members of the committee, who felt the tale of a knight trying to bring back his king was essentially harmless to the psyches of young comrades.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Soviet America Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Joel Rosenberg, Robbie A. Taylor, Comrade, Soviet States of America, Communism.



In 1949, noted child actor Caryn Johnson was born in New York City. She started acting as a girl of 8 in small stage productions with black theater companies in the city, and moved on to films and television roles during her teens. Like many child actors, she had her problems with drugs once she became an adult, but comedy turned out to be her rehab clinic. During her 30's, she started touring the country with a stand-up routine, and soon became nationally famous as "the funniest woman in America". Ms. Johnson used that fame to go back to dramatic roles on occasion, winning the Oscar for her lead role in "The Color Purple", but comedy has always been where she returns.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1980, Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan "Yoni" Netanyahu and other veterans of the Entebbe Raid arrive secretly in the United States. Whilst there, they will post mortem Operation Eagle Claw, the failed military operation to rescue the 53 hostages from the U.S. embassy in Tehran, Iran on April 24, 1980. And come up with a new, improved plan.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Operation Eagle Claw, Entebbe, Jimmy Carter, Iran Embassy Siege, 1980.



In 1974, Karen Silkwood's car is run off the road by a mysterious black car, and flips several times before coming to rest. Miraculously, Silkwood survives the crash with only minor injuries. Ms. Silkwood was carrying evidence of negligence towards safety at the nuclear power plant she worked in; her work resulted in the closing of the Kerr-McGee plant in Crescent, Oklahoma, and the indictment of its owners on several counts of criminal negligence.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 4578, the Siamese-Vietnamese War Memorial was erected in Beijing. The design was controversial at first, but after the opening, lauded as brilliant - it was simply a black stone wall, engraved with the names of all the slain soldiers of the war. Emperor Min-Yuan, on seeing the wall at the opening, wept openly, but viewed the entire length of the wall.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



Birder

In 2007, jurors in Galveston, Tex., heard opening arguments on Tuesday in the trial of a bird-watching enthusiast who fatally shot a cat that he said was stalking endangered shorebirds. The defendant, James M. Stevenson, is the founder of the Galveston Ornithological Society and leads bird-watching tours on this Gulf Coast island 60 miles southeast of Houston. If convicted on animal cruelty charges in the shooting last November, he faces up to twenty-five years in jail and a $1,000,000 fine. Mr. Stevenson, 54, does not deny using a .22-caliber rifle fitted with a scope to kill the cat, which lived under the San Luis Pass toll bridge, linking Galveston to the mainland. He also admits killing many other cats on his own property, where he operates a bed and breakfast for some of the estimated 500,000 birders who come to the island every year.

Birder - James M. Stevenson
James M. Stevenson

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: New York Times Labels: Birder, Cat Killer, James M. Stevenson, Texas, Cruelty.



In 2007, unambigous evidence of collusion was established between Pakistan's former Prime Minister, Benazir Bhutto and the military-led government of Gen Pervez Musharraf. A conspiratorial arrangement presupposes Gen Musharraf's early retirement from the army and a lifting of the emergency ahead of elections, which he says will be held before 9 January. It also presupposes a quick trial of Gen Musharraf's eligibility as president by the new Supreme Court, without which he is not ready to quit the army. Previously, there had been no way of knowing whether such an arrangement has been choreographed, with both Ms Bhutto and Gen Musharraf only playing to the galleries to earn credibility before they do what has been agreed. However copies of emails between Bhutto and Musharraf had been intercepted by al-Qaeda and the Taleban, who emerged as the unlikely defendants of liberty in the 'Fort of Islam'.

Benazir Bhutto
Benazir Bhutto - Opposition
Opposition

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: BBC News Labels: Imran Khan, Benazir Bhutto , Nawaz Sharif , Pakistan, Musharraf.



On December 13, 2003 the military objectives for Operation Red Dawn are achieved when imperial forces in the British Protectorate of Mesopotamia finally capture the 'Shadow' outside Tikrit. Under the jingoist headline 'We got him', the Times of London newspaper reveals the secret identity as one Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majidida al-Tikriti, noting that the Arabic meaning of Saddam is 'one who confronts'. Also revealed in the same article is the Shadow's lead role in the assassination of Prince Charles of Great Britain during his victor's mission to Kuwait on June 26, 1993. By a twist of fate this tragic event led to the marriage of his widow to the Arab billionaire Dodi Al-Fayed. The Shadow's agents also pulled off a terrorist attack in St Pauls Cathedral at the ceremony in 1997, slightly injuring the British entertainer Elton John.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majidida al-Tikriti, The Shadow, Mesopotamia, Iraq, Insurgency.





November 12



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if David Petraeus had leaked top level secrets to Paul Broadwell? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2012, on this day Fox News released shocking new details of the so-called Battle of Benghazi.

Embedded Journalist 2Because on the anniversary of September 11, a heavily armed group attacked the US consulate and a nearby intelligence compound killing Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other members of his diplomatic mission.

The report also included video footage of a speech given by Paula Broadwell, the "plague rat" journalist at the centre of the David Petraeus resignation scandal. On October 26th she said that the CIA annex was used to imprison Libyan militia members and this may have been the motivation behind the attack on the consulate. A Fox News Source subsequently confirmed that the CIA Annex was used as a detention center for not just militia members, but for prisoners from all parts of Northern Africa and the Middle East.

