A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Reagan 1976
 Richard Tolman  Sockless
 Soviet America  Speakers Line
 The Sheridans  The Baron
 The Claw  Warp
 Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Baron Jean de Batz
Playing Nice
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Jefferson Undone
Upper Carolina
Nixon killed
Margaret of Anjou
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
King Henry IXth
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Xavier's Vows
Fall of Aquileia
President Bentsen
American Napoleon 2
Reign of the Batman
Seventh Wife
President Gingrich
Adams Family Values
President Ferraro
Rise of the Bat-boy
Batman: Year One
2002 MN strikes
Panic of 1893
W.B. Yeats born
Too Cold
Comrade Stalin 3
Ohio's Finest
The Death of the Duke
Defenestration of Prague
Troy Eternal
King James III
The Orient
President Edwards born
Superman Begins
Comrade Stalin 4
Principled Stand
Guru
Nova Roma
Jesus of Rome III
President Heston dies
Ike is fired
Death of the Bruce
Happy Endings 20
Failed Statelet
Reagan in 76
June Revolution
POTUS Howard Baker
Actor Reagan
Tiananmen
Jeff and Abe
Centennial Crisis
Jesus of Rome II
Night the Green Goblin died
Mary, Queen of France
Snyder Act
Nicaraguan canal
Concert of Europe
Farthest West
Battle of Turaida
Little Giant
John Hinckley
Cold, Dead Hands
Happy Endings 26c
President Scott
Beauregard undone
Codename James Bond
Op Anthropoid Fails
President Humphrey
Nathaniel Gorham
Birth of the Duke
Jesus of Rome

Site Meter


September 23



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Mlosh had just passed through? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2012, humanity's first contact with a superior alien species was concluded by the decommissioning of the majority-Mlosh city of Qu'Mar.

First ContactThe extra-terresterials had arrived seeking nothing other than spare parts, planning to stay no longer than necessary to complete the repair work to their asteroid-damaged spaceship before continuing on their way. But of course human technology was incapable of scaring up the resources let alone the tools for the equipment, and the Mlosh were forced to establish a temporary base.

Although the serene aliens were in no great hurry to depart, world leaders wanted to rush through the operation at high speed. Because a number of humans hoped that the Mlosh WOULD intervene on their behalf in order to reset the imbalance in earthly affairs. The result was very much like the unwanted arrival of family members, an exasperating amount of money was spent on accomodation, but the sense of resentment was overwhelmed by palpable relief at their departure.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Mlosh Source: Wikipedia Labels: Warp, Mlosh, Alien, First Contact, Extraterrestrial.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Robbie Taylor's novel Warp is the story of a band of anti-Mlosh terrorists and the authorities who attempt to hunt them down. You can download the Kindle-friendly novel on the Lulu or Amazon web sites.






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if dissolution sparked the renaming of former Union states? muses Eric Lipps. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1878, the legislature of North Carolina, one of the sovereign states of the Confederate States of America, passed by an overwhelming margin a measure to rename the state "Upper Carolina" to remove the hated word "North" from its name. Governor Zebulon Baird Vance, a veteran of the war of secession, swiftly signed the measure into law.

Upper CarolinaSuch petty gestures were common in the Confederacy in the several decades after its separation from the United States of America, and were reciprocated in the U.S., where, for example, Congress approved in 1891 a petition to unite the states of North and South Dakota, which had been admitted separately into the Union on Nov. 2, 1889, into a single state of Dakota. North of the border there had even been talk of replacing George Washington's picture on the dollar bill with that of John Adams, though the bill to do so died in the House of Representatives.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: North Carolina, South Carolina, Zebulon Baird Vance, Confederacy, State.

Readers Comment Mike Stone commented on 2012-04-23 13:23:29 ~ I don't quite see what the Dakotas were admitted separately in the first place, given this attitude. If they were, they could have been called Upper and Lower Dakota, or one could have been called Dakota and the other North Platte or summat.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-04-23 18:46:53 ~ North Dakota has had a number of tries at renaming itself just "Dakota"... lots of logistics and road signs to replace, though, so the $ get in the way.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-04-23 23:38:33 ~ This does sound like the sort of silly thing people do after that sort of war.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Founding Fathers had issued a global declaration of republican principles? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, an eloquently worded demand for republican rule was routinely dismissed by His Britannic Majesty's Government.

Mr Jefferson's Letter reaches LondonAnd yet trouble was not so easy to avert. Because the revolutionary document known as Mr Jefferson's Letter was dispersed as a printed broadside, a viral format that suited widespread distribution and public reading throughout the British Empire. And worse still the rich colonial landowners behind it threatened more trouble than Scots-Irish Nationalists. Perhaps even the beginning of the most serious uprising against the Crown since the time of Oliver Cromwell.

In a clumsy, ham-fisted reaction, King George the Third (pictured) declared that the American colonies were in open rebellion. But his subsequent appeal for assistance from friendly states was a prescient masterstroke. Because shortly thereafter, a French language variant appeared on the Streets of Bourbon Paris.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Republican, America.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-03-18 10:08:30 ~ Jefferson begins the Internationale!

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-03-19 14:30:46 ~ All the kings of Europe would unite to crush Republicanism before it chopped off their heads.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Royal Family found happiness living in a progressive British Republican State? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the November 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1955, on the second night of Independent Television (ITV), twenty-nine year old Lizzie Windsor became the first female reader on prime-time television news.

Dropping the AnchorImmaculately groomed, radiant, impeccably mild mannered and devoid of the merest hint of a regional accent, she defined a posh generational model for presenters and correspondents of British terrestrial news channels.

But as modern Britain began to celebrate diversity, the "English Rose" model was increasingly recognised as an anachronism, and by the time the platinum blonde Maggie Thatcher retired from News at Ten change was inevitable. Her replacement Robert Mugabe, was a graduate of University College London who had first begun broadcasting in Southern Rhodesia. And in a further development step, the happy-go-lucky former Blue Peter presenter Diana Spencer moved newsreading to breakfast television.

By the time Mugabe was honoured for his services to journalism, the wheels had begun to fall off Windsor's own aspirational life style. Two of her sons separated, her daughter divorced, and a severe fire had destroyed part of her palatial residence in Essex. She famously described 1992 as her annus horribilis, meaning horrible year although she later recovered some private joy as the owner of Norwich Football Club.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2006-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Robert Mugabe, The Queen, Margaret Thatcher, BBC, Newsreader.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2010-10-22 04:31:16 ~ lmao!

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-10-22 05:43:46 ~ Not that different from what she does now...she reads someone else's words while dressed up.

Facebook Comment Comment from Quilly Mammoth on Facebook: English law. Sorry, not a winner. Look, alt history has to have a "pivot point" where _one_ real decision or event makes a difference. And history geeks will laugh at you. You have to ...make them gasp. Find that decision

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2010-10-22 12:24:30 ~ The family name has been Windsor ever since it was changed during the First World War. Many families did this; my late father-in-law was born "Schmitt" and became "Smith" for example.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-10-22 12:49:26 ~ Quilly Mammoth has a point. What's the POD here? I know that theoiretically any alternative one can dream up is legitimate if it's logically consistent, but I personally prefer AH springing from a single iudentified POD, as small as possible.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-10-22 16:44:14 ~ POD would be post-1700s, given the need for changing their surname. Perhaps George III's craziness led to some kind of upheaval, such as kicking out the Regency and just going with Parliament.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2010-10-22 23:12:52 ~ Would people still be knighted? Seems anachronistic in a republic...

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-10-23 00:03:16 ~ Her surname would likely be Battenburg. I suppose the POD is the second Stuart Restoration?

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-09-23 13:39:11 ~ Here in America many news shows have a male and female commentator working side by side, in a sort of professional marriage, so she and Robert could have been a team. I don't know what her husband Phillip would have had to say about that...but on the other, hand, with his looks and noble title, he might have found a rich wife anyway...perhaps even an American, like Gloria Vanderbilt.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if wonder woman can save us? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2010, the Jewish Grand Vizier of Persia, Moshe Katsav1 shocked the General Assembly of the United Nations by revealing incontrovertible evidence that "Secret Muslim" President Barack Hussein Obama was leading the cult of Islam's sinister takeover of Christian America.
Watch the Speech

Can Wonder Woman Save Us?It was Obama who had approved the construction of a Mega Mosque located just two blocks from the World Trade Centre from where shadowey Muslim Clerics were now planning suicide attacks on American infrastructure.

The cynical deception of concealing armaments on a religious site had first been introduced by La Resistance who had hid weapons in Catholic Churches throughout France during World War Two. The civilian possession of weapons had enabled American revolutionaries to start an insurgency, forming militia which defeated Imperialism in the form of their British Overlords. Thankfully, this right to bear arms had been guaranteed by an amendment to the constitution.

Because only nine years before, a wicked attempt to hijack commercial aircraft and crash them into the World Trade Centre had been prevented by the American passengers who had the presence of mind to check their automatic weapons onto the flight.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2006-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: The Nation Labels: Obama, Islam, Palin, Guns, 01/09/11.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, 1) The disgraced former President of Israel Moshe Katsav was born in Iran.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-10-02 23:15:56 ~ Oh, please.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-10-03 01:07:30 ~ This is not up to your usual level; you can do better. And can we _please_ look at something that hasn't been done-to-death or isn't current politics-by-another-name?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-10-03 02:59:32 ~ Ha, a good laugh.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the cosmicist novelist HP Lovecraft had become President of the United States?. muses John Reilly. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2010, John Reilly wrote ~ Howard Phillips Lovecraft (1890-1937) has a biography one might expect of a failed Hitler.

The Life and Times of President H.P. LovecraftLovecraft has suffered from more than his share of posthumous Freudian analysis, but it is true that his family history (father dying while Lovecraft was young, over- protective mother) is similar to Hitler's. Both their childhoods' were prologues to some some similar life-long characteristics. Lovecraft, like Hitler, was a marginal artist. He was a better writer than Hitler was a painter, though that is not saying much. Both were very briefly married, Hitler for just a few hours, Lovecraft for a few months. Both were interested in the occult to some degree. Certainly both Nazism and Lovecraft's fiction owe a great deal to Theosophy. (Lovecraft claimed to be a sceptic. Hitler was affected by ideas of this type, though he was not a believer to the extent that Himmler and Hess were.) Both were racist Social Darwinists of the sort who viewed history as primarily determined by racial factors. Both were hypochondriacs who repeatedly forecast their early deaths. Lovecraft, whose neurasthenia kept him out of the First World War, turned out to be right. In person, both were rather shy and formal, not hard to like. Hitler loved dogs, Lovecraft loved cats.

A new story by John ReillyImagine an alternative history in which Lovecraft's ideas did not remain the stuff of pulp fiction. Suppose his father had lived, or he had been orphaned, or his family finances changed so that he had to go to work early in life. He becomes, let us say, a journalist in Boston or New York. He might then have fought in the First World War and returned with a distinguished record. He becomes a nationally syndicated columnist, famous for his warnings against the threat of immigrants, Communists, and unbridled finance capitalism, particularly as associated with the Jews. Like many practical people, life experience could have changed his reading about the occult from entertainment to belief. (It happens. Look at W.B. Yeats. For that matter, look at Hitler.) In the social catastrophe of the Great Depression, he would have had a unique opportunity to implement his ideas for revolutionary reform.

