A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Richard Tolman
 Sockless  Soviet America
 Speakers Line  The Sheridans
 The Baron  The Claw
 Warp  Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Fall of Aquileia
President Bentsen
President Ferraro
Baron Jean de Batz
Upper Carolina
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Comrade Stalin 3
Defenestration of Prague
Margaret of Anjou
Comrade Stalin 4
Nova Roma
Nixon killed
President Heston dies
Happy Endings 20
POTUS Howard Baker
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
Concert of Europe
King Henry IXth
Farthest West
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Happy Endings 26c
Happy Endings 26b
Manassas Junction
World War Expands
Fed Lost Cause 4
Fed Lost Cause 3
Happy Endings 26
James Bond
Happy Endings 25
American Napoleon
Nieuw Zwolle
Steve Jobs, Google CEO
Battle of Lincoln
VP Herter
Plessy v. Ferguson
Malcolm X
Council of Pisa
Happy Endings 24
President Seward II
Breckinridge dies
President Seward
Fed Lost Cause 8
Mayor for Life
President Fonda
Fed Lost Cause 10
Madeleine Albright
Fed Lost Cause 7
Fast Heinz
Lewis and Clark
Fed Lost Cause 6
The Candyman
Fed Lost Cause 9
PM Beckett
Ellsberg Sentenced
PM Halifax
FBI Dir Burns
Fed Lost Cause 5
Sic semper tyrannis!
Lavoisier Survives
Monty in Berlin
Ethiopia Falls
3-term Truman
Fed Lost Cause 2
Orson Welles born
Happy Endings 23
The Oyster
Happy Endings Part 22
49th State, Redux
Birth of Flashman
Lake Peipus
Mission STS-51-L

Site Meter


September 22



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Lincoln had been assassinated twelve months earlier? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1862, on this day a preliminary version of the Emancipation Proclamation was released.

An Official Duty 2Just the month before, Abraham Lincoln had written a letter in response to an editorial by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune which had urged the complete abolition of slavery. Making a clear distinction between personal opinion and official duty Lincoln placed the emphasis on saving the Union. Therefore it was a complete shock when he published the Emancipation Proclamation only four weeks later. Cynics guessed that the ink was already dry on the document when Lincoln wrote his letter to the Tribune, and he was simply waiting for an opportune moment (a Union military victory) to justify such a complete reversal of government policy.

But Lincoln never had the chance to reveal the truth of the matter because two years later, the actor and matinee idol John Wilkes Booth shot him dead. Following the bloodbath of the spring, this further horror destroyed any remaining appetite to continue the war, and threw the administration into complete disarray. However President Hamlin managed to find out a way out: a truce that hardened into a peace settlement, and a "rump Dixie" which emerged based on Confederate-occupied Southern territory. The Union retained the border states plus recovered territories that had seceded, namely Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, West Virginia, Atlantic and Gulf coasts, half of Louisiana, Mississippi Valley and of course half of Virginia.

Unlike the assassinated President, Booth did have a brief opportunity to set down a testimony which made a grim mockery of both Greeley and Lincoln's visions of the future (he blamed Lincoln for abolishing slavery rather than making an overtly pro-Confederacy statement). The Union had not been saved, and worse still, "Free blacks" were classified as citizens of the reunited Dixie unionist states but not of the US itself. In effect the Emancipation Proclamation had only taken partial effect in the Union-occupied territories, and the real consequence was the prevention of a mass migration of African-Americans to the Northern Cities. Because as much as white Northerners hated slavery, they had absolutely no intention of accepting the principle of racial equality. Whereas in the South, by the turn of the century slavery had morphed into a form of peonage/caste system due to the joint pressure from London and the dangers of runaways to Union territory. Of course in time, economic equality would begin to develop, and today, we can only speculate as to what might have happened if Lincoln had lived to introduce constitutional amendments, it might even have been a "bitter legacy" of northern ghettos.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Abraham Lincoln, Slavery, Presidency, Horace Greeley, Emancipation Proclamation.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in developing this article we taken an original idea from Eric Oppen and consulted with Scott Palter and Jared Myers, also we have repurposed content from Wikipedia. The water colour by Henry Louis Stephens (c. 1863) is of a man reading a newspaper with headline "Presidential Proclamation / Slavery".






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Livonian Crusaders had won out? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1236, on this day the Livonian Brothers of the Sword consolidated thirty years of conquests by crushing the pagan Samogitians at the Battle of Saule (trans. "Sun").

Famous Livonian Victory at the Battle of SauleUnder the decisive leadership of Volkwin the Livonian Master, the Order had been forced to cope with strained financial resources, decreasing manpower, and ill reputation. Also the Order was in conflict with the papacy under Pope Gregory IX and the Holy Roman Emperor, two of its biggest supporters, over Estonia. However, on February 19, 1236, Pope Gregory IX issued a papal bull declaring a crusade against Lithuania. He targeted Samogitia, planning to conquer the coast of the Baltic Sea and connect with the Teutonic Knights in Prussia.

The Sword-Brothers wanted to keep expanding along the Daugava River and was somewhat reluctant to march against Samogitia. In fall of 1236 a party of crusaders arrived from Holstein; it demanded to be led into a battle. Volkwin gathered a large war party, which included troops from Pskov Republic, Livonians, Latgallians, Estonians.

The knights marched southward into Samogitia, raiding and plundering local settlements. They were fortunate to strike the Samogitians before the main pagan forces, led by Duke Vykintas, arrived at the camp. Because it was his delayed arrival sealed the Livonian victory, since the swampy ground was unsuitable for cavalary and a like-for-like armed battle would have favoured the javellin throwing Samogitians had they arrived on a single concentrated forced1.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Saule, Livonian, Samogitians, Volkwin, Lithuania.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality [1] between 48 and 60 knights were killed, including the Livonian Master, Volkwin. It was the earliest large-scale defeat suffered by the orders in Baltic lands. The Sword-Brothers, the first Catholic military order established in the Baltic lands, was soundly defeated and its remnants accepted incorporation into the Teutonic Order in 1237.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-09-21 20:43:19 ~ Don't think this would have changed much in the long run, but I'm by no means a real expert on that time and place.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-09-26 13:47:23 ~ Could butterfly out somehow. Would be a different world if the eastern Baltic was a mightier center of Europe, which could be possible with the resources if it hadn't been backward for centuries.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Abraham Lincoln vs. James Shields Duel had gone ahead? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1842, on this day the State Auditor for Illinois James Shields (pictured) was tragically killed in a duel fought on Sunflower Island across the border in Missouri.

The Sunflower Island AffairHis controversial decisions had been satirised by a fellow member of the state legislature in a Illinois newspaper, the Sagamon Journal. Taking offense at the mean spirited words used in these articles, Shields had demanded "satisfaction" by challenging the author to a participate in a duel near Alton. But his error immediately soon became apparent because his taller adversary got to decide the terms of the duel: broadswords in a twelve feet deep pit separated by a piece of plywood where they could not cross onto the opponents side.

Being six feet four, the much longer arms of this lanky Kentuckian chap, a fellow Abraham Lincoln would easily disarm his irate shorter opponent. And as Lincoln menacingly sweep away brush from above Shield's head, intermediaries attempted to wrest an apology for the letters that might have peacefully resolved the dispute, but Shields stubbornly refused to back down, falling into the pit where he broke his neck and died.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: James Shields, Abraham Lincoln, Missouri, Illinois, Duel.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this post we have repurposed content from Wikipedia, Alternate History Discussion Groups and also Top 10 Universities Online which concludes ~ just prior to engaging in combat, Lincoln made it a point to demonstrate his advantage by easily cutting a branch just above Shields' head, the two participants' seconds intervened and were able to convince the two men to cease hostilities, on the grounds that Lincoln had not written the letters.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-06-29 13:45:40 ~ This has some scary implications for the Civil War....

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-08-28 12:13:32 ~ If nothing else, it might have kept Lincoln from being the Republican nominee for president in 1860, meaning the presidency would have gone to . . . who knows?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-28 17:38:49 ~ Seward could've gotten the nomination, but he would've had to start making friends among those he alienated (not one of his strong suits).

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-08-28 17:45:36 ~ Would Lincoln's reputation have been hurt? IIRC at that time, duelling was widely practiced. And maybe if he was known to have "killed his man," as the phrase went at the time, he'd get more respect from the press during the Civil War.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2012-08-28 18:21:09 ~ Yes,one of many twists history could have taken.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Palestinian leadership was bought out in New York? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2011, a last minute, negotiated settlement on a "two state solution" was finally reached at the UN General Assembly after the International Quartet broke the deadlock by offering the Palestinian leadership a $multi-billion compensation fee to accept the loss of the occupied territories.

Payoff in New YorkUS, EU, UN and Russia had failed to dissuade President Mahmoud Abbas from lodging a request for Palestinian statehood on the basis of pre-1967 territory, a unilateral move supported by many non-aligned powers. Instead, they had continued to insist that a Palestinian state could only be created by negotiated settlement despite years of deadlocked talks. And in the final analysis, the bid in New York was part gambit. Also a combination of frustration, a desire to introduce a game changer and a realisation that Israel faced international isolation.

Sensing the underlying weakness of their negotiating position, cracks had started to appear in the negotiating position of the quartet. Even though Special Envoy Tony Blair was acting in a quasi-figurehead leadership role, the British Foreign Minister William Hague (who ironically had lost to Blair in the 2001 General Election) announced that Britain might after all abstain from the vote in the UN Security Council.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered to resume talks at the UN General Assembly, but indicated that the barrier to agreement was Palestinian refusal to recognise Israeli sovereignty. Netanyahu had repeatedly argued that a return to the indefinsible 1967 borders was unacceptable to Israel.

With matters heading towards impasse, a decision was made to bypass the issue of the occupied territories by offering the Palestinians a huge compensation fee that would guarantee that the new state would be viable.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Israel, Palestine, Quartet, Two State, West Bank.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this post we imagine that the political will (and funds) existed to prevent the Palestinian applying for statehood. Our tentative observation in this story is ultimately the situation is no less desperate than South Africa, and the answer there was cash guarantees to the party forced to withdraw, so why not use the same formula?


Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-25 01:14:49 ~ Wouldn't matter. The Palestinians would take the money, spend it, pocket it, and start another war. It's what they do. The Israelis cannot compromise on recognition, sovereignty, incitement, propaganda, and a permanent end to the conflict. (There are other crazy ideas that the Palestinians have, such as their refusal to grant citizenship to descendents of the 1948 refugees (I prefer the term "fugitive population") so that they could remain an open sore. Or their refusal to recognize the Jewish National Home. But no one hears of this sort of thing in the major media because, well, as a journalist, I know why. We all know why. But the Grey Ladies all say "Harumph!" and deny everything. Sorry for the rant, but I've been writing on this subject for years.