The CIA denied these allegations but the revelation forced former CIA Director Petraeus to be be subpoenaed to speak at the Senatorial hearings. He was previously excused because of his resignation as D/CIA.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: David Petraeus, Paula Broadwell, General, America, West Point.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality David Petraeus resigned from his post as CIA Director because of the extramarital affair. And thankfully there was no war in Korea in the first decade of the twenty-first century.


Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-11-14 13:11:54 ~ You never know who might leak what to who. But, in this case it could help spell out the prototype script for a really good thriller of a movie. Truth does not have to fall far from the tree to be really interesting.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-11-14 13:13:04 ~ A thriller movie? I had thought of it more as a soap opera!

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-11-14 16:27:31 ~ This might make life mighty interesting for US diplomatic personnel all over the ME.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Jackson lived, Longstreet died in the USCW? muse Ed and Scott Palter. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1864, on this day William T. Sherman's Union forces captured Atlanta. An installment of the Federal's Lost Cause thread.

Federal Lost Cause Part 5: Atlanta falls too late to save LincolnAlthough it only had a population of ten thousand citizens, , the Confederacy's second-most important city was a vital rail and commercial centre and had thus become a critical point of contention. Northern newspapers covered the victory, reporting General Hood's burning of many military facilities as he evacuated. But it was too late for Lincoln who had lost the General Election just four days earlier. The war-weary mood of the Northern voters had sealed his fate. Even if the mis-perception of stagnant stalemate had now been corrected, the peace candidate George B. McClellan (pictured) had won out.

However the bigger picture was still transformed. First of all, "Little Mac" would not take office until March, by which time Lincoln might still be able to defeat the South. Even if not, he could force legislation through that enabled his successor to continue the fight throughout 1865 without needing to seek funding approval. And of course McClellan himself was a reluctant peace candidate (the party platform was actually written by Copperhead Clement Vallandigham of Ohio). And so there was a dawning realization that an independent Confederacy was unlikely to emerge from the US Civil War regardless of military outcome. A weighty factor was McClellan opposition to emancipation. The balance of probability then was that the Southern States would rejoin the Union under terms they would not have been offered by Lincoln, and therein lie the chief consequence of the electoral result of 1864.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Alternate Historian Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Federal Lost Cause Source: Wikipedia Labels: James Longstreet, Battle of the Wilderness, Robert E. Lee, Premature Death, Confederate.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this article we have re-purposed content from Social Anxiety web site.


Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2013-05-10 06:03:28 ~ What happened to Hood's army? The March to the Sea required that Hood first have beat his army near to death.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2013-05-10 11:39:11 ~ I have a hard time seeing southern state governments willingly rejoining a Union where black runaways remain under arms. Indeed the number of conditions for Reunification on terms could arouse a lot of anger in the north.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-05-10 11:50:45 ~ What would have happened if slavery had continued to this day? The mind BOGGLES!

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2013-05-10 11:59:21 ~ Even if this scenario had played out, slavery would almost certainly be long gone by now. Even many prominent Conmfederates privately acknowledged it was doomed, though they dared not say so publicly. It was just a matter of when and how.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-05-10 12:15:40 ~ Eric, I have also heard that slavery would indeed die out, due to improved farming machinery.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-05-10 13:51:28 ~ At this time the Georgia state capital was Milledgeville, if memory serves me. Fixed - thanks, Ed

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-05-10 14:28:44 ~ Radical Republicans would've been furious! (not that they'd get the votes).

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-05-10 14:29:42 ~ On the matter of slavery, what if it transitioned away from agriculture to the Industrial Revolution, as would be seen in "factory towns" like those by Pullman?

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-05-10 15:25:32 ~ Jeff, I have read that there would have been a serious threat of sabotage if slaves had worked in factories. Not to mention the fact that the workers were getting slave wages anyway, so paying them was less expensive than keeping slaves.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2013-05-10 16:38:57 ~ There were 150-200K blacks under arms [depends on how you count armed laborers and home guard units]. Who precisely was going to take their rifles away?

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2013-05-11 03:53:33 ~ Scott: The (ex-)Confederate troops would love to try, and authorization to do so or at least regain 'property' seems like something the people running the CSA would want on the table during the re-accession talks.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2013-05-11 04:49:12 ~ Not in the cards. A peace in 1864-1865 consists of the Yankees going home and taking their blacks, carpetbaggers, Dixie Tories with them. North gives back no more territory than it feels like as South as in no position to force them. Think of the field situation. Union holds NOLA and half of Louisiana. Union holds southern coast except Wilmington, Mobile and Pensacola. Union holds forts up and down Mississippi river. Union holds a good piece of Arkansas, a slice of northern Alabama, over half of Virginia. Union holds virtually all of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee. South will prioritize getting as much land back as possible. Last thing Dixie wants is for talks to break off and Union to decide it would rather keep fighting. Dixie is near out of troops and essentially bankrupt. By the winter of 1864-1865 Lee's army [the best in the South and the one with the highest morale] was leaking the equivalent of a division a month of deserters to the point that Lee had to put several brigades out beyond the western end of his line curving south to intercept fleeing men.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-05-11 05:56:11 ~ Slavery, the CSA, both appeared to be on borrowed time by 1864, but did everyone in the north know that? Information moved slower in those days. My money would have been on the north continuing, despite any peace settlement through Union leaders. There might have been a break in hostilities, but one has to wonder of the effect of any European intervention or influences? Volunteers in CSA uniforms? It had already happened in the Confederate navy.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Pyrrhus of Epirus conquered Italy? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 278 B.C, the short-lived days of the Roman Empire came to an end as Greek conqueror Pyrrhus of Epirus determined to finish off the growing city. What had once been a pack of exiles and bandits who could only gain wives by stealing them during a false olympics became Rome, a masterful city-state that had taken in numerous forced allies after years of expansionistic war in Italy.

