A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Reagan 1976
 Richard Tolman  Sockless
 Soviet America  Speakers Line
 The Sheridans  The Baron
 The Claw  Warp
 Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Baron Jean de Batz
Playing Nice
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Jefferson Undone
Upper Carolina
Nixon killed
Margaret of Anjou
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
King Henry IXth
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Xavier's Vows
Fall of Aquileia
President Bentsen
Catalaunian Plains
American Napoleon 2
Reign of the Batman
Seventh Wife
President Gingrich
Adams Family Values
President Ferraro
Rise of the Bat-boy
Batman: Year One
2002 MN strikes
Panic of 1893
W.B. Yeats born
Too Cold
Comrade Stalin 3
Ohio's Finest
The Death of the Duke
Defenestration of Prague
Troy Eternal
King James III
The Orient
President Edwards born
Superman Begins
Comrade Stalin 4
Principled Stand
Guru
Nova Roma
Jesus of Rome III
President Heston dies
Ike is fired
Death of the Bruce
Happy Endings 20
Failed Statelet
Reagan in 76
June Revolution
POTUS Howard Baker
Actor Reagan
Tiananmen
Jeff and Abe
Centennial Crisis
Jesus of Rome II
Night the Green Goblin died
Mary, Queen of France
Snyder Act
Nicaraguan canal
Concert of Europe
Farthest West
Battle of Turaida
Little Giant
John Hinckley
Cold, Dead Hands
Happy Endings 26c
President Scott
Beauregard undone
Codename James Bond
Op Anthropoid Fails
President Humphrey
Nathaniel Gorham
Birth of the Duke

Site Meter


March 2



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the debate over filling the position of President pro tempore of the United States Senate was resolved long before the death of William P. Frye? An article collaboratively developed by Ed & Scott Palter. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1877, on this day the Electoral Commission adjourned after final agreement on a series of compromises which included a change to US Presidential succession such that Congress came before Cabinet and Senate as senior House came first.

RutherfraudIt was the conclusion to one of the most disputed and controversial presidential elections in American history, an informal, unwritten deal that was widely regarded as the second "corrupt bargain". But certainly "Rutherfraud" as it was known ended Congressional ("Radical") Reconstruction.

But the true significance of this change was revealed thirty-five years later when an anarchist detonated a bomb that killed both President Taft and his VP. His successor Augustus O. Bacon received the Democratic Nomination, but lost the General Election of 1912 to Teddy Roosevelt who brought the US into the Great War after the sinking of the Lusitania.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Pro Tempore, United States, Presidency, President, Congress.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality this change was excluded from the Compromise of 1877 and five politicians rotated the position between 1911 and 1913 after the death of William P. Frye. Please note that we have repurposed content from Wikipedia to author this article.


Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2012-04-30 16:40:32 ~ - should be 1876 or 1877 above - numbers are inverted. Fixed - thanks. Ed

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-05-01 02:21:34 ~ I think it should be "Democratic" nomination...the Dems I know prefer that form. And TR would have loved to get into WWI before we did. Fixed - thanks. Ed

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-05-01 17:03:00 ~ Interesting butterfly-ing.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the proposed Anglo-French military intervention in the Winter War had actually gone ahead? (this more belligerent response is re-queled by an earlier action in which Allied Air Forces bomb Stalin's supply of Baku's oil in October 1939). Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1940, on this day the sovereign governments of Norway and Sweden granted transit rights which authorized a British-French Corps to disembark at the Norwegian port of Narvik and support Finland via Sweden while securing supply routes along the way.

Allied Military Intervention in the Winter WarIn reality the actual prospect of Allied forces fighting the Red Army in the snow was quite ephemeral. Because the diplomatic exchange of these official requests masked a covert feint devised by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill. His secret plan was for the vast majority of the 135,000 men sent to aid the Finns to occupy the Swedish iron ore fields that were supplying Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, upon hearing of the plan Adolf Hitler stated that should Allied troops enter Sweden, Germany would invade.

Of course the allied strategy of neutralising enemy resources had been fixed right at the beginning of the war with the fateful decision to bomb Azerbaijan's oil fields. And that military reaction to the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led inevitably to the Russians joining the Axis.

Doubtless the Swedish Cabinet's approval of the transit rights request was relucantly given upon the threat of a similiar strike. Yet for all its obvious geographical disadvantages, a Scandinavian theatre clash would enable the Allies to strike a blow of military authority with their considerable air and sea power. And perhaps a military stalemate that starved the Axis of strategic resources might lead to a peace settlement on more favourable terms. But as things turned out, the Winter War was merely an interlude between the Phony War and the Phony Peace. This was the infinitely more complex situation inherited by the incoming British Prime Minister when Neville Chamberlain died on 9th November 1940.
This article is part of our Resource War thread..


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Resource War Source: Wikipedia Labels: Finland, Winter War, Britain, France, World War 2.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we explore an idea on the Military History Forum web site and repurpose content from Wikipedia which concludes ~ On 18 June 1941, the Swedish government quickly agreed to Nazi Germany's demand to transit rights across Sweden for German troops on their way from the then occupied Norway to Finland, in order to join the German attack on Soviet union. A total of 2.14 million German soldiers, and more than 100,000 German military railway carriages, would cross neutral Swedish territory in a thunderous display of "might over right" for the next three years.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-12-22 01:25:35 ~ Would Hitler stay allies with Stalin in this TL? This is my big question, how does England respond to barbarossa when at peace with Germany?

Readers Comment Chris Rohrs commented on 2011-12-22 04:14:02 ~ March 2, 1940, and Anglo-French Corps is in Narvik with the stated purpose of supporting the Finns and the real purpose of seizing the Swedish iron fields that the Swedes had been using to supply Germany with iron. First, effect - Germany will be reluctant to invade Norway. German rhetoric might encourage the Norwegians to call up their armed forces this making Hitler even more reluctant. The Anglo-French forces occupy the Swedish iron fields. Germany invades Sweden and is caught up in a war with a country that can raise 300,000 men to fight in the forests and hills of central Sweden.. Germany may invade Denmark (easy pickings), but leave Norway alone since they are caught up fighting Sweden. Germany may even delay invading France, Belgium and The Netherlands. If the Sitzkrieg in the west goes on until the spring of 1941, Stalin may attack Poland, Hungary, Germany, Czechoslovakia, etc. and we could be looking at Russian troops in central Germany by mid 1942.

Readers Comment Brian Wall commented on 2011-12-22 21:59:12 ~ I've always wondered why France and the UK declared war only on Germany after the 1939 invasion of Poland. There was a show on PBS awhile ago about the joint German-Soviet invasion of Poland and how chummy the Nazis were with in Soviets, according to Germans and Russians who were there at the time. The only thing that screwed up a potential alliance between Nazi Germany and the USSR was Hitler's invasion in 1941.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-12-23 23:00:30 ~ Norway would get caught in the middle, neutrality impossible as either Germany would take it as they did or the Anglo-French would, as they did to secure Iceland before it could possibly fall.

Yahoo! Discussion Group Comments Please click hyperlink for Yahoo! Groups Discussion comments.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Steve Jobs didnt delay his surgery? In our history, Jobs delayed longer, not undergoing surgery until July 2004. The extra delay may well have contributed to the relapse which eventually occurred, which took his life Oct. 5, 2011 after a protracted period of illness. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2004, Steve Jobs, founder of the hugely successful Apple computer firm, underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Steve Jobs Lives
A new article by Eric Lipps
Jobs had been diagnosed with the disease in October 2003, but had at first resisted scheduling surgery, preferring to try alternative, "natural" remedies first rather than undergo an operation to remove the tumor. He had finally been persuaded to employ conventional medicine after doctors advised him that his tumor was continuing to grow.