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2011-09-25 01:28:26 ~ Stole? Oh, John, you are so misguided about this. The Jewish population of Israel did not show up in 1948 and seize the land that had been Palestinian. A Jewish homeland already existed there and had for nearly 100 years. The people you call Palestinians are political pawns being used by anti-semites in the Middle East who want to see Israel destroyed. The above scenario would never come to pass because of the reasons Stan stated above.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-25 01:48:22 ~ Gee, John, perhaps you might want to visit the mountain tops where the settlers actually live. (If these were stolen from anyone, they were goats.) Regarding land stealing, perhaps you might be interested in the history of Hadassah House in Hebron. But I am not interested in the settlements, I am interested in nasty racism, which predates 1948. I recently wrote an article on the film Miral, which delves into Arab Nazis, and the media's efforts to cover them up. Do a google on it. Cheers.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2011-09-25 08:43:01 ~ Like it or not, a whole lot of Palestinians got screwed in '48 (i.e. many fled at gunpoint, many just fled the war, none were able to return); and there are many who keep screwing them to maintain cheap political points. That being said, the Zero Sum Game is not one the Palestinians can win for any meaningful definition thereof, as getting a Nuclear Power to evacuate the bulk of it's electorate (which is what the whole 'Reset Button' theory of liberating Palestine _is_) Just Will Not Work.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-09-25 13:03:11 ~ Re Matthew Dattilo: A "Jewish homeland" had not existed in Pakestine for "nearly 100 years" by 1948. Had that been the case there would have been no need for the Jewish lobbying effort which ultimately produced the 1919 Balfour Declaration calling for the establishmnent of such a homeland in Palestine. (Please note that even the Declaration called for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, not for recognizing all of Palestine as the Jewish homeland.) What had existed in Palestine for three generations were small colonies of fervent Zionists, both religious and decular, who had begun arriving, largely from Russia, in the 1880s. After World War II, many more poured in and in 1948, armed largely with Soviet-bloc weapons (the Soviets hoped, and the U,S. feared, that an independent Jewish state would go Communist) declared "independence" and started driving out the Palestinians at gunpoint. As for "Arab Nazis," many Arabs supported the Germans in World War II for the same reason they had in World War I: to kick the British and French colonialists out of the region. For that matter, Jewish zealots attacked the British in Palestine, blowing up staff cars, shooting at officers and so on (and, postwar, blowing up the King David Hotel) for the same reason. Arab nationalists would have had to be ignorant of Nazi ideology rather than supportive of it, though, if they chose to become Nazis, for had the Third Reich won the Arabs, as Semites themselves, would have followed the Jews into the death chambers.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-25 22:17:46 ~ Eric, Eric, Eric. Check the San Remo Conference treaty that created the League of Nations and the League of Nations Mandates. It's still international law as the United Nations received the League's rights and responsibilities as part of its charter. Eastern Palestine, the area east of the Jordan River and the Dead Sea, was 80 percent of the Mandate's territory and was soon split off (legally) by Winston Churchill. It is not called Jordan. the area west of the Jordan was the 'Jewish National Home, or "Eretz Israel" BY TREATY since 1920. It's only legal government was to be the Jewish Agency, which is now the government of Israel. You can't create international law just because you don't like the way it actually exists. Regarding Arab nazis, I have written extensively about them. The Ikhwan, or Muslim Brotherhood, which may soon take over Egypt, and is the parent organization of Hamas (every Hamas man is a Muslim Brother) was known for decades as the "Black Flag Fascists."

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-26 06:29:50 ~ Sorry, Eric. i meant: "It's NOW called Jordan." A typo. Regarding other Arab nazis, see my article on the film "Miral" which was a shameless whitewash of Palestinian nazis.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-09-26 11:32:37 ~ Let's see now. If Palestine were declared a "Jewish homeland" in 1920, that'd make it a short century (as per your earlier remark) by 1948, which was my point. As for the legitimacy of that action, even then many people (and no, not just anti-Semites) saw it for what it was: an effort by the British and French to stick a thumb in the Arabs' xollective eye, not to actually establish a Jewish homeland. After all, if the "Jewish homelaand" had existed "by TREATY" since 1920, why did the British stay there until essentially kicked out? And as for "Arab Nazis," I stand by my earlier remarks. Some Arabs allied themselves with the Nazis, but that did not make them Nazis any more than their fathers' generation were soldiers of the Kaiser--and indeed, again, the Nazis wouldn't have wanted them in the party, As I noted before, had the Axis won, the Arabs, as Semites, would have followed the Jews into the camps. Just in passing, are you aware that there are devout Jews who consider Israel illegitimate? Their reasoning is that according to prophecy Israel is meant to be re-established (as a tribal kingdom!) by the Messiah, who has not yet come. (Obviously they don't grant that title to Jesus of Nazareth.)

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-09-26 20:03:57 ~ Eric, it's pointless to discuss this further since you appear to be one of those people who read a little pre-digested pap in some magazine and think they know a lot. (The Arabs had, and still have, their own Nazi-style parties. One, National Socialist Party of Syria, is a member of the Baathists' ruling coalition. The Baathists themselves are a Fascist party. But I digress.) As far as the "Tribal kingdom!" you rage about, Judaism is post-tribal. It's national, but that is another thing you wouldn't understand. Yes i know about the Neturei Karta, the self-styled "Guardians of the City." I've met and interviewed a few. They are considered nuts by every other Heredi group. I found them delusional and completely ignorant of their own history. Regarding you, Eric, please, stick to other subjects. You don't know enough to comment on this subject -- but then, again few do. I once interviewed the participants of a Los Angeles Times conference on the Middle East, each a professor and author of a recent book -- not one could identify by name important individuals in modern middle Eastern history. If you want to learn something, may I suggest that you start with "O Jerusalem" by Collins and laPierre (the book, not the horrible movie), a bestseller based on interviews with the participants in the Siege of 1948, before the siege was pronounced embarrassing to the Arabs and banned. It is a popular history, not enough footnotes, but I haven't found anything wrong with it. I would then go on to "The Palestine Triangle" by British author Nicholas Bethell, until now the standard work on the last decade of the Mandate. I would avoid the so-called "New Historians" as they are primarily polemicists -- their footnotes often don't lead anywhere and their quotes are imaginary.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Stonewall Jackson had followed Lee's orders in the Peninsular Campaign? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1862, even though the Army of Northern Virginia had achieved another great victory, it was nevertheless facing strategic annihilation. On 22 September, although the battlefield was intensely quiet after the previous day's carnage, Lee ordered Jeb Stuart to send a cavalry force to the south to reconnoitre the Union positions located there.

The Race to Hancock by David AtwellNot travelling more than ten odd miles, Stuart returned to inform Lee that the Union had established strong defences that would take several hours to defeat. It seemed that, even though Burnside had lost 20 000 troops in one day, to the cost of fewer than 1 000 Confederates, Burnside had at least trapped the Army of Northern Virginia. It was merely a matter of time, or so it seemed, before total defeat. Lee, however, thought otherwise.

Lee now decided to break out of Washington, but not to the south. Instead he would attack to the west through the Union defences just north of the Potomac and the Chesapeake-Ohio Canal. Considering Longstreet was still not fully healthy, regardless of his activity in repelling Burnside's Folly, Jackson, considered the better offensive commander anyway, was given orders to attack the next morning on 23 September followed by a full evacuation of Washington as soon as possible. This was quickly achieved as the Army of the Potomac was caught unawares by Jackson's break out attempt, not to mention it had been severely weakened by the slaughter of two days earlier, and that Burnside had been sacked on the evening of 22 September by Lincoln. Ironically, Lincoln turned back to McClellan, after the Burnside's Folly disaster, as he believed he had no other choice at the time in question.A Chapter from Hancock 1862

McClellan, for his part, did not overly want to return to active duty on the night of 22 September. Furthermore, he had not even arrived at the headquarters of the Army of the Potomac when Jackson conducted his attack. Consequently no one quite knew what to do, save for the local Union commander on the spot who, although put up a brave defence, was nevertheless overrun for his efforts. Lee had thus gained his break out and, before McClellan could order a general assault upon Washington, the Army of Northern Virginia had escaped and was on the run in a westerly direction as per Lee's plan.

Unfortunately for Lee, not everything would work his way, fore mistakenly a copy of his plan had been left behind which was soon discovered by some Union soldiers. These plans were immediately sent to army headquarters. McClellan, hence, now had the opportunity to destroy the Army of Northern Virginia in his hands. Lee's plan, for the evacuation of Maryland, became infamously known as Special Orders No 191:

Special Orders, No. 191
Hdqrs. Army of Northern Virginia
September 23, 1862

The citizens of Fredericktown being unwilling while overrun by members of this army, to open their stores, in order to give them confidence, and to secure to officers and men purchasing supplies for benefit of this command, all officers and men of this army are strictly prohibited from visiting Fredericktown except on business, in which cases they will bear evidence of this in writing from division commanders. The provost-marshal in Fredericktown will see that his guard rigidly enforces this order.

Major Taylor will proceed to Sharpsburg, Maryland, and arrange for transportation of the sick and those unable to walk to Winchester, securing the transportation of the country for this purpose. The route between this and Culpepper Court-House east of the mountains being unsafe, will no longer be traveled. Those on the way to this army already across the river will move up promptly; all others will proceed to Winchester collectively and under command of officers, at which point, being the general depot of this army, its movements will be known and instructions given by commanding officer regulating further movements. The army will resume its march tomorrow, taking the Hagerstown road. General Jackson's command will form the advance, and, after passing Middletown, with such portion as he may select, take the route toward Harper's Ferry, cross the Potomac at the most convenient point, and by Friday morning take possession of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, capture such of them as may be at Martinsburg, and intercept such as may attempt to escape from that place.

General Magruder's command will pursue the same road as far as Boonsborough, where it will halt, with reserve, supply, and baggage trains of the army.

General McLaws, with his own division and that of General R. H. Anderson, will follow General Longstreet. On reaching Middletown will take the route to Harpers Ferry, and by Friday morning possess himself of the Maryland Heights and endeavor to ensure that any pursuing forces are repulsed.

General J. E. Johnston, with his command, after accomplishing the object in which he is now engaged, will cross the Potomac at Cheek's Ford, ascend its right bank to Lovettsville, take possession of Loudoun Heights, if practicable, by Friday morning, Key's Ford on his left, and the road between the end of the mountain and the Potomac on his right. He will, as far as practicable, cooperate with General McLaws and Jackson, and occupy Harper's Ferry.

General D. H. Hill's division will form the rear guard of the army, pursuing the road taken by the main body. The reserve artillery, ordnance, and supply trains, &c., will precede General Hill.

General Stuart will detach a squadron of cavalry to accompany the commands of Generals Longstreet, Jackson, and McLaws, and, with the main body of the cavalry, will cover the route of the army, bringing up all stragglers that may have been left behind.