Pyrrhus Obliviates the RomansWhat had once been a pack of exiles and bandits who could only gain wives by stealing them during a false olympics became Rome, a masterful city-state that had taken in numerous forced allies after years of expansionistic war in Italy.

Originally of the Molossians, Pyrrhus's father had been dethroned, and he grew up in exile, learning the importance of military strength and political prowess. His father-in-law, Ptolemy of Egypt, restored him as king of Epirus in 297 BC, and Pyrrhus determined to expand his power. He attempted to conquer Macedon, but was defeated. In 281 BC, a new chance arose to build a league of allies when Tarentum on the southern end of Italy determined to revolt against the growing influence of Rome. The Oracle at Delphi told him "Aio te, AEacide, Romanos vincere posse", meaning, "I say, Pyrrhus, that you the Romans can conquer". Armed with 3,000 cavalry, 2,000 archers, 500 slingers, 20,000 infantry and 20 war elephants (much of his forces on lone from Egypt), Pyrrhus set off for his Italian campaign.

A new story by Jeff ProvineIn 280 BC, he met the Romans in the Battle of Heraclea, defeating their larger army but taking tremendous losses not easily replaced as he was away from Epirus and his allies were wary of utterly declaring war on Rome. The Romans considered a treaty, but eventually declined and rebuilt a fresh army. The next year, he Pyrrhus again defeated the Romans at Asculum, and again his losses were so large that he commented, "One more such victory, and we shall be undone".

In 278 BC, Pyrrhus came upon two new opportunities. The Greek cities in Sicily approached him to drive out Carthage as he was driving the Romans out of southern Italy, and the Macedonians invited him to take the throne there as their king Ceraunus had been killed by barbarians. Both were glorious, but Pyrrhus determined his most important goal should be utter defeat of his present enemy, lest they counterattack and he lose his position as his father had. Taking up what was left in his coffers and forces, Pyrrhus stormed Rome with a grand army and left the city with no stone on top of another.

With Rome destroyed, Pyrrhus's influence in Italy was secure. He next took up the position as King of Sicily, driving out the Carthaginians and pacifying the Greeks in Sicily to be loyal under his command. Pyrrhus then returned to Macedon, and he was able to build up a system of diplomacy that make the Pyrrhic Empire the great power of the middle Mediterranean. He was invited by Cleonymus of Sparta to overthrow the city there, and Pyrrhus began his last campaign in 272 BC. He would be caught in the street fighting after successfully sneaking his army into the city and killed by a roofing tile thrown by an old woman. It seemed an unfitting end who Hannibal, the great statesman of the Carthaginians and conqueror of Gaul, called the greatest military commander in the world. His strategy of utterly destroying and absorbing his enemies gave birth to the phrase "Pyrrhic victory" in which a conquest is total.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Pyrrhus, Romans, Rome, Epirus , Italy.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Pyrrhus left the Romans to rebuild, and they would harass Italy to the point he abandoned Sicily to fight back, but was ultimately defeated after a string of "Pyrrhic victories" in which he won battles only at terrible cost. The unclear message of the Oracle stated that the Romans would conquer him, and they would in later campaigns into Illycrium. Appian noted that Hannibal called Pyrrhus the second greatest commander after Alexander.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-09-12 23:42:06 ~ Rome still called itself a republic at that time, though it was emerging as a de facto empire. It wouldn't be until after Julius Caesar's time that the Republic would be dissolved.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-09-13 02:16:00 ~ This would be the Roman Republic...and it had one advantage over Greek conquerors. Conquered peoples were, after a while, taken into the fold. Greeks had a lot of trouble accepting aliens as citizens in their _poleis._

Readers Comment Christopher Lee commented on 2011-09-18 20:41:11 ~ This is a major one! Without Rome we have a very different world indeed! However, I agree that victory for Phyrrhus was possible, he was a renowned warrior with experienced troops. He was done in by the unexpected and innovative nature of Roman military tactics and equipment.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Percival Lowell had recovered from his stroke on this day? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the November 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1916, on this day businessman, author, mathematician, and astronomer Percival Lowell regained reason to live.

Lowell Regains Reason to Live Percival Lowell had lived a life that few could not envy. A Harvard graduate, he left the world of business for travel and spent much of the 1880s in the Far East. He served as a diplomat's aide and made a study of Korean and, more specifically, Japanese culture. From his trips to the region, he wrote three books: The Soul of the Far East (1888), Noto (1891), and Occult Japan (1894). In 1893, he decided to dedicate himself to astronomy, picking up where the Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli had left off with a study of canals on the surface of Mars. The next year, Lowell used his fortune to establish the observatory in Arizona that bears his name.

A new story by Jeff ProvineThrough his study, Lowell determined sketches of the canals on Mars and wrote three more books: Mars (1895), Mars and Its Canals (1906), and Mars As the Abode of Life (1908). As the twentieth century began, Lowell's ideas of the canals as symbols of an intelligent Martian race led to less and less credit among the astronomical community. The dispassion weighed on him, and he turned toward further research to reestablish his name. Taking discrepancies in the orbit of Uranus, Lowell calculated that some other body must exist beyond the orbit of Neptune, an unfound planet he dubbed "Planet X". Despite laborious searches, nothing from the photographs of the heavens could be determined to be such a planet.