In February 2004, Jobs announced to Apple Inc. employees that he had decided to undergo surgery for his cancer and had been assured his chances of recovery were good.

Following the operation, a pancreaticoduodenectomy - a procedure consisting of removal of the distal half of the stomach (antrectomy), the gall bladder and its cystic duct (cholecystectomy), the common bile duct (choledochectomy), the head of the pancreas, duodenum, proximal jejunum, and regional lymph nodes, followed by reconstruction to allow digestive juices to flow normally and food to pass into the duodenum?Jobs, at his own insistence, did not receive either chemotherapy or radiation treatment. Although optimistic that his surgery had removed all of his pancreatic tumor, Jobs' doctors continued to monitor his condition. On March 2, 2009, Jobs the five-year anniversary of his operation, Jobs held a press conference at Apple corporate headquarters to announce that he remained cancer-free and that in his physicians' opinion he could be considered cured. Apple's stock price spiked following this announcement.

As of November 2011, Jobs remained active as Apple CEO.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Personalities Source: Wikipedia Labels: Steve Jobs, Apple, Cancer, Surgery, Premature Death.

Readers Comment Scott Eiler commented on 2011-11-02 22:26:59 ~ 2nd November, 2011: Steve Jobs responds to accusations he bullies employees. "Occupy Seattle" protestors take a road trip to Redmond to picket the Apple offices.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2011-11-03 12:01:29 ~ Pancreatic cancer is on of the worst cancers with survival rates much lower than other forms of the disease. With having so much of his body parts carved out like a Thanksgiving turkey, his prognosis is too poor to continue running his company. I think that a better PoD might be in October 2003, when being told that he has pancreatic cancer, Jobs points to the affected area and starts his mantra of "Get it out, Get it out, Get it out, Get it out, Get it out, Get it out!!!!!!" Then his chances are much better.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-11-03 14:54:30 ~ Apple most likely would have struggled as Jobs went through recovery. We might just now be getting to the iPhone 3.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-11-03 17:57:26 ~ Jobs could have turned his attention to cancer-in-general; right now, pancreatic cancer has a very low survival rate because it's often not caught till too late.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-11-03 23:07:40 ~ I thought about having Jobs immediately seek surgery, but decided it would be too great a leap from what he did in OTL.

Readers Comment Mike commented on 2011-11-04 06:34:33 ~ He at least had the option. I don't even have health care insurance. The Hospital chain I work for can't even afford to hire me full time and they make millions. I wonder how Obama thinks I can afford it on my own making 16,000 a year.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Houston Family had never left Virginia? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1793, on this day the 19th-century Virginian statesman Samuel Houston was born on his family's plantation near Timber Ridge Church in Rockbridge County.

Birth of Governor Samuel HoustonDesperately needing to leave his considerable debt behind, the elder Samuel Houston decided to move the family to the frontier when his fifth born son was fourteen years old. Tragically, his father died shortly after patenting land in East Tennessee. And his widow Elizabeth decided it was too risky to move their five sons and three daughters to the new state.

Fifty-five years later Houston did become the resident of a new frontier state but at a time when the Union itself faced similiar heartbreaking decisions on a national scale.

Delegates of the second Wheeling Conventions elected Houston to serve as the first governor of the key Civil War border state of West Virginia, which alongside Nevada, was one of only two states formed during the American Civil War.

On condition that a provision for the gradual abolition of slavery be inserted in its constitution, Abraham Lincoln admitted West Virginia into the Union. The President's declaration promoted an immediate response; General John D. Imboden, with five thousand Confederates overran a considerable portion of the state.

In a desperate last stand, Governor Houston called upon West Virginians to defend the Union-occupied City of Alexandria. Down to the last man, if necessary.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sam Houston, Civil War, Virginia, America, Confederacy.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in Wikipedia his early life is described as follows: planning to move on as people did on the frontier to leave debts behind, the elder Samuel Houston patented land in Maryville the county seat of Blount Co.in East Tennessee near relatives. He died in 1807 before he could move with his family, and they moved on without him: Elizabeth taking their five sons and three daughters to the new state. Having received only a basic education on the frontier, young Sam was 14 when his family moved to Maryville. In 1809, at age 16, Houston ran away from home, because he was dissatisfied to work as a shop clerk in his older brothers' store.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-05-15 19:08:26 ~ Sam'l Houston as first Governor of West Virginia works fine for me.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-05-16 01:27:21 ~ Well, if the Houston family had never left Virginia, odds are he'd have been in jail. Our Texas was founded by men running from the law...

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-05-16 15:31:22 ~ Solid alt history. Gotta be in the right place at the right time.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Damansky Island incident led to War? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1969, due to a delay with fuel transfer, a Soviet patrol on Damansky Island (known as Zhenbao Island to the Chinese) stumbled across a would-be Chinese ambush beginning to move out.

Sino-Soviet War Begins The Soviets counter-ambushed the Chinese, killing dozens. Cries for revenge spread over China, prompting Mao Zedong to declare war and storm the disputed territory on March 15. Initial Chinese casualties were high, but the far eastern Soviet stations ran out of munitions and found themselves overwhelmed by May.

The beginning of the altercation could be traced back to 1964, when Mao Zedong, leader of Communist China for over a decade, mentioned during a meeting with socialist Japanese that Tsarist Russia had taken valuable lands from the Chinese in unfair, century-old treaties. Even excluding eastern Siberia, Kamchatka, and other regions that had become all but fully Russian, there were several disputed areas along key rivers, most notably the Ussuri River, where Russia had claimed islands that normal shipping lane agreements would have given to China. Mao's statement spread, and tensions escalated along the 2,738 mile border.

A new story by Jeff ProvineWith an initial Soviet victory at Zhenbao sparking the anger that had been brewing for five years since Mao's comments, the Chinese called for vengeance against decades of unfair treatment. China mobilized, as did the Soviet Union under Leonid Brezhnev. With successes in the east, the Chinese launched a western campaign across the disputed Pamir Mountains, where a vague border had been established at the ridge of the Sarikol Range. The invasion proved costly, and the Soviets successfully held Tajikistan. While a tactical defeat, the draw of materiel to Tajikistan allowed for further gains in the east as China marched to the Sea of Okhotsk.

Brezhnev contemplated using the USSR's massive nuclear stockpile against the Chinese, sending out similar diplomatic feelers toward the United States as the US had done earlier in the 1960s in potential attacks against Chinese nuclear weapons sites. The administration of President Richard Nixon made its stance clear that conflict could never again escalate to the point of nuclear war, and that either side that launched first would suffer an immediate declaration of war by the United States. Battles through the summer had gone too far to turn away from fighting, and now Brezhnev was forced to follow the same "limited warfare" as the United States had seen in Korea and, concurrently, in Vietnam.

Although officially neutral, the US seemed to side more with the Chinese. As backroom deals went through, the war in Vietnam transformed from a stalemate to a ceasefire. Communist supplies had been cut from both the Soviet Union and China as they were needed for their own fighting, and leader Ho Chi Minh had died only months after the Sino-Soviet War began, leaving followers without strong connections. The nation was eventually divided peaceably between the Communist north and Capitalist south, action for which US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger would win a Nobel Peace Prize.