Lovecraft in politics would not have been a "conservative" in any serious sense of the word, though he would certainly have had little use for socialism or democracy. Sinclair Lewis, in his 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," tried to give some notion of what an American fascism might be like. It would be more puritanical than its European counterparts, he suggested. It would be less a case of a party imposing a political orthodoxy on the whole country than of radical right groups, such as the Klan, being empowered by the government to act at the local level. When Lewis thought of fascism, however, he seems to have been thinking of Italy. There was no particular place in his fascist America, as there was in Germany and would certainly have been in Lovecraft's America, for a national eugenics program. For that matter, Lewis did not understand, at least in 1935, how central anti-Semitism was to Nazism. If, as some writers have suggested, Hitler's Jewish policy was a necessary feature of his model of history (See Paul Wistrich's Hitler's Apocalypse), then one would expect similar notions to occur to Lovecraft, whose intellectual frame of reference was not so different from those of the leading Nazis.

America did not lack for proto-fascists in the 1930s, but they were regional personalities with little hope of forming an important national movement. Huey Long of Louisiana was very smart, of course, but he was, well, too "colorful" to be much appreciated outside his home state. Father Coughlin, the Radio Priest, would not himself have been a serious candidate for political office. His movement was too closely linked with Rome, at least in the public mind, to be anything but a faction in a larger right-wing coalition.

Lovecraft, or someone like him, might have been able to form such a coalition. A Northerner, nominally Protestant, he could have preached economic populism for the South and Midwest and anti-Communism for the Catholic Northeast. His background was such that he would have been more likely to have entered politics as a Republican than as a Democrat. In his native New England, the Democrats were the party of the hated immigrants. Of course, he might have taken the posture of a man above politics before the Depression. Like Perot in 1992 or Powell today, he could have had his pick of the nomination of either party. In terms of party platform, there was not much to choose between Roosevelt and Hoover in 1932. Roosevelt's chief qualification was that he was not Hoover. Lovecraft, who was in real life of a somewhat philosophical cast of mind, would have been not just a new face, but a man with a plan.

Any government elected in 1932 would have had to do much the same sort of thing on taking office that Roosevelt did. It was necessary to immediately reconstruct the banking system, to distribute disaster relief to the unemployed, and to try to cajole the country's businessmen into maintaining employment and making some investments. The Roosevelt Administration did this minimum, supplemented a little later with "make-work" projects, from new roads to the vaguely Stalinist murals you can still find in some older Post Offices. Some of these initiatives helped. Some, such as the government's price-fixing schemes, were catastrophes. In any event, though the economy improved in the 1930s, punctuated by various declines, the Depression was not finally ended until the United States began to mobilize for the Second World War. In this the US was in sharpest contrast to Nazi Germany. Hitler came to office about the same time Roosevelt did, and the economy was humming again within two years. The reason for this was simple enough: Hitler took office with the intention of fighting several major wars in about five to ten years, so rearmament began immediately. President Lovecraft, one suspects, would have done likewise.

Lovecraft's America would not have lacked for plausible enemies. There were, after all, the ubiquitous Communists, who would probably have favored Lovecraft's candidacy, as the German Communists favored Hitler's. (The idea was that Hitler's regime would soon collapse, thus leading to a red revolution.) Naturally, all the domestic ones would have to be arrested, and a military buildup begun in preparation for a final showdown with the USSR. The more immediate enemy, however, would have been the Yellow Peril, as manifest in Imperial Japan. It has always been difficult to explain to Americans why it was necessary to worry about threats from Europe. Arming against a possible war with Japan, in contrast, has always been an easy idea to sell. Actually, in the context of early Depression America, any kind of remilitarization program would have been easy to sell, since it would have been the one thing the government could have done to decrease unemployment quickly. (Young men not needed for the factories, of course, could have been drafted.)

Indeed, such a policy would have been self-sustaining, since possible enemies would have multiplied. The Roosevelt government was economically nationalist in terms of tariff policy, but it was content to let the international market economy continue to exist. It did not, at least to my knowledge, impose foreign exchange restrictions, or make it nearly impossible for foreigners to own property in America. Fascist governments, however, generally did do things like this. Such measures would have been serious blows to England and the Netherlands, whose people have always invested heavily in America. England would soon have perceived more than a financial threat, since an invasion of Canada would certainly have suggested itself to Lovecraft's government, both for strategic reasons and as an exercise. An Anglo-American naval war might have been the prelude to the western half of the Second World War.

That there would be a Second World War is hard to doubt, but the alliances would have been different. Britain, bereft of its overseas assets and a large part of its fleet (assuming the US won), could have had a revolution in the 1930s. If it was to the right, then the country would have been neutral in the event of a Nazi invasion of France. Fascist Britain might also have maintained its alliance with Japan through the 1930s, which would have meant the US could still have faced a two-ocean war when the fight with Japan started. Indeed, the US might have been faced with a Anglo-German alliance in the west. This would have made attacks on the continental United States plausible, particularly from the air. On the other hand, if Britain's revolution was to the left, then the British Empire would have disintegrated catastrophically. Red Britain might then have supported France in 1940, or whenever the German invasion came, but would probably have lacked the naval and air strength to resist invasion itself. Without Britain as a conduit, it is unlikely America would have become involved in Europe in the 1940s.

In the Pacific, hostilities might have begun as they did in the real world, but would have ended differently. For instance, since the United State would not have been cooperating with Great Britain on secret projects, and since America would not have been an attractive haven for refugee scientists, the atomic bomb would not have been invented. Despite what the revisionists say, an appalling invasion of Japan would almost certainly have been necessary. Lovecraft's government might then have been less interested in reforming the country than in depopulating it. Australia, one suspects, would have been annexed as Canada was annexed. The US might even have joined in the German war against the Soviet Union. (If the Nazis came to power in Germany, such an invasion would been inevitable). US aid would probably have taken the form of strategic bombing. It would also have been possible that the US would have gotten involved in a land war in China to finally defeat the Communists there.

Let us assume that Lovecraft dies about the time Roosevelt did, eight years later than Lovecraft did in fact. The world would then have been divided into two great spheres of influence, much as it was after the Second World War. However, they would have been far more evenly matched, since Europe would not have been laid in ruins by the Anglo- American and Russian invasions that occurred in the real world. The two empires would have had some ideological affinities, since both would have ruled by mystically-minded Aryan chauvinists. Some of their leaders would at least consider a union between the two empires. In contrast, popular opinion would have it, as did Hitler himself, that the great war between the eastern and western hemispheres would occur in the next generation. What a time for President Lovecraft to die! The only consolation would have been that the nation was be led by his brilliant young Vice President, L. Ron Hubbard.

But that's another story.


Entry posted by Guest Historian John Reilly Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © John Reilly, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: John Reilly Blog Source: John Reilly Labels: CS Lewis, Lovecraft, Presidency, America, Great Britain.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Some years ago, I read a novel with the title, The Iron Dream, which purported to be science fiction written by Adolf Hitler in an alternative history (who the actual author was I do not remember). In this history, there was a Communist coup in Germany in the early 1920s, and Hitler became just another exile. (His brief involvement in reactionary politics was not worth mentioning.) He settled in the United States, where he became a commercial illustrator for pulp magazines. He took to writing for the pulps as his English improved, eventually attracting a small literary cult. He charming Viennese manners made him the star of science fiction conventions. His major novel, The Iron Dream, dealt with a political movement in a post-apocalyptic world. The movement was dedicated to cleansing the gene-pool of mutations and destroying the great mutant empire in the East. While some people detected anti-Semitic undertones in the book, Hitler's defenders noted that many of his best friends were Jewish. After his death, his stories were frequently reprinted in paperback editions, often using his own illustrations


Readers Comment Mike Stone commented on 2010-09-25 17:25:46 ~ What sort of a Congress does he have? OTL, even FDR ran into trouble (depsite his party have huge majorities) when he overreached himself and tried to pack the Supreme Court. Seems to me Lovecraft probably would as well.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-25 18:25:37 ~ Like all of the Germans who turned on Hitler, it would be only a matter of time before assassination attempts went through or an overall revolution broke out. How VP L. Ron would deal with that would be quite entertaining... to read about from the outside. Terrifying to live through.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-09-25 20:06:11 ~ I don't think his health (polikothermism) would have allowed him to serve in the war.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-08-20 14:25:59 ~ Lovecraft died in March 1937, so assuming he could somehow have become president he'd have had only one term. And if he had assembled the apparatus of a dictatorship during that term, there's have been an ungodly struggle for power after his death, which might well have collapsed the whole thing.

Readers Comment Sailorbarsoom commented on 2012-08-21 18:16:50 ~ Disappointed presidential candidate Edgar R. Burroughs and his running mate, Robert E. Howard, announced today that they would not run for office again, but would would instead form a motion picture studio and satisfy the public yearning for heroic films in this time of war.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Merchant Royal had put in for repairs rather than sank? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1641, after having spent three years trading with Spanish colonies, the Merchant Royal and her sister ship, the Dover Merchant, returned to Europe laden with cargo. The long voyage had made her weathered and leaky, but she safely made port in Cadiz in Spain. England and Spain were at peace, and the English were welcome to trade their goods.

Merchant Royal Puts in for RepairsBy happenstance, a Spanish ship in Cadiz intended for payroll caught fire. Captain Limbrey of the Merchant Royal volunteered to carry the pay, which was in various ingots of gold and silver as well as coinage. It was some fifty tons of gold, but Limbrey felt certain that he would be able to deliver the pay to Antwerp in the Spanish Netherlands (Flanders) on his return to England.

A new story by Jeff ProvineAfter setting out, rough weather began to show. Limbrey initially planned to risk a storm, but the concerns of his men finally convinced him to put ashore in France. Hasty repairs were made, just enough to sail again, and the Merchant Royal set off for Flanders. The pay was delivered, and Limbrey and his crew were sent off again with a handsome reward.

Officials in Flanders quickly used the money to pay their soldiers, who were eager to spend the cash, flooding the market and causing skyrocketing prices. To the north were the Dutch, who had been at war with Spain for decades in what would become known as the Eighty Years' War or Dutch War of Independence. They understood this market bubble from their own experiences with land speculation, housing, cargo futures, and, most infamously, tulips. Trade, both legal and illegal, soared between the two countries. When the soldiers' money ran out, debts were called and property bought cheaply, winning a vast stake in the Flanders economy for the Dutch.

Spain, meanwhile, became increasingly disinterested in the Spanish Netherlands. France had declared war in 1635, Portugal had declared its independence in December of 1640, Catalonia was rebellious, and the massive army sent in 1639 to finish off the Dutch had been utterly destroyed, leaving the Netherlands as having the most powerful navy in the world. Peace negotiations began, but were slow to move forward. With the great stake in Flanders economically as well as colonial successes in the East Indies and Brazil, the Dutch gained a significant upper hand.

Finally, in 1648, the Peace of Munster was signed. The Spanish evacuated the Netherlands and freed the territory to be picked up by the Dutch United Provinces or returned to German princes. France made a bid for their share, but the Dutch assured them diplomatically that war would be fought. Fearing a bitter multi-front war, France conceded and returned to fight Spain in the Pyrenees. Secure and growing, the Dutch turned their interests back to colonialism (fighting, specifically, the Portuguese) and strengthened their banking system.

Over the course of European history, the Dutch state would continue to play a significant role. After defeating the English navy in the First Anglo-Dutch War, they would continue to battle the English until the conquest by William of Orange in the Glorious Revolution. Dutch colonies would continue in North America as well as the Caribbean and every discovered continent. While they did not have the population alone to man their colonies, they developed an intricate system of citizenship for foreigners and inclusion of cooperative natives. Much of the eighteenth century was spent solidifying its position in Europe and keeping the French at bay to maintain their independence.