The commands of Generals Jackson, McLaws, and Walker, after accomplishing the objects for which they have been detached, will join the main body of the army at Winchester.

Each regiment on the march will habitually carry its axes in the regimental ordnance-wagons, for use of the men at their encampments, to procure wood &c.

By command of General R. E. Lee
R.H. Chilton, Assistant Adjutant General

Essentially Lee's plan, although party based upon deception, required the capture of Harper's Ferry in order to get the Army of Northern Virginia into the relatively safe region of the Shenandoah Valley. Here Lee believed that his army would be out of danger. However, if something went wrong, the fate of the Army of Northern Virginia could easily end in disaster.

As luck would have it, though, disaster did almost take place for Lee, until it was discovered, to the senior Confederate commander's complete horror, that a copy of Special Orders No 191 had been left behind. Furthermore McClellan, now in possession of the means of Lee's defeat, immediately set off in pursuit. Lee, however, now aware of the huge mistake, reacted accordingly, and his well made plans, detailed in the lost special orders, were forthwith rescinded.

In their place, Lee issued orders to all his commanders, most notably to Jackson at Harpers Ferry who had been held up by the very stubborn defence offered by the Union garrison there of 20 000 troops under the command of General George Thomas, to immediately withdraw to the north-west and away from their current positions. They were to move at best speed in order to place as much distance as they could between themselves and the Union Army of the Potomac, which had just managed to gain the passes crossing South Mountain. At some point, though, to the north-west of Sharpsburg, Lee planed to then form up on favourable ground and offer battle to McClellan.


Read the whole story of Hancock 1862 - the Union Strikes Back on the Changing the Times web site.


Entry posted by Guest Historian David Atwell Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © David Atwell, 2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Action Jackson Source: Changing the Times Labels: Stonewall Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, George McClellan, Edwin Stanton, Robert E. Lee.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-01-03 12:41:51 ~ I rather suspect that if, as in this timeline, Lee had already captured Washington D.C., Union morale would be so far down the toilet that the war would be all but over. Not to mention that such a capture would have practically guaranteed foreign recognition of the CSA.

Readers Comment Sime SSparica commented on 2011-01-03 15:04:45 ~ Like !

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-01-03 15:06:58 ~ Huh huh, you said "Hancock". (channeling Butthead)




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Abraham Lincoln had died in a saber duel in 1842? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1842, it was a grim errand that sent Abraham Lincoln hurrying toward Alton, Illinois, early on this morning. At Alton, he would cross the Mississippi River to a small island over the Missouri border-Bloody Island. There, he would prepare himself to kill or be killed in a saber duel to the death.

Abraham Lincoln Prepares to Fight a Saber DuelThe idea of Lincoln fighting a duel begs a burning question for the perennial speculator, the intensely curious sort of history aficionado who wonders what might have happened if Major General George Meade had pursued the Army of Northern Virginia after the Battle of Gettysburg, or if Lieutenant General Thomas 'stonewall" Jackson had survived his wounds at Chancellorsville. The question is this: What if Abraham Lincoln had been killed by a saber slash in 1842? It could have happened by the hand of 36-year-old James Shields if events had gone differently on September 22, 1842. Before circumstances turned Shields and Lincoln into mortal enemies, the two politicians had had a peaceable, professional relationship. They had been in the Illinois state legislature together, Lincoln having won election as a Whig in 1834, and Shields, as a Democrat in 1836. Illinois had an enormous debt in the late 1830s and early 1840s, and the legislature had its hands full just keeping the government operating. In 1837, as the state bank teetered on the brink of collapse, Whigs and Democrats fought over what to do. Lincoln and Shields, however, were able to negotiate a compromise that saved the banks. On one key issue of the time-building new infrastructure such as railroads and other public works-the Whig party wanted private corporations to own the facilities. Democrats favored state ownership. Shields, though faced with heavy pressure from his party, often supported private ownership. So, despite party differences on major issues, Shields and Lincoln often managed to land on the same side of the final vote.

From the HistoryNetWhen the state bank defaulted in 1842, however, there was no such camaraderie. Shields, now the state auditor, aligned with the state's governor and treasurer to adopt a policy in which the state would refuse to accept its own paper money as payment of taxes and other debts. Lincoln cleverly assailed this sitting duck of a policy, simultaneously striking a blow at the Illinois Democratic party in general and at Shields in particular. In a letter to the editor of the Sangamo Journal published in the paper on September 2, 1842, Lincoln presented a polemic designed to embarrass Shields. He chose the Journal as his forum because he had fairly free rein in the paper's columns; editor Simeon Francis was friendly to him and sympathetic to his views. Mrs. Francis had even opened her home as a rendezvous for Lincoln and his future wife, Mary Todd.

Lincoln offered up some pungent prose in his letter to the editor. He began with an earthy character, Jeff, complaining to the rough-hewn but shrewd Rebecca: "I've been tugging ever since harvest getting out wheat and hauling it to the river, to raise State Bank paper enough to pay my tax this year, and a little school debt I owe; and now just as I've got it?, lo and behold, I find a set of fellows calling themselves officers of State, have forbidden to receive State paper at all; and so here it is, dead on my hands".

When Rebecca identifies Shields as one of the "officers of state" and reads aloud from his declaration against accepting state money, Jeff explodes. "I say-it-is-a-lie?. It grins out like a copper dollar. Shields is a fool as well as a liar. With him truth is out of the question".

Lincoln went on to deride his adversary on the social scene, with Jeff recalling Shields at a recent fair attended by the eligible women of Springfield. "His very features, in the ecstatic agony of his soul, spoke audibly and distinctly-"Dear girls, it is distressing, but I cannot marry you all. Too well I know how much you suffer; but do, do remember, it is not my fault that I am so handsome and so interesting".

The letter ended with an appeal to the editor: let your readers "know who and what these officers of State are. It may help to send the present hypocritical set to where they belong and to fill the places they now disgrace with men who will do more for less pay?". Lincoln signed it "Rebecca".

Before sending the letter to the Journal, Lincoln showed it to Mary Todd and her friend Julia Jayne. The two women had a grand time helping Lincoln sharpen his barbs. They apparently got carried away with excitement of the situation; later, they picked up where Lincoln left off and wrote a letter of their own, a feeble aping of Lincoln's cutting wit that ended with a derisive verse signed "Cathleen". Shields was an amusing if volatile target for taunting. Lincoln's future presidential secretaries John Nicolay and John Hay, both familiar with the Illinois capital and its characters, described him as "a man of inordinate vanity?, an irresistible mark for satire". Shields's law partner, Gustave Koerner, said, "He was exceedingly vain and very ambitious, and like most ambitious men, on occasions, quite egotistical? In his manner he was peculiar, not to say eccentric".

Needless to say, Shields was incensed by the Rebecca letter. In an effort to get to the bottom of the situation, Shields asked Francis for Rebecca's true identity. Francis responded, as Lincoln had instructed him, that it was Lincoln. Lincoln, of course, had had help, but apparently he wanted to keep Mary Todd out of it. If the reason for that protective measure was not obvious at the time, it would become so on November 4, 1842, when he married her. On finding the source of his public humiliation, Shields, emotionally wounded and furious, had a menacing note hand-delivered to Lincoln in Tremont on September 17. "I have become the object of slander, vituperation and personal abuse," Shields wrote. Only a full retraction "may prevent consequences which no one will regret more than myself". Lincoln discussed the predicament with his friends Dr. Elias Merryman, a Springfield physician, and William Butler, the clerk of Sangamon County Court, and decided not to retract his pointed words. Shields was not appeased and again demanded "absolute retraction". Lincoln refused, suggesting that Shields take back his hand-delivered letter and submit one that was more "gentlemanly". There would be no further negotiation. Shields challenged Lincoln to a duel.

As the party who had been challenged, Lincoln got to set the fight's conditions. He did so on September 19 in a letter that demonstrated a personal trait that historian Gary Wills has described as "letting nonsense work itself out to its own demise". First, Lincoln selected "cavalry broad sword of the largest size" rather than pistols as the dueling weapons. "I did not want to kill Shields and felt sure I could disarm him?," he later wrote, adding, "I didn"t want the d-d fellow to kill me, which I think he would have done if we had selected pistols". Next, Lincoln prescribed conditions so advantageous to himself that his opponent would be forced to write off the martial affair as a lost cause. He ordered "a plank ten feet long, and from nine to twelve inches abroad, to be firmly fixed on edge, on the ground, as the line between us, which neither is to pass his foot over upon forfeit of his life". Such unusual conditions would allow Lincoln to take advantage of his superior reach; Shields was only five feet, nine inches tall, while Lincoln soared to six feet, four inches. Once again Lincoln had underestimated Shields. Shields was an ambitious, perseverant man, and his professional experience proved that. He had been a state legislator and now was the state auditor. He had been in the Black Hawk War, and during the Mexican War and Civil War, he would serve as a brigadier general. In the 1840s and 1850s he would win elections to the U.S. Senate-first representing Illinois, then Minnesota, then Missouri. In Minnesota, he would found a town and name it Shieldsville. Such a driven and determined man fights stubbornly over his reputation.

Stubbornness was only one of the characteristics that led Shields to the dueling field in September 1842. He also had courage in the face of death. During the Mexican War, he would take a bullet in the chest at the Battle of Cerro Gordo. After surgery and nine weeks of recuperation, he would return to command. This was clearly not a man who would run away from a fight to the death. So, on September 22, 1842, Shields left Illinois, where dueling was illegal, for Missouri, where it was allowed. He walked ashore onto Bloody Island ready to kill Lincoln or be killed by him.

Fortunately for Shields and Lincoln, shared friends John J. Hardin, a relative of Mary Todd, and Dr. R.W. English sped to the duel scene-at least as much as anyone could speed in a small boat in 1842-and pleaded with the would-be combatants to let bygones be bygones. It was a truly desperate attempt to bring peace, but it worked. The duel was cancelled. Though the incident ended without violence, Lincoln avoided talking about it, preferring to forget it ever happened. In a letter written on December 9, 1865, Mary Lincoln recalled that an army officer visiting the White House asked her husband, "Is it true?that you once went out, to fight a duel and all for the sake of the lady by your side?" Lincoln replied, I do not deny it, but if you desire my friendship, you will never mention it again".

Despite his bad experience with heavy-handed sarcasm, Lincoln did not retire his acerbic wit. Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln's Democratic opponent in the 1858 election for one of Illinois's seats in the U.S. Senate, learned that firsthand. Lincoln roasted Douglas to a crisp during a debate in Charleston on September 18, and that display was not a one-time happening. Major General George B. McClellan, who received many kind words from Lincoln early in the Civil War, also knew the sting of Lincoln's sarcasm. Annoyed by McClellan's slowness in attacking Confederate armies in Virginia in late 1861 and early 1862, Lincoln referred to McClellan's massive Army of the Potomac as "McClellan's bodyguard". He remarked that if McClellan did not care to use his army for fighting, he "would like to borrow it".