Meanwhile, war between the Soviets and Chinese would drag on through the 1970s. Mongolia and Afghanistan became forced staging grounds between the two powers and suffered heavy civilian casualties. The United States continued to back China, supplying aid in a lend-lease program while never officially outraging the Soviet Union. After a decade of siege and counter-siege, the two nations began to call for an end to the seemingly unwinnable war. In the Treaty of Tashkent in 1982, the war officially ended, though fighting had quieted for some time. Russians had taken their fill of combat and rations, and the seeds of revolt were planted. Brezhnev left office that November, and his successor Yuri Andropov died in February of 1984, prompting revolution rather than instating another General Secretary.

China had become a very different nation by the end of the war. Mao Zedong had died in 1976, and his successors grew close to the Americans for their continuing support. The increase of comfort with capitalism started new economic freedom as well as an influx of American culture. While still carrying a powerful and centralized government, free elections were encouraged through the 1980s, building a new era of prosperity and growth.

The real winner of the war proved to be the United States, whose economy flourished with Chinese repayments of debts as well as in new markets in Eastern Europe where the Soviet collapse created a power-vacuum ready to be filled with blue jeans and McDonald's.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Soviet, China, Border War, Mao Zedong, Damansky Island.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Chinese ambush was successful. Fifty-eight Soviet soldiers were killed with 94 more wounded. Soviets retaliated on March 15 with artillery fire and secured Zhenbao Island. The war was cut short when troops were ordered not to fire upon returning Chinese soldiers. After the funeral of Ho Chi Minh, Soviet Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin visited Beijing and restarted diplomatic communication, however frictional. The two would never fully go to war, but gears would be set in motion to break the duality of the Cold War.


Facebook Comment Comment from Joe Annaruma on Facebook: Long story short...Russia and China practically destroy each other with Nuclear Bombs, with Russia somewhat being the victor simply because they were destroyed less. The U.S. came in towards the end (our specialty) and finished off the Russians. The U.S. rebuilt the Soviets infrastructure out of guilt and in 2015, The Democratic Republic of Russia was the worlds leading manufacturer of SUVs, Electronics and cheap shoes. Russia by this time owned 2 trillion dollars of US debt.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-03-02 14:43:49 ~ Lllllllllllllllllllllllet's get ready to rumbllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllle!

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-02 21:30:10 ~ This could have happened. Watching the world communist movement's little heads asplode would be hilariously funny...they wouldn't be able to decide who to back.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Nathaniel Greene had caught George Washington sleeping with his wife Kitty? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1779, on this day at Morristown the First Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army George Washington was shot dead by his most gifted and dependable subordinate, the American Revolutionary War General Nathanael Greene.
Watch the Youtube Clip

Crime PassionalEarlier in the evening, Greene had been sent on a wild goose chase, a secret mission behind enemy lines in Philadelphia. It was so urgent, General Washington had said, that he had to leave camp that night without even saying goodbye to Kitty who was preparing to attend a party with her husband.

However shortly after departing, his horse had grown lame, and Greene was forced to abandon the mission and return to Morristown. Upon his unexpected return, he immediately discovered that at the party, his wife and the Commander had danced for three and a half-hours with each other without stopping. Suspicious, he searched the camp, eventually discovering that the pair had headed to the matresses in pursuit of their own secret mission behind enemy lines.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Huffington Post Labels: Nathaniel Greene, George Washington, Kitty Green, Founding Fathers, Revolution.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality ~ "the man could have been the biggest stud in Virginia and the nation. One of the great heroic activities along this line during the war involved the general and the wife of Gen. Nathanael Greene. Young, vivacious, a beauty who could banter and play the coquette, Kitty Greene was the first Washington groupie. Some said she was an airhead, but she knew French and loved to dance. The general and Kitty Greene were reported by historians to have danced one night for three and a half-hours with each other without stopping during a party at Morristown. What kind of dancing was this, historians didn't explain. Was it horizontal or vertical? Especially noteworthy was Gen. Greene being sent that night on a secret mission to by some cricket bats or something behind the enemy lines in Philadelphia. It was so urgent, Gen. Washington said, he had to leave camp that night without even saying goodbye to Kitty. Suffice it to say, the founding fathers knew what they were doing when they built that monument honoring the first president on the Mall".


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-12-16 23:02:36 ~ Just goes to show, no matter what anyone says, it didn't start with JFK. This episode, of course, would have done wonders for morale and unit cohesion in the Continental Army. . . .

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-17 00:00:55 ~ This would have played hob with the Revolution---Washington wasn't any kind of great general, but he had the political savvy to keep the disparate colonies working more-or-less in tandem. Withoout him, "divide and conquer" becomes much easier.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-17 16:38:44 ~ Wonder if Greene continues the fight or loses faith in Washington's cause... Either way, from some of Greene's journals, he notes "His Excellency" and his wife dancing fairly often, such as the celebration of French recognition. He'd have to be pretty dense not to know anything was going on, provided it were. Maybe they just liked dancing?

Facebook Comment Comemnt from Larry Drennan on Facebook: The loss of a central leader acceptable to all segments of the colonies causes a schism. The Southern states immediately conclude a separate peace with the Crown. The Mid Atlantic states and New England eventually capitulate as well. Ironically the peace terms require noheavy handed retributions against rebel leaders. Slavery is contained and manumission comes into play. Slavery in North America ends by 1800.

Readers Comment Bruce Johnson commented on 2010-12-17 21:37:48 ~ Please don't insult our intelligence. What sheer NONSENSE!! Has any of you stopped to check out the video clip and the the source of this sleazy premise? (Pardon me - Jeff, you are correct on the points you make. In fact, the Feb. 1779 episode you are referencing is precisely the one this story twists. Thanks!) The speaker in this sorry section of a sorry show full of kooks (History Channel ought to be ashamed) is NO historian, and hardly attempts to be. Marvin Kittman is a humorist & TV critic. Not surprisingly, he is careless with his facts, and assumes the most scurrilous rumor, no matter how ill-founded, is true.. because it's more entertaining! His take on this episode, both here and in his joke of a book, "The making of the president, 1789: the unauthorized campaign biography", is full of errors. (For starters, NO one has produced letters about Greene's supposedly being sent off; Greene himself DID write about the dance, and how long Washington lasted... Martha was also there that night and throughout the encampment, though Kittman implies otherwise. He even chooses to totally misrepresent what other historians say -- sure, show us ONE who claims they were chatting about strategy! straw man! In the book he even characterizes that winter's weather as harsh, when it was just the opposite! sloppy!? at best) Books on the Greenes and Washingtons frequently tell of the relationships of the couples, who was where when, what they actually wrote. Kittman is a joke!




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the first African-American President had to confront the hostility of an unreconstructed Confederacy? This story was published in the March 2009 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2009, on this day the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and North Ireland Gordon Brown arrived in Washington D.C. for his first audience with President Barack Obama.

United People of the WorldWith an enormous amount of speculation surrounding the state visit, international news agencies reported "All eyes will be watching to see how they get on. Will stern, reticent Gordon gel with avuncular, articulate Barack? Will the two emerge equals, or will one call the shots?".

A small, but deliberate pun since Union-British relations had been ruptured for more than one hundred and fifty years by the Trent Affair. Because on November 8, 1861, the USS San Jacinto, commanded by Union Captain Charles Wilkes, intercepted the British mail packet Trent and removed two Confederate diplomats, James Mason and John Slidell.