With the success of the American Revolution (much aided by the colony of New Amsterdam, where George Washington had secretly stored goods and hidden spies), Europe began a fever of revolution that also affected the Netherlands. Massive devastation had come from the Fifth Anglo-Dutch War in the 1780s, but the navies from the colonies had kept the defeat from becoming a rout. The spirit of republicanism spread, and the Dutch joined the French in securing the rights of man. Wars against the monarchs of Europe would bring forth the great general Napoleon, with whom the Dutch allied to preserve their republic. The gamble would prove faulty, though, as Europe's coalitions eventually destroyed Napoleon and forced the Netherlands into a monarchy of its own. Belgium, much of what had been Flanders, would break away, and the Dutch glory had come to an end.

By this time, however, so much Dutch influence over the world had been set that the old adage went, "There are two languages in the world: money and Dutch, and the latter only talks of the former". A commonwealth would build up over the course of the nineteenth century, sending great aid to Europe in the German invasion during Second World War with Operation Torch led by Dutch battalions liberating the homeland in 1942.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Merchant Royal, Repairs, Royal Navy, 1641, Sink.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Merchant Royal sank off the coast of Land's End after its pumps broke under the strain of stormy seas. Eighteen men were lost, but Captain Limbrey and forty of his crew survived. Some believe that the ship was purposefully sunk with the gold safely transported to the Dover Merchant and made to be presumed lost. Whatever the fate of the treasure, the soldiers and merchants in Flanders went without their pay for a while longer, keeping the Spanish Netherlands low key in the coming decades.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-09-24 00:43:25 ~ Interesting--it shows how a nation we consider minor might have been much more influential had things gone just a tiny bit differently at the right point.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-09-24 16:27:16 ~ Amen.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-09-19 18:10:40 ~ Dutch dominance would have been interesting,. but did they have the "strategic depth" (numbers of men and whatnot) needed to pull it off?


On this day in 1974, the Cowboys dropped to 1-1 for the '74 NFL season with a 27-24 overtime loss to the Philadelphia Eagles. During the third quarter, Roger Staubach had to be taken out of the game due to vertigo and a sore shoulder; in overtime backup QB Craig Morton threw an interception that set up the Eagles' game-winning field goal.

 -

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ice Bowl Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dallas Cowboys, NFL, Kansas City Chiefs, America, Touchdown.



In 2008, on this day the Godfather: The Coppola Restoration boxset is released on DVD and BluRay.

As well as featuring all special features from the 2001 DVD set, it also features additional making of documentries and Easter Eggs. (including Andy Garcia and Robert DeNiro's joint 2000 appearance on Saturday Night Live to promote Part IV). As for the film themselves, all four Godfather films receive new transfers to their original film prints - and a documentary goes into extensive detail as to this process.

 -

Variant entry posted by Guest Historian Gerry Shannon Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Gerry Shannon, 2008- & Mario Puzo, 1969-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Godfather Source: Amazon Labels: Robert DeNiro, Mario Puzo, Godfather Part IV , Godfather, Marlon Brando.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, As in real life, this set is released, only in this scenario with all four films. They all get pristine new transfers, whereas in real life only the first two films did.




In 1976, the first presidential debate between the Republican and Democratic nominees takes place. Democratic challenger James Earl 'Jimmy' Carter talks of 'the bureaucratic mess' in Washington, and the 'lack of leadership,' and President Nelson Rockefeller's 'insensitivity' toward the unemployed and racial minorities. 'How can a man born with a solid-gold spoon in his mouth truly represent all of the people of this nation?' he asks. Carter calls the tax structure 'a disgrace' and said it was 'a welfare program for the rich . . . The whole philosophy of the Republican Party, including my opponent, has been to pile on taxes for low-income people to take them off on the wealthy.'

 -

Rockefeller replies that Carter 'plays the game of class warfare very well. However, he has failed to explain how he would improve the lot of America's less fortunate.' Rockefeller talks about getting jobs by 'expanding the private sector, reducing federal taxes, and holding the lid on federal spending.' He also said he intended to sign a tax reform bill passed by Congress but preferred 'an additional tax cut and a further limitation on federal spending.'

On the issue of crime, the President calls attention to his National Safe Streets Initiative, now underway, and says that if Congress will pass the full package of anti-crime legislation he has proposed, 'more progress will be made toward an America of order and stability to the benefit of all of our citizens.'


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Nelson Rockefeller, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Presidency, Assasination.



In 1957, as a large crowd mills around angrily outside the front entrance of Little Rock Central High, in Little Rock, Arkansas, the nine black students whose admission had previously been ordered via a court ruling are let in through a side door and escorted to the principal's office to receive their class assignments. When the crowd learns they are inside, its already hostile mood turns even uglier. The police officers on duty inform the principal that they may be unable to prevent the crowd from storming the building if the nine remain. The students are escorted out through a side exit and sent home under guard.

 -

Following this incident, Little Rocks mayor Woodrow Mann appeals to President Eisenhower by telegram for federal troops to enforce the integration order.

The next day, Eisenhower rejects Mann's appeal. In a telephone call to the mayor, he explains, 'The United States is not the Soviet Union. We do not lightly employ our armed forces in domestic law enforcement, particularly where other options exist. I am unpersuaded that your city's police force is incapable of maintaining order and enforcing the law. I urge you to use all means at your disposal to deal with this situation without requiring the federal government to use force against American citizens who have so far broken no law.'

Privately, the President is troubled by the prospect of a municipality and state defying legal rulings, including two from the Supreme Court itself. However, he has never been enthusiastic about desegregation, whether court-ordered or not. Having received a phone call from Governor Faubus warning that 'thousands of armed men' are converging on Little Rock to 'protect' Central High from 'forced' desegregation, he fears that dispatching federal troops will lead to a bloodbath which will not only undermine the federal government's authority throughout the South but hand the Soviets a terrific propaganda weapon overseas.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: JFK Impeached Source: Wikipedia Labels: Little Rock, Joseph McCarthy, Segregration, Orval Faubus, America.



In 1818, border demarcation markers were formally installed for Moresnet, a tiny European territory of about 3.5 sq km that existed from 1816 to 1919. Its two large neighbours (The Netherlands and Prussia) could not agree on who should own it, deciding therefore to make it a neutral territory where both would share control equally. Dr. Wilhelm Molly proposed in 1908 making Neutral Moresnet the world's first Esperanto-speaking state, named Amikejo or "place of friendship". Neutral Morsenet was chosen as the Capital City of the new Esperanto-speaking European State which rose from the collapse of the European monarchies during World War 1.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Moresnet, Netherlands, Prussia, Capital City, Esperanto.



William Pitt

In 1740, Britain entered the Nine Years War on the side of Prussia. This led to a war with France, who wanted to regain their dominance in Europe and expand their colonial Empire.

The war was a victory for Britain and Prussia, and Britain made some significant gains from it. The rest of French North America was ceded to Britain (minus some islands and Louisiana) while Prussia dominated Europe.

William Pitt - Lord Protector
Lord Protector

A rematch began in 1763 with the Silesian War. France had gathered a coalition together to attempt to reverse Prussian dominance. Britain joined Prussia yet again, but this time faced a new enemy in the United Provinces. With the defeat of French and Spanish colonial ambitions in North America, an anglo/dutch rivalry developed.

The war was directed with brilliant ability by William Pitt, a man who wished to see British dominance in North America. Pitt was made Lord Protector in 1765 to have total control over the war effort and the negotiations.

Britain and the United Provinces left the war in 1769. Britain had got the better of their rivals. New Netherland became a British province and Britain became the great power in India.

Britain had lost a massive amount of money through the Nine Year and Silesian Wars, and for the seven years after 1769, they attempted to recoup this by levelling massive taxation on the colonies. William Pitt opposed this, and stepped down as Chancellor in 1770 to be replaced by Charles Cornwallis.


Entry posted by Guest Historian PJY Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © PJY, 2007.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Invision Power Board Labels: English Revolution, William Pitt, Charles Stuart, Restoration, Britain.



In 1952, Senator Richard Nixon of California, who had been accused of accepting inappropriate gifts, gave a speech in which he declared that his dog, Checkers, had been the only gift he had ever accepted while in office. The ridicule that fell on Nixon after this caused Eisenhower to drop him from the vice-presidential spot on the Republican ticket and replace him with Senator Joe McCarthy of Wisconsin. Adlai Stevenson easily defeated Eisenhower after this debacle.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1920, famed comic actor Joe Yule, Jr. was born in Brooklyn, New York. Yule started acting in films as a young child, first appearing in silent pictures in the 20's before landing such roles as Andy Hardy in his teens, opposite girl sensation Frances Gumm.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1912, Thomas Edison's Dynamic Pictures releases the first of Mack Sennett's Keystone Comedies, about the hilarious misadventures of a precinct of incompetent police officers. The comedies make a star of Sennett, and millions for Dynamic.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1780, British spy John Andre narrowly avoided capture by the rebellious colonials of America, this preserving the secret he carried. After Andre reached Lord Cornwallis with the terms under which rebel General Benedict Arnold would surrender West Point, an agreement was reached, Arnold went over to the King's men, and the rebellion was crushed.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1122, the Concordat of Cornwall established that the Pope or his representatives would name the clergy in any Christian country. Pope Henry I of the Holy British Empire and Prince Callistus of Italy had been in a struggle over this issue for years, and Henry finally beat the prince down.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: 2nd Coming Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Holy British Empire, Robbie A. Taylor, Estelle Gerard, Pope, Catholic England.



In Hellenic Year 3281, the statesman/warrior Euripides was born in Salamis, during the great battle in which the Hellans defeated the Persians. The event proved to be destiny for Euripides, for he followed the path of war throughout his life, rising to lead Athens in battle against Sparta during its wars for freedom.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1915, Anton Dilger set up of a secret laboratory in Baltimore. The bio-terrorist was born in Front Royal, Virginia, to German parents, and moved to Germany when he was nine years old. He attended Gymnasium in Bensheim and trained as a physician in Heidelberg and Munich, later working for the Heidelberg University surgical clinic while researching for his doctoral dissertation. By the time World War One began, Dilger was in Germany, but he returned to the United States in 1915 with cultures of anthrax and glanders to unleash biological sabotage on behalf of the German government. The bio-terrorist strike that devastated America is described in The Fourth Horseman: One Man's Secret Campaign to Fight the Great War in America.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robert-Koenig, 'The Fourth Horseman: One Man's Secret Campaign to Fight the Great War in America'
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Amazon Labels: Anton Dilger, Fourth Horseman, Biological Weapons, Bio-terrorism, America.



In 1918, the demon known as Azazel possessed General Edmund Allenby at Meggido. It was an easy move really, the General Edmund Allenby had been in hell since he had learned that his son, Michael, had been killed on the Western Front by German artillery.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.



In 1918, the Battle of Meggido reached end-game as the Desert Mounted Corps secured the defiles of the Carmel Range. Late that day, they passed through these to capture El Afule and Beisan, complete with the bulk of two Depot Regiments. A brigade of the 5th Mounted Division attacked Nazareth, Liman von Sanders's HQ, although Liman himself escaped, and another (the Imperial Service Cavalry brigade) captured the vital port of Haifa the next day.

The last formed troops of the Seventh Army attempted to retreat directly east across the Jordan. On September 21, a large column was spotted by Allied aircraft in a defile west of the river and destroyed by continuous air attacks. Not many soldiers died, but all transport, guns and heavy equipment was abandoned, and the survivors were scattered and leaderless.

Over the next four days, the Fourth Mounted Division and Australian Mounted Division rounded up large numbers of demoralised and disorganised Turkish troops in the Jezreel Valley.

Liman had attempted to hold the line of the Jordan around the Sea of Galilee. A charge at last light on September 26 by Australian Light Horse captured the town of Samakh, breaking this line.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.





September 22



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Lincoln had been assassinated twelve months earlier? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1862, on this day a preliminary version of the Emancipation Proclamation was released.