Lincoln never again got tangled up in the makings of a duel. Shields, on the other hand, found himself involved in such proceedings in 1850, when on behalf of Democratic Congressman William H. Bissell, he presented the acceptance of a challenge to a duel issued by future Confederate president Jefferson Davis. But he immediately set to work settling the matter without violence. He was successful. Lincoln and Shields apparently settled their differences, or at least agreed to disagree. During the Civil War, Shields was nominated for the rank of brigadier general in the Union army. Final approval fell to the president-Lincoln. He approved. With that move some 20 years after the duel that was not, Lincoln publicly buried the cavalry broadsword.


Entry posted by Guest Historian HistoryNet Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © HistoryNet
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: History Net Labels: Premature Death, Abraham Lincoln, America, Lincoln, Assasination.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, this article was written by Louis Vargo and originally published in the February 2002 issue of Civil War Times Magazine.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-27 19:56:40 ~ Fascinating. It just goes to show how seemingly trivial events can have far-reaching consequences/

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-28 22:42:33 ~ Great what if. Curious to see further details.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Benjamin Tallmadge had rescued Nathaniel Hale? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

By 1776, as with any war, victory in the American Revolution could only be won with as much success in espionage as on the battlefield. Nathan Hale, young Yale graduate and school teacher, had joined the Revolution in the Connecticut militia. He rose fast through the ranks from his spirit and dedication to the movement. On September 8, 1776, Hale volunteered to go into British-controlled New York City and gather intelligence.

Tallmadge Rescues Hale While Hale was in the city, the Great Fire broke out on September 21. Rumors flew about it being Patriot activity, while others suspected uncontrollable British soldiers, and, either way, the occupying army set upon a course of rounding up potential rebels. Hale was discovered in a tavern by counter-intelligence and eventually captured in Queens where he had fled. He would hang at dawn.

A new story by Jeff ProvineBy what very well may have been luck, a contemporary of Hale's at Yale, Benjamin Tallmadge, was in New York. He had been recently commissioned in the Continental Army's light dragoons, but he had become ill and took a short leave. Just as he was coming back to the world, the fire had broken out, and he returned to his Revolutionary efforts hiding Patriots from the British crackdown. When word came that Hale had been captured, Tallmadge planned a desperate rescue.

In the morning, Hale was marched to the gallows. An African boy, Bill Richmond (who would later become a famous American boxer), had been hired by the British to secure the rope to the tree. Tallmadge had gotten to the boy and bribed him an enormous amount of money to have the rope slip. As the drummer ended, Hale was given his final words, and the twenty-one-year-old gave a short oration summed up, "I regret that I have but one life to give for my country".

The trap was pulled, and Hale fell. Carefully filed by Richmond, the rope snapped. Before the British guard could react, a group of Patriots let off a rifle barrage, gathering the crowd's attention. Tallmadge dove through the chaos and whisked away the stunned Hale, who would come out of the affair with a scar from the rope burn around his throat.

New York City would continue in an uproar for several days while Hale was hidden and finally sneaked out in the disguise of a milkmaid. Stories spread like lightning of the man who did indeed have more than one life to give for his country, causing a surge of patriotism across the colonies. Tallmadge was soon made Washington's chief intelligence officer, and he took Hale on as a spy. The two would form the Culper Spy Ring, which would discover Benedict Arnold's betrayal, and Hale himself would apprehend the traitorous general.

After the war, Tallmadge turned to business while Hale went back to teaching. Hale would later be elected a representative from Connecticut to the Constitutional Convention, and he would quickly give his support for Federalism under James Madison's plan. Tallmadge later served in the House of Representatives, being supportive of Hale's higher aspirations. Most famously, Hale would attend the Hartford Convention, giving another speech that stirred the war-weary New Englanders toward support and away from the idea of secession. "After all, are we not Federalists? Are we not Americans? We may not choose ourselves where the will of our country leads, but we may choose to follow the course, rough as it may be". Here, he bared his scar amid patriotic cheers.

Uniting the Federalists, Hale would win a narrow victory over Secretary of State James Monroe in the presidential election of 1816. In his term, Hale would clarify the role of state's rights, work toward internal improvements, and further bolster international trade. While his economic policies seemed good, they proved perhaps too good for their dependence of European payment, and the Panic of 1820 would usher Hale out of office with James Monroe taking over and the Democratic-Republicans returning to power. Hale returned to the Senate, and the two would prove effective friends, working to balance with the Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine of defending the freedom of other nations while maintaining ideals of isolationism.

In his later years, Hale would routinely denounce Senator, then President, Andrew Jackson as a political opportunist, bloodthirsty killer, retarder of economics, and "bad fellow". Jackson replied that Hale was a suppressor of the common man, wild gambler of others' money, and "old man". The two war heroes bit into each other until Hale's death in 1834. Jackson attended Hale's funeral even though believing that Hale had cost him the 1828 election. Despite their differences, Jackson said of Hale, "He gave every life he had for his country".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Tallmadge, Hale, Revolution, America, 1776.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Tallmadge was elsewhere in the war. Hale hanged, but it was his famous words that excited a fire of patriotism in an America where many were uncertain of independence.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-09-22 14:43:36 ~ Mr. Turtledove, please pick up the white courtesy phone... :D

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-09-22 19:10:15 ~ This might have been interesting. After an escape like that, Hale would have been an icon for the Patriots. They'd probably call him "Half-hanged Hale." And I think that Andrew Jackson would have been absolutely lost in admiration of Talmadge; it would be just the sort of stunt he'd see himself doing.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-09-23 00:30:23 ~ "Every life he had"? This suggests Hale might have been immortalized in Ameircan history in quite a different way than in our timeline: not as a man willing to die for his country but as one preserved by Providence for his country.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-23 17:30:31 ~ Ironic, given Andrew Jackson's notorious assassination where the guns didn't fire because of Providence (or the high humidity in the weather... caused by Providence).




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Texan secessionists heeded Sam Houston's dire warning during the 1860 crisis? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1860, Texas Governor Sam Houston delivered a fiery speech, "The Folly of Disunion" on this day at an anti-secessionist rally in Austin.

Lone StarMany Texans heeded Houston's warning, narrowly voting to remain in the Union on February 23, 1861; Texas would not after all become the seventh star in the Confederate flag.

Born in 1793 in Virginia, Houston was a pivotal figure in the history of Texas. Not only did he sign the Texas Declaration of Independence from Mexico, but he also served periods as President of the Republic of Texas, Senator for Texas after it joined the United States, and finally as governor.

"Are we to sell reality for a phantom?"Although married to a Cherokee, and a slaveowner and opponent of abolitionism, he refused, because of his unionist convictions, to swear loyalty to the Confederacy and thus had a decisive role in preventing Texas from seceding from the Union.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Berg, Gordon. "Texas under the microscope. (The Seventh Star of the Confederacy: Texas in the Civil War)" reviewed in America's Civil War Magazine, September 2009
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Civil War AL Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sam Houston, Confederacy, America, Texas, Civil War.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that extensive amounts of content have been repurposed from the source article which concludes: "On March 16, 1861, the Texas Secession Convention called for all the state's elected officials to take a loyalty oath to the new government. Sam Houston, twice president of the Republic, as well as U.S. senator, governor and slave owner, sat silent. He never did pledge allegiance to the Confederacy, and he died in 1863 still convinced that his fellow Texans had made a terrible mistake".


Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2009-10-17 20:48:30 ~ Unfortunately, it's been way too long since my last Texas history class, so I don't remember the sane Texans in the state who wanted to resist secession If you hadnt guessed already, the Reverend Robbie is a Texan.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-10-18 00:36:08 ~ Now this is an interesting scenario. I wonder how the civil war would be fought if a Union Texas lay to the south of the Confederacy. Either Texas would be occupied, by the Rebs, or the Union would base large scale operations out of the state to the detriment of the Confederacy.

Readers Comment Todayinah Ed. commented on 2009-10-18 00:45:20 ~ My thoughts too sir. Because in OTL Houston refused to lead a rebel army to fight for the Union to avoid bloodshed, I assume that a Houston led Govt would have tried to stay neutral in the war of the states. But then again, what if the Confederacy launched a pre-emptive strike?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-10-18 02:01:34 ~ If you'd had more Germans, who tended to be strongly antislavery and actually furnished Texas regiments to the US Army, this might have worked. As it was, Texas was nearly as badly divided as Missouri or the other border states were. If Texas had stayed Union, the war would have been much shorter---a lot of the CSA's best troops and officers came from there.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-10-18 07:42:31 ~ East Texas would have counterseceded. The rump of Texas probably would have declared neutrality in the manner of Kentucky.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-10-18 16:22:34 ~ Suggesting the possibility of a civil war within the Civil War, as Texan fought Texan. This would have taken the state out of the larger fight--at least until one side or the other tried occupying it, at which point the balance would have tilted, I think, to the would-be occupiers' opponent. In any event it would have been an extra burden for the CSA.

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-05-18 22:02:48 ~ It would certainly secure the frontier for the north but no doubt Texas would have internal problems like Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, as well Tennesse and Virginia with a population very much divided and each faction determined to fight.

Readers Comment Brian Wall commented on 2010-05-19 16:09:28 ~ Maybe Scott is on to something? A split up of Texas much like Virginia, the Unionist portion becoming a US State a la West Virginia. Where would have such a split occurred geographically? Maybe like the map of the Alt US on the last episode of Fringe?

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2010-09-23 03:31:50 ~ Perhaps the C.S.A would have confined itself to itself. No Ken,Miso or Ten battles.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-23 17:36:35 ~ Geographically, the ole rule of thumb is I-35. East Texas and West Texas are pretty different places. Divide or not, this would definitely change the western theater for the Civil War, perhaps even enough to pull reinforcements from the East.


In 1993, on this day the sitcom Cliff premieres on NBC.

Cliff premieres on NBC by Gerry ShannonA spin-off of the widely successful Cheers which ended the previous year, this new show spotlights the character of postman Cliff Clavin (John Ratzenberger, pictured) moving back to his hometown of Seattle after a painful divorce and taking up a new postal route.

New characters include Cliff's father, Martin (John Mahoney), a former police officer forced out of retirement following an injury in a shoot-out; and Martin's nurse, Daphne Moon (Jane Leeves), whom Cliff secretly pines after.

At the post office, Cliff's closest colleagues include his friendly, but bumbling post office manager Kenny Daly (Tom McGowan) and the opinionated, promiscuous postal clerk Roz Doyle (Peri Gilpin).

The series bettered it's predecessor by one season, ending it's twelve-year run in 2005. Wendt would win a number of Emmys and Golden Globes for his work on Cliff. In 2001, he negotiated a US$700, 000 per episode salary for the show; and is recognized for being the only actor to play the same character on television for a 23-year run.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Gerry Shannon Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Television Source: Wikipedia Labels: Cliff Clavin, Cheers, NBS, America, Seattle.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Of course, in this scenario, another Cheers character enjoys a successful spin-off instead of psychologist Fraiser Crane, as portrayed by Kelsey Grammer.