The envoys were bound for Great Britain and France to press the Confederacy's case for diplomatic recognition by Europe. Whilst the Trent never reached Great Britain, the mission nevertheless succeeded. Because the reaction in the United States was enthusiastically in support of the capture despite the questionable legality of the act. In the Confederate States, the hope was that diplomatic recognition by Britain of the Confederacy, and ultimately, Southern independence would follow, which it surely did. And in Great Britain, the public expressed outrage at this apparent insult to their national honour. The British government demanded an apology and the release of the prisoners while it took steps to strengthen its military forces in Canada and in the Atlantic. After several weeks of tension, the issue exploded into war when the Lincoln administration refused to release the envoys and avowed Captain Wilkes' actions.

No formal apology was issued until 2001. And now the early signs of renewed British-Union relations were thrown into jeopardy once again by an explosive development of civil rights - the election of the first African-American President, Barack Obama.
Click to watch the inauguration ball

Of course the issue of equality existed at many levels. Significantly, President Obama had met with his Canadian counterpart, Prime Minister Stephen Harper before Gordon Brown, and this diplomatic gesture was considered in some quarters to be a snub to the British.

One group of people that had even stronger feelings on the matter were the unreconstructed Confederate leadership in the City of Richmond, VA. In point of fact the conversation at the other "White House [of the Confederacy]" had hardly moved on from the tribute evening for Stevie Wonder on February 23rd.
Click to watch Obama's speech

In particular, the Confederate leadership had taken great exception to Wonder's "politicized" acceptance speech believing its many references had stepped way beyond the appropriate boundaries of a musical award ~

"But what's really exciting for me today is that we truly have lived to see a time where America has a chance to again live up to the greatness that it deserves to be seen and known as, through the love and the caring and the commitment of a president, as in our president, Barack Obama. [APPLAUSE] It's exciting 'cause I know my children will be able to say, 'I was born when there was the first African American president. Yeah, I can do that too!' But not only can they do that, but all children of all various ethnicities understand that they can speak in truth. They can talk about loving and caring about this country. They can talk about being a united people of the United States of America. They can live that dream that Dr. King talked about so long ago. And if those in this country and throughout the world - you can put down your spirits of hate and open up your hearts to receive God's ever commitment of love, then we can be a united people of the world. If we can think that big, and feel that strong, then I believe, as is said to me by my God, impossible is unacceptable. We don't know the miracles that will be bestown on us because of that. "

The timings of the visits from Stevie Wonder and Gordon Brown could be considered unfortunate. Yet few disagreed that a miracle was needed to set things back on track. And only a few optimists held out hope that Mr Brown could initiate substantive dialogue between the three parties, and open a new chapter in UK-USA-CSA bilateral relations.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Trent Affair, Barack Obama, Stevie Wonder, Confederate States, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, The concept of the Trent Incident leading to War between the Union and Great Britain is described in a number of alternate history stories including Robert Conroy's novel 1862 and also Amanda Foreman's "The Trent Incident Leads to War". However in no way have we repurposed content from these works of fiction, we have made modifications only to public copyright free content in Wikipedia anbd YouTube only to explore how an unreconstructed CSA would respond to President Obama's election.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-03-03 15:11:30 ~ Looks pretty good. The Trent Affair is used as the POD in Robert Conroy's novel 1862, but taken in a very different direction.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-03-04 00:19:28 ~ Not bad at all...the Trent Incident was one of those turning-points where history could have gone in a lot of different directions.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-03-04 15:36:25 ~ The Civil War is practically a gold mine of PODs.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Marlon Brando had stayed in good health? muses Gerry Shannon. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2000, Marlon Brando completes a day's work dubbing lines for certain scenes involving Robert DeNiro as Don Vito Corleone in the new Godfather film.

The Godfather Part IV, RebootIt is a role DeNiro reprises from the 1974 sequel, in which he played a younger version of the same character famously portrayed by Brando in the 1972 original.

Director Francis Coppola had read reports for the last several months that Brando, 76, was bitterly disappointed Coppola had not asked him to reprise the role of Vito in The Godfather Part IV, in flashback scenes set in the early mid- to late-1930s that detail the rise of the Corleone crime family in New York. however, Coopola decided early in the pre-production process that he was not keen on dealing with Brando's erratic nature on set as he did last in Apocalypse Now - and though Brando is noted as being robust for his age, the director thought the idea he would play Vito in his 40s to be faintly ridiculous.

However, it is DeNiro that is keen to suggests Brando perhaps dub some of DeNiro's own lines in his distinctive whispery tones for the sake of continuity and when DeNiro feels he didn't quite succeed in imitating Brando's Oscar-winning preformance from the first film. DeNiro's true reasons for allowing this is that he is keen to get Brando to agree to play a role in heist film The Score, currently starring DeNiro and Steve Buscemi.

Though Brando recieves a pricely sum for his services, Coppola stops short of giving into his demand for a star billing in the gangster sequel for just a few recorded lines and he instead gets a 'Very Special Thanks To' mention at the very end of the film's credits.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Gerry Shannon Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Gerry Shannon, 2008- & Mario Puzo, 1969-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Godfather Source: Wikipedia Labels: Robert DeNiro, Mario Puzo, Godfather Part IV , Godfather, Marlon Brando.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, here, actor Marlon Brando has little or no health issues in his last years of life - and perhaps lives even longer into the next decade and manages to maybe even get a few more acclaimed roles before he passes. Here however, as befitting the last few decades of his workload, he is keen to be well paid for whatever work he gets.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-03-02 01:37:25 ~ He'd have to be a hellova lot less self-indulgent, and more disciplined.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-03-02 10:52:30 ~ I read once that when James Dean died in that car crash, TWO actors perished. It was only when Dean was alive and very competative with his good friend Brando that Marlon Brando was extremely disiplined. After his friend died, Brando seemed to let go and become more self-indulgent. Many of the films that he did shwo that he was an extremely gifted actor, but he did a lot of schlock as well. Maybe if James Deam had survived another twenty or thirty years (maybe dying in the AIDS epidemic of the later seventies?), Brando might have lived up to his talant.....

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-03-02 15:40:25 ~ People would be outraged over rebooting Godfather. They'd probably still see it, but outraged while doing so.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2012-03-03 00:08:35 ~ More likely, he would have demanded the "and" credit often given to great stars who perform cameos, e.g. "and Marlon Brando as Don Corleone."

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-03-03 13:31:21 ~ A reboot like this one runs the risk of turning out a stinkeroo like "Star Wars: Episode I," which damn near killed the franchise. A sequel made so long after the original is too far removed from the original inspiration.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if John Calhoun had led a second unsuccessful bid for American independence? muses Eric Lipps. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1841, the Second American Insurrection [against the British Empire] ends with the capture of the last of its leaders, "provisional president" John Calhoun.

Calhoun CapturedThe South Carolina native is arrested in East Florida while attempting to take passage aboard a ship bound for Cuba. He will be executed for treason a month later.

Disorganized rebel bands will continue to operate throughout the formerly slaveholding South for years, often under banners based on the so-called "Eagle and Stars" adopted as the flag of the "United Commonwealths of America" declared by the rebels. This emblem featured an eagle with wings outspread, one claw clutching a set of arrows and the other an olive branch, surrounded by a wreath of stars, one for each commonwealth of the Union, on a blue field.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Liberty Fails Source: Wikipedia Labels: John Calhoun, America, Slavery, Georgia, Andrew Jackson.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, this event never occurred at all in our history. It's a "butterfly" following the collapse of the American Revolution in the 1770s because of Southern rejection of the Declaration of Independence.