An Official Duty 2Just the month before, Abraham Lincoln had written a letter in response to an editorial by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune which had urged the complete abolition of slavery. Making a clear distinction between personal opinion and official duty Lincoln placed the emphasis on saving the Union. Therefore it was a complete shock when he published the Emancipation Proclamation only four weeks later. Cynics guessed that the ink was already dry on the document when Lincoln wrote his letter to the Tribune, and he was simply waiting for an opportune moment (a Union military victory) to justify such a complete reversal of government policy.

But Lincoln never had the chance to reveal the truth of the matter because two years later, the actor and matinee idol John Wilkes Booth shot him dead. Following the bloodbath of the spring, this further horror destroyed any remaining appetite to continue the war, and threw the administration into complete disarray. However President Hamlin managed to find out a way out: a truce that hardened into a peace settlement, and a "rump Dixie" which emerged based on Confederate-occupied Southern territory. The Union retained the border states plus recovered territories that had seceded, namely Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, West Virginia, Atlantic and Gulf coasts, half of Louisiana, Mississippi Valley and of course half of Virginia.

Unlike the assassinated President, Booth did have a brief opportunity to set down a testimony which made a grim mockery of both Greeley and Lincoln's visions of the future (he blamed Lincoln for abolishing slavery rather than making an overtly pro-Confederacy statement). The Union had not been saved, and worse still, "Free blacks" were classified as citizens of the reunited Dixie unionist states but not of the US itself. In effect the Emancipation Proclamation had only taken partial effect in the Union-occupied territories, and the real consequence was the prevention of a mass migration of African-Americans to the Northern Cities. Because as much as white Northerners hated slavery, they had absolutely no intention of accepting the principle of racial equality. Whereas in the South, by the turn of the century slavery had morphed into a form of peonage/caste system due to the joint pressure from London and the dangers of runaways to Union territory. Of course in time, economic equality would begin to develop, and today, we can only speculate as to what might have happened if Lincoln had lived to introduce constitutional amendments, it might even have been a "bitter legacy" of northern ghettos.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Abraham Lincoln, Slavery, Presidency, Horace Greeley, Emancipation Proclamation.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in developing this article we taken an original idea from Eric Oppen and consulted with Scott Palter and Jared Myers, also we have repurposed content from Wikipedia. The water colour by Henry Louis Stephens (c. 1863) is of a man reading a newspaper with headline "Presidential Proclamation / Slavery".






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Livonian Crusaders had won out? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1236, on this day the Livonian Brothers of the Sword consolidated thirty years of conquests by crushing the pagan Samogitians at the Battle of Saule (trans. "Sun").

Famous Livonian Victory at the Battle of SauleUnder the decisive leadership of Volkwin the Livonian Master, the Order had been forced to cope with strained financial resources, decreasing manpower, and ill reputation. Also the Order was in conflict with the papacy under Pope Gregory IX and the Holy Roman Emperor, two of its biggest supporters, over Estonia. However, on February 19, 1236, Pope Gregory IX issued a papal bull declaring a crusade against Lithuania. He targeted Samogitia, planning to conquer the coast of the Baltic Sea and connect with the Teutonic Knights in Prussia.

The Sword-Brothers wanted to keep expanding along the Daugava River and was somewhat reluctant to march against Samogitia. In fall of 1236 a party of crusaders arrived from Holstein; it demanded to be led into a battle. Volkwin gathered a large war party, which included troops from Pskov Republic, Livonians, Latgallians, Estonians.

The knights marched southward into Samogitia, raiding and plundering local settlements. They were fortunate to strike the Samogitians before the main pagan forces, led by Duke Vykintas, arrived at the camp. Because it was his delayed arrival sealed the Livonian victory, since the swampy ground was unsuitable for cavalary and a like-for-like armed battle would have favoured the javellin throwing Samogitians had they arrived on a single concentrated forced1.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Saule, Livonian, Samogitians, Volkwin, Lithuania.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality [1] between 48 and 60 knights were killed, including the Livonian Master, Volkwin. It was the earliest large-scale defeat suffered by the orders in Baltic lands. The Sword-Brothers, the first Catholic military order established in the Baltic lands, was soundly defeated and its remnants accepted incorporation into the Teutonic Order in 1237.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-09-21 20:43:19 ~ Don't think this would have changed much in the long run, but I'm by no means a real expert on that time and place.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-09-26 13:47:23 ~ Could butterfly out somehow. Would be a different world if the eastern Baltic was a mightier center of Europe, which could be possible with the resources if it hadn't been backward for centuries.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Abraham Lincoln vs. James Shields Duel had gone ahead? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1842, on this day the State Auditor for Illinois James Shields (pictured) was tragically killed in a duel fought on Sunflower Island across the border in Missouri.

The Sunflower Island AffairHis controversial decisions had been satirised by a fellow member of the state legislature in a Illinois newspaper, the Sagamon Journal. Taking offense at the mean spirited words used in these articles, Shields had demanded "satisfaction" by challenging the author to a participate in a duel near Alton. But his error immediately soon became apparent because his taller adversary got to decide the terms of the duel: broadswords in a twelve feet deep pit separated by a piece of plywood where they could not cross onto the opponents side.

Being six feet four, the much longer arms of this lanky Kentuckian chap, a fellow Abraham Lincoln would easily disarm his irate shorter opponent. And as Lincoln menacingly sweep away brush from above Shield's head, intermediaries attempted to wrest an apology for the letters that might have peacefully resolved the dispute, but Shields stubbornly refused to back down, falling into the pit where he broke his neck and died.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: James Shields, Abraham Lincoln, Missouri, Illinois, Duel.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this post we have repurposed content from Wikipedia, Alternate History Discussion Groups and also Top 10 Universities Online which concludes ~ just prior to engaging in combat, Lincoln made it a point to demonstrate his advantage by easily cutting a branch just above Shields' head, the two participants' seconds intervened and were able to convince the two men to cease hostilities, on the grounds that Lincoln had not written the letters.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-06-29 13:45:40 ~ This has some scary implications for the Civil War....

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-08-28 12:13:32 ~ If nothing else, it might have kept Lincoln from being the Republican nominee for president in 1860, meaning the presidency would have gone to . . . who knows?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-28 17:38:49 ~ Seward could've gotten the nomination, but he would've had to start making friends among those he alienated (not one of his strong suits).

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-08-28 17:45:36 ~ Would Lincoln's reputation have been hurt? IIRC at that time, duelling was widely practiced. And maybe if he was known to have "killed his man," as the phrase went at the time, he'd get more respect from the press during the Civil War.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2012-08-28 18:21:09 ~ Yes,one of many twists history could have taken.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Palestinian leadership was bought out in New York? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2011, a last minute, negotiated settlement on a "two state solution" was finally reached at the UN General Assembly after the International Quartet broke the deadlock by offering the Palestinian leadership a $multi-billion compensation fee to accept the loss of the occupied territories.

Payoff in New YorkUS, EU, UN and Russia had failed to dissuade President Mahmoud Abbas from lodging a request for Palestinian statehood on the basis of pre-1967 territory, a unilateral move supported by many non-aligned powers. Instead, they had continued to insist that a Palestinian state could only be created by negotiated settlement despite years of deadlocked talks. And in the final analysis, the bid in New York was part gambit. Also a combination of frustration, a desire to introduce a game changer and a realisation that Israel faced international isolation.

Sensing the underlying weakness of their negotiating position, cracks had started to appear in the negotiating position of the quartet. Even though Special Envoy Tony Blair was acting in a quasi-figurehead leadership role, the British Foreign Minister William Hague (who ironically had lost to Blair in the 2001 General Election) announced that Britain might after all abstain from the vote in the UN Security Council.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered to resume talks at the UN General Assembly, but indicated that the barrier to agreement was Palestinian refusal to recognise Israeli sovereignty. Netanyahu had repeatedly argued that a return to the indefinsible 1967 borders was unacceptable to Israel.

With matters heading towards impasse, a decision was made to bypass the issue of the occupied territories by offering the Palestinians a huge compensation fee that would guarantee that the new state would be viable.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Israel, Palestine, Quartet, Two State, West Bank.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this post we imagine that the political will (and funds) existed to prevent the Palestinian applying for statehood. Our tentative observation in this story is ultimately the situation is no less desperate than South Africa, and the answer there was cash guarantees to the party forced to withdraw, so why not use the same formula?


Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-25 01:14:49 ~ Wouldn't matter. The Palestinians would take the money, spend it, pocket it, and start another war. It's what they do. The Israelis cannot compromise on recognition, sovereignty, incitement, propaganda, and a permanent end to the conflict. (There are other crazy ideas that the Palestinians have, such as their refusal to grant citizenship to descendents of the 1948 refugees (I prefer the term "fugitive population") so that they could remain an open sore. Or their refusal to recognize the Jewish National Home. But no one hears of this sort of thing in the major media because, well, as a journalist, I know why. We all know why. But the Grey Ladies all say "Harumph!" and deny everything. Sorry for the rant, but I've been writing on this subject for years.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2011-09-25 01:23:50 ~ Gee, and all this time I thought that the reason the Israelis didn't want a Palestinian state next to theirs was because they might have to give up the land they stole and put settlements on....... P.S. "Harumph!"

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2011-09-25 01:28:26 ~ Stole? Oh, John, you are so misguided about this. The Jewish population of Israel did not show up in 1948 and seize the land that had been Palestinian. A Jewish homeland already existed there and had for nearly 100 years. The people you call Palestinians are political pawns being used by anti-semites in the Middle East who want to see Israel destroyed. The above scenario would never come to pass because of the reasons Stan stated above.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-25 01:48:22 ~ Gee, John, perhaps you might want to visit the mountain tops where the settlers actually live. (If these were stolen from anyone, they were goats.) Regarding land stealing, perhaps you might be interested in the history of Hadassah House in Hebron. But I am not interested in the settlements, I am interested in nasty racism, which predates 1948. I recently wrote an article on the film Miral, which delves into Arab Nazis, and the media's efforts to cover them up. Do a google on it. Cheers.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2011-09-25 08:43:01 ~ Like it or not, a whole lot of Palestinians got screwed in '48 (i.e. many fled at gunpoint, many just fled the war, none were able to return); and there are many who keep screwing them to maintain cheap political points. That being said, the Zero Sum Game is not one the Palestinians can win for any meaningful definition thereof, as getting a Nuclear Power to evacuate the bulk of it's electorate (which is what the whole 'Reset Button' theory of liberating Palestine _is_) Just Will Not Work.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-09-25 13:03:11 ~ Re Matthew Dattilo: A "Jewish homeland" had not existed in Pakestine for "nearly 100 years" by 1948. Had that been the case there would have been no need for the Jewish lobbying effort which ultimately produced the 1919 Balfour Declaration calling for the establishmnent of such a homeland in Palestine. (Please note that even the Declaration called for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, not for recognizing all of Palestine as the Jewish homeland.) What had existed in Palestine for three generations were small colonies of fervent Zionists, both religious and decular, who had begun arriving, largely from Russia, in the 1880s. After World War II, many more poured in and in 1948, armed largely with Soviet-bloc weapons (the Soviets hoped, and the U,S. feared, that an independent Jewish state would go Communist) declared "independence" and started driving out the Palestinians at gunpoint. As for "Arab Nazis," many Arabs supported the Germans in World War II for the same reason they had in World War I: to kick the British and French colonialists out of the region. For that matter, Jewish zealots attacked the British in Palestine, blowing up staff cars, shooting at officers and so on (and, postwar, blowing up the King David Hotel) for the same reason. Arab nationalists would have had to be ignorant of Nazi ideology rather than supportive of it, though, if they chose to become Nazis, for had the Third Reich won the Arabs, as Semites themselves, would have followed the Jews into the death chambers.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-25 22:17:46 ~ Eric, Eric, Eric. Check the San Remo Conference treaty that created the League of Nations and the League of Nations Mandates. It's still international law as the United Nations received the League's rights and responsibilities as part of its charter. Eastern Palestine, the area east of the Jordan River and the Dead Sea, was 80 percent of the Mandate's territory and was soon split off (legally) by Winston Churchill. It is not called Jordan. the area west of the Jordan was the 'Jewish National Home, or "Eretz Israel" BY TREATY since 1920. It's only legal government was to be the Jewish Agency, which is now the government of Israel. You can't create international law just because you don't like the way it actually exists. Regarding Arab nazis, I have written extensively about them. The Ikhwan, or Muslim Brotherhood, which may soon take over Egypt, and is the parent organization of Hamas (every Hamas man is a Muslim Brother) was known for decades as the "Black Flag Fascists."

