A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Reagan 1976
 Richard Tolman  Sockless
 Soviet America  Speakers Line
 The Sheridans  The Baron
 The Claw  Warp
 Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Baron Jean de Batz
Playing Nice
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Jefferson Undone
Upper Carolina
Nixon killed
Margaret of Anjou
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
King Henry IXth
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Xavier's Vows
Fall of Aquileia
President Bentsen
American Napoleon 2
Reign of the Batman
Seventh Wife
President Gingrich
Adams Family Values
President Ferraro
Rise of the Bat-boy
Batman: Year One
2002 MN strikes
Panic of 1893
W.B. Yeats born
Too Cold
Comrade Stalin 3
Ohio's Finest
The Death of the Duke
Defenestration of Prague
Troy Eternal
King James III
The Orient
President Edwards born
Superman Begins
Comrade Stalin 4
Principled Stand
Guru
Nova Roma
Jesus of Rome III
President Heston dies
Ike is fired
Death of the Bruce
Happy Endings 20
Failed Statelet
Reagan in 76
June Revolution
POTUS Howard Baker
Actor Reagan
Tiananmen
Jeff and Abe
Centennial Crisis
Jesus of Rome II
Night the Green Goblin died
Mary, Queen of France
Snyder Act
Nicaraguan canal
Concert of Europe
Farthest West
Battle of Turaida
Little Giant
John Hinckley
Cold, Dead Hands
Happy Endings 26c
President Scott
Beauregard undone
Codename James Bond
Op Anthropoid Fails
President Humphrey
Nathaniel Gorham
Birth of the Duke
Jesus of Rome

Site Meter


June 29



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Constantinople had fallen much earlier? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 626, on this day Avars Storm Constantinople. Following the fall of Rome to the Visigoths, Constantinople took up the mantle of Roman Empire and again established rule through the Mediterranean under the emperor Justinian (527-565). Such a massive empire again proved unwieldy, and Justinian had to install massive bureaucracy to achieve the continuation of his empire.

Avars Storm ConstantinopleWhile maintaining order, the bureaucracy was also incredibly expensive, which ironically created unrest as the populace grew weary of heavy taxes despite the wealth of empire. Emperor Maurice (582-602) created cost-saving measures whenever possible, such as refusing in 598 to pay ransom to the Avar Khaganate for thousands of Byzantine prisoners-of-war. The result was the soldiers being slaughtered, but the coffers of the Empire remaining full. In 602 as another measure, he ordered the army to make winter quarters on the frontier north of the Danube rather than march home. This action caused the army to rebel and march on Constantinople, dragging Maurice out of sanctuary in a monastery to execute him. Their leader Phocas was installed the new emperor.

A new article by Jeff ProvineAlthough popular, Phocas proved unable to defend the empire. In the north, the Avars and their Slavic allies overwhelmed the Balkan territories. In the east, Governor Narses of Mesopotamia incited a rebellion against Phocas' rule. When Phocas sent an army to put him down, Narses sought aid from Khosrau II, emperor of the Sassanid Persians, who was pleased to attack the weakened Byzantines. The Persians defeated the Byzantine army sent against them and began conquering through Armenia and Asia Minor. In 610, Heraclius, the Exarch ("regional governor") of Africa, overthrew the now very unpopular Phocas and tried to make peace. The Persians denied him and continued conquering the Levant and Egypt. Heraclius assembled expeditionary forces to counterattack in northern Asia Minor and then left Constantinople in 624 to campaign in the Caucasus.

The Avars continued their sweep across the Balkans to the capital itself with some eighty thousand men and siege equipment with the goal of wiping out the Byzantines altogether. An army twelve thousand strong and featuring cavalry defended the city, but it was the bureaucracy who managed life there. A bureaucrat named John determined that food the coming siege was of crucial value and began work to maintain the bread supply. He moved to cancel the free bread ration for the imperial guard (who had ample money of their own to spend) and enacted that overall bread prices be increased from three to eight folles to ensure none was wasted. On May 14 and 15, people gathered at the Great Church and chanted in protest. The local governing body under Bonos discussed what to do and ultimately decided that austerity must be retained in the face of the oncoming barbarians. After days of protest, the government sent loyal soldiers to chase away the chanters. Rioting began, and soon the city was set aflame. Order was restored at times, but the populace proved unresponsive even to zealous religious appeals. In the end, most of the citizenry abandoned the city and fled by sea in convoys to avoid attack Persians. City bureaucrats attempted to stop the retreat with control of the sea walls, but defenses were sabotaged by the people hoping to escape.

When the Avars arrived on June 29, few soldiers were left loyal to Byzantium. A short battle followed, and, despite superior defensive technology with its walls, the Avars broke into Constantinople. Barbarians looted what remained of the city and burned the rest, ending what had been a key position of trade in the known world. Heraclius found himself without a capital, and his allies lost all confidence. He began an overall evacuation to Africa and established himself there, though the empire continued to crumble with Visigoths seizing lands to the west in Spain. The Persians and the Avars reached agreement on a border along the Hellespont, giving both access to trade there while making it a dangerous haven for pirates on the newly unprotected strait.

Although victorious over their Byzantine rival, the Sassanids soon found themselves overwhelmed by the Arab Empire that grew up following the spread of Islam in the 630s and 640s. It eclipsed Zoroastrianism and spread through Africa to Spain, India, and northward to become the principal religion of the Huns and Rus. Charlemagne maintained Christendom in central Europe, and the Scandinavian nations joined as well. Western Europe continued as a marginal corner of the world with trade centering on the vast holdings of the Caliphates. Eventually European explorers seeking a westward route around the Muslim monopoly discovered the New World, which brought a new age of empire upon the out-of-the-way continent.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Avars, Constantinople, Istanbul, Turkey, Rome.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the government removed John (who earned the name "Seismos" or "Earthquake") and instead worked to reinforce the spirit of the Constantinopolitans to stand against the heathen hordes. After a short siege that summer, the Avars "lacked the technology and the patience to take the city (Walter Kaegi) and gave up when they deemed Heraclius' victories divinely inspired. Heraclius defeated the Persians and established Byzantine security, which was reaffirmed by the Crusades against the Turks beginning in 1095. Constantinople would not be conquered until 1453.


Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2012-08-11 20:36:27 ~ Count on A) An important trade city being built on Constantinople's ruins (place is too strategic for words if troops can reliably maintain the walls), B) Christianity surviving in Anatolia and the Aegean (note the Copts), Christianity crossing the Sahara so long as OTL's Maghreb remains part of Christiandom.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-08-12 00:50:09 ~ Phocas was just about that inept. However---popular? It wasn't long after his accession that people were bitterly regretting Maurice.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Napoleon had escaped to North America? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1815, a week after his fruitless return to Paris, Napoleon Bonaparte left Malmaison for Rochefort where he evaded English coast guards to board a vessel that carried him to the United States.

Napoleon's Escape to North America, Reboot
by Ed, Eric Oppen and Jackie Rose
Travelling to Bolton, Massachusetts, he resided at the home of the merchant Sampson Vryling Stoddard (S.V.S.) Wilder, a noted member of the small American community in Paris. He was an acquaintance of both Talleyrand and Lafayette, and in addition to the influence of their political thought, had been deeply impressed by the changes brought about in society and politics under Napoleonic Rule. Compelled to act after the tragic defeat at Waterloo, he provided the fallen Emperor with his valet's passport.

Wilder dreamt of a meeting of minds with President Madison, a potential co-belligerent who had declared war on England in 1812. But Napoleon had set his mind on a new vision shortly after after he visited Malmaison where Josephine had died only thirteen months before. And so over the next six months he collected all his relatives around him, forming the nucleus of a national union, a second France. They headed West to found a Bonapartist dynasty that would dominate Mexican politics for the next two millenia.
This blog is a reboot of an article with the same name in which Napoleon didn't make it.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: History World Labels: Napoleon Bonaparte, Waterloo, Wilder, America, Escape.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the emperor seriously considered this scheme, but finally declined, because he would leave his friends behind him. In authoring this article, we have used an idea proposed by Eric Oppen, and re-purposed content from Historum and History-World web sites.


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-07-27 02:31:53 ~ But how could he raise an army large enough to conquer Mexico? Or would be arouse the Mexican peasants to revolt? Either way, would his forces then try to annex the American West? We'll have to stay tuned...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-07-27 04:46:53 ~ Napoleon in Mexico? The British would be after him, and so would the "continental" Spanish. ISTR that at that time, Mexico was still a Spanish colony---did Napoleon end up leading or generaling the revolution that threw the Spaniards out?

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-07-28 00:22:46 ~ But what if it's the other way around...and he recruits Western Americans to invade Mexico?

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2012-09-30 14:47:35 ~ "If Napoleon Had Escaped to America" in "If It Had Happened Otherwise"

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-10-01 20:16:31 ~ Dominating politics sounds like the way to go: build up a nice series of ranches and plantations, build wealth... but how long would Napoleon live?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Custer had been successful at the Little Big Horn? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1876, the problem of choosing a candidate to fill the boots of outgoing President Ulysses S. Grant appeared to be miraculously solved by the fortuitous arrival of George Armstrong Custer on the floor of the Democratic National Convention in St. Louis.

American Heroes 3:
Triumph of "The Morning Star"
Positively beaming with the euphoria of his spectacular victory at the Little Big Horn, the "Morning Star" was very much a chip off the old block. A shameless self-promoter with a track record of show-boating, he was a genocidal, centennial poster boy for foolish men to rally around. Dripping with Indian blood, he too was an inhuman butcher devoid of respect for human life. Incredibly, his administration would make Grant's look good by comparison.

Only later during his impeachment trial would the grisly truth emerge amongst other evidence of malfeasance, corruption and deception.

One insight that the more cynical convention delegates had long suspected. Amongst a political generation that had fought the Civil War, those fomer servicemen had queried the logic of a three pronged attack which made no military sense. Because surely a concentration of forces was the best tactic for defeating a large hostile army ferociously defending its native homeland? At least until it was revealed that Custer and Major Marcus Reno had ordered their loyalist troopers to indiscriminately slaughter the helpless women and children in the village of White Deer, none of whom were committed Democrats voters anyway.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Armchair General Labels: Custer, Ulysses S. Grant, Corruption, Presidency, White House.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-07-01 03:02:32 ~ You honestly think they would have impeached him for that? Hell, they wanted to give medals to the butchers at Wounded Knee RT I was suggesting this grisly fact emerged at the impeachment as part of wider corruption/deception charges not that this genocide was the central charge.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-07-01 05:56:07 ~ YouAt that time nobody felt particularly sorry for "wild Indians," and most voters thought that Grant and Sherman had, if anything, been too d*mn merciful to the Confederates. There would have been a considerable constituency for the platform "kill them all, burn their houses, and sow the ground with salt."

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2011-07-01 10:49:43 ~ You forgot "....and hear da lamantations of der vimmin!"

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-01 15:17:21 ~ I can very much see Custer's administration falling to corruption that would've surpassed Grant's.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Huey Long had survived? muses Travis on his excellent Sanity is Dead blog. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1935, on this day in Baton Rouge, the charismatic Louisiana senator Huey Pierce Long formally announced his entrance into the race for the White House even though he had no intention of running for the presidency the following year1.

The greatest President we never had
Huey Long was without a doubt the greatest politician who ever lived
Long instead planned to challenge Roosevelt for the Democratic nomination in 1936, knowing he would lose the nomination but gain valuable publicity in the process. Then he would break from the Democrats and form a third party using the Share Our Wealth plan as a basis for its program.

He also planned to use Father Charles Coughlin, a Catholic priest and populist talk radio personality from Royal Oak, Michigan; Iowa agrarian radical Milo Reno; and other dissidents. The new party would run someone else as its 1936 candidate, but Long would be the primary campaigner. This candidate would split the progressive vote with Roosevelt, thereby resulting in the election of a Republican as president but proving the electoral appeal of Share Our Wealth. Long would then run for president as a Democrat in 1940. In the spring of 1935, Long undertook a national speaking tour and regular radio appearances, attracting large crowds and increasing his stature.