In 1916, Lowell's life seemed to have run out. The World War weighed as heavily on him as the sneers from fellow astronomers. He had believed so much in humanity and the drive of human progress; reports of hundreds of thousands of young men slain on battlefields seemed to disprove that. Stresses had built up into his system, perhaps directing him to an early end of life. But, in the early hours of November 12, an aide hurriedly approached Lowell with prints from the photographic plates taken that March and April with a distant dot that may have been his Planet X.

Reinvigorated, Lowell threw himself into research. The planet looked too small to genuinely affect the mass of Uranus and Neptune, which caused him to recalculate the planetary masses. When this new mathematical arrangement seemed to fit better than the standard model, Lowell published his results in 1917. While some of the astronomical community became persuaded, the overall opinion was against him. Rather than falling under pressure as he had before, Lowell broke with standards and decided that humanity as a whole was becoming corrupt. If progress were to be made, it would be by smaller groups of like-minded, imaginative mini-cultures. He decided that hope for the future lay not in the overpopulated nations of the world but in individual creativity.

Lowell began bringing influential scientists and writers (including his sister, Amy) to his observatory, creating a new community. Some whispered that he was building a scientific cult, but Lowell had given up on impressing his fellows. Instead, he gathered funding and built up the observatory into not only an astronomical facility, but a place for research in numerous fields.

In 1920, Lowell came across a front page article in The New York Times about a lecturer at Clark University believing he could reach the Moon by means of rocketry. Dr. Robert Goddard proposed sending meteorological instruments into the upper atmosphere and even flash powder to the dark side of the Moon, illuminating it for astronomical study. The day after the article, an editorial in The Times trounced Goddard's ideas and concluded that he was a fool who had forgotten "the relation of action and reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react-to say that would be absurd". Lowell contacted Goddard through his connections at Clark University (where he had received an honorary degree in 1909), the two bonded over Goddard's explanation of the fallacy believed to be from Newton's laws of motion. When Lowell secured funding for Goddard's experiments, the latter joined him at the Observatory.

In 1923, Lowell was informed of another controversial thesis, this by a young German student, Hermann Oberth, entitled Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen ("By Rocket into Planetary Space"). Lowell became enamored with traveling not only to the Moon, but Mars itself, and invited him to join Goddard's research. Oberth, who also had been frowned upon by the academic communities as "utopian", accepted Lowell's invitation. Lowell would later invite Konstantin Tsiolkovsky after widespread publications of the genius's earlier work, but the Russian would decline to move to Arizona, instead maintaining a rigorous correspondence until Lowell's death in 1930.

Lowell died from a stroke February 18, 1930, many said caused by overwork. Since the Crash of the stock market, funding had begun to dry up, and Lowell worked continuously to keep his society running. While the '30s would be lean times at the Observatory, the explosion of need for technological development as the United States entered World War Two gave them something of a blank check. It is believed that Lowell's efforts, combined with yet another war, enabled mankind to achieve space flight in 1948, establish the Lowell Lunar Colony in 1961, and launch the Lowell Ares Program, establishing a Martian outpost in 1983. By that time, however, it had become obvious that Lowell's canals were only an optical illusion.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Percival Lowell, Stroke, Recover, Premature Death, 1916.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Percival Lowell died of a stroke on November 12. His research on Planet X would lead to the discovery of Pluto in 1930, its name being given partially because of Lowell's initials PL forming the first two letters. Lowell's observations of canals would be disproved in 1965 with the Mariner 4 probe's images, and Pluto would be demoted from planetary status in 2006.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-11-13 23:45:21 ~ Interesting! We might be farther along in space if this had happened.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-13 23:53:39 ~ The New York Times article cited was not one of the paper's prouder moment, not least because, had its writers bothered to check with actual scientists or even a good encyclopedia, they would have learned that a rocket doesn't push against a medium at all--basic physics, even in 1920. And if Oberth had left Europe in the 1920s, Nazi Germany's rocket program would have been slowed; perhaps there would have been no V-2s in World War II.

Facebook Comment Comment from Margo Barotta on Facebook: maybe he will help to discovered new things in the universe in that time .

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-15 16:47:50 ~ Maybe combined Observatory and Manhattan Project gives the US ICBMs by the early '50s. Take that, Communism!




Todayinah Editor Editor says, none of this ever happened. But if George W. Bush had lost the election, it could have. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2009, on this day Michael Isikoff wrote this article in Newsweek Magazine ~ The Impeachment of Al Gore Next Essay. Be Careful What You Wish For None of this ever happened. But if George W. Bush had lost the election, it could have.

I. A New Day in Washington

It is hard to reconstruct, nine years later, just how inspiring Al Gore seemed when he first addressed the country after being declared the winner of the 2000 election. It was a moment that nobody in Washington ever anticipated--at least not until Justice Anthony Kennedy at the last minute flipped his vote in chambers on Bush v. Gore, thereby permitting the Florida recount to proceed. (And even then, Gore was able to eke out a razor-thin 107-vote victory only when the Florida Supreme Court ordered that all disputed ballots be tallied.)

The Impeachment of Al GoreBut as Republicans cried foul, Gore, on Christmas Eve, rose to the occasion. "What remains of partisan rancor must now be put aside," he declared in a nationwide television address in which he vowed to do "everything possible" to bring Americans together, including naming Republicans to his cabinet. Gore fulfilled his pledge two days later by picking John McCain as his defense secretary. Soon enough, the pundits were predicting that Gore had the potential to usher in a new "post-partisan" era in American politics that would make the country forget the nasty divisiveness of the Clinton years. Little could they imagine that, within a few short years, Gore would have embroiled the country in two unpopular wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan. Or that, blamed for failing to stop the deadliest attack ever on American soil, he would confront a harrowing impeachment trial in the Senate that would make Clinton's Lewinsky troubles seem like a frolic.