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-26 06:29:50 ~ Sorry, Eric. i meant: "It's NOW called Jordan." A typo. Regarding other Arab nazis, see my article on the film "Miral" which was a shameless whitewash of Palestinian nazis.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-09-26 11:32:37 ~ Let's see now. If Palestine were declared a "Jewish homeland" in 1920, that'd make it a short century (as per your earlier remark) by 1948, which was my point. As for the legitimacy of that action, even then many people (and no, not just anti-Semites) saw it for what it was: an effort by the British and French to stick a thumb in the Arabs' xollective eye, not to actually establish a Jewish homeland. After all, if the "Jewish homelaand" had existed "by TREATY" since 1920, why did the British stay there until essentially kicked out? And as for "Arab Nazis," I stand by my earlier remarks. Some Arabs allied themselves with the Nazis, but that did not make them Nazis any more than their fathers' generation were soldiers of the Kaiser--and indeed, again, the Nazis wouldn't have wanted them in the party, As I noted before, had the Axis won, the Arabs, as Semites, would have followed the Jews into the camps. Just in passing, are you aware that there are devout Jews who consider Israel illegitimate? Their reasoning is that according to prophecy Israel is meant to be re-established (as a tribal kingdom!) by the Messiah, who has not yet come. (Obviously they don't grant that title to Jesus of Nazareth.)

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-26 20:03:57 ~ Eric, it's pointless to discuss this further since you appear to be one of those people who read a little pre-digested pap in some magazine and think they know a lot. (The Arabs had, and still have, their own Nazi-style parties. One, National Socialist Party of Syria, is a member of the Baathists' ruling coalition. The Baathists themselves are a Fascist party. But I digress.) As far as the "Tribal kingdom!" you rage about, Judaism is post-tribal. It's national, but that is another thing you wouldn't understand. Yes i know about the Neturei Karta, the self-styled "Guardians of the City." I've met and interviewed a few. They are considered nuts by every other Heredi group. I found them delusional and completely ignorant of their own history. Regarding you, Eric, please, stick to other subjects. You don't know enough to comment on this subject -- but then, again few do. I once interviewed the participants of a Los Angeles Times conference on the Middle East, each a professor and author of a recent book -- not one could identify by name important individuals in modern middle Eastern history. If you want to learn something, may I suggest that you start with "O Jerusalem" by Collins and laPierre (the book, not the horrible movie), a bestseller based on interviews with the participants in the Siege of 1948, before the siege was pronounced embarrassing to the Arabs and banned. It is a popular history, not enough footnotes, but I haven't found anything wrong with it. I would then go on to "The Palestine Triangle" by British author Nicholas Bethell, until now the standard work on the last decade of the Mandate. I would avoid the so-called "New Historians" as they are primarily polemicists -- their footnotes often don't lead anywhere and their quotes are imaginary.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Stonewall Jackson had followed Lee's orders in the Peninsular Campaign? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1862, even though the Army of Northern Virginia had achieved another great victory, it was nevertheless facing strategic annihilation. On 22 September, although the battlefield was intensely quiet after the previous day's carnage, Lee ordered Jeb Stuart to send a cavalry force to the south to reconnoitre the Union positions located there.

The Race to Hancock by David AtwellNot travelling more than ten odd miles, Stuart returned to inform Lee that the Union had established strong defences that would take several hours to defeat. It seemed that, even though Burnside had lost 20 000 troops in one day, to the cost of fewer than 1 000 Confederates, Burnside had at least trapped the Army of Northern Virginia. It was merely a matter of time, or so it seemed, before total defeat. Lee, however, thought otherwise.

Lee now decided to break out of Washington, but not to the south. Instead he would attack to the west through the Union defences just north of the Potomac and the Chesapeake-Ohio Canal. Considering Longstreet was still not fully healthy, regardless of his activity in repelling Burnside's Folly, Jackson, considered the better offensive commander anyway, was given orders to attack the next morning on 23 September followed by a full evacuation of Washington as soon as possible. This was quickly achieved as the Army of the Potomac was caught unawares by Jackson's break out attempt, not to mention it had been severely weakened by the slaughter of two days earlier, and that Burnside had been sacked on the evening of 22 September by Lincoln. Ironically, Lincoln turned back to McClellan, after the Burnside's Folly disaster, as he believed he had no other choice at the time in question.A Chapter from Hancock 1862

McClellan, for his part, did not overly want to return to active duty on the night of 22 September. Furthermore, he had not even arrived at the headquarters of the Army of the Potomac when Jackson conducted his attack. Consequently no one quite knew what to do, save for the local Union commander on the spot who, although put up a brave defence, was nevertheless overrun for his efforts. Lee had thus gained his break out and, before McClellan could order a general assault upon Washington, the Army of Northern Virginia had escaped and was on the run in a westerly direction as per Lee's plan.

Unfortunately for Lee, not everything would work his way, fore mistakenly a copy of his plan had been left behind which was soon discovered by some Union soldiers. These plans were immediately sent to army headquarters. McClellan, hence, now had the opportunity to destroy the Army of Northern Virginia in his hands. Lee's plan, for the evacuation of Maryland, became infamously known as Special Orders No 191:

Special Orders, No. 191
Hdqrs. Army of Northern Virginia
September 23, 1862

The citizens of Fredericktown being unwilling while overrun by members of this army, to open their stores, in order to give them confidence, and to secure to officers and men purchasing supplies for benefit of this command, all officers and men of this army are strictly prohibited from visiting Fredericktown except on business, in which cases they will bear evidence of this in writing from division commanders. The provost-marshal in Fredericktown will see that his guard rigidly enforces this order.

Major Taylor will proceed to Sharpsburg, Maryland, and arrange for transportation of the sick and those unable to walk to Winchester, securing the transportation of the country for this purpose. The route between this and Culpepper Court-House east of the mountains being unsafe, will no longer be traveled. Those on the way to this army already across the river will move up promptly; all others will proceed to Winchester collectively and under command of officers, at which point, being the general depot of this army, its movements will be known and instructions given by commanding officer regulating further movements. The army will resume its march tomorrow, taking the Hagerstown road. General Jackson's command will form the advance, and, after passing Middletown, with such portion as he may select, take the route toward Harper's Ferry, cross the Potomac at the most convenient point, and by Friday morning take possession of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, capture such of them as may be at Martinsburg, and intercept such as may attempt to escape from that place.

General Magruder's command will pursue the same road as far as Boonsborough, where it will halt, with reserve, supply, and baggage trains of the army.

General McLaws, with his own division and that of General R. H. Anderson, will follow General Longstreet. On reaching Middletown will take the route to Harpers Ferry, and by Friday morning possess himself of the Maryland Heights and endeavor to ensure that any pursuing forces are repulsed.

General J. E. Johnston, with his command, after accomplishing the object in which he is now engaged, will cross the Potomac at Cheek's Ford, ascend its right bank to Lovettsville, take possession of Loudoun Heights, if practicable, by Friday morning, Key's Ford on his left, and the road between the end of the mountain and the Potomac on his right. He will, as far as practicable, cooperate with General McLaws and Jackson, and occupy Harper's Ferry.

General D. H. Hill's division will form the rear guard of the army, pursuing the road taken by the main body. The reserve artillery, ordnance, and supply trains, &c., will precede General Hill.

General Stuart will detach a squadron of cavalry to accompany the commands of Generals Longstreet, Jackson, and McLaws, and, with the main body of the cavalry, will cover the route of the army, bringing up all stragglers that may have been left behind.

The commands of Generals Jackson, McLaws, and Walker, after accomplishing the objects for which they have been detached, will join the main body of the army at Winchester.

Each regiment on the march will habitually carry its axes in the regimental ordnance-wagons, for use of the men at their encampments, to procure wood &c.

By command of General R. E. Lee
R.H. Chilton, Assistant Adjutant General

Essentially Lee's plan, although party based upon deception, required the capture of Harper's Ferry in order to get the Army of Northern Virginia into the relatively safe region of the Shenandoah Valley. Here Lee believed that his army would be out of danger. However, if something went wrong, the fate of the Army of Northern Virginia could easily end in disaster.

As luck would have it, though, disaster did almost take place for Lee, until it was discovered, to the senior Confederate commander's complete horror, that a copy of Special Orders No 191 had been left behind. Furthermore McClellan, now in possession of the means of Lee's defeat, immediately set off in pursuit. Lee, however, now aware of the huge mistake, reacted accordingly, and his well made plans, detailed in the lost special orders, were forthwith rescinded.

In their place, Lee issued orders to all his commanders, most notably to Jackson at Harpers Ferry who had been held up by the very stubborn defence offered by the Union garrison there of 20 000 troops under the command of General George Thomas, to immediately withdraw to the north-west and away from their current positions. They were to move at best speed in order to place as much distance as they could between themselves and the Union Army of the Potomac, which had just managed to gain the passes crossing South Mountain. At some point, though, to the north-west of Sharpsburg, Lee planed to then form up on favourable ground and offer battle to McClellan.


Read the whole story of Hancock 1862 - the Union Strikes Back on the Changing the Times web site.


Entry posted by Guest Historian David Atwell Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © David Atwell, 2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Action Jackson Source: Changing the Times Labels: Stonewall Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, George McClellan, Edwin Stanton, Robert E. Lee.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-01-03 12:41:51 ~ I rather suspect that if, as in this timeline, Lee had already captured Washington D.C., Union morale would be so far down the toilet that the war would be all but over. Not to mention that such a capture would have practically guaranteed foreign recognition of the CSA.

Readers Comment Sime SSparica commented on 2011-01-03 15:04:45 ~ Like !

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-01-03 15:06:58 ~ Huh huh, you said "Hancock". (channeling Butthead)




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Abraham Lincoln had died in a saber duel in 1842? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1842, it was a grim errand that sent Abraham Lincoln hurrying toward Alton, Illinois, early on this morning. At Alton, he would cross the Mississippi River to a small island over the Missouri border-Bloody Island. There, he would prepare himself to kill or be killed in a saber duel to the death.

Abraham Lincoln Prepares to Fight a Saber DuelThe idea of Lincoln fighting a duel begs a burning question for the perennial speculator, the intensely curious sort of history aficionado who wonders what might have happened if Major General George Meade had pursued the Army of Northern Virginia after the Battle of Gettysburg, or if Lieutenant General Thomas 'stonewall" Jackson had survived his wounds at Chancellorsville. The question is this: What if Abraham Lincoln had been killed by a saber slash in 1842? It could have happened by the hand of 36-year-old James Shields if events had gone differently on September 22, 1842. Before circumstances turned Shields and Lincoln into mortal enemies, the two politicians had had a peaceable, professional relationship. They had been in the Illinois state legislature together, Lincoln having won election as a Whig in 1834, and Shields, as a Democrat in 1836. Illinois had an enormous debt in the late 1830s and early 1840s, and the legislature had its hands full just keeping the government operating. In 1837, as the state bank teetered on the brink of collapse, Whigs and Democrats fought over what to do. Lincoln and Shields, however, were able to negotiate a compromise that saved the banks. On one key issue of the time-building new infrastructure such as railroads and other public works-the Whig party wanted private corporations to own the facilities. Democrats favored state ownership. Shields, though faced with heavy pressure from his party, often supported private ownership. So, despite party differences on major issues, Shields and Lincoln often managed to land on the same side of the final vote.