Long was well on his way to being president in 1940. If Long would have been elected president, there would be no WWII, no profits from the banking interests in Europe and America in financing this war, nor any war profits from American corporations like IG Farben. All of the best laid plans Roosevelt had would have gone to hell in a handbasket.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Travis Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Travis, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Sanity is Dead Labels: Huey Long, Roosevelt, 1936, Presidency, White House.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, 1) according to Long biographers T. Harry Williams and William Ivy Hair


Facebook Comment Comment from Alan Abramowitz on Facebook: I cant see avoiding WW2 unless Long sent an assaisination team to Berlin. The Republicans could never have won with Alfred Landon. Roosevelt crushed him in our timeline. At worst Roosevelt would have won a squeaker. Of Long ran as himself then he might have squeaked by Franklin. Father Coughlin was a anti-semite and Hollywood would have turned in him.

Facebook Comment Comment from Alan Abramowitz on Facebook: I cant see avoiding WW2 unless Long sent an assaisination team to Berlin. The Republicans could never have won with Alfred Landon. Roosevelt crushed him in our timeline. At worst Roosevelt would have won a squeaker. Of Long ran as himself then he might have squeaked by Franklin. Father Coughlin was a anti-semite and Hollywood would have turned in him.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2011-06-30 02:34:06 ~ So,he either would not have isolated Japan or evacuated Hawaii?

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-06-30 03:07:09 ~ This seems more of a what if rather than a dispatch from the alternate reality. Still, I'm sort of glad I didn't live in a world where Coughlin would have had even more influence

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-06-30 03:36:52 ~ Long would have been handicapped by his very Southern speaking...there was a lot of prejudice against a Deep South accent outside the South itself.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-06-30 11:19:15 ~ If Huey Long had be elected President, there would still have been a World War II. It's just that the Nazis would have won. Without U.S. support, both Britain and Russia would likely have collapsed. And, um . . . since when is I.G. Farben an American corporation? It might have had operations in America, but it was German through and through and would have profited handsomely from a Second World War in which the U.S. wasn't a factor. If you're looking for American companies which profiteered, try Ford Motors, which sold the Third Reich military vehicles until early 1942 (!) and made arrangements to keep its German subsidiaries operating, and generating profits, during the war; or IBM, which sold the Nazis tabulating equipment they used to track the "progress" of the Final Solution. FDR had nothing to do with either case.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-01 15:08:05 ~ Perhaps the 1936 election went to Earl Warren rather than Alf Landon. His judicial background would've been a big shift from FDR's executive push.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Irish patriot, poet, revolutionary, and nationalist Roger Casement had escaped his miscarrigage of justice? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1916, on this day the liberal journalist Henry W. Nevinson shouted out "God save Ireland!" from the back of the Old Bailey when the Irish patriot, poet, revolutionary, and nationalist Roger Casement was acquitted of treason.

God Save Ireland!Nevertheless, he was stripped of his British Honours; in 1911, Casement had been knighted by George V as Knight Bachelor for his efforts on behalf of the Amazonian Indians, having been reluctantly appointed Companion of the Order of St Michael and St George (CMG) in 1905 for his Congo work.

Unsuprisingly, no honours would be forthcoming for his work on behalf of the Irish. Because his involvement in the "Irish Plan" was unquestioned; during his time in Germany (pictured) he recruited an "Irish Brigade" consisting of Irish prisoners-of-war in the prison camp of Limburg an der Lahn, who would be trained to fight against Britain.

"I maintain that I have a natural right to be tried in that natural jurisdiction, Ireland my own country"Unfortunately for the prosecution team, it seemed that the medieval Treason Act applied only to activities carried out on English soil. And they failed to convince the court that the inclusion of a comma in the text widened the scope to include "in the realm or elsewhere" meaning where acts were done and not just where the "King's enemies" may be. And so the court decided that Casement was not to be "hanged by a comma".

Among the many people who pleaded for his clemency were Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who became acquainted with Casement through the work of the Congo Reform Association, W. B. Yeats and George Bernard Shaw. Edmund Dene Morel could not visit him in jail, being under attack for his pacifist position. Although the outcome of the case upheld the honour of the judicial system, the consequences for the British War Effort would be huge. Encouraged by Casement his supporters would take their arguments to the United States where they would cause immense difficulties for the American politicians seeking to enter the war on the Allied side.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Roger Casement, Henry W Nevinson, Treason, World War 1, Ireland.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality he was hanged at Pentonville Prison in London on 3 August 1916, at the age of 51. He was received into the Catholic Church while awaiting execution and went to his death, he said, with the body of his God as his last meal. Nevison decided that, in the end, he would remain silent. Might he be imprisoned for saying such a thing? As he was English, did he even have a right to say it? Perhaps the Irish would take against him?


Readers Comment Rurri Heakin commented on 2011-01-02 00:13:07 ~ The Black diaries released? The British spare Casement. They spared Dev, and other people Mulcachy for example. Beyond that Irish America did not matter on the question of US entry.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-01-02 07:08:59 ~ If what he did wasn't treason, then why did they hang Lord Haw-Haw?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-01-04 17:49:05 ~ With enough push from pro-Germans, America remains neutral, Allies win anyway, and America doesn't get international influence as in our TL. Less isolationism come WW2?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if one of the key causes of the American revolution didn't happen, muses Eric Lipps?

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1767, on this day the so-called "Townshend Acts" were voted down in the British Parliament.

Originated by Charles Townshend and designed to collect revenue from Britain's American colonists by imposing customs duties on imported glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea, the acts were rejected as likely to cause even more resistance than had the recently-repealed Stamp Act.

Townshend Acts by Eric LippsFrustrated partisans of the Acts demanded to know, as one of them put it in a letter to a friend shortly after the vote, "How, if it be barred that we collect monies from the Colonies in duties for Trade, or by direct Taxation, we can be expected to provide for the Defence, of those selfsame Colonies? Yet if we do not, their Agitators will cry that we have Abandoned them, to the French and to the Savages which do infest that Continent.

One might almost think they consider themselves, an independent Country, yet demand Tribute from England in the form of Protection from Attack".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Liberty Fails Source: Wikipedia Labels: America, Britain, British Empire, Revolution, Imperial America.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-06-30 06:33:23 ~ This might have averted the Revolution, particularly if the British told the Americans that they were now expected to shoulder the burden of their own defense.

Facebook Comment Comment from Walter H. Hunt on Facebook: I'm all over this one. But I prefer the Proclamation of 1763 as the villainous event here

Facebook Comment Comment from Patrick Hooker on Facebook: one of the key problems was that England saw the colonies purely on an economical basis. They didn't share information, or even consider telling the colonies anything dealing with policy. This led to constant miscommunication between the two, and only helped broaden the gap arising between England and America

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-07-01 00:30:36 ~ Of course, communication wasn't helped by the fact that it could take two months to make the crossing between England and the colonies in those sailing days.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2011-07-01 07:37:13 ~ Good irony.Independence w/o war?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-01 15:13:41 ~ So the would-be Townshend Acts were a good historical footnote instead of a must-know for civics class. We've still got Sam Adams and other rabble-rousers to deal with.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, Robin Cook said in his resignation speech that "What has come to trouble me most over past weeks is the suspicion that if the hanging chads in Florida had gone the other way and Al Gore had been elected, we would not now be about to commit British troops". Lets imagine for a moment that the hanging chads had gone the other way, and no Tony Blair either. Instead, the wise proponents of containment must confront a nuclear-armed Saddam. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2004, on this day British Prime Minister Robin Cook confirmed to the House of Commons that Iraq had sought "significant quantities of uranium from Africa" warning that "his [Saddam Hussein's]" military planning allows for some of the Weapons of Mass Destruction to be ready within forty-five minutes of an order to use them".

Britain's biggest selling popular daily newspaper, The Sun, carried the headline "Brits 45 Mins from Doom", while the Star reported "Mad Saddam Ready to Attack: 45 Minutes from a Chemical War".

Forty-five Minutes from DoomTo the fury of many figures in the British establishment, Cook urged a cautious, measured approach to the crisis. The Foreign Secretary Bryan Gould was working closely with Britain's key allies around the world, confirmed the Prime Minister. A powerful coalition was being built which would seek a resolution from the UN Security Council, sanctioning multi-lateral military action in order to disarm Iraq.

Cook urged the House to consider the key lessons from his adept handling of the Kosovo Crisis. "There was no doubt about the multilateral support that we had for the action that we took [in Kosovo]. It was supported by NATO; it was supported by the European Union; it was supported by every single one of the seven neighbours in the region. France and Germany were our active allies. It is precisely because we need that same level of support in this case that it is all the more important to get agreement in the Security Council as the best hope of demonstrating international agreement".

Yet forces outside the mother of parliaments were driving events now. And a far more belligerent approach to Iraq was adopted by his successor, after Cook's mysterious death in the Highlands of Scotland on August 6th, 2005.

Because at around 2.20pm, whilst walking down Ben Stack in Sutherland, Scotland, Cook suddenly suffered a severe heart attack, collapsed and lost consciousness. A helicopter arrived 40 minutes after a 999 call was taken, containing paramedics. Cook then was flown to Raigmore Hospital, Inverness. Despite strenuous efforts made by the medical team to revive Cook in the helicopter, he was already beyond recovery, and at 4:05pm, minutes after arrival at the hospital, Robin Cook was pronounced dead. "I may not have succeeded in halting the war, but I did secure the right of parliament to decide on war".Two days later, a post mortem revealed that Cook died of hypertensive heart disease. Rumours of foul play continued throughout the Second Gulf War.

In January 2007, a headstone was erected in Grange Cemetery in Edinburgh, where Cook is buried, bearing the epitaph: "I may not have succeeded in halting the war, but I did secure the right of parliament to decide on war". Cynics would claim another victory for the national interest, that unstoppable force that had driven British Foreign Policy since the Middle Ages.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Robin Cook, Saddam Hussein, Bryan Gould, Labour Party, Iraq.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, we have repurposed this story from The British Government Dossier and also Robin Cook's Resignation Speech.


Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-06-29 03:39:09 ~ And, in an alternate timeline, the epitaph on Cook's grave read: "Never mess with the MOD!" ;)

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-06-29 14:36:18 ~ Actually, most of the blame for the war lies squarely with Saddam himself. He's the one who jerked the UN around for twelve years.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-06-29 19:00:28 ~ Well, some of it certainly rests with him. But some rests with others, notably George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld, who made it quite clear early on that they wanted a war, and who, among other things,kept flogging a fictional Saddam connection to 9/11 as a raationale, long after it became clear that there was no such connection. Indeed, their response to the lack of evidence was to insinuate through opinion columnist (and former Spiro Agnew sopeechwriter) William Safire that the CIA was covering it up--that is to say, that the Central Intelligence Agency was cdomitting treason to help out Saffam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Britain kept the Colonies only to lose Canada? muses Robbie Taylor. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, South Carolinian Edward Rutledge writes what will become the most influential letter of the brief war for American independence to John Jay of New York.

The Rutledge LetterRutledge urged Jay to find a way to turn his Continental Congress colleagues from independence, hoping that there was still a way to "effectively oppose" the headlong rush toward nationhood that the colonials were in.

When Jay took control of the Continental Congress and began negotiating for a rapprochement with the Crown, he sent Rutledge to Great Britain to argue on behalf of increased autonomy for the colonies if they would yield to continued British rule. Rutledge found many in Britain's Parliament eager to accede to American demands in order to free up forces for the disastrous war in Canada, and his own affinity for the British won him enough allies to push his measures through and end the war between the American colonies and Great Britain.
This post is an article from the Canadian Revolution thread.


Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Canadian Rev Labels: Canada, America, War of Independence, John Jay, Edward Rutledge.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-13 15:39:07 ~ Certainly a lot of Loyalists in the South, true. I wonder if the North would have revolted without the South?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-08-13 22:25:03 ~ I doubt it would hve dared, as Southerners wuld then have flocked to join colonial militias fighting alongside the British. A North-only rebellion would have been sure to fail.


In 1984, Muammar Khadafy was indicted in the Hague before a UN war crimes tribunal; it marked the first time in thirty-eight years a senior official from a dictatorship had been so charged.

 -

It wouldn't be the last, however, as Khadafy would be joined in the dock before the end of the year by fellow Middle East tyrant Saddam Hussein.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Battlefield Alaska Source: Wikipedia Labels: Khadafy, Libya, America, 1984, Cold War.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-12-08 00:28:06 ~ I think I made a mistake with this entry; it was supposed to be dated June 29th. Can you make the appropriate corrections? Thank you.