Readers Comment Todayinah Ed. commented on 2012-03-01 21:35:57 ~ I have been reading Liberty Fails thread for years, but only reading this article tonight it occurred to me the consequences of an "Angry Eagle" hence the choice of picture.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-03-02 03:16:36 ~ Headed for the Caribbean - always a thorn in the side of the British Empire.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2012-03-02 11:08:17 ~ Couple of points. First the Insurrection was NOT about slavery, it was about States Rights; specifially it started over the Tarriff of Abominations (desired by the manufacturing North, but not the agricultural South - specifically South Carolina) and Second, during this period, South Carolina stood pretty much alone in their desire to scoot. Added a comment to make this clearer. Ed

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-03-02 15:33:48 ~ Tariffs might be enough for a war. Anything that hits people in their pocketbooks is enough to act.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-03-02 17:53:31 ~ So what was New England doing? And did they have some sort of local "Congress" (one loyal to Britain, of course) to levy taxes?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-03-03 13:26:23 ~ The "states' rights" Confederates cared about were their rights to own, buy and sell African-Americans. This is made abundantly clear by (1) demands after the 1860 election that its outcome be ignored and a pro-slavery candidate (there were three candidates, of varying persuasions, besides Lincoln) installed as president; (2) the secession resolutions of such states as South Carolina, which stated baldly that protecting slavery was the reason for leaving the Union; and (3) the Confederate constitution, which explicitly prohibited the passage of any law "denying or impairing the right of property in Negro slaves." The slaveholding South certainly didn't care about the "states' rights" of Northern states: in the 1850s they demanded that the federal government send in troops if necessary to force the surrender of runaway slaves residing in free states. As for South Carolina standing alone, that was during the "nullification crisis" in our history, a few years prior to the Insurrection in this timeline. In this timeline, the entire South faced a threat to its most cherished institution due to Britain's decision to ban slavery throughout the Empire. And as for New England, its states, or rather colonies (remember, this alternate America is still under British rule) contribute troops to fight the Insurrection alongside the British. While independence sentiment remains, in this instance it's trumped by offense at the South's choice to rebel to keep slavery.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Congress had abolished slavery? muses Robbie Taylor. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the April 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1807, after months of riotous debate, the American Congress abolishes slavery. Northern representatives joined with a surprisingly large number of southern politicians to pass the Writ of Emancipation.

Writ of EmancipationThe origin of the Great Writ was actually just an attempt to stop the traffic in slaves from Africa, but the abolitionists found enough sympathizers to pass much more comprehensive legislation.

President Thomas Jefferson (pictured), himself a southerner and slave-owner, signed the bill into law, saying, "Today, we finally acknowledge the noble sentiments that we spoke of in the Constitution; today, all men are equal under the law, at last".

A new article by Robbie TaylorIt was thought by many of his contemporaries that Jefferson had a slave lover who had influenced his decision, and indeed, after leaving office, Jefferson married a former slave who was his dead wife's half-sister.

As to the Great Writ itself, although the southern leadership had considered slavery to be of little importance to their region, hundreds of slave-owners felt that it was an attack on them, personally. Minor rebellions flared in the south for decades as the former slave-owners attempted to take their revenge on the US for what they perceived as a usurpation of their sovereignty, and pockets of slavery existed until the 1840's before the government could finally track them all down.


Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: History Channel Labels: Slavery, Abolition, Africa, Thomas Jefferson, African Holocaust.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2011-03-29 16:51:34 ~ Beautiful alt quote from Jefferson. Leaves room for thought,in a very good way.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-03-29 17:22:52 ~ A long, shallow civil war... enough to establish federalism firmly?

Readers Comment Bruce Johnson commented on 2011-03-29 19:53:20 ~ As with the 'Taylor lives' story this runs square into the Constitution -- which allowed for the end of the slave trade (which most already supported in the 1780s), but left the institution itself to the states (many of which would strongly oppose ending slavery). That is, Congress COULD pass legislation to end the slave trade, but NOT to end slavery (except in D.C. and the territories). And what is the EXPLANATION for this sudden strong pro-emancipation movement in the South? Also very confused on "abolitionists" -- sounds like you mean IMMEDIATE general emancipation. But no movement of any significant size even in the NORTH started advocating this method till about 1830. (As for Jefferson's *marrying* Sally Hemmings... now you've absolutely left the realm of reality, and what Jefferson would remotely consider doing in Southern society of the time.)

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-29 21:05:45 ~ I take it that the cotton gin hadn't been invented yet. It was the cotton boom that made slavery a really big thing in the South, but not in the North.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-03-30 00:44:55 ~ 1. "All men are created equal" was not in the Constitution but in the Declaration of Independence, as Jefferson, who drafted the latter, should have known. The Constitution as originally written and as it stood in 1807, with (to take just one example) its provision to count slaves as three-fifths of a person each for purposes of Congressional apportionment, explicitly endorsed inequality. 2. It was about all the South could choke down to abolish the African slave trade in 1808, let alone abolish slavery itself--and the abolition of the slave trade was permitted because Southerners feared a continued infusion of "untamed" African blacks would eventually lead to a slave rebellion. I don't see a POD which would have changed opinion enough to make ending slavery itself possible so early.

Readers Comment Brian Hartman commented on 2011-03-30 17:50:13 ~ Aside from Eric Lipps' point about the quote being from the Declaration (which Jefferson drafted) instead of the Constitution, I think the big problem with this one is that there's no explanation given for the South's sudden emancipation fever. Not only that, but Jefferson *himself* had slaves. If he didn't emancipate his own slaves, why would he emancipate others'? And as Eric L. also points out, in the South of the time, (and even, among many, the South of today) Jefferson wouldn't have been able to marry Hemmings without losing his reputation. Remember: 1808 is about 20 years out from the constitutional convention, and even then, the question of slavery was very much on the table. A lot of the language of the Constitution was put there specifically to mollify the slaveholders. Abolishing slavery so soon after the constitutional convention doesn't make a lot of sense. A lot of the people at the convention were still in positions of power.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Golden Bear Republic decided to stay a Republic instead of gaining statehood? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1836, on this day in Agua Dulce Creek, Coahuila y Tejas Province, the sun was gradually creeping over the far hilltops, but it wasn't likely to obscure the vision of the waiting cavalry.

Bienvenidos a California!The leading dragoon shifted slightly in his saddle, so that the branch of a tree shaded his eyes from the slowly brightening rays. But the light of the sun had an advantage- on the road winding past the base of the gently sloping hill, the Texans were clearly visible.

Fifty-one, fifty-two, fifty-three men, marching with little order down the road. Fifty-three rebel Texans on the road, fifty-three men in contempt of the laws of the land and of their superiors. The dragoon's lip curled. He ran his fingers along the handle of his sabre, stroking the cold metal and then slowly tightening his grip around it. The rest of his company was similarly waiting, men and horses tense before the coming uproar, awaiting one thing only.

A sudden bugle sounded two harsh cries, each echoed in the valley by a Texan voice:
"Mexicans!"
"Ambush!"

The dragoon spurred his black horse forward, and with a great sweep of his hand drew his long, steel sabre, which flashed red in the early sunlight as it hissed round in front of him. He lowered the point of the blade, steadying his hand despite the jarring motion as his horse, among forty others, pressed down the slope, and aimed the sword directly at his target- the one Texan he could see wearing a dark blue soldier's uniform. Those riders to his right and left recognised their captain's signal from the corner of their eyes, and knew what he meant. The Texan commander was his kill.

The victim was hurriedly trying to bring about some semblance of order among his men, pressing them to form firing lines and bring down some the onrushing horses before they were upon them, but to little avail. Fifty yards, forty, thirty, twenty, ten.