From the HistoryNetWhen the state bank defaulted in 1842, however, there was no such camaraderie. Shields, now the state auditor, aligned with the state's governor and treasurer to adopt a policy in which the state would refuse to accept its own paper money as payment of taxes and other debts. Lincoln cleverly assailed this sitting duck of a policy, simultaneously striking a blow at the Illinois Democratic party in general and at Shields in particular. In a letter to the editor of the Sangamo Journal published in the paper on September 2, 1842, Lincoln presented a polemic designed to embarrass Shields. He chose the Journal as his forum because he had fairly free rein in the paper's columns; editor Simeon Francis was friendly to him and sympathetic to his views. Mrs. Francis had even opened her home as a rendezvous for Lincoln and his future wife, Mary Todd.

Lincoln offered up some pungent prose in his letter to the editor. He began with an earthy character, Jeff, complaining to the rough-hewn but shrewd Rebecca: "I've been tugging ever since harvest getting out wheat and hauling it to the river, to raise State Bank paper enough to pay my tax this year, and a little school debt I owe; and now just as I've got it?, lo and behold, I find a set of fellows calling themselves officers of State, have forbidden to receive State paper at all; and so here it is, dead on my hands".

When Rebecca identifies Shields as one of the "officers of state" and reads aloud from his declaration against accepting state money, Jeff explodes. "I say-it-is-a-lie?. It grins out like a copper dollar. Shields is a fool as well as a liar. With him truth is out of the question".

Lincoln went on to deride his adversary on the social scene, with Jeff recalling Shields at a recent fair attended by the eligible women of Springfield. "His very features, in the ecstatic agony of his soul, spoke audibly and distinctly-"Dear girls, it is distressing, but I cannot marry you all. Too well I know how much you suffer; but do, do remember, it is not my fault that I am so handsome and so interesting".

The letter ended with an appeal to the editor: let your readers "know who and what these officers of State are. It may help to send the present hypocritical set to where they belong and to fill the places they now disgrace with men who will do more for less pay?". Lincoln signed it "Rebecca".

Before sending the letter to the Journal, Lincoln showed it to Mary Todd and her friend Julia Jayne. The two women had a grand time helping Lincoln sharpen his barbs. They apparently got carried away with excitement of the situation; later, they picked up where Lincoln left off and wrote a letter of their own, a feeble aping of Lincoln's cutting wit that ended with a derisive verse signed "Cathleen". Shields was an amusing if volatile target for taunting. Lincoln's future presidential secretaries John Nicolay and John Hay, both familiar with the Illinois capital and its characters, described him as "a man of inordinate vanity?, an irresistible mark for satire". Shields's law partner, Gustave Koerner, said, "He was exceedingly vain and very ambitious, and like most ambitious men, on occasions, quite egotistical? In his manner he was peculiar, not to say eccentric".

Needless to say, Shields was incensed by the Rebecca letter. In an effort to get to the bottom of the situation, Shields asked Francis for Rebecca's true identity. Francis responded, as Lincoln had instructed him, that it was Lincoln. Lincoln, of course, had had help, but apparently he wanted to keep Mary Todd out of it. If the reason for that protective measure was not obvious at the time, it would become so on November 4, 1842, when he married her. On finding the source of his public humiliation, Shields, emotionally wounded and furious, had a menacing note hand-delivered to Lincoln in Tremont on September 17. "I have become the object of slander, vituperation and personal abuse," Shields wrote. Only a full retraction "may prevent consequences which no one will regret more than myself". Lincoln discussed the predicament with his friends Dr. Elias Merryman, a Springfield physician, and William Butler, the clerk of Sangamon County Court, and decided not to retract his pointed words. Shields was not appeased and again demanded "absolute retraction". Lincoln refused, suggesting that Shields take back his hand-delivered letter and submit one that was more "gentlemanly". There would be no further negotiation. Shields challenged Lincoln to a duel.

As the party who had been challenged, Lincoln got to set the fight's conditions. He did so on September 19 in a letter that demonstrated a personal trait that historian Gary Wills has described as "letting nonsense work itself out to its own demise". First, Lincoln selected "cavalry broad sword of the largest size" rather than pistols as the dueling weapons. "I did not want to kill Shields and felt sure I could disarm him?," he later wrote, adding, "I didn"t want the d-d fellow to kill me, which I think he would have done if we had selected pistols". Next, Lincoln prescribed conditions so advantageous to himself that his opponent would be forced to write off the martial affair as a lost cause. He ordered "a plank ten feet long, and from nine to twelve inches abroad, to be firmly fixed on edge, on the ground, as the line between us, which neither is to pass his foot over upon forfeit of his life". Such unusual conditions would allow Lincoln to take advantage of his superior reach; Shields was only five feet, nine inches tall, while Lincoln soared to six feet, four inches. Once again Lincoln had underestimated Shields. Shields was an ambitious, perseverant man, and his professional experience proved that. He had been a state legislator and now was the state auditor. He had been in the Black Hawk War, and during the Mexican War and Civil War, he would serve as a brigadier general. In the 1840s and 1850s he would win elections to the U.S. Senate-first representing Illinois, then Minnesota, then Missouri. In Minnesota, he would found a town and name it Shieldsville. Such a driven and determined man fights stubbornly over his reputation.

Stubbornness was only one of the characteristics that led Shields to the dueling field in September 1842. He also had courage in the face of death. During the Mexican War, he would take a bullet in the chest at the Battle of Cerro Gordo. After surgery and nine weeks of recuperation, he would return to command. This was clearly not a man who would run away from a fight to the death. So, on September 22, 1842, Shields left Illinois, where dueling was illegal, for Missouri, where it was allowed. He walked ashore onto Bloody Island ready to kill Lincoln or be killed by him.

Fortunately for Shields and Lincoln, shared friends John J. Hardin, a relative of Mary Todd, and Dr. R.W. English sped to the duel scene-at least as much as anyone could speed in a small boat in 1842-and pleaded with the would-be combatants to let bygones be bygones. It was a truly desperate attempt to bring peace, but it worked. The duel was cancelled. Though the incident ended without violence, Lincoln avoided talking about it, preferring to forget it ever happened. In a letter written on December 9, 1865, Mary Lincoln recalled that an army officer visiting the White House asked her husband, "Is it true?that you once went out, to fight a duel and all for the sake of the lady by your side?" Lincoln replied, I do not deny it, but if you desire my friendship, you will never mention it again".

Despite his bad experience with heavy-handed sarcasm, Lincoln did not retire his acerbic wit. Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln's Democratic opponent in the 1858 election for one of Illinois's seats in the U.S. Senate, learned that firsthand. Lincoln roasted Douglas to a crisp during a debate in Charleston on September 18, and that display was not a one-time happening. Major General George B. McClellan, who received many kind words from Lincoln early in the Civil War, also knew the sting of Lincoln's sarcasm. Annoyed by McClellan's slowness in attacking Confederate armies in Virginia in late 1861 and early 1862, Lincoln referred to McClellan's massive Army of the Potomac as "McClellan's bodyguard". He remarked that if McClellan did not care to use his army for fighting, he "would like to borrow it".

Lincoln never again got tangled up in the makings of a duel. Shields, on the other hand, found himself involved in such proceedings in 1850, when on behalf of Democratic Congressman William H. Bissell, he presented the acceptance of a challenge to a duel issued by future Confederate president Jefferson Davis. But he immediately set to work settling the matter without violence. He was successful. Lincoln and Shields apparently settled their differences, or at least agreed to disagree. During the Civil War, Shields was nominated for the rank of brigadier general in the Union army. Final approval fell to the president-Lincoln. He approved. With that move some 20 years after the duel that was not, Lincoln publicly buried the cavalry broadsword.


Entry posted by Guest Historian HistoryNet Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © HistoryNet
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: History Net Labels: Premature Death, Abraham Lincoln, America, Lincoln, Assasination.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, this article was written by Louis Vargo and originally published in the February 2002 issue of Civil War Times Magazine.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-27 19:56:40 ~ Fascinating. It just goes to show how seemingly trivial events can have far-reaching consequences/

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-28 22:42:33 ~ Great what if. Curious to see further details.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Benjamin Tallmadge had rescued Nathaniel Hale? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

By 1776, as with any war, victory in the American Revolution could only be won with as much success in espionage as on the battlefield. Nathan Hale, young Yale graduate and school teacher, had joined the Revolution in the Connecticut militia. He rose fast through the ranks from his spirit and dedication to the movement. On September 8, 1776, Hale volunteered to go into British-controlled New York City and gather intelligence.

Tallmadge Rescues Hale While Hale was in the city, the Great Fire broke out on September 21. Rumors flew about it being Patriot activity, while others suspected uncontrollable British soldiers, and, either way, the occupying army set upon a course of rounding up potential rebels. Hale was discovered in a tavern by counter-intelligence and eventually captured in Queens where he had fled. He would hang at dawn.

A new story by Jeff ProvineBy what very well may have been luck, a contemporary of Hale's at Yale, Benjamin Tallmadge, was in New York. He had been recently commissioned in the Continental Army's light dragoons, but he had become ill and took a short leave. Just as he was coming back to the world, the fire had broken out, and he returned to his Revolutionary efforts hiding Patriots from the British crackdown. When word came that Hale had been captured, Tallmadge planned a desperate rescue.

In the morning, Hale was marched to the gallows. An African boy, Bill Richmond (who would later become a famous American boxer), had been hired by the British to secure the rope to the tree. Tallmadge had gotten to the boy and bribed him an enormous amount of money to have the rope slip. As the drummer ended, Hale was given his final words, and the twenty-one-year-old gave a short oration summed up, "I regret that I have but one life to give for my country".

The trap was pulled, and Hale fell. Carefully filed by Richmond, the rope snapped. Before the British guard could react, a group of Patriots let off a rifle barrage, gathering the crowd's attention. Tallmadge dove through the chaos and whisked away the stunned Hale, who would come out of the affair with a scar from the rope burn around his throat.

New York City would continue in an uproar for several days while Hale was hidden and finally sneaked out in the disguise of a milkmaid. Stories spread like lightning of the man who did indeed have more than one life to give for his country, causing a surge of patriotism across the colonies. Tallmadge was soon made Washington's chief intelligence officer, and he took Hale on as a spy. The two would form the Culper Spy Ring, which would discover Benedict Arnold's betrayal, and Hale himself would apprehend the traitorous general.

After the war, Tallmadge turned to business while Hale went back to teaching. Hale would later be elected a representative from Connecticut to the Constitutional Convention, and he would quickly give his support for Federalism under James Madison's plan. Tallmadge later served in the House of Representatives, being supportive of Hale's higher aspirations. Most famously, Hale would attend the Hartford Convention, giving another speech that stirred the war-weary New Englanders toward support and away from the idea of secession. "After all, are we not Federalists? Are we not Americans? We may not choose ourselves where the will of our country leads, but we may choose to follow the course, rough as it may be". Here, he bared his scar amid patriotic cheers.

Uniting the Federalists, Hale would win a narrow victory over Secretary of State James Monroe in the presidential election of 1816. In his term, Hale would clarify the role of state's rights, work toward internal improvements, and further bolster international trade. While his economic policies seemed good, they proved perhaps too good for their dependence of European payment, and the Panic of 1820 would usher Hale out of office with James Monroe taking over and the Democratic-Republicans returning to power. Hale returned to the Senate, and the two would prove effective friends, working to balance with the Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine of defending the freedom of other nations while maintaining ideals of isolationism.