In 2003, the Australian military sent couriers to the US, Russian, British and Chinese militaries with samples of nanobots and the process for making more. Multiple couriers went to each target nation, in case of capture.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1941, Kwame Toure, future leader of the American underground organization, the Semitic-African Resistance, is born. One of the galvanizing moments of his life happens in his first few hours: the neo-Nazi supported German People's Underground fires several nuclear missiles at Greater Zionist-controlled cities across Europe.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Protocols Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Elders of Protocols of Zion, Robbie A. Taylor, Greater Zionist Resistence, GZR, Nazi.



In 4561, casualties on either side of the siege of Hanoi stand at 200,000 fatalities as the final week of battle begins. The Chinese forces move slowly into the city, fighting every inch of the way against truly horrifying opposition from the citizens and military inside the city. In his memoirs of the Battle of Hanoi, Imperial General Zuo Zongtang said that he would prefer being dropped into the deepest of the hells to fighting the Viet again.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Chdo Democracy Labels: Chdo_Democracy, Robbie A. Taylor, China, 4648, Emperor Dao-Ming.



In 1999, Sir Lance du Lac meets with a small team of his Round Table Corps in London. 'Much like myself,' he tells them, 'the king has become bewitched by Queen Gwen's charms. He freed me; I aim to do the same for him.' The three knights he has brought together to aid him murmur about treason - Sir Lance cuts through this sharply. 'It is not treason to rescue our beloved King Arthur from the clutches of the woman who sent him into a coma. Indeed, it is the highest form of patriotism. The king needs our help. Which of you will stand ready for him?' Slowly, all three of the other knights raise their hands. Satisfied, Sir Lance tells them, 'We shall move tomorrow night.'

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Arthur II Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Arthur Pendragon, Robbie A. Taylor, Camelot Redux, Merlin, England.



In 1644, Charles I of England defeated a Parliamentarian detachment at the Battle of Cropredy Bridge. The rebellion was starting to quell, and the House of Stuart was about to enjoy the golden era of their quad centennial rule that ended with the velvet revolution of 1989.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Cropredy Bridge, English Civil War, Beheading, King Charles I, Britain.



In 2001, a memorial in honour of Charles Windsor, Prince of Wales, is to be built in London's Hyde Park, the government announced. The GBP 3m fountain will be built on the site of a derelict pump house and chlorination plant on the banks of the Serpentine - the 40-acre artificial lake in the royal park. The prince, who would have been 53 this year, was killed in a high-speed car crash in Paris with his lover Camilla Parker-Bowles almost four years ago. Teams of architects will now be invited to tender designs for the memorial, which will be paid for by public funds.

Charles Windsor
Charles Windsor - Prince
Prince

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Prince Charles, Charles Windsor, 2001 Memorial, Camilla Parker Bowles, Royal Family.



In 1974, on this day Eva Peron was sworn in as interim leader of the Argentine Republic. Her husband President Juan Peron delegated responsibility after doctors said he required 24-hour medical attention and rest. Mrs Peron was now Argentina's first female president and at 55 the youngest Latin American head of state. Her 78-year-old husband has not been seen in public for two weeks and is reported to be seriously ill with bronchitis and influenza. In a state broadcast, Mrs Peron said her husband was 'conscious that his state of health prevents him from directly attending to government affairs until his recovery'. Peron would become Argentina's greatest President. As the 'Iron Lady', she defeated the British in the 1982 Malvinas Conflict and recovered the sovereignty (and prestige) of the lost islands.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Peron Dynasty, Argentina, Malvinas, Falklands, Britain.



In 1970, NBC aired The Judy & Liza Show, which paired the mother-daughter team of Judy Garland and Liza Minelli. The emotional show, featuring music and skits between them, won several Emmys, including Ms. Garland's first after 3 other nominations. Accepting the award, she thanked God, Reverend Martin King, and her daughter, 'who's been on this road with me for so long. I love you, honey.' It was all the more poignant because they had each been nominated in the same category, and rumor had it that Ms. Minelli wanted the award just as much for herself as for her mother. Still, when her mother won, they embraced and the two seemed to bear no ill will towards each other afterwards.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Society Source: Wikipedia Labels: Judy & Liza Show, Judy Garland, Liza Minelli, Hollywood, Broadway.



In 1964, producer Bob Wesley's show Star Trek airs its pilot, The Cage. Although the pilot is disappointing, the show's concept excites the test audience, and Wesley reworks the cast and script. With a new cast starring Canadian William Shatner, the series was a phenomenal hit, running through 1973 and inspiring a wave of science fiction on television.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Society Source: Wikipedia Labels: Bob Wesley, The Cage, Star Trek, Hollywood, William Shatner.



In 1956, blonde bombshell Norma Jeane Mortenson married famed humorist Arthur Miller. When asked why she had chosen a man who was not exactly known for his physique, Mrs. Miller answered, 'He makes me laugh.' Indeed, the sex goddess seemed much happier after the marriage, and the two laughed away their years together until Mrs. Miller's death in 2001.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Personalities Source: Wikipedia Labels: Norma Jeane Mortenson, Arthur Miller, Marilyn Monroe, Hollywood, America.



In 1613, London's Globe Theatre burns down. Suspicion immediately falls on William Shakespeare, who had been presenting himself as the author of several plays penned by Francis Bacon until Bacon revealed himself as the author. Shakespeare's life had taken a sharp downturn since that time, and the entire theatrical community knew that he harbored a dep grudge against Bacon for stealing that prestige from him.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Society Source: Wikipedia Labels: Globe Theatre, William Shakespeare, The Bard, Francis Bacon, Playwright.



In 1974, Emperor Napoleon V Airport was belatedly opened by the Mayor of Paris, Andre Joseph Marie de Gaulle. The event was almost marred by an assassination attempt on the Major. The assassin known as the Jackal, disguised as a war veteran, made his way to a building which faced the runway where de Gaulle presented veterans with medals. However, the Jackal failed to take into account the Gallic custom of kissing on both cheeks, expecting instead that de Gaulle would shake hands with the medal recipient. As the Jackal fired, de Gaulle simultaneously moved forward to kiss the recipient on the cheeks, causing the bullet to miss.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Andre Joseph Marie de Gaulle, Day of the Jackal, France, Assassination, Premature Death.



In 2007, conspiracy theories that dispute the official version of US President John F. Kennedy's assassination have been given a major boost by tests in Italy. Army-supervised tests on a rifle identical to the Italian-made weapon Lee Harvey Oswald allegedly used to murder the president suggest he could not have been working alone.

According to the official Warren Commission report on the assassination, Oswald loaded and fired three shots at Kennedy in seven seconds in Dallas on November 22, 1963. He used a Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle. The first shot missed the president, the second went through his back and neck and the third hit Kennedy in the head, killing him. But the Italian tests showed that it would take a minimum of 19 seconds to load and fire three shots using a Carcano M91/38. So there must have been at least one more sniper for so many shots to have been fired in such a short space of time, the experts believe.

The tests were carried out at the former Carcano factory in the town of Terni, around 100km north of Rome, where the alleged murder weapon was produced in 1940. The research also raised questions about whether the Commission's conclusion that the third bullet disintegrated when it hit Kennedy's head is compatible with the supposition that Oswald was about 80 meters away in a book depository when he fired the shot.Tests on the Carcano M91/38 suggested the bullet would have remained intact and come out of Kennedy's forehead, if fired from that distance. The tests also focused on the so-called 'magic bullet' of the second shot. The Warren Report concluded the bullet passed through Kennedy's body and hit then-Texas Governor John Connally in the back, chest and wrist, remaining almost perfectly intact at the end. Bullets fired through two blocks of meat in the Italian tests were so deformed that experts concluded it would have been impossible for the bullet to remain intact.

Over the years sceptics have picked at suspected inconsistencies in the official version of the Warren Commission - named after Chief Justice Earl Warren - to support a wide range of conspiracy theories.

Entry posted by Guest Historian Marco Pertoni Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Marco Pertoni, 2007.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Yahoo! Discussion Group Labels: John F Kennedy, Assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald, Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle, Italy.



In 614, Allah is merciful as Christian rebel Ferdinand of Castille is driven from Cordoba by the faithful Moors. The infidels are pushed north, where they last for another century before the faithful can destroy them.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ferdinand of Castille, Moors, Spain, Islam, Christendom Defeated.



Saint Paul

In 3828 by the Hebrew Calendar, Saul of Tarsus died in Rome of the thorn in his flesh (Old Testament - thorns means enemies). And the murderer was none other than the amanuensis Paul had often employed for authoring his Epistles, only occasionally writing himself.

Saint Paul -

Variant entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: American Catholic Labels: Paul, Thorn, Epistles, Rome, American Catholic.





June 28



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Charles Lee had controlled his temper at Monmouth? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the November 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1778, on this day Major General Charles Lee was forced to withdrew his advanced guard from the Monmouth Court House in the face of overwhelming British opposition.
A reversal of the earliest post All Hail King Washington.

Long Live King LeeThe decision left Major General George Washington incandescent with rage, and he immediately called for the court martial of his second in command (Washington had wanted to test the abilities of Lee's troops, since they were among the first to be trained in European tactics by Baron von Steuben). Fortunately, knowing Lee's famous weakness for insubordination, his loyal officers managed to avoid an angry confrontation between the two men (married to Mohawk woman he was called "Chief Boiling Waters" by that tribe due to his foul temperament).

At the court martial in Englishtown, the blame for the failures of the day were placed squarely on General Washington's shoulders, ensuring that the vindicated Lee would succeed him as Commander in Chief of the Continental Army. Fate intervened, when a disheartened Washington was captured shortly thereafter (there were even rumours that he may have "turned coat". If so, this was ironic given that Lee was born in England unlike Washington who was a native Virginian).

Even if Lee and Washington could be considered equals in terms of military prowess, their mentalities were fundamentally different. Because Lee had absolutely no problem in accepting the crown when it was eventually offered to him at Philadelphia. After all, he was an Englishman.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: George Washington, Presidency, Tyrant, Battle of Monthmouth, Charles Lee.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we explore an idea from Eric Oppen, repurpose a suggestion to reverse the fates of Lee and Washington from Alternate History and again pay homage to All Hail King Washington in Assassin's Creed III'S DLC.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-10-15 01:59:58 ~ Mr. Turtledove, please pick up the white courtesy phone.... :)

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-10-15 22:33:54 ~ Assuming that Washington's removal as commander in chief didn't doom the Revolution, it's still unlikely that Charles Lee would have been offered a crown. There simply wasn't enough support for establishing an American monarchy.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-10-16 00:31:45 ~ Charles Lee was probably part of the famous dynasty that also produced Robert E. Lee, right? And Robert E. might have been much less likely to lead a rebellion against President Lee, less than 100 years later. And if Robert E. Lee had stayed out of the Confederacy...or even led the Union Army, as he was invited to do...then the Civil War might have been much shorter. In fact, could it be that it might never have happened at all?

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-10-16 01:12:52 ~ I know, I know...I should have said that "Robert E. might have been much less likely to lead a rebellion against King Charles Lee's successors." I just could not stop thinking of America as having presidents. Sorry about that.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-10-16 01:49:41 ~ He'd probably have gone by "King Charles."

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-10-16 05:51:42 ~ Would those southerners have stood for a king? Doubtful. I think it might have imploded the Confederacy idea, and sparked another internal not-so-civil war long before the real one in 1861-1865.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-10-16 11:56:29 ~ Mike, it seems to me more likely that the Boston Yankees are the ones who would have rejected a monarchy.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-10-17 18:25:17 ~ I could see King Robert freeing the slaves.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Joe Biden and Paul Ryan had both been alive, young and still residing in their ancestral Ireland during the Civil War? Here's how it might have turned out..? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the November 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

It is June 28, 1922, and the Irish Civil War is about to begin.

Brendan Biden and Paddy RyanBrendan Biden and Paddy Ryan have both helped to fight the British Army to a standstill, but now a treaty has been signed that is tearing the rebels apart.

Biden, who is also called the Laughing Boy, is standing with Eamon de Valera and the Irish Republican Army, in demanding an independent Republic. Ryan, on the other hand, has taken the side of compromise, with Michael Collins and the Irish Free State, which will still be part of the empire. The two sides collide when Ryan leads the attack on the Four Courts building, which Biden is holding along with his fellow IRA men. Led by two such dedicated patriots, the battle is the beginning of the Irish Civil War.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jackie Rose Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jackie Rose, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Joe Biden, Paul Ryan, Ireland, Catholic, IRA.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality, Biden and Ryan were the respective US VP candidates in the 2012 election, notably, both Catholic and of Irish descent.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-10-17 07:42:59 ~ Would they be "The IRA Who Couldn't Shoot or Think Straight?"