II. The Troubles Begin

Gore's political woes began within minutes after he took office on Jan. 20, 2001. A new article from Newsweek MagazineNo sooner had he finished his inaugural address than a firestorm erupted over Bill Clinton's last-minute pardon of fugitive financier named Marc Rich. Although Gore had known nothing about Rich or the pardon, his White House was immediately under siege. Jack Quinn, a longtime adviser who was Gore's first vice presidential chief of staff, had later become Rich's chief lawyer. Sources inside the Justice Department leaked word that Quinn had gotten a crucial assist when Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder, Gore's nominee to be A.G., told the White House he was "[neutral, leaning toward favorable" on a Rich pardon.

Career prosecutors at Justice were outraged. Inside the White House, tempers flared. "I can't believe the goddamn Clintons did this to us again!" First Lady Tipper Gore was reported to have screamed to her husband one night over dinner.

When NEWSWEEK reported on Feb. 10 that federal prosecutors in New York were considering a criminal investigation into the pardon, Republicans saw their opening. "How could the Gore Justice Department possibly investigate itself?" thundered Rep. Dan Burton, who, as chairman of the House Government Reform Committee, had already announced hearings. Even The New York Times editorial page agreed. Before the week was through, Holder's nomination was withdrawn. ("I'm done. Public life is over for me," he told The Washington Post.) As the price for getting the president's new nominee (Jamie Gorelick) confirmed, the administration had no choice but to capitulate to GOP demands for an independent investigation. Gore's term had barely begun and already he was saddled with that hallmark of the Clinton era--a special prosecutor.

III. A Gathering Storm

Yet there were even graver threats looming beneath the surface in those early days. On Jan. 25, 2001, CIA Director George Tenet (whom Gore had decided to retain) told the new president in a briefing that the "preliminary judgment" of the U.S. intelligence community was that Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda was responsible for the bombing of the USS Cole, which had killed 17 U.S. sailors off the coast of Yemen the previous October. That very same day, Richard Clarke, the White House counterterrorism adviser and another Clinton holdover, wrote Gore a fateful memo urging him to retaliate for the Cole bombing. "We have got to destroy these guys, Mr. President. If we don't, there will be more attacks," Clarke would later testify he told Gore that day in a private conversation outside the Situation Room. As Clarke recounted the exchange in his testimony at the House impeachment hearings (and in a bestselling book that somehow managed to come out the same day), Gore brushed him off: "Enough already, Dick. I know all about Al Qaeda. We'll get them. But now is not the time".

Gore would hear much the same thing from Tenet four months later when the CIA director presented a National Security Council (NSC) briefing about the alarming uptick in threat warnings about Al Qaeda. "The system is blinking red," an exasperated Tenet told Gore on June 30. Gore was troubled and told the CIA director to "stay on top of this one". But Gore once again insisted that there was nothing he could do about Al Qaeda right away. He had too much on his plate--like winning congressional passage of his new climate-change tax-credit proposals. Besides, the public had forgotten all about the Cole bombing. The U.S. military also had given him no good targets for hitting bin Laden. "What's the point of pounding sand?" asked McCain, echoing the views of the Joint Chiefs, at the NSC meeting that day.

Frustrated at the administration's lack of attention, intelligence-agency officials made another attempt to drive home their concerns about Al Qaeda. On Aug. 6, while Gore was on vacation at the family farm outside Carthage, Tenn., the CIA presented a President's Daily Brief (PDB) with the eye-grabbing title: "Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S". Gore poured over the PDB and repeatedly underlined key portions. "Damnit, I want the FBI all over this right away," he told Gorelick in a phone call later that morning. But still, the brief was sketchy, offering no specifics or any proposed course of action. Certainly, there was nothing that dissuaded Gore later that day from directing White House lawyers to finish up work on a document intended to fulfill one of his campaign promises--an executive order banning religious, ethnic, or racial profiling by federal law-enforcement officials.

IV. The White House Under Siege

Gore signed the executive order at a White House ceremony on Sept 10. The next day, he flew off to Detroit for an education event at an inner-city school. He was reading a book to second graders about the effect of global warming on polar bears, Where Did All the Little Bears Go?, when his new chief of staff, Ron Klain, whispered in his ear that two airplanes had slammed into the World Trade Towers and that "America is under attack".

Gore flew back to Washington that afternoon and rallied the country. "This will not stand," Gore proclaimed. "We will not shrink from doing whatever it takes to prevail against the terrorists who did this to us". At a Camp David meeting later that month, Gore assembled his war council and gave the approval for an immediate invasion of Afghanistan.

As Bob Woodward later reported in his book Gore at War, some on the president's team--notably Vice President Joe Lieberman and McCain--wanted even bolder moves. "What about Iraq?" Lieberman asked. "Shouldn't we be going after Saddam as well?" Gore, according to Woodward's explosive account, thought Lieberman was "out of his mind". At Camp David, he curtly cut his vice president off. "Joe, this has nothing to do with Saddam," Gore said, ending the discussion. "Let's stay focused here".