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Desmond Tutu was the hero of Rainbow South Africa? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1997, following the overthrow of President Eugene Terreblanche's National Front party, the Archbishop of Canterbury1 Desmond Tutu (pictured) returned to his beloved South Africa after more than a decade in exile.Tutu Actuality
Six years previously, Terreblanche had pledged the support of his extremist post-apartheid nation to the United States of America and its Constitutionalist leader, President Ralph Shephard who had said of the alliance ~
"Together, we form a fulcrum that will be used to turn the world upside down".
Now after the defeat of the Fulcrum powers by Britain, Egypt and China, South Africa was itself turned upside down.
Yet Archbishop Tutu offered fresh hope in the form of a peaceful transition from apartheid to full and free democracy in South Africa; he would chair a court-like body in which anyone who felt that he or she was a victim of violence was invited to come forward and be heard. Perpetrators of violence could also give testimony and request amnesty from prosecution.
In the Tutu actuality2, the Archbishop defined his powerful vision for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission ~
"We will have looked the beast3 in the eye.
We will have come to terms with our horrendous past, and it will no longer keep us hostage.
We will cast off its shackles. and holding hands together, black and white, we will stride together into the future.
A glorious future god holds out before us, we who are the rainbow people of god, and looking at our past we will commit ourselves: never again"..
On May 3rd 1999, a new South African constitution granted all citizens the right to vote, regardless of race, color or creed. Nelson Mandela, long thought dead in a South African prison camp, became South Africa's first president elected by a majority of the population.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Watch the Video Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © The Ralph Shephard timeline by Robert A. Taylor
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ralph Shephard Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ralph Shepherd, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, South Africa, Apartheid.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, We continue Mr Taylor's thread after the falling of Eugene Terreblanche's regime sometime in 1997.
1) Wikipedia ~ Tutu was considered as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1990, however George Carey was chosen in his stead. Tutu has commented that he is 'glad' that he was not chosen, as once installed in Lambeth Palace, he would have been homesick for South Africa, unhappy to be away from home during a critical time in the country's history. In this thread, we assume this was not possible.
2) This was the introduction to the TRC report.
3) We redefine the Beast not in the Archbishop's general meaning as the apartheid system, but specifically as the monster Eugene Terreblanche himself.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2008-09-21 08:53:26 ~ This is interesting, although I know little of South Africa.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2008-09-21 14:23:20 ~ It's sometimes depressing to me that the horrific alternate reality of my imagination is only slightly worse than the reality of South Africa under apartheid.


On this day in 1968, President Lyndon Johnson met with Czech premier Alexander Dubcek in New York City in the first U.S. visit by a Czechoslovakian head of state in over twenty years.

 -

During the Johnson-Dubcek summit agreements were reached on trade between the United States and Czechoslovakia and U.S. economic assistance to the Czech government.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ground Zero Murmansk Source: Wikipedia Labels: Russia, Great Britain, America, Soviet Union, Lech Walesa.



On this day in 1971, Major League Baseball commissioner Bowie Kuhn announced that the 1971 MLB playoffs and the start of the 1972 MLB season were being indefinitely postponed. Of the 26 MLB teams which had been in business before the China virus pandemic, only nine were still functioning, and of those nine only five still had an adequate number of players on their roster.

 - Bowie Kuhn
Bowie Kuhn

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Omega71 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charlton Heston, Richard Nixon, Bioweapon, America, Cold War.



On this day in 1944, Dutch anti-Nazi guerrillas seized control of the main phone, radio, and communications facilities in Amsterdam and sent a message to Allied field commanders that they were attacking the main German troop garrison in that city.

 -

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: France44 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Warsaw Uprising, Soviet Union, Poland, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin.



On this day in 1968, Green Bay Packers offensive lineman Forrest Gregg held an impromptu press conference to announce his immediate and permanent retirement from the NFL. Gregg, still heartbroken over the Packers' defeat by the Dallas Cowboys in the legendary Ice Bowl the previous December, said at that press conference he could no longer summon up the motivation to keep going out on the field.

 -

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ice Bowl Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dallas Cowboys, NFL, Kansas City Chiefs, America, Touchdown.



In 1980, after months of deteriorating relations between Tehran and Baghdad, squadrons of Iraqi MiG-21's and MiG-23s attack the Iranian air bases at Mehrabad and Doshen-Tappen, along with a number of other military targets, launching a full-scale war between Iran and Iraq.

In the United States, President Kennedy convenes an emergency meeting of the National Security Council to address the implications of the conflict for America. Vice-President Jackson urges that the U.S. warn Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to back down or risk American retaliation.

 -

Gen. David C. Jones, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warns that a military intervention will take time to prepare and that, if one is undertaken, it must be devastating, in order to force Iraq to yield. National security adviser Clark Clifford cautions that there are significant political risks to taking sides in the Iran-Iraq conflict, and recommends that the U.S. take no overt action against Iraq. Instead, he suggests, America should supply Iran with arms, taking care to keep such efforts quiet to preserve the appearance of nonpartisanship.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ted Kennedy, Iran-Iraq War, Middle East, 1980 Election, America.



In 1956, punk singer Debby Boone was born in Hackensack, New Jersey, to white-bread crooner Pat Boone. A rebel against her father's wholesome image at an early age, she recorded the tribute to marijuana, You Light Up My Life, in 1977, and spiraled downward into a life of drugs and meaningless sex. She committed suicide in 1989 after breaking up with her boyfriend, Sid Vicious.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1927, boxer Jack Dempsey successfully recovered his title against champion Gene Tunney by knocking him down in the 7th round. Dempsey was confused about which corner to go to for the count, but his manager whistled him over before any time could be lost from the referee's count.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1903, Italo Marchiony patents his Gelato Cone, a thin cone used to hold the Italian iced dessert. The next year, Charles Menches uses a waffle-like variant of it to try to sell his ice cream, but the cone proved more popular than the filling. The same fate befell Marchiony's own gelato shop; Americans just didn't like creamy ice desserts.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1692, the last 8 witches were to be executed after the infamous trials in Salem, Massachusetts. One of their number, though, turned out to be a real witch, and escaped from her captors with a mighty spell that turned half of the township into toads.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1283 AUC, the minority religion known as Catholicism splits into 3 factions, all of whom hate each other more than they hate the Romans. Power struggles between the 3 Papacies kill off most of their followers, and a few Romans, as well. The Empire does its best to quell their hatred, but many in the Senate are more than willing to let the Catholics kill themselves.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1991, the Dead Sea Scrolls were made available to the public for the first time, by the Huntington Library. They were quickly withdrawn for further study after the Library received numerous reports of fiery letters appearing.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dead Sea Scrolls, Fiery Letters, Huntington Library, Britain, Israel.



In 1990, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom resigned after he was dealt a fatal blow by the resignation of a senior cabinet minister. On November 1st 1990, Margaret Thatcher, one of Sir Geoffrey Howe's oldest and staunchest supporters, had resigned from her position as Deputy Prime Minister in protest at Howe's European policy. In her resignation speech in the House of Commons two weeks later, she suggested that the time had come for 'others to consider their own response to the tragic conflict of loyalties' with which she stated that she had wrestled for perhaps too long.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sir Geoffrey Howe, Margaret Thatcher, Assassination, Secret Government, 1990.



In 1975, despite a determined efforts by a decorated Marine and Vietnam War Oliver Sipple, Sara Jane Moore assassinated U.S. President Gerald Ford in San Francisco. Moore was 40 feet away from the President when she fired a single shot at him. The bullet hit the President despite bystander Oliver Sipple grabbing Moore's arm; Sipple said at the time: 'I saw [her gun] pointed out there and I grabbed for it. [...] I lunged and grabbed the woman's arm too late and the gun went off.' It was the year of the three Presidents; the crises in government famously described by Richard Nixon as 'the long national nightmare' began to approach the screaming phase.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Wikipedia Labels: Oliver Sipple, Gerald Ford, Assassination, Sara Jane Moore, 1975.



In 1918, the troops of the antichrist's armies transmogrify into the soldiers of the clashing armies in the Jezreel Valley. In a moment, they are gone. Or so it would seem.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.



In 1918, British General Edmund Allenby had been in hell for three years. On June 9th 1915 he had been removed from command and transferred to Egypt due to his continuing feud with Field Marshal Haig over tactical matters. Shortly after his arrival in Egypt, he learned that his son, Michael, had been killed on the Western Front by German artillery. The paralells Allenby was seeing with the Book of Revelations, and the arrival of the antichrist's armies were just further steps on the road to hell. Where he was now, to be precise.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.





September 21



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Second Amendment had been repealed? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1791, on this fateful day the House of Representatives accepted the change made to the Second Amendment by the Senate to wit "the right to bear arms [in the service of the State militia]". The original wording had of course been more ambiguous about gun ownership for the purpose of self-defence by private citizens or indeed the ad-hoc formation of citizenry into local militia "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

The Repeal of the Second AmendmentThe libertarian significance of this revision was to place security in the hands of the States who as a final resort could overthrow an oppressive Federal Government. And of course that measure was only tested once in 1861-5, after which the Amendment was repealed.

Otherwise, [it was argued] America might now be a dystopian society with neighbourhood militia delivering vigilante justice. But of course that argument was turned on its head when an ad-hoc civilian militia saved thousands of innocent American lives by storming the cockpit of the Boeing 757-222 on September 11, 2001.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Constitution, Philadelphia, Second Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Right to Bear Arms.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality there are an estimated 270,000,000 guns in the hands of private citizens living in the United States today.


Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2012-12-16 02:11:11 ~ If the Civil War erupted over disappearing gun rights (as opposed to slavery), the South would have had much more Northern sympathy during the war. Intriguing prospect.

Readers Comment Andrew Beane commented on 2012-12-16 02:13:07 ~ Jeez, sharp implications there! I think that weak-central gov't-minded politicians would not have let this version of the 2nd amendment go through, but its interesting to think of how it would have played out.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-12-16 02:28:54 ~ Jared, I don't think he means to imply that the civil war was over guns rights, although that would have been an interesting mix of states rather than the one we got... Correct the intention was privately owned guns used by the rebels, not the cause of the rebellion - Ed

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-16 03:09:37 ~ At that time, and theoretically to this day, the "militia" was the citizenry itself in arms. A lot of the myth of the Revolution revolved around brave militia men fighting evil Redcoats. Good call, yes I have made a small but significant change to the article, thanks - Ed

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-16 04:19:34 ~ Raises interesting questions re: the modern concept of self-defense....