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-10-17 10:20:44 ~ I see a slight edge for Biden in this battle, so long as he can fire rhetorical bullets and keep smiling.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-10-17 11:43:32 ~ As long as Biden runs with that Black Irishman O'Bama, he won't loose.....




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Siege of Antioch had failed? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1098, on this day the eight month Crusader's Siege of Antioch was finally relieved by a Muslim army from Mosul under the command of Kerbogha.

Allah Wills IT!Although a huge force of over one hundred thousand men had departed from Catholic Europe, the Crusader Army had been greatly weakened by attacks from two Muslim armies. And Antioch was so large that the crusaders did not have enough troops to fully surround it, and as a result it was able to stay partially supplied.

The crusaders knew they would have to take the city before Kerbogha arrived if they had any chance of survival. Bohemund secretly established contact with Firouz, an Armenian guard who controlled the Tower of the Two Sisters but had a grudge with Yaghi-Siyan, and bribed him to open the gates. He then approached the other crusaders and offered to let them in, through Firouz, if they would agree to let him have the city. Raymond was furious and argued that the city should be handed over to Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos, as they had agreed when they left Constantinople in 1097. They were still arguing when Kerbogha arrived.

Although the defeat at Antioch was a military setback for the Crusaders, their retreating troops were reinforced by a Byzantine Army. And their subsequent success upheld the overarching principle of the First Crusade, to save the Byzantine Empire which could have been easily undermined by the establishment of Frankish States as secretly desired by Godfrey, Tancred, Robert, and the other leaders.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Crusade, Antioch, Allah, Religion, Holy Land.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality [reports Wikipedia] the crusaders knew they would have to take the city before Kerbogha arrived if they had any chance of survival. Bohemund secretly established contact with Firouz, an Armenian guard who controlled the Tower of the Two Sisters but had a grudge with Yaghi-Siyan, and bribed him to open the gates. He then approached the other crusaders and offered to let them in, through Firouz, if they would agree to let him have the city. Raymond was furious and argued that the city should be handed over to Alexios, as they had agreed when they left Constantinople in 1097, but Godfrey, Tancred, Robert, and the other leaders, faced with a desperate situation, gave in to his demands. Please note that we have re-purposed ideas from both Wikipedia and the September 2012 Edition of History Today Magazine.


Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2012-12-01 05:37:05 ~ In short, the Crusades start off restoring the Anatolian interior to it's prior rulers (at least nominally, I doubt the smallholders of the themes in question will be restored) rather than OTL's Levantine Landgrabs

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-01 06:19:13 ~ With Anatolia back under Byzantine rule, the Empire could last longer, although I think it had been depopulated by the previous troubles.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Henry VIII had been elected Holy Roman Emperor? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1519, on this day Henry VIII was elected Holy Roman Emperor. After the death of Archduke of Austria, King of the Romans, and Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I in January of 1519, many of his titles went directly by inheritance to his Habsburg grandson Charles V. The title emperor, however, would be given by decision of the seven elector-princes of the Germans, Albert of Mainz; Richard von Greiffenklau zu Vollrads of Trier; Hermann of Wied of Cologne; Frederick III of Saxony; Joachim I of Brandenburg; Louis V, Elector Palatine; and Louis II Jagiellon, King of Bohemia. Charles was most obvious choice as brother-in-law to Louis of Bohemia, but others were nervous about too much power being placed in one man's hands. Along with his grandfather's titles, Charles had also recently inherited the title "King of Spain", which he ruled alongside his mother, Joanna the Mad of Castile.

Henry VIII Elected Holy Roman EmperorFrancis I of France also wished to hold the powerful title, rejoining lands that had all once been Carolingian. Francis and Charles were bitter rivals since a French victory at the Battle of Marignano the year before brought the twenty-one-year-old Francis to the forefront of European politics. The two began a bribing war for votes, which made some electors all the more nervous. Ideally, a German would be emperor, which was suggested to Fredrick of Saxony, but he refused. Another possibility for the election was Henry VIII of England, but he did not have nearly the money or influence to compete with the Bourbons of France and all the holdings of the Habsburgs. The decision seemed to settle toward Charles until Cardinal Thomas Woolsey, the Lord Chancellor who had conducted matters of state for the young Henry, presented in secret a new plan: Francis use his influence to support Henry's election. Francis, though disappointed that he would not win the title, was at least satisfied that Charles would be deprived of it. The electors were amiable toward an English king (since at least they could relate the language to German) and were more comfortable with a less overwhelming force. The election of Henry was announced to the shock of Europe and instant dismay of Habsburg-supporters.

A new article by Jeff ProvineIn 1520, Francis and Henry met in a garish display at the Camp du Drap d'Or ("Field of the Cloth of Gold") in northern France as Henry began a tour of his new lands. Wolsey orchestrated this meeting as well, but it proved ineffectual as, despite Francis' generosity, Henry declined forging an alliance. Wolsey, who was quietly campaigning for himself as pope, also organized a meeting with Charles while in Germany, but this meeting also came to no avail. Instead, Europe was in a tense peace as Henry threatened to attack whoever began a war.

Meanwhile, Henry focused on the problems of the Reformation beginning in his new empire. Reacting to the sale of indulgences as part of the funding for construction on St. Peter's Basilica, Augustinian friar Martin Luther had posted Ninety-Five Theses critiquing the Catholic Church. During the latter part of Henry's tour in 1521, he heard Luther's case at Worms. In the end, and to the frustration of Pope Leo X, Henry determined to appease his subjects and declared the matter religious debate and did not seek any punishment for him. The support for Luther won over the respect of disgruntled knights in the Rhineland who were nervous of new money but reaffirmed by Henry out of his fanaticism for jousting. The knights' loyalty proved key to Henry's defeat of the German Peasants' Uprising a few years later.

Despite his great realms, Henry struggled to produce an heir. His wife, Catherine of Aragon, six years his senior, had not had a pregnancy since the birth of their daughter Mary. Henry had become fascinated with one of Catherine's maidens, Anne Boleyn. Anne refused to become a mistress and replied that she could only meet Henry's advances if she were queen. Henry asked Pope Clement VII for an annulment of his marriage as Catherine had earlier been married to his brother Arthur, but the pope declined. After the debate dragged for years, Henry decided to break with Rome as the Swedes has had done, name himself Supreme Head of the Church of England in 1533, and bring about his marriage to Anne.

This led to the question of what to do with his holdings in the Holy Roman Empire. Catholic regions saw Henry as an adulterer, but the Protestants saw a chance for freedom from Rome. When Henry dissolved the monasteries of England and seized their valuables, Charles took a stand as defender of Catholicism and invaded the Holy Roman Empire to seize the title he long believed to have been stolen. Henry counterattacked with Swedish assistance, and the war spilled across the Alps as Italian states saw a chance to rebel. Germany served as the principal battleground with towns razed and re-razed as Protestant and Catholic armies carried on campaigns. France attempted to remain neutral as internal strife with the Huguenots grew up, and eventually Francis I determined a policy of religious freedom to maintain his allies. The war threatened to expand further with an unprecedented alliance with Suleiman the Magnificent of the Ottoman Empire who had previously besieged Vienna and threatened Hungary, and Charles knew when to capitulate and agreed to a treaty.

Upon the death of Henry in 1547, the electors met again and, thanks to Henry's urgings, named his son Edward VI of England as the new, ten-year-old emperor. Edward proved a great mover in Protestantism, but he was sickly, dying in 1553. His half-sister Mary ascended the throne of England; the electors, however, could not have a female emperor and instead chose Henry II of France, whose consort Catherine de Medici had great influence and policies of religious tolerance were a healthy compromise between electors optioning Protestant King Christian of Denmark or staunchly Catholic Habsburg Ferdinand I. Bourbons continued to be Holy Roman Emperors until 1685 when Louis XIV worked to affirm his autocracy by promoting Catholicism as the single state religion. Many Protestants fled to Germany, but when Louis began to enact strict religious rule in the Empire as well, the electors refused and stripped him of his title. The Franco-German War brought about a liberated Germany at the expense of France. The electors named Frederick, King in Prussia, as emperor; Augustus II of Saxony, King of Poland, also stood had allegiances outside of Germany, and the time had come for German self-rule. United Germany became a powerful central figure in Europe, leading modernization and industrialization through the next two centuries.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Henry VIII, Tudor, Europe, Holy Roman Emperor, Britain.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality there was no alliance between Francis I and Henry VIII, even at the later a lavish meeting at the Field of the Cloth of Gold. Wars between Catholics and Protestants would flare up in Germany to a height in the Thirty Years War (1618-1648). The Habsburgs held onto the Holy Roman Empire nearly continuously for hundreds of years until it was dissolved by Napoleon in 1806.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-08-08 20:34:11 ~ This would have been very interesting, and would have tied England in closely with affairs on the Continent.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Frederick the Wise had been elected Holy Roman Emperor? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1519, on this day Frederick the Wise was elected Holy Roman Emperor. After the death of Archduke of Austria, King of the Romans, and Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I in January of 1519, many of his titles went directly by inheritance to his Habsburg grandson Charles V. The title emperor, however, would be given by decision of the seven elector-princes of the Germans, Albert of Mainz; Richard von Greiffenklau zu Vollrads of Trier; Hermann of Wied of Cologne; Frederick III of Saxony; Joachim I of Brandenburg; Louis V, Elector Palatine; and Louis II Jagiellon, King of Bohemia. Charles was most obvious choice as brother-in-law to Louis of Bohemia, but others were nervous about too much power being placed in one man's hands. Along with his grandfather's titles, Charles had also recently inherited the title "King of Spain", which he ruled alongside his mother, Joanna the Mad of Castile.

Frederick the Wise Elected Holy Roman EmperorFrancis I of France also wished to hold the powerful title, rejoining lands that had all once been Carolingian. Francis and Charles were bitter rivals since a French victory at the Battle of Marignano the year before brought the twenty-one-year-old Francis to the forefront of European politics. The two began a bribing war for votes, which made some electors all the more nervous.

A new article by Jeff ProvineThe suggestion of eliminating outside influence arose, and Frederick II of Saxony (called "the Wise") was offered the election. The task would be monumental and place him at the forefront of politics among much wealthier and more powerful figures, but Frederick determined it to be the right path and agreed. To the dismay of Francis and Charles both, Frederick was elected.

Problems quickly arose in the empire. The knights of Rhineland rebelled, using Protestant rhetoric to rally their people against the growing "new money" as Feudalism began to break down. Frederick met with the knights and created the Diet of the Germans to address issues. The Diet was proven successful as the communistic Peasants' War was put down and undercut by expanding religious freedom to the growing factions of Protestants. Germany became a powerful center to the new Europe, but would eventually be torn apart into its smaller kingdoms due to religious strife.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Frederick the Wise, Holy Roman Emperor, Habsburg, Francis, Europe.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-08-07 19:42:55 ~ I wonder what would happen to Martin Luther? IIRC the RL Holy Roman Emperor was opposed to him.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-07 20:20:17 ~ HRE Charles V definitely didn't like Luther questioning Catholicism, which was the one thing tying his multi-national, multi-lingual holdings together. Strangely enough, after turning down the offer of the emperor title, Frederick of Saxony was the one who hid Luther at Wartburg.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-08-08 16:30:45 ~ Could you say that Frederick was the Martin Luther King? :)

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-08 17:07:24 ~ Aaaaaah, nice one.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Benito Mussolini had been able to commit more resources to the Regia Marina? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1937, on this day at the Ansaldo Shipyard in Genoa Il Duce ordered an expansion of the Regia Marina (Royal Italian Navy) to include the building of the Aquila ("Eagle") and Sparviero ("Sparrowhark") double aircraft carrier force mirroring (and perhaps rivaling) the "Plan Z" construction undertaken by the Kriegsmarine.

Flugzeugträger Part 9:
Operation Hats
Benito Mussolini saw the control of the Mediterranean Sea as an essential prerequisite for expanding his "New Roman Empire" into Nice, Corsica, Tunis, and the Balkans. He described the Mediterranean as "Mare Nostrum" (Our Sea) and ensured that Italian naval building accelerated during his tenure.