Once the initial shock of 9/11 wore off and the Taliban fled Kabul, Republicans in Congress started demanding a full-scale investigation of how the country had found itself defenseless against a tiny band of terrorists. "We need to know who knew what and when about bin Laden," Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott said in early November. The same day, Sen. Arlen Specter introduced a resolution (cosponsored by every Republican in the Senate) creating a special Senate panel to probe the 9/11 attacks. Others in the GOP (and on the right-wing talk-radio shows) blamed nine years of "spineless" Democratic national security decisions that began when Bill Clinton pulled U.S. troops out of Somalia in 1993 and continued right up to Gore's failure to retaliate for the Cole bombing. Democrats were aghast at the GOP hypocrisy: Wasn't it Specter who, just three years earlier, had suggested that Clinton's decision to retaliate for the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Africa was a "diversionary" move to distract attention from the Lewinsky scandal? And Lott who had said much the same thing when Clinton bombed Iraq?

But by now, the administration was reeling. In April 2002, The Washington Post obtained leaked FAA documents and e-mails showing that nine of the 9/11 hijackers--including all five on American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon--had been flagged for secondary screening the morning of the attacks by an agency computer system known as CAPPs, set up to identify potentially dangerous passengers. (The flagged hijackers had purchased one-way tickets and paid for them with cash.) But the airlines were barred from using the CAPPs warning as a basis to question the passengers themselves. Why? A commission on aviation security headed by Gore in 1997 had recommended against any extra questioning and frisking of passengers on the grounds that it might cause undue "inconvenience" or "embarrassment" for some religious or ethnic groups. "Does anyone here have any doubt we could have saved thousands of lives had it not been for those ridiculous [Gore] commission rules?" one internal FAA official had written in one of the most damning of the leaked e-mails.

Three weeks later The New York Times--quoting unnamed "U.S. intelligence officials"--reported the title of the bombshell Aug. 6, 2001, PDB about bin Laden's plans to attack. The first resolution of impeachment was introduced in the House the same afternoon. "Gore Knew" screamed the headline in the New York Post the next day.

V. Impeachment and Trial in the Senate

The summer of 2002 was agony for the White House. Each day, as the House Judiciary Committee pursued its impeachment inquiry, there were new leaks about government screw-ups in the run-up to 9/11. Despite Gore's orders to Tenet and Gorelick, his directives had never made their way to the field. The CIA didn't tell the FBI about two of the hijackers who had entered the country. The FBI had failed to follow up on warnings about Arabs attending U.S. flight schools. These and more foul-ups had taken place, the Republicans charged, because the Gore White House had been "asleep at the switch". "They were more interested in promoting their extremist climate-change agenda than in protecting the country," declared Dick Cheney, the losing 2000 GOP vice-presidential candidate in a speech at the American Enterprise Institute (where he served on the board). When Republicans scored an overwhelming victory in the 2002 congressional elections, locking up commanding majorities in both chambers, Gore's presidency seemed in peril.

On Jan. 20, 2003, two years to the day after he had been sworn in, Gore was impeached by a lopsided vote of 285-150. To make their case, the House impeachment leaders had crafted an article that charged Gore with the "high crime" of "dereliction of duty". But then, to mollify demands of libertarian conservatives like Grover Norquist (of the anti-tax advocacy group Americans for Tax Reform) and the NRA, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay included an extra article of impeachment that focused on Gore's post 9/11 actions, accusing the president of violating the constitutional rights of Americans by holding some terror suspects as "enemy combatants" and--even worse--issuing an executive order that blocked gun sales to thousands of citizens whose names had been added to the FBI's rapidly expanding terrorist watch list. (NRA "action alerts" trumpeted "horror stories" about innocent Americans being placed on the watch list and then denied their Second Amendment rights--all thanks to the "gun grabbers" at the White House.) The so-called civil liberties article seemed a stroke of political genius: not only had it whipped up enthusiasm for impeachment in rural America, but it had also attracted cautious support even from liberals appalled by the roundups of illegal aliens and other crackdowns of the Gorelick Justice Department.

White House political advisers warned Gore he needed to take bold action to save his presidency--and there was only one obvious option on the table: invade Iraq. Gore had thought the whole idea of an Iraq invasion made no sense and was based on skimpy evidence. But McCain and Lieberman--egged on by influential columnists like Tom Friedman and The Washington Post editorial page--had never given up their campaign for war. They relentlessly pushed Tenet to make his "best case" to Gore. When Tenet told the president in December 2002 that it was a "slam dunk" that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, Gore had seemed annoyed. "This isn't a basketball game, George," Gore had shot back, demanding to know how many sources the agency really had in Baghdad. ("None," Tenet was forced, sheepishly, to admit.)

But by the spring, Gore's resistance to an invasion began to soften, especially after his secretary of state, Richard Holbrooke--who had previously been on the fence--finally sided with the hawks. Holbrooke cited evidence--purportedly gleaned from the interrogation of a Qaeda detainee rendered to Egypt by the CIA--that Iraq had trained Qaeda operatives to use chemical weapons and might even be helping them acquire nuclear weapons. "We can't wait for the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud, Mr. President," Holbrooke, with his flair for melodrama, said at one cabinet meeting. Under pressure, Gore caved. On March 20, 2003, on the very day his impeachment trial began in the Senate, Gore announced that he had ordered the U.S. military to invade Iraq--not for the purpose of overthrowing Saddam's regime--but to find "every last one of his WMDs".