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-12-16 15:15:57 ~ Of course, armed citizens storming the cockpit of a large jetliner flying over a major metropolitan area poses not the slightest risk of mass casualties. . . ! Seriously, the suggestion that if only the passengers aboard those doomed planes had been armed 9/11 wouldn't have happened is rubbish. In that event, Al Qaeda would simply have drawn up its plans differently. (Perhaps it would have tried again using truck bombs, as in 1993, but with bigger and more sophisticated bombs this time.)

Readers Comment Sailorbarsoom commented on 2012-12-16 17:18:17 ~ If it was up to me, I could end all the sky-jackings tomorrow. What you gotta do is arm all your passengers. He knows the passengers are armed, he ain't got no superiority there, he ain't gonna dare to pull out no rod. And then your airlines, they wouldn't have to search the passengers on the ground no more; they just pass out the pistols at the beginning of the trip, and they pick them up again at the end. Case closed.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-17 12:01:04 ~ In fact, there have been several attempts at skyjackings since 9/11, but they all ended with the passengers jumping the terrorists, knowing that that was their only chance. The real argument for gun control was the heartbreaking tragedy at Sandy Hook School. On the other hand, if the principal had been armed...

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-19 16:18:56 ~ The key words "well regulated" when referring to "militia" would be an interesting legal issue. Being a card-carrying member of the NRA could be an actual license!




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Fascists had overthrown the United States? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the April 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1921, on this day former Assistant Secretary of the Navy and former Democratic Vice Presidential candidate Franklin Delano Roosevelt died in New York City Presbyterian Hospital. He is 39 years old. The official cause of death as listed as polio (though years later, this assessment would be challenged with alternate theories, including Guillain-Barré syndrome). An installment from the Fascist USA thread on Althistory Wiki.

Premature Death of FDRFlash forward eleven years. Herbert Hoover is in the White House and the Great Depression has struck. Hoover is unable to deal with the crisis and is blamed for America's increasing financial woes.

Without Roosevelt to lead them, 1928 candidate Al Smith wins the Presidency, with William Gibbs McAdoo as his Vice President. No Roosevelt means no New Deal. Though Smith has some early successes, by the 1934 midterms, America is in a very bad way. The unemployment level has hit almost 40%, and riots break out across the country. Both Republicans and Democrats are blamed. By this point, the number of Americans supporting both the Communist Party and various far-right, Fascist organisations is more than five times higher than it had been in 1930.

Inspired by Hitler's success in turning around the German economy, the American fascist movement, which by 1935 is led solely by William Dudley Pelley, commits to overthrowing President Smith and installing a fascist government across the United States. In early 1936, Pelley leads a 400,000-strong march on Washington, and with the backing of segments of the U.S. military, a powerful group of World War I veterans, business leaders out for their own interests and even some members of Congress, Pelley succeeds in overthrowing the elected government and establishes a fascist, anti-Semitic, anti-communist government in Washington. When this new United States allies itself with Germany, the Second World War becomes radically different...


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Fascist USA Source: Wikipedia Labels: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Fascist USA, American Nazi Party, Silver Legion, William Dudley Pelley.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in the Fascist USA thread William Dudley Pelley (March 12, 1880-July 1, 1965) was an American fascist leader who served firstly as Acting President of the United States of America after taking power in a coup de etat on April 9, 1936.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-03-11 06:48:59 ~ This would have serious consequences.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-03-11 10:11:00 ~ So much for the new deal -- looks like a very bad deal. And, we would have missed all those recent comedies centered around FDR.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2013-03-11 11:26:58 ~ The Depression reached its hight in the hand-over period from Nov. 1932 to Feb. 1933. Without the New Deal the economywill collapse, and many businessmen such as Du Pont and Rockerfeller were sympathetic to fascism, nazism and Hitler - it is known as "Nazis in the attic".

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2013-03-11 13:52:35 ~ Far fetched.The new deal only added to national debt.Other like minded socialists existed.FDR was not unique.Or irreplaceable.

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2013-03-11 14:15:04 ~ I think any government would have taken similar measures to FDR's in 1933,at least.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-03-11 14:16:29 ~ I would not call FDR a socialist...but the fact that Kirk describes him that way is a strong suggestion that socialism was much more popular than fascism, and therefore much more likely to win that first landslide victory.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2013-03-11 21:32:31 ~ Al Smith was not going to be president, period. In 1932 the U.S. was not ready to elect a Catholic to that office; it only barely was in 1960.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-04-01 21:33:38 ~ Anti-semitism... would it lead to pogroms in NYC and elsewhere?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if early Estonian Statehood had won out? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1217, on this day the formation of the independent country of Estonia was assured by a decisive victory over the German crusading order the Sword Brethren.

Battle of St. Matthew's DayA large force of six thousand men had been gathered by Lembitu of Lehola, an ancient Estonian elder of Sakala County and the military leader in the struggle against conquest of the Estonian lands by the German Livonian Brothers of the Sword.

His adversaries were the chieftain Caupo of Turaida and Master Volkwin who led a smaller force of three thousand men at the bloody Battle of St. Matthew's Day fought near the town of Viljandi. Their ultimate goal was the forced conversion of the pagans, but in the event they were defeated and the Northern Crusaders suffered a serious setback.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of St. Matthew's Day, Estonia, Sword Brethren, Lembitu, Caupo of Turaida.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Germans won, Lembitu and Caupo of Turaida were killed. Also many others were forced to convert.


Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-01-15 08:01:32 ~ It would all matter to Estonians, and those in the surrounding countries, but probably not much significance in world events.

Readers Comment Tom B commented on 2013-01-15 08:07:35 ~ Paganism in Estonia will survive only a few decades more

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-01-15 16:28:10 ~ And for that time, they'd be an open target to any wanna-be crusader.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Scots had won the Battle of Mons Graupius? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In AD 83, the Battle of Mons Graupius: on this day the Roman Conquest of Britain was finally halted in North-east Scotland where the Caledonian Confederacy defeated forces under the command of Gnaeus Julius Agricola.

Battle of Mons Graupius The Scots save Britain, AgainJust how close the Romans came to conquering the whole of Britain was evidenced by the location of the battle which was joined north of the River Dee, at the Grampian Mounth within sight of the North Sea.

The victory was a triumph for the Caledonian chariotry which decimated the Roman light infantry and British auxiliaries on the level plain between the two armies. But in a larger sense, defeat or even withdrawal was not an option for Calgacus thirty-thousand men because the Romans had marched on the main granaries leaving the Caledonians with no choice but to to fight, or starve over the next winter.

Soon after the defeat, Agricola was recalled to Rome, and his post passed to Sallustius Lucullus. Troops were withdrawn because of more pressing military requirements elsewhere in the empire. The period of occupation was not yet over, but ultimately, Emperor Domitian had abandoned Rome's best chance to subjugate the whole of Britain.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Mons Graupius, Gnaeus Julius Agricola, Caledonian Confederacy, Scotland, Roman.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Tacitus reported that ten thousand Caledonian lives were lost at a cost of only 360 auxiliary troops.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-10-03 17:58:51 ~ This would have made Culloden look like a pillow fight.

Readers Comment Rurri Heakin commented on 2011-10-03 18:53:54 ~ The big change, is probably noticable after the migration area. If Calgacus's tribal confederacy endures. It may stop the Scotti- Dalriada migration into Scotland. We may also lose, the Works of Tacitus, if he shares his father in laws, disgrace. The lost of several legions, I suspect, may be avenged. Than again, where did, the Ninth legion go?

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-10-03 19:26:45 ~ After Alexander defeated the Persians, no one used chariots again in a major battle. To hold off a chariot, one only needs a spear with the back end stuck in the ground -- a pike. Horses rarely like to impale themselves.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-10-03 20:53:03 ~ Ironically could have weakened the defensive cohesiveness of Britain, leaving it even more wide open for Germans and Vikings. Unless the tribes formed a hard confederacy, and then would could have seen a Pictish Empire.

Readers Comment Mike commented on 2011-10-03 21:48:17 ~ Had the Romans been halted no changes in history really. It did not matter that the Romans never took the Scot Highlands. If you took the border and moved iit down into Britian nothing changes so long as the Romans could keep the Various factions from forming an allience but then even then till Rome was week the tribes across the Fronteers would not mess with Rome. And Rome always kept the various tribes at each other.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-10-03 23:45:02 ~ I agree with Mike.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Tsar Nicholas II had fled from Russia in 1906? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the September 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1907, a year after the restoration of the Romanovs (most of that time being spent in delicate negotiations with foreign governments) Tsar Michael ceded the Grand Duchy of Russian America to his brother Nicholas.

Grand Duke of Alaska By Ed, Stan Brin and Jeff ProvineThe disasterous Russo-Japanese War had brought the nation perilously close to the point of collapse. With the invasion of Siberia already underway, Tsar Nicholas II met with Japanese negotiators and offered them reparations in the form of Russian America, a territory populated by 700 out of 40,000 Aleuts (even though many elders of the local Tlingit tribe maintained that "Castle Hill" comprised the only land that Russia was entitled to sell or exchange).

During those negotiations, Father Gapon led a protest march in St Petersburg which led to a complete collapse of government authority. And so instead of accepting, the Japanese made a counter-offer, safe passage for the Tsar and his family - to join the Russian cronies who had run the Crown's gold mining operations since 1848.

But by the time Nicholas II reached his new exile abode in Sitka, the situation in St Petersberg had improved. The new dictatorship had failed to hold, and his brother Michael had been recalled from France and offered the Russian Throne.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Stan Brin Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Alaska, Tsar, Russia, Czar, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this post we explore an idea from Knight-Dragon on the Civilization Fanatics Forum. Co-author Stan Brin adds ? since Nicholas is out of power in 1914, there is no one to pay Col. Apis, and there is no assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. The 19th Century sails on for decades more, without a major war.


Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-09-19 20:48:19 ~ Instant major shift for the 20th century all because some people decided to fund gold mining expeditions instead of shrugging off the discoveries. Apathy causes Hitler.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-09-20 00:04:47 ~ Certainly if Prince Michael takes the throne, away goes Rasputin as a factor. But what kind of ruler would Tsar Michael have made? Any better than Nicholas? If not, then something like 1917 might still happen.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Hundred Days' Reform lead to a political crackdown in China? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

By 1898, after the embarrassing loss of the Sino-Japanese War in 1895 in which China was soundly defeated by the "inferior" Japanese in less than a year, the nation was obviously in need of change.

Hundred Days' Reform Leads to Political Crackdown in China Idealist philosopher Kang Youwei (pictured) approached the Emperor Guangxu with a series of suggestions to improve his state. Beginning June 11, 1898, institutional reforms such as modernization of education and the military, support of capitalism, and industrialization were put into place. These progressive aspects came too quickly for the like of many conservative Chinese, particularly leaders in the Grand Council and the Empress Dowager Cixi. Plans were put into place for a coup against the Guangxu.