With the German double aircraft carrier force committed to the Atlantic, it would fall upon the Regia Marina to lead the Battle of the Mediterranean. And eventually the operation of Malta Convoys ("Operation Hats") would pave the wave for the the Italo-German invasion of the island of Malta. And yet the development of a formidable Italian Navy was a luxury resulting from the early Italian disengagement in the Spanish Civil War, a messy conflict that could have easily sapped resources at a time when military build-up needed to accelerate. Instead, the Fall of Madrid (and subsequent implosion of the Republic) was entirely due to the fortuitous deployment of a German Volunteer Division that had tipped the scales in favour of the Fascists.
This post shares some commonality with the sister articles in the Flugzeugträger thread.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Flugzeugtrager Source: Wikipedia Labels: Regia Marina, Kriegsmarine, German Navy, Operation Hats, Second World War.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in our timeline the aircraft carriers Aquila and Sparviero were never completed and most air support during the Battle of the Mediterranean was supplied by the land-based Regia Aeronautica. Please note that in authoring this post we have repurposed a considerable amount of content from Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2012-06-28 13:54:54 ~ If Italy had concentrated on control of the Med (and possession of Malta) instead of remaining in North Africa and contributing to the Eastern Front (with one division, I believe), I think they would have been a much bigger player in the war. Would the Allies have invaded an Italy that was in control of the surrounding sea lanes? Maybe not. Churchill's desire to invade Greece may have come to fruition after all.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2012-07-10 09:25:33 ~ They wouldn't have been able to fully control the Mediterranean without Gibraltar, so we could have expected an Italian attempt on the Rock after the successful invasion of Malta.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-07-10 11:40:40 ~ Could they get Spanish help (such as it was) in cracking the Rock? Maybe in return for a promise of Spanish control "after the hostilities have settled down".....

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-07-10 17:34:02 ~ The British would have taken Italy quite a bit more seriously if they'd had a better Navy. More resources would have been tasked to dealing with them, which means that the Germans would have had a freer hand elsewhere.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-07-11 15:52:11 ~ If it'd been able to pin up the British fleet and seize the French ships at Mers-el-Kebir, they'd have a hefty force. If not Gibraltar, what about the Suez?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Franz Ferdinand had lived? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

It is June 28 1914, and the Austrian Crown Prince Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie are touring his imperial uncle's possessions in Bosnia. Suddenly a bomb is thrown into their carriage, forcing them to flee.

Close call in SarajevoFranz Ferdinand insists on going to the hospital, to visit the ambush victims .. but Sophie pleads with him to take refuge in the Sarajevo city hall, until the soldiers can arrive to guard them on their way back to the border. Giving in to her urging, he waits until the soldiers are surrounding them, thus forming a human shield all the way back to the border.

He is soon very glad that he listened to her, when reports come that four radical Bosnian and Serbian youths were planning to shoot them both, thus inciting a war between their own countries and the Austrian empire. With their plot foiled, both nations join in giving thanks that the couple's life was spared, thus bringing Bosnia closer to her imperial rulers.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jackie Rose Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jackie Rose, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Franz Ferdinand, Sarajevo, World War 1, First World War, Austria.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, what really happened: Franz Ferdinand and Sophie were both murdered on the way to the hospital, leading Austria and her ally Germany to declare war on Serbia. Russia soon entered on Serbia's side, and they were soon joined by England, France and eventually America too. World War I had begun.


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-06-20 22:20:41 ~ Some say that Germany was looking for any excuse to start a war...but a failed assassination plot would have been a pretty poor one.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2012-06-27 09:06:05 ~ If only...

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-06-27 10:33:03 ~ It is entirely untrue Imperial germany was looking for an excuseto start a war. It would be true to say Imperial Russia was, followed by the War parties in French and Britain. "Curses Foiled Again" would be the cry in certain quarters in St.Petersburg. it is unlikey there would be rejoicing in Serbia, but its government would be placed in a highly embarrassing situation as Serbian military intelligence were involved. Russia now has no pretext for war. What will happen to its war preparations which have been going on since the previous November? What will happen when the British battlecruiser squadron visit St.P. on 28thth June to 3rd July? What will Poincare say at the Franco-Russian Military conference at St.P when he visits on 22-24th July? Will he now go at all?

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-06-27 11:31:13 ~ I agree, the fuse fizzled THIS TIME, but it was only a metter of time before the powderkegs ignited and the world was thrown into the abyss.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-06-27 11:36:34 ~ True, but they would have to find another pretext.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2012-06-27 12:46:15 ~ Should be Serbs and Bosnian Serbs. The Bosniaks were reasonably happy with Austrian rule as the alternates were Hungarian and Serbian.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-06-27 16:28:16 ~ True, the Hungarians didn't care for the German-descended Croats and Bosnians ("Donauschwaben") and the Serbs even then practiced "Ethnic Cleansing", although it was refered to as banditry by person or persons unknown.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-06-27 16:41:42 ~ A major breaking point in history. If Russia doesn't lose out so readily, there won't be uprisings to lead to soviet power; same with Germany and fascism.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-06-27 16:45:30 ~ And all those millions of soldiers' lives had been saved, Jeff. I'd call that a win-win situation all the way around.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-06-27 17:49:23 ~ It is a mega-turning point in history. The whole disasterous history of the Twentieth Century derives from WW1 and the Versailles peace - books on this have been written in the US. Jackie be pleased to hear Hitler remains a bad artist in Vienna after discharge from the Bavarian army, Lenin remains in Georgia and so on. Wison is a single term president. Europe lacks the mass killing of the trenches and WW1 battles.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-06-27 18:27:20 ~ It's been said if in an Alternative Universe someone was to write an Alternative istory of the 20th century based on ours no-one would believe it to be credible. Pity about the Roaring Twenties.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-06-27 18:31:05 ~ It could have happened, or just have Franz and Sophie's car not stop right in front of that little twerp Princip.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-06-27 22:04:42 ~ You could have had the '20's but no great depressin. This came from wall Street withdrawing the german loans it had made, so that thye germans could pay the reparations so the Entente powers couldreay their war loans to the US> It was like the present collapses in the EEC. Alsothe US government had sold War Bonds on a mass basis to the population. After te war why should not Stock Brokers do this for ordinary companies, many of the Share sales beingon credit. Then foolishly the stockbrokers sold the shares they were holding for private individuals, as they were on credit, to try to get some of the money back. The collapse became permanent. There are good TV documentaries on this. So there is a chain of events and Domino Effect from the war.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-06-28 00:07:23 ~ It's unlikely the Twenties would have been the same, even in America, without the "war to end all wars" to react against. As for the thirties and beyond, who knows? Certainly if the war could have been avoided things would have been different for Germany--and for Russia, where two million people starved to deathy during the war years BEFORE the revolution, which helped make the revolution possible.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, the Sarajevo crisis was suposed to ignite the world into a 4 year war that would devastate much of Europe. But what if it didn't? muses Steven Fisher. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1914, on this day the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, Archduke Ferdinand of Austria and his wife Sofia were assassinated at Sarajevo, the provincial capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, by Gavrilo Princip, a member of Young Bosnia and one of a group of assassins organized by the Black Hand.

The Last Chance for Peace #1 By Steven FisherThe Sarajevo crisis was suposed to ignite the world into a 4 year war that would devastate much of Europe. But what if it didn't? What if, in the dwindling lgiht, when it looked like war was certain, the determination of one man prevented a continent wide conflict.

Bethmann-Hollweg, the German Foreign Minister and an avid Anglophile, realized that Count Berchtold had double crossed him and was courting disaster. Knowing what he had to do, he recalled Wilhelm from his cruise early, to stop the crisis. After many arguments, he convinced Wilhelm to withdraw the "Blank Cheque", and declare neutrality in this conflict. Wilhelm agreed, and a proclamation was issued later that day that Germany would not be mobilizing in the defense of Austria.

With Germany staying out, France takes a limited position in the war, and WW1 stays as an isolated war between Austria and Russia, ensuring that the German Reich survives. Austria Hungary falls in a three-year war with Russia, fragmenting the Balkans, who slowly polarize around Germany and Russia. The Balkans light the fires of WW1, a war with more advanced tech, and a forknowledge of the impenetrable defense. The world feels the flames of war once again, but this time there is no knowing when they will die out. The whole thread is available at the Alt History Wikia.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Steve Fisher Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Steven Fisher, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Last Chance Source: Wikipedia Labels: Franz Ferdinand, Sarajevo, Kaiser, Great War, World War 1.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2011-11-21 12:54:36 ~ Doesn't work. A straight Austro-Russian war destroys AH and leads to a truly isolated Germany diplomatically. However Germany could have refused to attack France and adopted a defensive attitude in the East. War end in 1915 after Belgrade falls.

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2011-11-21 13:19:16 ~ AH destroyed=Germany picks up a lot of it.

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2011-11-21 14:52:53 ~ Scott, I think you've head it head-on. I wonder what a shorter war leaving an intact Russia would mean for the October Revolution in 1917: does it happen at all, or is it simply delayed? I fall on the side of a simple delay and I believe the Czar's days were numbered regardless.

Readers Comment Brian Wall commented on 2011-11-21 15:28:39 ~ Scott, not necessarily. It seems in this TL that Germany is somewhat closer to the UK before war even breaks outs. And if Germany sits out this WWI, it may earn some good grace from France, maybe selling them some arms? And if Germany doesn't invade Belgium, then relations with the UK either remain as is, or maybe even improve a bit. I could see after the war is over and AH collapses, that Russia is viewed as the new 'bad guy' of Europe, just 25 years or earlier then it happened in our TL.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-11-21 18:20:54 ~ Would Russia have been able to do as well against A-H without the Western Allies? Their war effort was incredibly shambolic, IIRC; men were sent forward unarmed and told to take rifles from the dead. And some of the nationalities of the Hapsburg Empire (Poles, forex) were more than eager to tangle with the Russians.

Readers Comment Mike commented on 2011-11-21 19:13:30 ~ Without WWI I'd not have an awsome German Helmet collection :)

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-11-22 00:07:45 ~ I can't really see Germany sidelining itself. The interlocking alliances which created the Central Powers bloc would have more or less forced Wilhelm II to get involved.

Readers Comment Steven Fisher commented on 2011-11-22 01:01:19 ~ The idea was taken in part from a telegram that Bethmann sent to the German Embassy in Vienna, which said, "Serbia has in fact met the Austrian demands in so wide-sweeping a manner that if the Austro-Hungarian government adopted a wholly uncompromising attitude, a gradual revulsion of public opinion against it in all of Europe would have to be reckoned with." Diplomatic language couldn't put it better. Austria-Hungary was going to war in a bad cause, at least to the Germans. The honorable way out was there if they wanted it. So what if they had taken it? This is what the story explores. Russia can get weapons through the Dardanelles, helping tyheir supply situation. The Austrians can get guns from the Germans, who definitely don't want to see a total Russian victory, but don't want to get in a major war not of their choosing. They want to make sure they have the moral high ground.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-11-22 15:58:15 ~ As Russia grew in strength, everyone else would panic about the shift of power, Germany and its UK ally would be brought into war soon enough (over Poland, Finland?) with France caught up alongside. What would've happened to the Ottomans?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the framers really had mangled Thomas Jefferson's fine words? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, on this day a five-man drafting committee placed the Declaration of Independence before the Second Continental Congress after striking out the inappropriate fifty-five word preamble penned by the young idealistic author, Thomas Jefferson.

MangledChairman John Adams had originally asked the far more experienced Benjamin Franklin to pen the declaration but he had refused citing a long-standing aversion to having his own words edited by others. It was a lesson not lost on the dismayed Jefferson who truly believed that his rhetorical prose had been "mangled" by the drafting committee.

From a broader perspective, Adams, Franklin, Robert Livingston and Roger Sherman were absolutely right because the Declaration was not a standalone document to be embellished by Jefferson. Rather it was the last in a series of stage documents preceded by Richard Henry Lee's resolution of June 7th that "these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states".

In his own treatise, "Thoughts on Government" Adams had made it clear that he sought evolution. Not much more in fact than the transfer of sovereignty to a Republican Government. Because despite its grandiose democratic-sounding title, the Second Contintental Congress was not yet an elected body. And Jefferson's words took the struggle for independence to a new level, a revolution that seem to invite, welcome even, an untested future of mob rule: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".