In a vicious, scything arc the dragoon slashed his sabre into the first Texan in his path, a grizzled-looking man in a mud-stained white shirt. The blade slit a neat line around the base of the man's neck and he dropped his rifle, clutching instead at the newly-opened wound, which was already beginning to tinge his shirt a different colour. A second man swung the heavy butt of a gun towards the horseman, who slid neatly in his saddle leaving the weapon to fly harmlessly past, and flicked his better weapon back with a twist of the wrist, catching the rebel across the face with its razor-sharp point. He fell with a cry that mixed surprise and pain, it was left to the onrushing Mexican horses to finish the job their captain had started.

A article from "The Golden Nation" by DerKaizerTaking the reins with his sword-hand, the dragoon reached from his side for a long-barrelled, sleek, black pistol and drew in his horse, who reared high to halt its gallop. The rider lowered his gun at one of the few Texans who had managed to get a shot off- a boy surely not yet of age who was hurriedly trying to reload the weapon with fumbling hands- one crack from the pistol, and he fell. A guttural roar from his right side caused the dragoon to twist in his saddle, to see a bearded man rushing at him holding a bayonet high in both hands. But the attacker was too far away, and his target's reflexes too fast. The bullet caught him near his left shoulder, and he, too, fell. This was not a challenge, this was target practice.

Replacing his pistol in its holster, he turned his horse swiftly and kicked her on towards the rising sun, to where the soldier stood. This was no amateur. He had felled a dragoon to the right of the captain on the charge with his rifle, and now held a pistol and a finely-crafted sword in his hand. A man worth killing.

"Senor!" He called, in a passable English accent. "Will you do me the honour?"

The soldier understood him, he dropped his pistol and raised the sabre in his right hand. The dragoon once again reigned in his mount and vaulted easily from the saddle with a practiced air, likewise with sabre in hand.

The Texan lunged, and his adversary twisted on the spot, neatly dodging the attack, and beating the other's back with the flat of his blade- this was not the killing blow, he was merely chastising his opponent for so pedestrian an effort. The Texan brought his sword down in a great blow, and the dragoon raised his blade in turn, and with a resounding clash the two weapons met, sending a shuddering blow down each hand. The dragoon slid away, ducking under a rapid swipe from his opponent, and jabbed him under the arm, tearing the blue sleeve and the skin underneath. The victim growled in anger and pulled himself free, lunging again and again failing to meet his mark- but this time the dragoon's attack was met with the Texan's sword and the two parted again.

Now the dragoon darted forwards with a lunge of his own, and though the Texan parried he flicked his wrist rapidly- more rapidly than his opponent had anticipated, and caught him in the sword-hand. The Texan dropped his weapon with a howl of pain and anger, blood streaming down his hand, and as he looked up at his opponent he caught the dragoon's boot in his face, and fell onto his back. The point of his adversary's sabre hovered above his face.

"I thank you, senor, an honourable display.". Came the Spanish voice.
"Honourable?" Spat the Texan in pain. "Call an ambush honourable? You're all the same- cheating Mexican.".
"Californian, actually". Replied the dragoon with a smile, and drove the sabre downwards.
The whole alternate history is available at Paradox Plaza.


Entry posted by Guest Historian DerKaiser Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alt History Wikia
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Golden Bear Republic Source: Paradox Plaza Labels: Mexico, California, America, Golden Bear, West Coast.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-04-17 18:17:01 ~ So California's independent, but in alliance with Mexico? I have a hard time seeing that.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-04-17 19:38:39 ~ So do I.

Readers Comment Mike commented on 2011-04-17 19:49:44 ~ they did not win at the time but will the next time. Lets say they had won. CA would have been as bad off as the rest of Mexico. For the life of me I don't know why they think they can run the CA economy better then whites. They won't be able to. They will make a waste of it's resources.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-04-17 19:50:40 ~ Well, if you're a small republic with American Manifest Destiny bearing down on you, aligning with Mexico isn't such a bad idea...

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2011-04-17 21:30:38 ~ By the time California's potential statehood became an issue, Mexico was well on its way to becoming a non-player in North America. Most residents of California saw US dominance as a given and, most likely, the best way to go in terms of future security.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-04-17 22:34:10 ~ Re "Mike's" comment: Let's leave aside the racism implied here, especially since Hispanics were actually counted as white, at least offcially, until fairly recently (nobody thinks Spain is a nonwhite country). Looking at California right now,does "white" management look all that much better than what Mexico has?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-04-18 18:59:51 ~ When gold's discovered in 1849 (or whenever in this TL), the US would swoop in with massive imperialistic force. Enough to spark a second Mexican-American War with allies involved?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-04-18 19:00:47 ~ When gold's discovered in 1849 (or whenever in this TL), the US would swoop in with massive imperialistic force. Enough to spark a second Mexican-American War with allies involved?


In 1877, Democrat Samuel J. Tilden was awarded the presidency of the United States by an 8-7 vote of an electoral commission established to resolve the disputed 1876 election.

Tilden won after the defection of a single Republican commission member forced the commission to evenly divide the disputed electoral votes of three Southern states rather than, as the other Republican members had wanted, awarding them all to GOP contender Rutherford B. Hayes.

 -

Had the dissident member voted with his fellow Republicans, Hayes would have won, by 185 electoral votes to Tilden's 184.

The "back-room" character of this decision lent force to a movement to abolish the Electoral College, and in 1901, the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution would do exactly that, establishing direct election of the president. Ironically, U.S. senators would not be directly elected until the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913; until that time, they would continue to be chosen by state legislatures.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Samuel Tilden, Rutherford Hayes, America, Election, Presidency.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2011-05-15 18:18:56 ~ It should have been so.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-05-15 19:05:39 ~ I know there was an almighty brouhaha about this election. Would Pres't Tilden have brought Reconstruction to an end, or would he not have dared?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-05-15 23:19:59 ~ According to what I've read, IOTL Hayes got all of the disputed Southern electors in part by way of a back-room deal to end Reconstruction. If Tilden had been elected because of the failure of such a bargain, he'd probably have had a hard slog getting anything at all done as president: Republicans would be furious that he'd won the way he did, and would have used their clout in Congress to frustrate any Tilden administration initiatives. I suspect Reconstruction would have ended anyway, though perhaps not quite so abruptly as in our history; it had been gradually loosening throughout the 1870s anyway as state after ex-Confederate state met the (shockingly mild) conditions fpor readmission to the Union: ratification of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and the signng of a loyalty oath by a mere 10 percent of their citizens.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-05-16 15:33:12 ~ Wonder if this could break down (or add to) some of the corruption of the Gilded Age.


In 1995, after several weeks of often angry debate, President Sam Nunn's proposal for creating an anti-terrorism Internal Defense Administration is defeated in the Senate. Among the loudest voices against it has been former President Edward M. Kennedy.

Among the idea's defenders, the most forceful has been Tennessee Senator Albert Gore.

Pres. Nominee
Pres. Nominee - Sam Nunn
Sam Nunn

"No one is more aware than I of the dangers potentially posed by such an agency," the Senator explains. "However, we cannot leave this nation naked to terrorist attack. Conventional police forces cannot combat terrorists effectively, and the FBI, while it has the tools, has too many other responsibilities. We need a new agency to counter this new and growing threat. I believe Congress can design one which will carry out its mission within the limits imposed by the Constitution".

Unfortunately for him, not enough of his fellow senators share that belief.The split between Kennedy and Gore on this issue strains what had been a friendly relationship between the former President and the Senator. Ex-President Kennedy had been quietly favoring a Gore run for the presidency in 2000, but will grow cooler on the idea following this episode.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sam Nunn, Presidency, 1992 Election, America, Assasination.