A new story by Jeff ProvineJust before of it action could take place, the Emperor became aware. He placed General Yuan Shikai, who had remained silent so far, upon the task of arresting his mother and various named supporters. The general's political senses latched onto the opportunity to become a favorite of the Emperor. The conspirators were taken to Ocean Terrace on the edge of the Forbidden City and kept under house arrest. Shikai would be instrumental in Chinese involvement in the Russo-Japanese War.

Noting the spirit of his country, the Emperor slowed his radical advances and impressed upon his people the importance of taking from the outside world what they could get. Education was modified after the Japanese model while the military was bolstered with a great deal of German Imperial influence. Throughout the country, spirited "Boxers" called for violent reform, but the Emperor was able to focus their energy into positive effort constructing railroads and setting up factories near mines and forests. "Support the Qing, overcome the Foreign!" became a rallying cry.

By 1904, China was a changed land and ever-growing in political influence. The Russo-Japanese War broke out with the Japanese as quick victors, but the sudden inclusion of China due to border disputes (arguably Shikai's meddling) tipped the balance. American President Theodore Roosevelt managed to mediate a peace that set Japan back, protecting Korea as a neutral position between Russia, China, and Japan. This peace would be fragile, and in 1927, militaristic Japan would launch invasions of Korea as well as raids from their long-held colony of Taiwan. The Second Sino-Japanese War would rage until 1937, when China finally beat back the Japanese invaders. The German Hitler reportedly watched the war with great interest, and, when China became the seeming victors, he offered them an alliance.

When the West began their Second World War, China and Japan launched into one another again. China had joined the Axis, helping to bring about the downfall of Russia with attacks through Manchuria and Mongolia opposite Hitler's Operation Barbarossa, while Japan kept to their old defense agreements with the British. Superior Japanese aircraft kept Chinese armies from exploiting their full advantages, but it would be the defense in the Invasion of the Home Islands that proved their merit. With Americans joining on the side of the Japanese after the bombing of the USS Oklahoma, Operation Coyote would begin the amphibious counter-invasion.

By the end of the war, China was a spent and broken land, much like their German allies. British and American forces tried to keep Japan from imperialistic occupation behind what Churchill referred to as a "Silken Curtain", but the East had suddenly been given a power vacuum into which Japan spread. A revolution against Japanese control of the Emperor broke out in 1947, led in a large part by the communist Mao Zedong. The West would leave the war to itself, resulting in the overthrow of the Japanese-backed puppet government and a new communist power in 1951, seemingly to replace the shattered Soviet Union.

After violent purges and years of gradual reform, China remains communist but with great experimentation of Western values of capitalism, just as it had taken up one hundred years before. Japan, meanwhile, rests as an aged kingdom taking up many social services to emulate its neighbor. Korea, which had been spared much of the carnage of the wars and served as bases for American troops, remains the dominant economic power in the region.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: China, Russia, Japan, 1898, Political reform.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Empress Dowager's coup succeeded. Guangxu would be put into seclusion while Cixi ruled. The invasion in reaction to the Boxer Rebellion would bring massive international influence into China, further weakening it in preparation for the Chinese Revolution of 1911, where Yuan Shikai would play politically, eventually attempting to set himself up as emperor. Guangxu had died in 1908, just one day before Cixi, with two thousand times the common amount of arsenic in his system.


Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-09-21 11:03:51 ~ Presume this happens. No Boxer Rebellion. No Russian army in Manchuria. How does the Ruddo-Japanese War start?

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-09-21 11:48:32 ~ A little confusing. Mao's victory in 1949 was largely Soviet directed and entirely Soviet supplied. It required a very specific set of historical circumstances. I doubt that it could have happened without Soviet occupation of Manchuria.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-21 15:21:01 ~ Good Double-What-If for the TL would be: what if Japan had won the Second Sino-Japanese War and been Axis?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-09-21 15:32:35 ~ Russo-Japanese War happens further north in the Russian Coastal Province and Vladimir Bay. As for Mao, I'd see some kind of counter-Japanese revolution happening, but it would definitely take a specific set of circumstances for such to be "counter" enough to turn to communism. He was a heck of a leader, tho not necessarily in the good sense.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-09-21 17:49:38 ~ Interesting...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-09-21 18:52:51 ~ The Qing would still have had to deal with opposition based on their being "foreign" (Manchus), and real reform would have endangered a good many "iron rice bowls," meaning that the owners of same would have opposed reform.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-09-22 00:46:40 ~ So, no Hiroshima in this timeline? Is the bomb dropped on some coastal Chinese cities instead? Re Stan Brin's comment: while I'm willing to believe the Soviets supplied the Red Army (they also supplied the nascent Israeli army, hoping to buy nfluence) "Soviet-directed" clashes with accounts I've read which suggest that Stalin preferred China to remain weak and disunited. Evidence? (Other than "But they were both Communist, of course.")




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the 1940 Tokyo Olympics went ahead in a world where the Confederacy survived the American Civil War? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1940, on this day in the city of Tokyo, the opening ceremony of the Games of the XII Olympiad were marked by the conspicious absence of the United States with the only American competitors representing the Confederacy.

Tokyo Olympics by Rob Barta and EdThe Union had been increasingly isolated since the Great War. At Versailles, the CSA, with her British allies, had sought to regain the so-called "occupied territories". And two years later, a successful attempt to break Japanese Naval Codes had ended in disaster at the Washington Naval Conference. The result was the current four power alliance which was being showcased at the Games. And hence the Union's absence.

Although the opening ceremony went smoothly, there were however a number of acts of defiance at the Games itself. Even though the German athlete Carl Ludwig "Lutz" Long won the broad jump, he mailed the Gold Medal to his absent friend Jesse Owens. Due to the anti-espionage measures in operation in the Union, he never received it though. For his actions in the spirit of sportsmanship, Long was posthumously awarded the Pierre de Coubertin medal after fighting in Sicily and dying in a British military hospital.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Rob Barta Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Rob Barta
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Hampton Roads Source: Wikipedia Labels: 1940 Olympics, Civil War, 1865, 1940, Great War.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-04-03 18:14:28 ~ My understanding is that the Confederacy was very lucky to get as far as it did. It was entirely dependent on the failure of the Federals to impliment new technologies, such as the breach loading, repeating rifle and the Gatling gun. In addition, their commanders during the first two years of the war failed to follow up their victories, much to Lincoln's frustration.
I don't buy the "If the South won the war" obsession. It's been done to death, especially by Harry "20 Chapters, four equal length scenes to a Chapter" Turtledove (not for publication). I am more interested in the more sublte, but realistic, "If the south lost at Bull Run."

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-04-03 18:14:28 ~ I don't see a British intervention leading to anything more than the occupation of the Canadas. (Feelings in the US were high after the 1859 "Pig War" on San Juan Island. The war was mainly a Mel Brooks comedy, but the Americans were furious, with good reason.)

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-04-03 23:57:14 ~ Would the Olympic movement even exist? A change as far back as you're postulating might have butterflied it out of existence. No big loss...

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-04-04 01:35:22 ~ I'm not sure there would have been a 1940 Olympics either...

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-04-04 01:56:14 ~ I doubt the US would boycott the Olympics. They refused to heed that call for that with the Berlin Olympics over HItler's mistreatment of Jews. Japan had done things far less offensive to the eyes of the Washington establishment.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Global War on Terror was even more frightening than Bush-Cheney imagined? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2009, on this day in Ottawa terrorists stormed the Parliament Buildings with a radiological dirty-bomb.

The War on Terror Plus, Part 4 - The Dragon HuntersElements of the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command applied bomb disposal skills developed in the wilds of Kandahar province and seen mostly recently in action after a "nuclear suitcase" incident in Downtown Toronto. Of course pacifists indicated that it was the country's very involvement in the "Global War on Terror" that invited these attacks into Canadian soil.

The extent to which Canada has expanded overseas military operations in recent year is evident from the greatest deployment of reserve forces since World War II. A further expansion in "homeland security and defence" funding is considered certain due to the new threats from Chemical, Biological, Radiological or Nuclear weapons combined with the political leadership's desire to gain the respect due to a "middle power" with aggressive moves in the North Pole.

The belligerence of Canadian Foreign Policy is in sharp contrast to the broad sweep of national history. During the middle years of the twentieth century, enlightened politicians such as Lester B. Pearson marginalised British imperialism during the Suez Crisis and also foiled the attempt to grant independence to White Rhodesia. Ironically, it seems likely that during a period of alignment with the new Western imperialists, Canada might weaken ties with the United Kingdom by leaving the Commonweath and declaring a Republic.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © "The Dragon Hunters" by Adam Day, Legion Magazine, September 5, 2009 edition.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: War on Terror Plus Source: Legion Magazine Labels: Stephen Harper, Canada, War on Terror, Ottawa, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that large amounts of content have been repurposed from the article in the Legion Magazine.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-09-21 01:03:17 ~ Wow. What's the POD? If it's referenced here, I'm missing it: I don't know that much about Canadian history.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-09-21 01:50:32 ~ This might well be the catalyst to get Canada into the active end of great-powerdom.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-09-21 01:53:28 ~ So why is Canada getting picked on instead of the USA?

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-09-21 01:53:28 ~ Dirty bombs are media scare weapons.

Readers Comment Todayinah Ed. commented on 2009-09-21 02:23:35 ~ The USA is, the idea here is that so is Canada, Britain and other belligerents in the War on Terror.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Winston Churchill had sent the fateful telegram in 1938? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1938, facing down Nazi pressure to secede the Sudetenland to the Third Reich, the President of Czechoslovakia Edvard Benes declared war on Germany.

Fire your cannon & all will be wellThe catalist was a a fateful telegram from anti-appeasement politican Winston Spencer Churchill advising "Fire your cannon, and all will be well".

Neither Churchill nor Benes were aware that the British and French Governments had been in secret negotiations with Herr Hitler to find a peaceful settlement to the crisis.

In a press release that same evening, Churchill explained that "the mere neutralisation of Czechoslovakia means the liberation of twenty-five German Divisions, which will threaten the Western front; in addition to which it will open up for the triumphant Nazis the road to the Black sea. It is not Czechoslovakia alone which is menaced, but also the freedom and the democracy of all nations, The belief that security could be obtained by throwing a small nation to the wolves is a fatal delusion. The war potential of Germany will increase in a short time more rapidly that it will be possible for France and Great Britain to complete the measure necessary for their defence".


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Churchill A Life by Martin Glbert (1991)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: India, Czechoslovakia, Sudetenland, Forties, Winston Churchill.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Churchill decided not to send the fateful telegram claiming "I should be grasping responsibilities which I have no right to seek, and no power to bear".


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-07 00:21:42 ~ Turtledove did a very similar scenario in "The War that Came Early."