Franklin, a man that heartily agreed with the sentiments of the preamble, offered a prophetic warning to Adams. Rushed into action by King George's Prohibitory Act, Adams plan offered a reasoned approach to the assumption of power. But ran the risk of causing a reaction. Making revolutionaries of idealists such as Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine, soon to be the most dangerous men in America.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Joseph J. Ellis, "American Creation" (2007)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Thomas Jefferson , Benjamin Franklin, Declaration of Independence, America, Revolution.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-04-25 02:49:45 ~ So, Adams is the Ghandi to Jefferson & Paine's Jinna?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-04-25 21:10:04 ~ It's amazing a room full of bright guys like that actually got anything done. I wonder what a world where politicians check their egos is like.

Readers Comment Bruce Johnson commented on 2011-04-26 18:08:02 ~ This all seems to rest on the totally uninformed popular notion that Jefferson was adding something new to the argument, that the point of the prologue wasn't one commonly made in political writings of the era (and for over a century before). Consider especially, the 1774 "Declarations and Resolves" of the First Continental Congress, the 1775 "Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms" of the Second Continental Congress, and the "Virginia Declaration of Rights" newly penned by George Mason (as the first part of Virginia's new state constitution) just a few weeks before. Jefferson's writing here is not at all original in its basic form and substance. His distinctive contribution is that he STATED it well. (I'm also curious what sort of preamble you would imagine substituting to maintain the form of the document as a whole.) The fact that the debates and changes to the document in Congress focused on the list of grievances (the body) further underlines how UN-surprising the preamble was. (It's even more incredible to imagine the likes of John Adams objecting to this part when conservative Southern delegates did not.)




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Harold Wilson really a spy and this disclosure destroyed the Soviet Union? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1984, on this day Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha died suddenly of heart failure at the age of 75.

Death of Enver HoxhaHis passing triggered the most severe political crisis in Albania's modern history, since succession procedures were unclear and almost no one in the Marxist regime's upper echelons was strong enough to take power single-handedly; furthermore, the Albanian people were becoming increasingly fed up with the repression they'd been subjected to under the hard-line Stalinist government that had ruled the country since 1946. Within just hours of Hoxha's funeral on July 2nd, the streets of Albania's capital Tirana were filled with demonstrators demanding the end of one-party rule and greater political and economic freedom for Albania's citizens.A new installment in Necessary Evil

In spite of the Marxist regime's sternest efforts to crush the incipient uprising, the demonstrators refused to back down from their calls for change; indeed some of the more militant dissidents were inspired by the example of Russia's Patriotic Liberation Movement to begin secretly stockpiliing weapons in hopes of being able to launch their own armed insurrection. Even when the Albanian regular army, still largely pro-Communist, unleashed a massive crackdown on the dissident movement it only succeeded in driving the anti-Communists underground. Albania would spend the next seven years locked in a state of quasi-civil war and nearly fell into total anarchy between the anti-Communist faction finally prevailed in the summer of 1991.

Following the overthrow of the Marxist dictatorship the new Albanian government moved quickly to restore the diplomatic ties with the West the Hoxha regime had severed; one of the first Western nations to re-establish relations with Albania was the United States, which saw the post-Communist government in Tirana as a potential ally in Washington's efforts to combat global terrorism.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Necessary Evil Source: Wikipedia Labels: Enver Hoxha, Yuro Andropov, Great Britain, Seventies, Afghanistan.





Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the late Robert Byrd had supported the conviction of Bill Clinton? muses Eric Lipps. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2020 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2010, US Senator Robert Byrd, the longest-serving member of Congress in history, has died aged 92, his spokesman has said.

Longest-serving US lawmaker Robert Byrd dies, aged 92The West Virginia lawmaker died peacefully at a hospital in Fairfax, Virginia, the spokesman says. The cause of death was not immediately known.

Senator Byrd was elected to the House of Representatives in 1952, becoming a senator seven years later. As a young man, Mr. Byrd was for a brief period a member of the white supremacist group the Ku Klux Klan and also joined Southern Democrats in an unsuccessful filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He later apologized for both actions, saying that intolerance had no place in America. In his later years as a senator, Robert Byrd became a champion of civil rights. He was also an outspoken opponent of the Iraq war and warned against a build-up of US troops in Afghanistan, winning a record ninth term in the Senate in 2006.

His death is not expected to change the Democrats' current majority in the Senate. West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, a Democrat, is expected to appoint a Democrat to serve the remainder of Mr. Byrd's current six-year term, which expires in 2012, Reuters reports.

Clinton Impeachment

Sen. Byrd's most controversial action in the Senate was his decision to support the conviction of President Bill Clinton at his impeachment trial and to use his influence to persuade other Democrats to do likewise. Byrd's efforts led to the defection of a coalition of Democratic conservatives and self-described "independents," among them Ben Nelson of Colorado and Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut from the embattled President's side, making possible Mr. Clinton's conviction, by a margin of one vote, on Feb. 16, 1999. Mr. Clinton thus became the first U.S. president ever removed from office via impeachment. (In 1868, Andrew Johnson-the only other president ever impeached and like Clinton a Democrat facing a Republican Congress-was acquitted by one vote. Richard Nixon, facing impeachment, resigned instead.)

Bitterness over the impeachment would affect the 2000 election. Senator Lieberman would be repudiated in his state's Democratic primary and would win another Senate term only by running as an independent with substantial aid from the Republican Party, which actually provided more funds to his campaign than to that of its own nominee for his seat. President Gore would spend much of the campaign fending off Republican efforts to impeach him as well. GOP opposition to Gore was sufficiently powerful to prevent the confirmation of anyone to replace Gore as VP, meaning that if he, too, had been removed from office, the Republican speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, would have succeeded to the presidency, the first time in U.S. history the office had changed partisan hands without an intervening election. (The closest parallel would have been that of Andrew Johnson, a Democrat, had run with President Abraham Lincoln on a Union ticket in 1864.) Lieberman, running as a Republican in 2006, having joined the GOP after an unsuccessful attempt to mend fences with the Democrats and run for that party's 2004 presidential nomination, would lose to Democratic challenger Ned Lamont in a race whose most memorable commercial would be nicknamed "Hop, Frog," featuring Sen. Lieberman as a frog leaping among lily pads labeled "D", ""I" and "R".

Byrd, by contrast, would survive relatively unscathed, calmly enduring his being tagged by both parties as "George W. Bush's favorite Democrat" after Bush's narrow victory over President Gore and running-mate Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont. In the evenly divided Senate which emerged from that election, he would wield extraordinary power due to his combination of seniority and personal influence. As recently as 2009 he was a senior Democrat on the powerful Appropriations Committee.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Robert Byrd, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, America, Presidency.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-07-08 23:18:30 ~ There were no grounds to impeach Gore. Everyone knew it. Clinton was a self-confessed perjurer.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2010-07-08 23:47:57 ~ True, but in politics, if the truth isn't damning enough, they'll make up ~something~. Remember the phrase, "throw enough bullplop against the wall and see what sticks".

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-07-09 00:34:00 ~ If he'd caused Clinton to be removed from office, I'd be willing to forgive him almost anything. That dead girl (or live boy) in his bed? NO problemo! Senators will be Senators!

Facebook Comment Comment from Bob Hufford on Facebook: Byrd's vote to acquit Clinton stripped away the last bit of respect I had for him. He is the only man to make me actually ashamed to be a West Virginian. We have had other low life politicians (WV is the most corrupt state in the Union, save possibly LA), but they were mere garden variety slime of small ability; Byrd's ability was great, but so was his corruption. My own guilt is magnified by having voted for the ******* when I was young and stupid. God forgive me and my poor state for what we did to this nation.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-07-09 15:16:18 ~ Um . . . just in passing, perjury isn't an impeachable offense. It isn't always even legally actionable in nonpolitical tribunals: it's been pointed out, for instance, that in divorce cases, perjury is frequently committed by one party or the other, and proved, but almost never prosecuted. There were no genuine grounds for impeaching Clinton, but the Gingrich Congress went ahead and did it anyway despite polls showing that 70 percent of the American people opposed it. You'd think they had enough ways of wasting our tax money without that, but apparently not.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Hitler, funded by his Jewish grandfather's family had passed the entrance exam in Vienna? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1944, at dawn on this day officers of the KGB Station in Vienna entered the bohemian apartment of Adolf Schicklegruber and his wife Geli Raubal, seizing a number of paintings in which the Jewish artist had expressed his insanity on canvass.

Happy Artist Hitler ArrestedThe Soviet authorities had becoming increasingly alarmed by the emergence of a modern art movement known as "post-Dadaism", a style originally founded in Zurich in 1916 at the Cabaret Voltaire. The term Dada, nonsense or baby-talk term, symbolizes the loss of meaning in European culture, starting out as an indictment against the values that were responsible for the horrors of the Great War.

Heavily influenced by the recent conflict in Europe, the conventional art scene had begun to give way to a group of bohemians whose artistic endeavors tended towards anti-war and anti-conformities. In fact the subversive artworks ignored religion, government and all arranged forms of conformity, breaking all of the known rules of painting.

And so Schicklegruber and his colleagues were shipped to Nuremberg for a mock trial followed by execution. At least that was the plan, but it didn't quite turn out that way...


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2006-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jewish Hitler Source: Wikipedia Labels: Adolf Hitler, Austria, Germany, Arts, Vienna.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, this story was the result of a number of great suggestions received from Facebook Users with thanks Vonda Allan, Candacey Doris, Arlena Arteaga Kelly, Melissa Pretorius and Sharon Anderson.


Facebook Comment What "recent conflict"? Details, please. If Hitler was still just an eccentric artist in 1944, who was running Germany after 1933? I'm assuming that the Soviets were in control of Germany and Austria by '44, but how did that happen? And despite lots of rumors, there's no real evidence of which I'm aware that Hitler himself was Jewish. What, did he convert? That's never been easy, even for Christians of Jewish ancestry. See Facebook comment Ben Camo - The Rothschild bankers would have gotten someone else to be the figurehead for the Third Reich who would have also gotten built up and taken down, just like Hitler.

Facebook Comment Comment from Jim Hubbard on Facebook: I recall reading something years ago about his thugs targeting Freud's disciples for internment in concentration camps. He felt that they were less than deserving of life

Facebook Comment Comment from Mike McIlvain on Facebook: And, like what if Fidel Castro had actually been signed to play baseball in the U.S.?

Facebook Comment Comment from Adam Krallon Facebook: If only...

Facebook Comment Comment from Al McCulley on Facebook: help assure that people will continue to bear witness to this evil legacy. CLICK THE LINK to VIEW the Auschwitz Album

Facebook Comment Comment from Jim Hubbard on Facebook: His paintings have no people in them. What would Freud have said about that?

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-06-26 00:43:43 ~ Hitler had no Jewish ancestry. This is disgusting nonsense.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-06-26 03:37:27 ~ This is a long ways off in left field. AFAIK Hitler had no Jewish ancestry, although he might very well have had Czechs or Slavs in the woodpile somewhere---it was heavily forbidden to investigate the Fuhrer's geneaology during the Third Reich, and probably for good reasons.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2010-06-26 12:58:34 ~ <<<>>> According to rumor, which MAY have been Allied propaganda, Hitler's maternal grandfather may have been a lapsed or non-practicing Jew.

Facebook Comment Comment from Vinay Singh on Facebook: if it wasn't for Hitler's eccentric obsession for wiping off the Jews, he was just like any other military General... though a lot more tactical and efficient...!!!

Facebook Comment Comment from Margo Barotta on Facebook: well hitler like to much painting if hitler was passed the enterance exam in vienna school for painting it will be a turning point in europe in that era .one decision could change somthing in our life imagine the decision of hitler if he want to be painter and had been expected .many facteurs will change new players will show on europe .the WWII will not exist.

Facebook Comment Comment from Sime SSparica on Facebook: After all people that told him he is not good were more all less well know and established jews in (who hold positions) art community of Wienna in that time.
Main reason for Hitler's rejaction was because he was not able to paint portraits, which you had to know in that time, in Wienna (middle Europe school) correct me if I am wrong.
Thinking what would happen if he was accepted, if you ask me I would say that art would not change course of his life.

Facebook Comment Comment from Phyllis Swan on Facebook: He probably would have murdered his Jewish grandfathers had he not passed...