In his later years, Hale would routinely denounce Senator, then President, Andrew Jackson as a political opportunist, bloodthirsty killer, retarder of economics, and "bad fellow". Jackson replied that Hale was a suppressor of the common man, wild gambler of others' money, and "old man". The two war heroes bit into each other until Hale's death in 1834. Jackson attended Hale's funeral even though believing that Hale had cost him the 1828 election. Despite their differences, Jackson said of Hale, "He gave every life he had for his country".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Tallmadge, Hale, Revolution, America, 1776.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Tallmadge was elsewhere in the war. Hale hanged, but it was his famous words that excited a fire of patriotism in an America where many were uncertain of independence.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-09-22 14:43:36 ~ Mr. Turtledove, please pick up the white courtesy phone... :D

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-09-22 19:10:15 ~ This might have been interesting. After an escape like that, Hale would have been an icon for the Patriots. They'd probably call him "Half-hanged Hale." And I think that Andrew Jackson would have been absolutely lost in admiration of Talmadge; it would be just the sort of stunt he'd see himself doing.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-09-23 00:30:23 ~ "Every life he had"? This suggests Hale might have been immortalized in Ameircan history in quite a different way than in our timeline: not as a man willing to die for his country but as one preserved by Providence for his country.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-23 17:30:31 ~ Ironic, given Andrew Jackson's notorious assassination where the guns didn't fire because of Providence (or the high humidity in the weather... caused by Providence).




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Texan secessionists heeded Sam Houston's dire warning during the 1860 crisis? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1860, Texas Governor Sam Houston delivered a fiery speech, "The Folly of Disunion" on this day at an anti-secessionist rally in Austin.

Lone StarMany Texans heeded Houston's warning, narrowly voting to remain in the Union on February 23, 1861; Texas would not after all become the seventh star in the Confederate flag.

Born in 1793 in Virginia, Houston was a pivotal figure in the history of Texas. Not only did he sign the Texas Declaration of Independence from Mexico, but he also served periods as President of the Republic of Texas, Senator for Texas after it joined the United States, and finally as governor.

"Are we to sell reality for a phantom?"Although married to a Cherokee, and a slaveowner and opponent of abolitionism, he refused, because of his unionist convictions, to swear loyalty to the Confederacy and thus had a decisive role in preventing Texas from seceding from the Union.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Berg, Gordon. "Texas under the microscope. (The Seventh Star of the Confederacy: Texas in the Civil War)" reviewed in America's Civil War Magazine, September 2009
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Civil War AL Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sam Houston, Confederacy, America, Texas, Civil War.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that extensive amounts of content have been repurposed from the source article which concludes: "On March 16, 1861, the Texas Secession Convention called for all the state's elected officials to take a loyalty oath to the new government. Sam Houston, twice president of the Republic, as well as U.S. senator, governor and slave owner, sat silent. He never did pledge allegiance to the Confederacy, and he died in 1863 still convinced that his fellow Texans had made a terrible mistake".


Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2009-10-17 20:48:30 ~ Unfortunately, it's been way too long since my last Texas history class, so I don't remember the sane Texans in the state who wanted to resist secession If you hadnt guessed already, the Reverend Robbie is a Texan.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-10-18 00:36:08 ~ Now this is an interesting scenario. I wonder how the civil war would be fought if a Union Texas lay to the south of the Confederacy. Either Texas would be occupied, by the Rebs, or the Union would base large scale operations out of the state to the detriment of the Confederacy.

Readers Comment Todayinah Ed. commented on 2009-10-18 00:45:20 ~ My thoughts too sir. Because in OTL Houston refused to lead a rebel army to fight for the Union to avoid bloodshed, I assume that a Houston led Govt would have tried to stay neutral in the war of the states. But then again, what if the Confederacy launched a pre-emptive strike?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-10-18 02:01:34 ~ If you'd had more Germans, who tended to be strongly antislavery and actually furnished Texas regiments to the US Army, this might have worked. As it was, Texas was nearly as badly divided as Missouri or the other border states were. If Texas had stayed Union, the war would have been much shorter---a lot of the CSA's best troops and officers came from there.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-10-18 07:42:31 ~ East Texas would have counterseceded. The rump of Texas probably would have declared neutrality in the manner of Kentucky.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-10-18 16:22:34 ~ Suggesting the possibility of a civil war within the Civil War, as Texan fought Texan. This would have taken the state out of the larger fight--at least until one side or the other tried occupying it, at which point the balance would have tilted, I think, to the would-be occupiers' opponent. In any event it would have been an extra burden for the CSA.

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-05-18 22:02:48 ~ It would certainly secure the frontier for the north but no doubt Texas would have internal problems like Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, as well Tennesse and Virginia with a population very much divided and each faction determined to fight.

Readers Comment Brian Wall commented on 2010-05-19 16:09:28 ~ Maybe Scott is on to something? A split up of Texas much like Virginia, the Unionist portion becoming a US State a la West Virginia. Where would have such a split occurred geographically? Maybe like the map of the Alt US on the last episode of Fringe?

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2010-09-23 03:31:50 ~ Perhaps the C.S.A would have confined itself to itself. No Ken,Miso or Ten battles.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-23 17:36:35 ~ Geographically, the ole rule of thumb is I-35. East Texas and West Texas are pretty different places. Divide or not, this would definitely change the western theater for the Civil War, perhaps even enough to pull reinforcements from the East.


In 1993, on this day the sitcom Cliff premieres on NBC.

Cliff premieres on NBC by Gerry ShannonA spin-off of the widely successful Cheers which ended the previous year, this new show spotlights the character of postman Cliff Clavin (John Ratzenberger, pictured) moving back to his hometown of Seattle after a painful divorce and taking up a new postal route.

New characters include Cliff's father, Martin (John Mahoney), a former police officer forced out of retirement following an injury in a shoot-out; and Martin's nurse, Daphne Moon (Jane Leeves), whom Cliff secretly pines after.

At the post office, Cliff's closest colleagues include his friendly, but bumbling post office manager Kenny Daly (Tom McGowan) and the opinionated, promiscuous postal clerk Roz Doyle (Peri Gilpin).

The series bettered it's predecessor by one season, ending it's twelve-year run in 2005. Wendt would win a number of Emmys and Golden Globes for his work on Cliff. In 2001, he negotiated a US$700, 000 per episode salary for the show; and is recognized for being the only actor to play the same character on television for a 23-year run.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Gerry Shannon Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Television Source: Wikipedia Labels: Cliff Clavin, Cheers, NBS, America, Seattle.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Of course, in this scenario, another Cheers character enjoys a successful spin-off instead of psychologist Fraiser Crane, as portrayed by Kelsey Grammer.






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Desmond Tutu was the hero of Rainbow South Africa? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1997, following the overthrow of President Eugene Terreblanche's National Front party, the Archbishop of Canterbury1 Desmond Tutu (pictured) returned to his beloved South Africa after more than a decade in exile.Tutu Actuality
Six years previously, Terreblanche had pledged the support of his extremist post-apartheid nation to the United States of America and its Constitutionalist leader, President Ralph Shephard who had said of the alliance ~
"Together, we form a fulcrum that will be used to turn the world upside down".
Now after the defeat of the Fulcrum powers by Britain, Egypt and China, South Africa was itself turned upside down.
Yet Archbishop Tutu offered fresh hope in the form of a peaceful transition from apartheid to full and free democracy in South Africa; he would chair a court-like body in which anyone who felt that he or she was a victim of violence was invited to come forward and be heard. Perpetrators of violence could also give testimony and request amnesty from prosecution.
In the Tutu actuality2, the Archbishop defined his powerful vision for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission ~
"We will have looked the beast3 in the eye.
We will have come to terms with our horrendous past, and it will no longer keep us hostage.
We will cast off its shackles. and holding hands together, black and white, we will stride together into the future.
A glorious future god holds out before us, we who are the rainbow people of god, and looking at our past we will commit ourselves: never again"..
On May 3rd 1999, a new South African constitution granted all citizens the right to vote, regardless of race, color or creed. Nelson Mandela, long thought dead in a South African prison camp, became South Africa's first president elected by a majority of the population.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Watch the Video Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © The Ralph Shephard timeline by Robert A. Taylor
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ralph Shephard Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ralph Shepherd, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, South Africa, Apartheid.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, We continue Mr Taylor's thread after the falling of Eugene Terreblanche's regime sometime in 1997.
1) Wikipedia ~ Tutu was considered as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1990, however George Carey was chosen in his stead. Tutu has commented that he is 'glad' that he was not chosen, as once installed in Lambeth Palace, he would have been homesick for South Africa, unhappy to be away from home during a critical time in the country's history. In this thread, we assume this was not possible.
2) This was the introduction to the TRC report.
3) We redefine the Beast not in the Archbishop's general meaning as the apartheid system, but specifically as the monster Eugene Terreblanche himself.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2008-09-21 08:53:26 ~ This is interesting, although I know little of South Africa.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2008-09-21 14:23:20 ~ It's sometimes depressing to me that the horrific alternate reality of my imagination is only slightly worse than the reality of South Africa under apartheid.


On this day in 1968, President Lyndon Johnson met with Czech premier Alexander Dubcek in New York City in the first U.S. visit by a Czechoslovakian head of state in over twenty years.

 -

During the Johnson-Dubcek summit agreements were reached on trade between the United States and Czechoslovakia and U.S. economic assistance to the Czech government.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ground Zero Murmansk Source: Wikipedia Labels: Russia, Great Britain, America, Soviet Union, Lech Walesa.



On this day in 1971, Major League Baseball commissioner Bowie Kuhn announced that the 1971 MLB playoffs and the start of the 1972 MLB season were being indefinitely postponed. Of the 26 MLB teams which had been in business before the China virus pandemic, only nine were still functioning, and of those nine only five still had an adequate number of players on their roster.

 - Bowie Kuhn
Bowie Kuhn

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Omega71 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charlton Heston, Richard Nixon, Bioweapon, America, Cold War.



On this day in 1944, Dutch anti-Nazi guerrillas seized control of the main phone, radio, and communications facilities in Amsterdam and sent a message to Allied field commanders that they were attacking the main German troop garrison in that city.

 -

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: France44 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Warsaw Uprising, Soviet Union, Poland, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin.



On this day in 1968, Green Bay Packers offensive lineman Forrest Gregg held an impromptu press conference to announce his immediate and permanent retirement from the NFL. Gregg, still heartbroken over the Packers' defeat by the Dallas Cowboys in the legendary Ice Bowl the previous December, said at that press conference he could no longer summon up the motivation to keep going out on the field.

 -

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ice Bowl Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dallas Cowboys, NFL, Kansas City Chiefs, America, Touchdown.



In 1980, after months of deteriorating relations between Tehran and Baghdad, squadrons of Iraqi MiG-21's and MiG-23s attack the Iranian air bases at Mehrabad and Doshen-Tappen, along with a number of other military targets, launching a full-scale war between Iran and Iraq.

In the United States, President Kennedy convenes an emergency meeting of the National Security Council to address the implications of the conflict for America. Vice-President Jackson urges that the U.S. warn Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to back down or risk American retaliation.

 -

Gen. David C. Jones, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warns that a military intervention will take time to prepare and that, if one is undertaken, it must be devastating, in order to force Iraq to yield. National security adviser Clark Clifford cautions that there are significant political risks to taking sides in the Iran-Iraq conflict, and recommends that the U.S. take no overt action against Iraq. Instead, he suggests, America should supply Iran with arms, taking care to keep such efforts quiet to preserve the appearance of nonpartisanship.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ted Kennedy, Iran-Iraq War, Middle East, 1980 Election, America.