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2011-03-07 00:23:42 ~ And so what happened to Czechoslovakia?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-03-07 03:19:12 ~ The Czechs would suffer very heavy casualties, but it might be enough to call in international support to take out Hitler before the war machine really got going.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-03-07 11:22:29 ~ It's "catalyst". One consequence of an earlier World War II might have been that when, in December 1938, uranium fission was discovered at Berlin's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, the Nazis would move immediately to keep the finding secret, so that researchers in England, France, America and the Soviet Union would not have learned of it when they did. Whether or not this allowed the Third Reich to develop the A-bomb first, it would at the least have delayed the start of the Manhattan Project.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-03-07 14:15:24 ~ Fight! Fight!

Readers Comment Bruce Johnson commented on 2011-03-07 14:16:14 ~ Before we jump ahead to such things as how the bomb technology would have been affected, consider this -- the Oster Conspiracy. This planned putsch was probably the plan with the BEST pre-Valkyrie chance to bring down Hitler (and the Nazis in general), but it depended on RESISTANCE to Hitler's invasion of Czechoslovakia. Not only was Germany not anything like as prepared for war as it would be a year later, not to mention the fact that Hitler would not be secure on the East and so not able to move West... the German PEOPLE were at this time as fearful of war as Britain & France. In light of this many army leaders not even directly involved in the conspiracy, but certainly not pro-Hitler (indeed willing to cover plots vs. Hitler even when they weren't willing to risk joining them), would have gone along. In short, very early on in the war Hitler and the Nazis are taken out (all the more likely to succeed if Britain & France are cajoled into supporting the Czechs - which, for all their fear, seems very possible)... war ENDS!

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2011-03-07 15:56:21 ~ Hitler Out, a Junta in Berlin willing to use carrots on pulling the Slavs of Central Europe into thie orbit, no Shoah... this seems nice already compared to OTL.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, inspired by the 1932 novel by Philip Gordon Wylie and Edwin Balmer.

In 1951, Argentine dictator Juan Peron was assassinated in Buenos Aires during a rally meant to shore up popular support for his faltering regime, which was being increasingly blamed for the host of misfortunes that had befallen Argentina since the Bellus-Zyra disaster.

Pres. Argentina
Pres. Argentina - Juan Peron
Juan Peron

Although nearly every Latin American nation had been affected by the catastrophe, Argentina had been particularly hard-hit; in fact, at the time of Peron's assassination, the country was experiencing the worst famine in its history and a typhoid epidemic that had claimed more than ten thousand lives.


Ironically, although initial newspaper reports of the assassination had suggested Peron was killed by leftist radicals, the real assassin was later identified as a 25-year-old Argentine army combat engineer named Leopold Galtieri; in a suicide note found in Galtieri's jail cell after his death, the young engineer said he shot Peron to avenge the demise of his family, who had been among the casualties of the typhoid outbreak and whose deaths he held Peron directly responsible for.


Variant entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © "When World's Collide" (1932), Philip Gordon Wylie and Edwin Balmer
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Worlds Collide Source: Wikipedia Labels: Worlds Collide, Juan Peron, Argentina, Fascist, Buenos Aires.



Apollo One

On this day in 1970, Apollo 8 returned to Earth. It was a bittersweet moment for NASA, since three days earlier Congress had voted to end the Apollo project as of May of 1971.

Apollo One - Crew
Crew

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Apollo One Survives Source: Wikipedia Labels: Apollo One, NASA, 1967, America, Space Race.



In 1960, on this day the Baltimore Orioles clinched the American League pennant with a 4-1 win over the Boston Red Sox; it was only the team's second-ever AL championship, their first having come back in 1944 when they were still the St. Louis Browns.

Baltimore
Baltimore - Orioles Logo
Orioles Logo

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jamaica Bay Source: Wikipedia Labels: New York, Hurricane, America, 1948, Disaster.



In 2008, in an interview after winning her second Emmy for the sitcom The New Adventures of Old Christine, Julia Louis-Dreyfus admits surprise at the non-backlash by audiences to the conclusion of The Seinfeld Movie

After hints throughout, Dreyfus' Elaine Benes and the fictional version of Jerry Seinfeld played by the comedian himself hook up and get engaged.

 - Julia Louis-Dreyfus
Julia Louis-Dreyfus

"I actually begged Jerry and the other writers not to go that direction", the sitcom star admits, "... not because I don't think the characters would do that. But we tried that in an early season of the show, and it just didn't gel for viewers at all. But I guess by some weird process it managed to work this time. That the engagement came about as a result of a ridiculous dare on Elaine's part, and Jerry agreed to it I thought was very true to how wonderfully shallow those two can be". Louis-Dreyfus confirms that the highly-anticipated follow-up, The Seinfeld Sequel, is set to begin shooting in New York this coming February. It is scheduled for release in the latter half of 2009.


Variant entry posted by Guest Historian Gerry Shannon Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Gerry Shannon, 2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Seinfeld Source: Wikipedia Labels: Seinfeld, Julia Louis-Dreyfus , Mark Kermode, Cosmo Kramer, The Michael Richards Show.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, In this scenario, Julia-Louis Dreyfus wins her second Emmy for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy Series. Tina Fey won the award in real life for the sitcom 30 Rock. Voter favouritism due to Julia Louis-Dreyfus being in The Seinfeld Movie perhaps?!




In 2004, on this day shortly after the season premiere of the fifth (and last) season of The Michael Richards Show, the titular star and his former Seinfeld so-star, Jerry Seinfeld, are spotted having dinner together in Greenwich Village.

It instantly sparks rumours the pair have made up in their long-standing dispute and pointed forward to the inevitability of a on-screen Seinfeld reunion.

 -

Such speculation was fuelled earlier in the year, while Richards agreed to participate in special features for the up-coming Seinfeld DVD sets. (Though notably both men were the only two cast members not to record a DVD commentary together). Both men's agents quickly quashed the rumours, Seinfeld's agent only going so far as to say, "They're old friends, and they still respect each other a lot, but they had more important issues to work out then a long-rumoured movie that may never happen".


Variant entry posted by Guest Historian Gerry Shannon Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Gerry Shannon, 2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Seinfeld Source: Wikipedia Labels: Seinfeld, Jerry Seinfeld , Michael Richards, Cosmo Kramer, The Michael Richards Show.



General

On this day in 1941, acting CPSU First Secretary and Soviet armed forces commander-in-chief Ivan Konev ordered the Red Army to mount a multi-front attack on the German lines outside Moscow.

General -  Ivan Konev
Ivan Konev

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Barbarossa41 Source: Wikipedia Labels: World War 2, Operation Barbarossa, Fascism, Ivan Konev, Axis Powers.



In 1961, following a series of private communiques between Washington and Moscow, President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev meet in New York City to begin negotiations regarding Berlin. President Kennedy continues to insist that Khrushchev drop his demand for a neutralized West Berlin and presses for the demolition of the wall now dividing Berlin.

Sen. Joseph McCarthy, grandstanding for the TV networks, denounces the negotiations as a sign of weakness on Kennedy's part.

 - Joseph McCarthy
Joseph McCarthy

"We have the strength to take the wall down ourselves, whether the Soviets like it or not," he opines. "Unfortunately, the boy in the White House doesn't have the guts". He goes on to suggest that if he had won the Republican nomination in 1960, he would have won the White House as well, and then "we'd've seen what a real American can do against this country's enemies!" Several reporters present will later privately say that McCarthy seemed slightly intoxicated.


Variant entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Berlin Wall, John F Kennedy, Nikita Khruschev, Cold War, Joseph McCarthy.



In 1947, romance novelist Stephen King was born in Portland, Maine. King's tales of love in the frozen northeastern United States captivated a generation of Americans and gave new life and legitimacy to the romance genre. Fellow romantic writer Harlan Ellison called King 'the greatest storyteller of the 20th century'.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1904, Himmahtooyahlatkekt, the North American Confederation's First Minister from 1891-1900, dies at his home among the Wallowa of the Pacific Northwest. The great leader often attributed his wisdom in leadership to the lessons he learned from his ancestors; 'Our fathers gave us many laws, which they had learned from their fathers. These laws were good. They told us to treat all people as they treated us; that we should never be the first to break a bargain; that is was a disgrace to tell a lie; that we should speak only the truth; that it was a shame for one man to take from another his wife or his property without paying for it.'

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1897, the New York Worker published its famous editorial by Francis Church, Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. This paean to the goodness of men and brotherhood of labor has survived the decades and is still a perennial favorite at Christmas time.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1866, Herbert George Wells was born in Bromley, England. Wells is most famous for his creation of the role-playing game genre with his famous game Little Warriors. On the side, Wells also wrote novels.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1940,, the vicious street fighting of the past fortnight finally ceased across London. Whitehall was seized by the Wehrmacht. Prime Minister Winston Churchill went down pistols blazing, his ashes scattered in the garden at Number 10 Downing Street. The Battle of Britain was lost, but the War on Nazidom was only just beginning. It was Britain's finest hour.

Stub Entry posted by Todayinah Editor



In 1823, the angel Moroni appears to a farmer in America and reveals the location of golden tablets that reveal a secret history of the continent, and its connection to God's favored people of Israel. This farmer, John Brown of Ohio, founded the Church of Latter-Day Saints, also known as the Mormons. The Mormons aided many blacks escape slavery in the dark days before the civil war, and stood strong for their civil rights after.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 9, three Roman legions led by Publius Quinctilius Varus fought an alliance of Germanic tribes led by Arminius, the son of Segimer of the Cherusci at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. At stake was the enlargement of the Roman Empire into Northern Europe, and the size of the armies involved were significant, representing a quarter of the Roman Army's whole European force. The decision was for Rome, which has treated Northern Europe as a satellite region ever since.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Publius Quinctilius Varus, Arminius, Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, Segimer of the Cherusci, Germania.



In 1940, on this day Operation Sealion proceeded as planned. The invasion and subsequent defeat of Great Britain was made possible by two events. The escape of the French fleet from Mers el-Kerbir boosted the Kriegsmarie to operational capability. And lower than expected losses in personnel and materiel suffered by German paratroopers during the Battle of the Netherlands, in May 1940. Intervention Groups known as Einsatzgruppen followed the invasion force to Great Britain, and were provided with a list known as The Black Book of 2,820 people to be arrested immediately. Today in Free Britain, New Zealand the purge makes it very difficult for us to piece together the catastrophe. Yet soon we will know for ourselves, he is close, so very close now.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Operation Sealion, Free Britain, Adolf Hitler, British Empire, World War 2.



In 1918, British General Edmund Allenby was seeing more paralells with the Book of Revelations than he had anticipated. The destruction of the Turkish Eighty Army and the conquest of Palestine was on schedule, alright. Trouble was, the antichrist's armies would be the new occupying power, not Allenby after a promotion to Field Marshall and perhaps a Viscouncy if he was so lucky.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Meggido Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Meggido, End of the World, Battle of Armgaddeon, Book of Revelations, Lawrence of Arabia.





Older Posts 




© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.