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-10-26 22:45:53 ~ 1. How do you get the Austrian SSR? 2. If you do why is Adolph not an exile in Paris or New York?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-10-28 16:54:51 ~ Still grew his Charlie Chaplin mustache. What a poser.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Woodrow Wilson's ideas had framed the Treaty of Versailles? Please note that this post was the result of collaboration between Ed,. Eric Lipps, Eric Oppen & Stan Brin. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1919, a comprehensive peace settlement was signed on this day in the Hall of Mirrors of the Palace of Versailles; the signatories were the proletariat representatives of the provisional socialist governments which had emerged from the Great War.

Crying WolfNaturally, the United States acted as the guarantor, being the only great power to have emerged unscathed from the conflict. Consequently, President Woodrow Wilson's proposals for self-determination and a League of Nations would be central to the new framework for collective security.

America's declaration of neutrality at the outset of the war had in fact proven unenforceable because both sides had attempted to starve each other out with naval blockades. There could be no freedom of the high seas for neutrals whilst the battle raged in the Atlantic between the Royal Navy and the Kaiserliche Marine. And so during May 1915 America actually came close to joining the war as a belligerent when a passenger ocean liner owned by the Cunard Line had entered the war zone. However Captain von Luckner of the steamship SMS Seeadler chose not to sink the RMS Lusitania, but instead to capture it. And the German Government was therefore able to issue an unambigously worded official statement that the Lusitania had been armed with guns, and had "large quantities of war material" in her cargo.

Subsequently, the US Government made any form of involvement conditional upon the belligerent's acceptance of the Fourteen Points proposed by President Wilson. And during 1916, a settlement became a distinct possibility because by then both sides were exhausted and only wanted to save themselves. Emperor Karl Habsburg of Austria-Hungary issued a letter seeking peace on the basis of a "status quo ante bellum" agreement, but the initiative came to nought.

By 1918, Spanish Flu had decimated the continent of Europe, the monarchies were overthrown and provisional governments sought to re-establish central authority in their anarchic nations. Far-flung Empires were disgarded by the impoverished new nations that could scarely control their own borders.

And yet Versailles would prove a false dawn. As many members of Congress had warned, American's commitment to collective security dragged the US into a never ending series of brush wars in the nineteen twenties and thirties. And by the time Hitler set Europe on the road to war, America had already withdrawn from the League of Nations.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Versailles, World War 1, Great War, Armistice, Allies.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Herr Wolf was Adolf Hitler's nickname


Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2010-03-11 02:48:06 ~ OK, not sure whre to begin, but for starters, in WWI, the German navy wasn't called the Kriegsmarine but the Kaiserliche Marine. Fixed - thanks Secondly how does a small U-Boat stop a large ship, which can travel 10 knots quicker than it on the surface, which is also something like 100 times it size, not to mention the U-Boat crew would be vastly outnumbered? Thirdly, if through some miracle the Lusitania is captured, what are the 25 or so Germans on board going to do when the RN intercepts them with anything bigger than a 3 inch gun? In other words the RN will intercept the ship with just about everything they can spare that's fast, including battlecruisers with 15 inch guns, cruisers with 6 - 8 inch guns, & destroyers with 3 - 4 inch guns, whilst the Germans will be lucky if they've got a machine gun. Fourthly, considering it's wartime & the Lusitania is a British flagged merchant vessel, so what if it is being used to transport weapons materiel. Fifthly, why would the USA support a whole lot of new European countries who, as their political philosophy, are opposed to the capitalist Americans? Plus why would these new European socialist/communist nations want to have much to do with the USA when they remained isolated, & kept out of it, whilst Europe tore itself to pieces? Er - money? Sorry guys if I appear to be so scathing, but...

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2010-03-11 03:15:18 ~ Money? But you've got them as socialists/communists ;) They may not take it out of principle, whilst the conditions applied to any American loans maybe completely unacceptable. Meanwhile the Americans may in fact not offer any given the political philosophies of the two groups.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-03-11 06:27:30 ~ My learned friend Mr. Atwell is apparently unaware that Cpt. von Luckner's _Seeadler_ was NOT a U-boat...she was a converted windjammer. Cpt. von Luckner had a very swashbuckling career, and captured lots and lots of ships. Finding him stooging around the North Atlantic would be a _little_ OOC for him, but you could say that he was just getting out of port and couldn't resist temptation. And the fuss about the _Lusitania_ in OTL was "Oh, those evil, evil, evil Germans---they sank an _unarmed passenger liner!_ By the rules of the time, if _Lusitania_ was carrying war materiel, she was fair game, as I understand it. Von Luckner waged a very humane war; he left very few corpses in his wake. Grabbing the _Lusitania_ would have been very much in character for him.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2010-03-11 08:51:29 ~ Oh did I get the OTL interception wrong? My humble apologies if I did as I just assumed that the OTL encounter took place, naughty me, as I really didn'y understand the part about the "Seeadler" :o So we are really talking about a sailing ship taking on the Lusitania & capturing her?

Facebook Comment Comment from Mia Amani on Facebook: The WWs aint my thing but the RMS Lusitania is another example of our government misleading the public for the sake of waging war. If only more Americans studied history.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the First World War had ushered in even more profound changes? Could the 1971 Singapore Declaration have in fact been signed half a century before, and would it of survived Hitler? Please note that substantial amounts of content have been repurposed from article of the same name in the July edition of the History Today Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1919, delegates of the newly founded independent states which had emerged from the dissolution of the former British Empire issued the Versailles Declaration on this day. These free nations committed themselves to an exhilirating multi-racial future based upon the principle that "We believe in equal rights for all citizens regardless of race. We recognise racial prejudice as a dangerous sickness and racial discrimination as an unmitigated evil of society" Two years before, military exigencies had forced British Prime Minister David Lloyd-George to bring the White Dominions into an imperial government, after Canadians demanded that "if you want our aid, call us to your councils".

A Communist Britain, Part Two - The Peace AccordThe invitation had been issued to India too; whilst not a self-governing Dominion, the subcontinent committed over a million men to the Imperial British Army, suffering over 80,000 deaths.

"We believe in equal rights for all citizens regardless of raceYet the war had ended in catastrophe for the British Homeland, with chronic food shortages and an intolerable casualty counts fuelling a Communist overthrow of Lloyd-George's Government in London.

And so the peace delegation at Versailles would be composed of free men, sitting at the top table as equals with their British comrades. And yet none would have foreseen that their declaration of principles would meet the severest of tests - the re-emergence of Germay with a programme of ethnic cleansing that would shake the Versailles Declaration to its very core.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © History Today Magazine, June 2009
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Communist Britain Source: History Today Magazine Labels: Versailles, Singapore Declaration, Britain, Communism, World War 1.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-06-25 13:17:24 ~ Difficult to say what would happen after this. Would a Communist Britain ally with the USSR, or does that even exist in this TL?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-06-25 14:40:35 ~ I'd say that would depend on what the actual POD is. That's not clear from this post.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-06-25 15:46:26 ~ Does anyone besides me find the notion of a Communist UK faintly alarming?

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-06-25 23:03:15 ~ I still don't get how Germany lost WWI if the British were in such a dire situation themselves. With Britain in political turmoil, having a starving population which overthrows the goverment, & probably a military in chaos (otherwise it would have simply shotdown any communist revolution in the streets of London), the 1918 German Offensives on the Western Front would have been successful thus winning the war.


This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1914, Serbian nationalist Nedjelko Cabrinovic blows up the Austrian nobleman Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, along with their driver.

Flower of Freedom
by Robbie Taylor
A dozen people on the Sarajevo street where the Archduke was driving were injured. The Serbian terrorist had tossed his bomb into the Austrian car, and Ferdinand almost tossed it back out, but it went off before the nobleman could save himself and his wife.

The horror of the bomb scene, with the mutilated bodies of the Austrians and injured Sarajevans, enraged the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and Emperor Franz Joseph wanted to move troops into Serbia immediately to hunt for the nationalists who killed his nephew. Russia was asked not to interfere, because they had a security pact with Serbia, and the Austrian negotiator took photographs of the Archduke's body to convince them. After seeing the consequences of this horrible attack, the Russians reluctantly worked with the Austrians to convince the Serbs to give up the nationalist elements in their society. The betrayed Serbians declared war on both Austria-Hungary and Russia, but the tiny nation was unable to keep these European giants from dispatching their own military in short order.

Once Austria-Hungary had the nationalists who had assassinated the Archduke in custody, they withdrew from Serbia, but their attack proved more far-reaching; Serbians sympathetic to the nationalists began a campaign of terror attacks against Austro-Hungarian and Russian targets across Europe. Although Russia eventually toppled the Serbian government and replaced it with one more to their liking, the terror attacks continued until the Austro-Hungarians and Russians committed genocide against the Serbs in 1928, virtually annihilating the Serbian people.

The two empires were condemned by the western democracies for this war crime, and lack of trade with civilized nations after this horrific transgression took them into a gradual decline; Russia's Tsar abdicated in 1934, and a parliamentary government headed by Alexander Kerensky took control and reestablished diplomatic and trade relations with the rest of the world. After Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria-Hungary died in 1936, the empire split into 6 minor countries, each of which repudiated their imperial past and rejoined the international community. This blossoming of democracy in the 1930's even spread to the powers that hadn't been involved in the Serbian atrocity - Germany, Spain and Italy all liberalized their governments into parliamentary democracies. "The flower of freedom has bloomed from the grave of Serbia" Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany said as he turned over most of his power to the new German Chancellor, Friedrich Ebert.


Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Austria, Serbia, World War 1, Germany, Franz Ferdinand.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Wikipedia reports - Through its purported connections to the June 1914 assassination in Sarajevo of Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria, the Black Hand may have been one of the principal catalysts to the start of World War I, fueling the July Crisis of 1914 and giving Austria-Hungary a pretext to invade Serbia.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-08-10 12:02:21 ~ I don't see the Serbs being successfully pressured to "give up the nationalist elements in their society." Serbian nationalism was a strong and growing force in 1914, with widespread popular support. That said, Austria-Hungary and Russia might have been able to persuade the Serbs to pursue and arrest the members of the Black Hand for their group's ties to the attack. Jusging by our own post-9/11 experience, though, this is unlikely to have led to a wave of democratic liberalization, however much it destabilized various countries' governments.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-10 15:02:09 ~ On the one hand, Russia backstabbing the Serbs is politically shameful; on the other, an escalating war costing 16 million lives ain't good either.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2012-08-10 15:02:09 ~ He wasn't a mere nobleman. He was also a brilliant, fascinating, hyper-active, man, one of my heroes.


This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1969, what had been planned as a simple raid on a New York night-club that was violating its liquor license turned into a neighborhood-wide riot as police were attacked by locals angered at the treatment of the night-club's homosexual patrons.

Stonewall Inn Riot
by Robbie Taylor
The raiding policemen were shut up in the Stonewall Inn by the riot, and they desperately radioed for assistance. When riot police arrived, a few hotheads in the crowd began setting fire to buildings, including the Stonewall Inn, itself. With fires raging all around them, the riot police were unable to contain the situation, and withdrew. Fire trucks were allowed in to put out the blazes, but police were repelled when they attempted to follow the fire fighters into the community to restore order. This chaos continued for almost three days while the nation watched, and homosexuals across America became galvanized into action. When the New York cops finally put the riot down, 43 people were dead, over 300 were injured, and the nation saw for the first time that "Gays", as they now referred to themselves, would no longer take the abuse they had been dealt in the past.

The Stonewall Organization, dedicated to civil rights for homosexuals, was founded on the ashes of the night-club, and won their first major victory that year, as New York City voted to recognize the civil rights of homosexuals and decriminalize homosexuality. A storm of outrage from conservatives and fundamentalist Christians across America greeted this progressive move, but the Stonewall Organization was just getting started.

In spite of many cultural battles over the '70's and '80's, homosexual rights won acceptance from the mainstream culture, and the Stonewall Act of 1987, signed into law by President Ronald Reagan, a one-time opponent, granted homosexuals full citizenship for the first time in American history.


Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Stonewall Inn, Minority, Civil Rights, Gay, Homosexual.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-04-28 09:01:46 ~ Wouldn't this give opponents lots of free ammunition? "Not only are they preverts, but they're _violent_ preverts?"

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-04-28 11:10:17 ~ I think that Reagan would have chopped off his fingers before signing such a bill. How did he come to change his mind, early onset Alzheimer's?