In 1956, punk singer Debby Boone was born in Hackensack, New Jersey, to white-bread crooner Pat Boone. A rebel against her father's wholesome image at an early age, she recorded the tribute to marijuana, You Light Up My Life, in 1977, and spiraled downward into a life of drugs and meaningless sex. She committed suicide in 1989 after breaking up with her boyfriend, Sid Vicious.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1927, boxer Jack Dempsey successfully recovered his title against champion Gene Tunney by knocking him down in the 7th round. Dempsey was confused about which corner to go to for the count, but his manager whistled him over before any time could be lost from the referee's count.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1903, Italo Marchiony patents his Gelato Cone, a thin cone used to hold the Italian iced dessert. The next year, Charles Menches uses a waffle-like variant of it to try to sell his ice cream, but the cone proved more popular than the filling. The same fate befell Marchiony's own gelato shop; Americans just didn't like creamy ice desserts.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1692, the last 8 witches were to be executed after the infamous trials in Salem, Massachusetts. One of their number, though, turned out to be a real witch, and escaped from her captors with a mighty spell that turned half of the township into toads.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1283 AUC, the minority religion known as Catholicism splits into 3 factions, all of whom hate each other more than they hate the Romans. Power struggles between the 3 Papacies kill off most of their followers, and a few Romans, as well. The Empire does its best to quell their hatred, but many in the Senate are more than willing to let the Catholics kill themselves.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1991, the Dead Sea Scrolls were made available to the public for the first time, by the Huntington Library. They were quickly withdrawn for further study after the Library received numerous reports of fiery letters appearing.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dead Sea Scrolls, Fiery Letters, Huntington Library, Britain, Israel.



In 1990, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom resigned after he was dealt a fatal blow by the resignation of a senior cabinet minister. On November 1st 1990, Margaret Thatcher, one of Sir Geoffrey Howe's oldest and staunchest supporters, had resigned from her position as Deputy Prime Minister in protest at Howe's European policy. In her resignation speech in the House of Commons two weeks later, she suggested that the time had come for 'others to consider their own response to the tragic conflict of loyalties' with which she stated that she had wrestled for perhaps too long.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sir Geoffrey Howe, Margaret Thatcher, Assassination, Secret Government, 1990.



In 1975, despite a determined efforts by a decorated Marine and Vietnam War Oliver Sipple, Sara Jane Moore assassinated U.S. President Gerald Ford in San Francisco. Moore was 40 feet away from the President when she fired a single shot at him. The bullet hit the President despite bystander Oliver Sipple grabbing Moore's arm; Sipple said at the time: 'I saw [her gun] pointed out there and I grabbed for it. [...] I lunged and grabbed the woman's arm too late and the gun went off.' It was the year of the three Presidents; the crises in government famously described by Richard Nixon as 'the long national nightmare' began to approach the screaming phase.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Wikipedia Labels: Oliver Sipple, Gerald Ford, Assassination, Sara Jane Moore, 1975.



In 1918, the troops of the antichrist's armies transmogrify into the soldiers of the clashing armies in the Jezreel Valley. In a moment, they are gone. Or so it would seem.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.



In 1918, British General Edmund Allenby had been in hell for three years. On June 9th 1915 he had been removed from command and transferred to Egypt due to his continuing feud with Field Marshal Haig over tactical matters. Shortly after his arrival in Egypt, he learned that his son, Michael, had been killed on the Western Front by German artillery. The paralells Allenby was seeing with the Book of Revelations, and the arrival of the antichrist's armies were just further steps on the road to hell. Where he was now, to be precise.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.





September 21



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Second Amendment had been repealed? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1791, on this fateful day the House of Representatives accepted the change made to the Second Amendment by the Senate to wit "the right to bear arms [in the service of the State militia]". The original wording had of course been more ambiguous about gun ownership for the purpose of self-defence by private citizens or indeed the ad-hoc formation of citizenry into local militia "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

The Repeal of the Second AmendmentThe libertarian significance of this revision was to place security in the hands of the States who as a final resort could overthrow an oppressive Federal Government. And of course that measure was only tested once in 1861-5, after which the Amendment was repealed.

Otherwise, [it was argued] America might now be a dystopian society with neighbourhood militia delivering vigilante justice. But of course that argument was turned on its head when an ad-hoc civilian militia saved thousands of innocent American lives by storming the cockpit of the Boeing 757-222 on September 11, 2001.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Constitution, Philadelphia, Second Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Right to Bear Arms.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality there are an estimated 270,000,000 guns in the hands of private citizens living in the United States today.


Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2012-12-16 02:11:11 ~ If the Civil War erupted over disappearing gun rights (as opposed to slavery), the South would have had much more Northern sympathy during the war. Intriguing prospect.

Readers Comment Andrew Beane commented on 2012-12-16 02:13:07 ~ Jeez, sharp implications there! I think that weak-central gov't-minded politicians would not have let this version of the 2nd amendment go through, but its interesting to think of how it would have played out.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-12-16 02:28:54 ~ Jared, I don't think he means to imply that the civil war was over guns rights, although that would have been an interesting mix of states rather than the one we got... Correct the intention was privately owned guns used by the rebels, not the cause of the rebellion - Ed

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-16 03:09:37 ~ At that time, and theoretically to this day, the "militia" was the citizenry itself in arms. A lot of the myth of the Revolution revolved around brave militia men fighting evil Redcoats. Good call, yes I have made a small but significant change to the article, thanks - Ed

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-16 04:19:34 ~ Raises interesting questions re: the modern concept of self-defense....

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-12-16 15:15:57 ~ Of course, armed citizens storming the cockpit of a large jetliner flying over a major metropolitan area poses not the slightest risk of mass casualties. . . ! Seriously, the suggestion that if only the passengers aboard those doomed planes had been armed 9/11 wouldn't have happened is rubbish. In that event, Al Qaeda would simply have drawn up its plans differently. (Perhaps it would have tried again using truck bombs, as in 1993, but with bigger and more sophisticated bombs this time.)

Readers Comment Sailorbarsoom commented on 2012-12-16 17:18:17 ~ If it was up to me, I could end all the sky-jackings tomorrow. What you gotta do is arm all your passengers. He knows the passengers are armed, he ain't got no superiority there, he ain't gonna dare to pull out no rod. And then your airlines, they wouldn't have to search the passengers on the ground no more; they just pass out the pistols at the beginning of the trip, and they pick them up again at the end. Case closed.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-17 12:01:04 ~ In fact, there have been several attempts at skyjackings since 9/11, but they all ended with the passengers jumping the terrorists, knowing that that was their only chance. The real argument for gun control was the heartbreaking tragedy at Sandy Hook School. On the other hand, if the principal had been armed...

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-19 16:18:56 ~ The key words "well regulated" when referring to "militia" would be an interesting legal issue. Being a card-carrying member of the NRA could be an actual license!




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Fascists had overthrown the United States? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the April 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1921, on this day former Assistant Secretary of the Navy and former Democratic Vice Presidential candidate Franklin Delano Roosevelt died in New York City Presbyterian Hospital. He is 39 years old. The official cause of death as listed as polio (though years later, this assessment would be challenged with alternate theories, including Guillain-Barré syndrome). An installment from the Fascist USA thread on Althistory Wiki.

Premature Death of FDRFlash forward eleven years. Herbert Hoover is in the White House and the Great Depression has struck. Hoover is unable to deal with the crisis and is blamed for America's increasing financial woes.

Without Roosevelt to lead them, 1928 candidate Al Smith wins the Presidency, with William Gibbs McAdoo as his Vice President. No Roosevelt means no New Deal. Though Smith has some early successes, by the 1934 midterms, America is in a very bad way. The unemployment level has hit almost 40%, and riots break out across the country. Both Republicans and Democrats are blamed. By this point, the number of Americans supporting both the Communist Party and various far-right, Fascist organisations is more than five times higher than it had been in 1930.

Inspired by Hitler's success in turning around the German economy, the American fascist movement, which by 1935 is led solely by William Dudley Pelley, commits to overthrowing President Smith and installing a fascist government across the United States. In early 1936, Pelley leads a 400,000-strong march on Washington, and with the backing of segments of the U.S. military, a powerful group of World War I veterans, business leaders out for their own interests and even some members of Congress, Pelley succeeds in overthrowing the elected government and establishes a fascist, anti-Semitic, anti-communist government in Washington. When this new United States allies itself with Germany, the Second World War becomes radically different...


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Fascist USA Source: Wikipedia Labels: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Fascist USA, American Nazi Party, Silver Legion, William Dudley Pelley.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in the Fascist USA thread William Dudley Pelley (March 12, 1880-July 1, 1965) was an American fascist leader who served firstly as Acting President of the United States of America after taking power in a coup de etat on April 9, 1936.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-03-11 06:48:59 ~ This would have serious consequences.

Readers Comment Mike Stone commented on 2013-03-11 07:23:31 ~ Was the US Army big enough to stage a coup? I had the impression that it was vastly outnumbered by the various State militias, so that the support of their governors would have been needed also.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-03-11 10:11:00 ~ So much for the new deal -- looks like a very bad deal. And, we would have missed all those recent comedies centered around FDR.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2013-03-11 11:26:58 ~ The Depression reached its hight in the hand-over period from Nov. 1932 to Feb. 1933. Without the New Deal the economywill collapse, and many businessmen such as Du Pont and Rockerfeller were sympathetic to fascism, nazism and Hitler - it is known as "Nazis in the attic".

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2013-03-11 13:52:35 ~ Far fetched.The new deal only added to national debt.Other like minded socialists existed.FDR was not unique.Or irreplaceable.

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2013-03-11 14:15:04 ~ I think any government would have taken similar measures to FDR's in 1933,at least.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-03-11 14:16:29 ~ I would not call FDR a socialist...but the fact that Kirk describes him that way is a strong suggestion that socialism was much more popular than fascism, and therefore much more likely to win that first landslide victory.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2013-03-11 21:32:31 ~ Al Smith was not going to be president, period. In 1932 the U.S. was not ready to elect a Catholic to that office; it only barely was in 1960.

Readers Comment Mike Stone commented on 2013-03-12 07:49:55 ~ They will if the only alternative is a Republican. If this 1932 is anything like OTL, the GOP is toast virtually whoever the Democrats choose.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-04-01 21:33:38 ~ Anti-semitism... would it lead to pogroms in NYC and elsewhere?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if early Estonian Statehood had won out? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1217, on this day the formation of the independent country of Estonia was assured by a decisive victory over the German crusading order the Sword Brethren.

Battle of St. Matthew's DayA large force of six thousand men had been gathered by Lembitu of Lehola, an ancient Estonian elder of Sakala County and the military leader in the struggle against conquest of the Estonian lands by the German Livonian Brothers of the Sword.

His adversaries were the chieftain Caupo of Turaida and Master Volkwin who led a smaller force of three thousand men at the bloody Battle of St. Matthew's Day fought near the town of Viljandi. Their ultimate goal was the forced conversion of the pagans, but in the event they were defeated and the Northern Crusaders suffered a serious setback.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of St. Matthew's Day, Estonia, Sword Brethren, Lembitu, Caupo of Turaida.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Germans won, Lembitu and Caupo of Turaida were killed. Also many others were forced to convert.


Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-01-15 08:01:32 ~ It would all matter to Estonians, and those in the surrounding countries, but probably not much significance in world events.

Readers Comment Tom B commented on 2013-01-15 08:07:35 ~ Paganism in Estonia will survive only a few decades more

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-01-15 16:28:10 ~ And for that time, they'd be an open target to any wanna-be crusader.




Older Posts 




© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.