In 1836, Santa Anna's forces, reeling from their defeat at the Alamo, are crushed by the combined forces of Houston, Travis and Fannin at San Antonio. Colonel William Travis, the hero of the Alamo, accepts the surrender of the Mexican leader, and promises him that Texas and Mexico will 'live side-by-side in peace as long as you respect the sanctity of our borders.' Travis became the first president of the Republic of Texas in elections held that year.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1970, the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, declared his country a republic, cutting its last link with the British Crown.

Mr Mugabe signed a proclamation officially dissolving the current parliament and introducing a new Republican Constitution. The new Zimbabwean Republic, came into being at 2301BST yesterday, unrecognised by Western Governments apart from Canada.

 -

The core of the dispute sprung from the Victoria Falls meeting in late 1963, in which then Rhodesian Deputy Prime Minister Ian Smith extracted a key promise from British Foreign Secretary Rab Butler. Butler grandly declared that the British Government were 'very pleased to agree' to independence at least on the same time scale as Zambia and Malawi.

This unscrupulous commitment was a clear abrogration of No Independence Before Majority African Rule, devised by the forward thinking Canadian Government. This precipitated a civil war, with Ian Smith and the White Settler Government defeated before the decade was out.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: BBC News Labels: Zimbabwe, Rhodesia, Robert Mugabe, Canada, Rab Butler.



In 1969, Soviet and Chinese forces clashed at the Damanski. Zhenbao border outpost on the Ussuri River. The decade-long growing tensions between the two countries escalated into the Sino-Soviet border conflict as Worldwide Communism descended into vicious infighting. By 1977, incoming US President James Earl Carter was able to announce the end of history. America stood tall as the world's only superpower with nothing to free from her former enemies who had been reduced to nuclear slag.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Other Timelines Labels: Douglas MacArthur, MacArthur Doctrine, Ussuri River War , Far East, Greater East Asia War.



In 1836, Sam Houston and the other founding fathers of Texas sign their Declaration of Independence, a document drafted by a newcomer to their ranks at Washington-On-The-Brazos, a man by the name of Richard Tolman. He had forcefully persuaded all of them to agree to abolish slavery from the fledgling nation, a small miracle in light of the fact that most of the founders were slave-holders, but according to Houston's diary entry from that day, Tolman was 'the most persuasive man I ever met - it was like he knew what you were thinking before you thought it.'

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Richard Tolman Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dr. Richard Tolman, Robbie A. Taylor, Time Travel, Time, Physics.



In 1836, Texan rebels at Washington-On-The-Brazos receive word that U.S. troops are on their way; President Andrew Jackson has agreed to annex them into the United States, and declare war on Mexico. Sam Houston, leader of the rebels, halts work on the independence proclamation and instead produces the treaty that will join the Texas Territory to the United States.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1836, at a ceremony in Washington, Texas, Conspirators of the Speaker's Line break the rebel nation away from Mexican rule. They plan to use the vast western lands of Texas to base their own people and experiments. General Santa Anna, a Conqueror of the Speaker's Line, almost manages to recapture them, but fails in two different wars against them.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Telka Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Speakers Line, Robbie A. Taylor, The Dreaming, Conspiracy, Speakers.



In 1836, the Texican People's Republic, under the leadership of Thomas Skidmore, declares its independence from imperialist Mexico in a ceremony at Washington-On-The-Brazos. Skidmore, a labor organizer back in the United States, turns the new nation of Texas into a place where people are proud to work, and know that their labor is the real foundation of wealth.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 12-11-0-11-3, the Caddo, Apache and Tejas, banded together a mere two years before, achieve the impossible, and free themselves from the rule of the Oueztecan Empire. For the next 9 years, their tiny nation holds off the mightiest country in the world, but the economic boycott Ouezteca enforces against finally leads them to rejoin the empire in 12-11-10-3-15.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1836, Texas, long a center for those unwilling to live under the rules of the North American Confederation, signs the San Jacinto Treaty, granting it independence. Over the next century, it remains an island of rugged individualism in the sea of Mlosh-led conformity.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Mlosh Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Mlosh, 1720, Robbie A. Taylor, Warp, Alien.



In 1836, Generalissimo Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna overcomes the treachery of the rebel Texicans and finally crushes Sam Houston and his army in their little encampment they called Washington-On-The-Brazos. The rebels had attempted to lull Santa Anna away with the charms of a lovely young woman, but the Generalissimo was too clever for them.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 2000, former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet boarded a military transport plane to Belgium after being told the UK would extradite him on torture charges.

Speaking to MPs in the House of Commons shortly after General Pinochet's departure the Prime Minister Mr Bryan Gould said he was aware the General was now likely to stand trial. 'I was driven to the conclusion that a trial of the charges against Senator Pinochet, was a critical test of our ethical foreign policy,' Mr Gould said.

 -

The essence of the dispute is the ethical foreign policy deviced by Mr Gould and his Foreign Secretary, Mr Robin Cook. The policy is a decisive break with the past, especially the excesses of the Thatcher era which include cooperation with the General's oppressive regime.

The Conservatives challenged today's decision. Leader William Hague accused Labour of incompetence, he said four million pounds of public money had been wasted on 'moral posturing' which had achieved nothing.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: BBC News Labels: General Pinochet, New Labour, Ethical Foreign Policy, Bryan Gould, Robin Cook.



Buddha

In 1815, by signing a binding treaty indigenous headmen of the Kingdom of Kandy (Sri Lanka) forced representatives of the British Crown to permanently withdraw the Royal Navy from the total exclusion zone of 200 nautical miles around the Island and southern tip of the subcontinent of Hindustan.

The British were also forced to accept that the Kingdom of Kandy would be governed according to its customary Buddhist laws and institutions.

Buddha - Protector
Protector

The British had been transfixed by giant sized images of Buddha in recumbent, standing and sitting postures cut in the rock caves in various parts of the country. By now the British were convinced that certain calamities which fell upon the invaders were due to his displeasure.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Kandy, Buddha, British Empire, Invaders, Peace Treaty.



In 1836, Texan rebels at Washington-On-The-Brazos receive word that U.S. troops are on their way; President Andrew Jackson has agreed to annex them into the United States, and declare war on Mexico. Sam Houston, leader of the rebels, halts work on the independence proclamation and instead produces the treaty that will join the Texas Territory to the United States.

 -

Variant entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Washington-On-The-Brazos, Mexico, Texas, America, South-west.



In 1836, Santa Anna's forces, reeling from their defeat at the Alamo, are crushed by the combined forces of Houston, Travis and Fannin at San Antonio. Colonel William Travis, the hero of the Alamo, accepts the surrender of the Mexican leader, and promises him that Texas and Mexico will 'live side-by-side in peace as long as you respect the sanctity of our borders.' Travis became the first president of the Republic of Texas in elections held that year.

 -

Variant entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Washington-On-The-Brazos, Mexico, Texas, America, South-west.



In 1836, the Texican People's Republic, under the leadership of Thomas Skidmore, declares its independence from imperialist Mexico in a ceremony at Washington-On-The-Brazos. Skidmore, a labor organizer back in the United States, turns the new nation of Texas into a place where people are proud to work, and know that their labor is the real foundation of wealth.

 -

Variant entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Washington-On-The-Brazos, Mexico, Texas, America, South-west.