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-04-28 15:52:51 ~ In spite of some of his incendiary rhetoric, Reagan personally knew a large number of gay people - he was a former star in Hollywood, after all. The main difference in this timeline is the galvanizing of homosexuals in the nation - instead of going deeper into the closet, they came out and forced the nation to look at who they were and how they were being treated.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-04-28 18:31:14 ~ Weren't the actual Stonewall Riots pretty much a neighborhood-wide event?

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2012-04-28 18:47:43 ~ 1) John, you wouldn't know funny if you snorted Drano. 2) "Full citizenship?" You need to go find out who citizenship is defined in the United States, not what you THINK citizenship means. I'm talking about the legal definition.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Archduke Franz Ferdinand had survived the assassination attempt in Sarajevo? Please note that the views expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the author.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1914, the near-assassination of Austria's Archduke Franz Ferdinand, later Emperor of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, by a militant Serbian nationalist was a crucial turning point in European history.

Serbian nationalism had been a sore point within the Empire ever since the Kingdom of Serbia was formally recognized as an independent state in 1878. In the years leading up to the attempt on the Archduke's life, there had been a series of diplomatic crises and brushfire wars, between Serbia and Austria-Hungary over the provinces of Bosnia and Herzegovina and then between Serbia and Turkey, from which the Serbs seized Macedonia and Kosovo. Franz Ferdinand favored a policy known as "trialism", under which the Hapsburg Empire's Slavic lands would be reorganized as a separate monarchy, transforming the so-called Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary into a triple one and making the Slavic lands a bulwark against Serbian expansionism.

The Emergence of Trialism by Eric LippsFollowing the death of Emperor Franz Joseph in November 1916, Franz Ferdinand succeeded to the imperial throne, from which he labored diligently to put his favored policies into effect and improve the position of Austria relative to that of Germany.

An early crisis gave him the opportunity to do so, when the deeply unpopular Tsar Nicholas II of Russia faced a radical uprising in 1917.

Anti-government sentiment had been growing in Russia since the humuiliating conclusion of the Russo-Japanese War, which had actually provoked a revolution which had compelled Nicholas to agree to the creation of a parliament, the Duma. Radicals, however, had considered this reform insuffcient, even after the Duma's power was increased by subsequent measures. The Tsar's dismissal of the first and second Dumas undescored the fact that he remained the real power, and his actions following itas formation inspired little confidence. Although the Duma's creation temporarily divided Nicholas's opposition, resentment over his high-handed treatment of what were supposed to be the Russiaan people's representatives presently swung the pendulum in the opposite direction.

Nicholas was actually forced to abdicate in March of that year, and a parliamentary government established under Alexander Kerensky. When Kerensky's government in turn seemed about to fall to a radical left-wing movement led by Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, Emperor Franz Ferdinand dispatched Austrian troops to "restore order". By March of 1918, the revolutionaries had been crushed and Kerensky, who had fled to Finland in January, had returned to St. Petersburg. Ulyanov disappeared, and rumors had him dead, imprisoned or hiding somewhere in Europe.

At that point, Franz Ferdinand faced a decision: recognize and support the embattled Kerensky regime, or restore his Romanov cousin to the throne. He chose the latter, and backed it up with force. In April, Nicholas reassumed the throne.

The restored Tsar, however, was little more than a figurehead. The events of 1917 had demonstrated how weak his support really was among his own people, and it was soon apparent that if the Hapsburg troops who had helped put him back in his seat were to leave, he would fall once more. That harsh reality compelled him to realize that he had become essentially Franz Ferdinand's subject.

The Hapsburg ruler realized it as well, and took the opportunity to squeeze the weakened Nicholas for trade and territorial concessions, which his Russian cousin had no choice but to grant even though doing so reduced his power and popularity even more. Among the prizes taken by Austria-Hungary were Russian Poland and the Baltic provinces of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.

In March of 1923, Vladimir Ulyanov surfaced in Munich, where he attempted to lead a general strike of the city's industrial workers. The Prussian police responded with brutal force, and Ulyanov was among scores of casualties.

Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm II regarded the ascendancy of Franz Ferdinand's Austria with growing apprehension. Wilhelm's Germany, dominated by Prussia, had been a bigger, stronger brother to Austria since the nineteenth century; now, it seemed, the scales were tilting in the opposite direction. The Hohenzollern emperor began to worry that the Hapsburgs might, in time, become an actual threat. In an effort to counter that danger, the Kaiser began to extend diplomatic overtures to its longtime rival Britain and even to France, its foe since 1870.

In 1928, Emperor Franz Ferdinand's "trialist" scheme became reality, with a newly established Kingdom of Slavonia, embracing the Hapsburg Empire's Slavic possessions, assuming its place as the third partner in the Emperor's Triple Monarchy under the rule of Prince Aimone Roberto Margherita Maria Giuseppe Torino of Savoy, great-grandson of Italy's King Victor Emmanuel II. At his coronation, Prince Aimon assumed the name Tomislav II, in homage to the first king of medieval Croatia. The new king's ancestry bound him firmly to the Hapsburgs, while his choice of kingly name affirmed his opposition to Serbian ambitions, which had never abated.

By 1930, Europe had been transformed. The alliances of 1914, which, if war had come at that time, would have pitted England, France and Russia against Germany, Austria-Hungary and Ottoman Turkey, had given way to a new order in which England, France and Germany faced the newly established Triple Monarchy of Austria-Hungary-Slavonia, Turkey, and a docile but resource-rich Romanov Russia under the frail hemophiliac Tsar Alexander IV, who had succeeded Nicholas II upon the latter's death in 1929.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Invision Power Board Labels: Frank Ferdinand, Austria-Hungary, Assassination, World War 1, Survives.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2010-02-28 16:45:25 ~ Unless we have a seperate Polish administration, this looks to border on overstretch.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2010-07-28 11:40:46 ~ Just a couple of points. 1) Lenin (VIU) was in exile before 1914 and it was the Germans in OTL that brought him from Switzerland to Russia in 1917 (the closed train), how did he get back in this ATL? 2) I ~know~ that (too) many of the royalty and nobility in Europe were related, but was FF actually a cousin of Nicky? I know that Willy II was related to the Romanovs, as was the British king, but I'm not so sure about FF. 3) Thank you for putting Lenin in the *Beer Hall Putsch; it was good to see him coming up dead. One last point; could you go into a bit deeper detail as to HOW FF got the Trialism to work? It's my understanding that the Hungarians really weren't in favor of it. Thanks for a great story.

Readers Comment Brian Hartman commented on 2010-10-28 21:04:10 ~ I don't think the Russian Revolution would've happened in 1917 without World War I. I'm not saying it wouldn't have happened at all, but I think it would've taken longer. It was the heavy losses of WWI that really incited dissent among the people.


This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

In 1491, King Henry VIII, second monarch of the House of Tudor, was born - beginning the golden age of the British Royal Family.

Birth of King Henry VIII
by Chris Collins
Henry VIII is known to have been an avid gambler and dice player. In his youth, he excelled at sports, especially jousting, hunting, and real tennis. He was also an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his best known piece of music is Pastime with Good Company ('The Kynges Ballade').

Henry VIII was also involved in the original construction and improvement of several significant buildings, including Nonsuch Palace, King's College Chapel, Cambridge and Westminster Abbey in London. Many of the existing buildings Henry improved were properties confiscated from Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, such as Christ Church, Oxford, Hampton Court Palace, palace of Whitehall, and Trinity College, Cambridge. He founded Christ Church Cathedral School, Oxford in 1546.

On 12th October 1537 the King and his wife Catherine of Aragon announced the birth of a healthy baby boy. Edward VI (12 October 1537 - 6 July 1597) became King of England, King of France (in practice only the town and surrounding district of Calais) and Edward I of Ireland on 28 January 1547, and was crowned on 20 February, at nine years of age. Edward's early rule was mediated through a council of regency, first led by his uncle, Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset (1547-1549), and then by John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland (1549-1553). When he reached maturity, Edward established his own protestant authority announcing "Oh my Lord God, defend this realm from papistry and maintain Thy true religion"; he really was "a chip of the old block".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Collins Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Collins, 2007-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Edward VI, Catherine of Aragon, Jane Seymour, Tudor Dynasty, Royal Family.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-04-25 11:50:40 ~ If Henry VIII andCatherine had had a son who lived, would England have become Protestant at all? It was Henry's insistence on his right to divorce wives who failed t produce a royal heir which caused the split with Rome. And why would Edward break with the Vatican if his father hadn't?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-04-25 21:48:59 ~ Perhaps Edward was a Protestant himself, fairly liberal at the time, but a lot of Knoxians would have been thrilled. The real fallout I'd see is the relations with Scotland. No Stewarts, no Act of Union 1706-7.


In 2015, on this day the former Prince of Wales, Charles Windsor, won election as first premier of the newly independent Welsh Republic.

                                           

 -

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: GSTQ Source: Wikipedia Labels: David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Gordon Brown, Conservative, Charles Windsor.



In 2003, Jacob Sheridan replicates and is able to control nanobots created using the techniques copied from the captured Martian vessel. The handful of nanobots he has made are able to generate more power than a rocket engine. Sheridan had been awake for over 48 hours, and was manic when he burst into office of General Bertram Hughes, declaring, 'We've got the buggers, now!'

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Sheridan Labels: Jacob Sheridan, Robbie A. Taylor, Livinia Sheridan, Mars Attacks, America.



In 4561, forces in Hanoi are facing starvation, along with the general populace. Chinese troops begin advancing into the outlying districts, and the Viet of the city are urged to fight with whatever weapons they have at hand. 'Let us not face them as a goat waiting for slaughter,' Prince Nguyen Vo exhorted his citizens, 'but as the tiger in the trap waiting for the man to come. Let us make the price of our lives so high that none will ever wish to fight the Viet again, for even victory is a defeat.'

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Chdo Democracy Labels: Chdo_Democracy, Robbie A. Taylor, China, 4648, Emperor Dao-Ming.



In 1862, in a serendipitous stroke of good luck, a police officer in the small town of Heathfield stopped to assist a young man whose vehicle had broken down. The young man looked familiar to the officer, Patrolman Danny Barnett, who scanned his image and checked with the main computers at Scotland Yard. When the man's identity came back as Brent Carpenter, founder of the Human League, Patrolman Barnett immediately called for help and wrestled Carpenter to the ground. Once handcuffed to his own vehicle, Carpenter began freely confessing everything to Barnett, who let his handheld computer record all the horrific acts of violence against both human and Mlosh that the terrorist told him about.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Mlosh Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Mlosh, 1720, Robbie A. Taylor, Warp, Alien.



In 1491, future Pope Henry VIII of the Holy British Empire is born. Henry was the most tolerant Pope towards the Protestants in history; some wags even called him the 'Protestant Pope'.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: 2nd Coming Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Holy British Empire, Robbie A. Taylor, Estelle Gerard, Pope, Catholic England.



Wildfire

On this day in 1981, Tommy Rich was attacked by Terry Funk during an interview segment for the NWA's weekly TV show; the injuries Rich sustained in that attack would put the NWA world champion out of action for almost two weeks.

Wildfire - Tommy Rich
Tommy Rich

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: The Tommy Rich Story Source: Wikipedia Labels: Tommy Rich, Wildfire, Wrestling, NWA, Boxing.



In 1999, Walton Ray Thermopolous meets with Prime Minister Kay Ector at the PM"s insistence. "I have a feeling the queen needs our help," Sir Kay says to Thermopolous. "But she cannot ask for fear of what may be revealed. Therefore, We must come to her aid stealthily". Thermopolous, who is doing quite well now that he no longer has to split his profits with either the Illuminati or Queen Gwen, is reluctant to do anything to jeopardize his position.She seems to be fine with the state of affairs they way they are," he tells the prime minister. "Why act without orders? Right now, we're on top of the world - the CEE is gone, my old masters went with them, and the queen sits at the side of the king rather than in a jail cell. There is no need for action" Ector simply cannot bring himself to believe this. "She needs our help. I know this is the case. And if you will not help, your government contracts will be cut off". Thermopolous reluctantly agrees to supply a small team of professionals for the plan that the prime minister has drawn up for them.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Arthur II Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Arthur Pendragon, Robbie A. Taylor, Camelot Redux, Merlin, England.



On this day in 2004 American conservative political commentator Ann Coulter weighed in on the Fahrenheit 9/11 controversy with a scathing indictment of Michael Moore titled 'Moore-onic'.

 - Michael Moore
Michael Moore

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Moore911 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Fahrenheit 911, Michael Moore, George Bush, September 11, 911.





Older Posts 




© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.