The limited purpose of the invasion drew howls of derision from conservatives. But as American troops marched into Baghdad and were hailed as heroes (if less by the Iraqis than by American reporters who had been "embedded" with the military), public opinion started to swing back to Gore. To be sure, American soldiers couldn't find any WMDs or Qaeda terrorists either. But Saddam fled his palace and Gore proclaimed the country "liberated". Meanwhile, in his Senate trial, DeLay's maneuver of combining an article impeaching the president for doing too little to protect the country with another one impeaching him for doing too much started to backfire. "This is an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink case," proclaimed Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle. "And can our Republican friends really sit here with a straight face and tell us that if George W. Bush had been elected president he would have done anything different about Al Qaeda than President Gore".

Still, the vote was nerve-bitingly close and very much in doubt until GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham--heavily lobbied by his friend McCain--gave a dramatic floor speech announcing he would vote to acquit. "I care about this country too much to vote to impeach two presidents in a row," said Graham, who had been one of the House floor managers for Clinton's impeachment four years earlier. Much as Justice Kennedy's last-minute switch had made Gore president, Graham's unexpected about-face in the Senate saved him--by one vote.

VI. The Final Days

The rest, as they say, is history. Gore narrowly won reelection in 2004--but only because Cheney, his GOP opponent, had terrified the country by declaring he wanted to invade Iran and, "if they don't shape up," Syria, North Korea, and Venezuela as well. Within months into his second term, Gore found he was saddled with two wars--neither of which was going well. To invade Iraq, Gore had been forced to pull troops and logistical support out of Afghanistan, resulting in a resurgence of the Taliban (and the escape of bin Laden and Al Qaeda through the mountains of Tora Bora. In Iraq, a Sunni insurgency was spreading rapidly, throwing the country into chaos and resulting in the deaths of 3,000 Americans by the end of 2006. Gore--who had never wanted to invade Iraq in the first place--was heartsick over the slaughter. He began looking for an exit strategy. In December 2006, he rejected calls for a "surge" of new troops to Iraq and adopted the recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, chaired by former secretary of state Jim Baker and former Indiana congressman Lee Hamilton, calling for a phased withdrawal. McCain resigned. Sources close to Lieberman put out word he was considering abandoning the Democrats. By Gore's last year, his approval ratings were at historic lows in the mid-30s.

Small wonder then that, in 2008, Americans elected GOP candidate and former Florida governor Jeb Bush--who pledged to clean up the mess in Washington and restore America's honor and prestige around the world. He trounced Gore's handpicked successor, John Kerry. The Gore years were over. A new era, the Age of Bush, was about to begin.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Michael Isikoff Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Newsweek Magazine
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Newsweek Magazine Labels: Gore, Lieberman, Bush, Impeachment, Presidency.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-11-12 10:08:13 ~ Tripe. 1. The House GOP Caucus was simply not crazy enough to vote for a second failed impeachment that quickly. 2. senate after the 2000 election was 50-50 but then Jeffords switched to make it 51-49. Impeachment takes a 2/3rds vote. So it was dead before it started 3. No chance Cheney runs in 2004 or is nominated if he ran. Mostly likely candidate would have been McCain.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-12 13:05:01 ~ I doubt Gore would have been panicked into invading Iraq just to "save his presidency." There would have to have been real evidence of a direct and serious threat to the U.S., or proof (of the sort Bush, and Bush administration media proxy William Safire, kept insisting had to be there somewhere) of a direct link between Saddam and 9-11. I also aagree with Scott Palter that the GOP would not have had the stomach for another impeachment fight after the last one, which hurt them in the '98 midterms. Especially since, as with Clinton, their chances of getting a conviction would, realistically, have been near zero.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-12 16:17:44 ~ Great to see alternate history in the mainstream, even if imperfect.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-11-12 19:12:25 ~ Gore would have had trouble from the minute he was sworn in---a lot of people thought that the Democrats' actions in Florida and elsewhere stunk to high heaven. Among other things, they did want to ignore Florida law.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-11-13 00:14:52 ~ Makes no sense at all. You can't impeach anyone for something they did before an election. It sounds like pure drama. Have him actually do something wrong.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the former belligerents of the American Civil War clashed again at the Washington Naval Conference? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1921, two years after the Confederacy sought to regain the so-called "occupied territories" at Versailles, the Great Powers conducted further round table talks at the Washington Naval Conference. This time around the goal was to defuse the naval arms race that was threatening the fragile world peace that had existed since the end of the Great War.

Washington Naval Conference by Michael N. Ryan & EdIn reality, relations between the United States and Britain had been at boiling point even before the Trent Affair. And ever since the scuttling of the Reichsmarine at the Scapa Flow, tension had escalated sharply. Matters had worsened in Paris, with the British advocating the return of the "occupied territories" to the CSA as part of a comprehensive peace settlement.

Both navies had been rebuilding at a frightening rate, and the new sixteen inch guns that were being fitted on battleships would soon be upgraded to eighteen. Worse still, Japan, France and Italy had now joined the arms race too. The Union insisted upon a formula for a larger allocation of capital ships because of her commitments in both the Atlantic and the Pacific.

As if that demand wasn't offensive enough, the Americans also took the opportunity to break the naval codes of the Japanese delegation led by Admiral Yamamoto (pictured). It was a bad mistake that would bring the Japanese strongly into the British camp. And when the British offered the Japanese shared usage of the new super-modern fortified port at Singapore, the Union would wake up to some grave new security threats in the Pacific theatre.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Michael N. Ryan
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Hampton Roads Source: Wikipedia Labels: Washington Naval Conference, Civil War, 1865, 1919, Great War.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-04-02 01:32:15 ~ OUCH!

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-04-02 01:47:28 ~ Yamamoto was a Comander at the time and studying in Harvard. Italy and France were still too war tired from the previous conflict to be effective but they did none the less join the negotiations and signed in on the dotted lines. Italy actually scrapped its fifteen inch gun battleships under construciton and stayed with the twelve inch gun battleships she had from before the war. The irony about the Japanese codes was that they were broken so quietly but the top American negotiator made that public with the denunciation "Gentlemen do not read other Gentlemen's mail".

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-04-02 01:49:13 ~ I don't think Britain would have shared Singapore though. Japan was at the time their big ally but I d don't think they would share so far as that.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-04-02 06:36:44 ~ This sounds a little like something out of Turtledove's TL-191 books. I don't know that the CSA would necessarily want to drag the rest of the world in on its quarrels with the US.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Secret Six were brought to Southern Justice? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1859, on this day a team of "out of uniform" militiamen were dispatched from Richmond, VA, under secret orders from Governor Henry A. Wise to kidnap the half-dozen prominent northerners who had conspired to organize John Brown's attack on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry.

Harpers Ferry Raid, Part 2
In Pursuit of the Secret Six by Ed., Scott Palter & Eric Oppen
As the secessionist crisis reached a new level of intensity, wiser heads in Washington recognised that southern demands for justice could only be satisfied by swiftly bringing to justice the "Secret Six". Trouble was, the tiny US Marshall Service were totally inequipped for the task, because many of the abolitionists had bolted, some across the border into Canada. Worse the Federal Government had absolutely no legal authority to seize the men, and on paper at least, was no more able to extradite the men than the State of Virginia, which had issued the arrest warrants just the day before. Which was precisely why Governor Wise had resorted to decidely unorthodox means to seize the men who sent John Brown to Harper's Ferry. And thus the Union was trapped in its own Federalist logic, because the General Government could only act by stamping on State's Rights which were the very core of the issue threatening to tear America in two.

And yet all was not lost. Because, fortunately for the future of the Union, the new Attorney General Wade Keyes was an independent thinking southern lawmaker who anticipated Governor Wise's hotheaded actions, and had developed his own super-clever strategem for defusing the crisis. Realising that US President John Buchanan was not up to the task of resolving crisis, he demonstrated true leadership by taking matters into his own hands, instituting treason charges on his own and daring Buchanan to repudiate them.

And surely Keyes' predecessor, the divisive figure of Jeremiah Sullivan Black (pictured) would have excaberated the crisis, being not only the most influential of President Buchanan's official advisers, but also a stubborn theocrat who made matters worse by spending his time denying the constitutionality of secession.

Black consider his biggest achievement to be his success in contesting the validity of the California land claims to about 19,000 square miles of land, fraudulently alleged to have been granted to land-grabbers and others by the Mexican government prior to the close of the Mexican-American War. Hell bent on re-inforcing the authority of the Federal Government, Black would was incapable of the higher order understanding developed by Wade, that Washington had to intervene imaginatively to resolve the dispute. For the good forture of everyone apart from the Harper's Ferry Raiders and the Secret Six themselves, early in 1959, Black had been forced to resign for personal reason.

There was one force at work more powerful than either Governor Wise or Attorny General Wade Keyes: money. And before long, the first Secret Six member was in Southern hands, Franklin Sanborn, arrested by mercenaries at Concord, MA before the residents of the Town could rouse for his defence.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: John Brown, Wade Keyes, Virginia, Civil War, Jeremiah Black.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that extensive amounts of content have been repurposed from the source articles. The two PODs are a) Govenor Wise pursues the Secret Six, b) Black resigns for personal reasons in this ATL.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-12 03:15:56 ~ They'd have to be _real_ careful, and maybe very lucky, to grab all of the Six, particularly if they were in Canada. And, once they were grabbed, getting them into slave territory, possibly clear across the free states, would be a non-trivial problem.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-11-12 05:28:01 ~ Might have capped the crisis or might have exploded it with Buchanan still in office. Would mean Lincoln running as a hard war candidate in the midst of ongoing hostilities. Would also mean the war would have started with the Union losing Maryland and DC.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-11-12 14:48:22 ~ My money's on explosion.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-01-12 15:26:23 ~ I concur with Mr. Braungart's point of the international incident. I doubt it'd cause war with Victoria's Britain, but it would give any breakaway CSA a much better diplomatic standing for support.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-01-23 07:42:24 ~ They could have gone into hiding -- this was the nineteenth century, and anybody who wanted to hide could stay hidden. (No doubt that the author of this piece was educated in Old Blighty...)


In 1927, Iosif Vissarionovich Dzugashvili (pictured), better known by his assumed name of Joseph Stalin, is expelled from the Soviet Communist Party, ending a power struggle which had been ongoing since the death of Lenin in 1924. Stalin Flees by Eric Lipps
Iosif Vissarionovich Dzugashvili, better known by his assumed name of Joseph Stalin, is expelled from the Soviet Communist Party, ending a power struggle which had been ongoing since the death of Lenin in 1924.
Leon Trotsky, born Lev Davidovich Bronstein, assumes leadership of the party, and will retain control until his death in 1949 from a cerebral hemorrhage.
Dzugashvili will flee into exile in Mexico, where he will die in 1953, having unsuccessfully attempted to organize a revolutionary movement in that country.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Joseph Stalin, Stalin, Iosif Vissarionovich Dzugashvili, Lev Davidovich Bronstein, Trotsky.





Older Posts 




© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.