In 12-11-0-11-3, the Caddo, Apache and Tejas, banded together a mere two years before, achieve the impossible, and free themselves from the rule of the Oueztecan Empire. For the next 9 years, their tiny nation holds off the mightiest country in the world, but the economic boycott Ouezteca enforces against finally leads them to rejoin the empire in 12-11-10-3-15.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Caddo, Mexico, Texas, America, South-west.



In 1836, Generalissimo Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna overcomes the treachery of the rebel Texicans and finally crushes Sam Houston and his army in their little encampment they called Washington-On-The-Brazos. The rebels had attempted to lull Santa Anna away with the charms of a lovely young woman, but the Generalissimo was too clever for them.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1946, Ho Chi Minh was elected the President of Vietnam, acting as a vital power broker in the Far East as the United States sought to rebuild the region from the ashes of the Japanese and European Colonial Empires. Uncle Ho had been a trusted ally since President Woodrow Wilson met with him at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, and was persuaded to extend the definition of self-determination to indigenous people outside of Europe as intended by the British and the French. Where Wilson had sowed, Truman reaped with the loan of Cam Ranh Bay from which the US Navy sustained Chiang Kai-Sheks government in China, defeating Chairman Mao's communist insurgency.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ho Chi Minh, Uncle Ho, Vietnam War, Indochina, America.



In 1888, the Convention of Constantinople was signed by Great Britain, Germany, Austro-Hungary, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, and Turkey, guaranteeing a right of passage of all ships through the Suez Canal during war and peace. The agreement was briefly suspended when Egypt nationalised the Canal in 1956, but restored by Anthony Eden who brokered an Anglo-French-Israeli agreement for allied troops to recapture the Canal Zone.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Convention of Constantinople, Suez Crisis, Suez Canal, Anthony Eden, Nasser.





March 1



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Charles, Lindbergh Jr. returned alive? muses Jackie Rose. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

It is March 1, 1932, .. and the nation is stunned to learn that Charles Lindbergh's infant son has been kidnapped.
An installment from the Happy Endings thread

Happy Endings Part 24
Lindy is Lucky Again
Everyone breathes sigh of relief when the child is returned unharmed, after the ransom is paid. He later grows up to be as skilled a pilot as his father .. and that is saying a great deal, since "Lucky Lindy" is well known for having flown non-stop across the Atlantic in 1927, at age 25.

After the kidnapping, he is more famous than ever .. and more in demand as a speaker on the future of air-plane flight. It will, he believes, include a larger role for air combat in wartime, and urges America to prepare for any conflict that may come. His warnings grow increasingly serious as Germany starts to re-arm.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jackie Rose Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jackie Rose, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Happy Endings Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charles Lindbergh, Kidnap, America, Premature Death, Isolation.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, In real life: Tragically, as we all know, Charles, Jr. was found dead. As a result, the Lindbergh family left America to live in Germany .. even though, ironically, the kidnap-killer had been a German named Bruno Hauptmann. Lindbergh was later so impressed by German air power that he urged Britain, France and above all America to avoid fighting against it. This resulted in his leadership of the isolationist movement called America First, which might well have delayed re-armament efforts until after the Pearl Harbor surprise attack.

As another unplanned effect .. The infant's death, and Hauptmann's execution, led to the Lindbergh Law, making kidnapping for ransom a capital offense .. even though Clarence Darrow and others warned that it would lead the kidnappers with no reason for leaving the victim alive.


Facebook Comment Comment from John Ritzert on Facebook: Many historians today consider Hauptmann to be innocent of the kidnapping and murder.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-05-17 20:38:54 ~ People who've studied the crime without preconceptions are sure that Hauptmann was guilty. That's as in "guilty, guilty, guilty!"

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-05-18 20:22:18 ~ OH, all right. What I should have said was, "the accused kidnap killer..." or "the man executed for the crime...'

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2013-05-18 20:25:53 ~ The only "evidence" that Schwartzkopf Sr. was able to dig up was purely circumstancial - and that's a fact. They needed a conviction and they needed now so they grabbed the first loser that they could find and make the "facts" stick to.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-05-21 15:10:16 ~ Lindbergh baby would be too young to fight in WWII, but he could see action in Korea.

Facebook Comment Comment from John Ritzert on Facebook: He was a professional carpenter. The rickety handmade ladder was clearly made by an untalented amateur. Also, why would he have torn up his own attic for wood when he had easy and unnoteworthy access to wood from the lumber yard he frequented?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Beneke was a Welsh Wizard? muses Dirk Puehl. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1827, it was rather a chance meeting that brought the German professor Friedrich Eduard Beneke together with Rosmerta Howl from Carmarthen.
This post was written by Dirk Puehl the highly recommended author of #onthisday #history Google+ posts.

Beneke, Welsh WizardDirk Puehl writes - The former had just returned to Berlin after years of disfavour for speaking out against mighty Hegel, the latter visited the Prußian capital in the wake of "Pickwick" Fürst von Pückler-Muskau.

The Welsh adventureß was an infrequent guest in the famous Salon of Rahel Varnhagen where she and Beneke became acquainted during a soiree. A lengthy discussion together with the famous Romantic poet Ludwig Tieck ensued, with Beneke lecturing his position of metaphysics, Tieck adding the sense of wonder and magic while Rosmerta introduced the professor and the poet to Iolo Morganwg's theory of concentric rings of existence emerging from the old Celtic Otherworld, the Annwn, then a pet theory of the Welsh revival circles.

Whether the unfamiliar theory and ancient lore or the charms of Rosmerta Howl captivated Beneke's interest is open to debate. While Tieck perpetuated the meeting in his novel "The Scholar" ("Der Gelehrte"), Beneke began to study history, language and customs of the old Gauls and Britons with a vengeance. He studied Brythonic languages together with Friedrich Rückert who was equally captivated by the topic and began to estrange his Berlin students beyond anti-Hegelian positions with highly theoretical deliberations on other and spirit-worlds as well as metempsychosis.

Beneke finally lost his chair at the Berlin University of the Arts in 1832 and returned to Göttingen to earn a meagre living as lecturer, since the late 1830s as assistant of the Princeps mathematicorum Carl Friedfrich Gauß, he even published a paper on "Paraxial Approximation and the Wisdom of the Ancients" and was noted especially in students' anecdotes for sudden appearances and disappearances in and from improbable places.

Beneke was in correspondence with quite a few members of the Gwyneddigion Society on the inheritance of Iolo Morganwg who had died in 1826 as well as the whereabouts of Rosmerta Howl until he finally met with William Owen Pughe and others in London in 1835. How he made the journey from Göttingen to there with almost no means to speak of remains a mystery. The discußions followed up the topics of the surviving correspondence, about the Welsh fairies, the Tylwyth Teg, fairy paths, the Annwn and, of course, Rosmerta. He finally met her in Camarthen in 1836 and returned to Göttingen a year later after a prolonged but undocumented sojourn in the historical region of Brycheiniog in Southern Wales.

His unexpected reappearance in the German university town saw him not only obviously financially independent but in even more frequent meetings with Gauß without giving lectures anymore. Beneke resettled to a lonely manor in the nearby Harz mountain range where he continüd his studies in utmost privacy. He was rumoured to have been seen in various European towns and ancient locations from Spain, France and Bohemia and even Central Turkey to Scotland and Ireland until he finally disappeared on March 1st, 1854 on the island of Anglesey. His body was discovered in June 1856, floating in a Berlin Canal, without any obvious reasons for his death.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Dirk Puehl Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Dirk Puehl, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Dirks Blog Source: Wikipedia Labels: Friedrich Eduard Beneke, Carmarthen, Germany, St Davids Day, Wales.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality on March 1, 1854 he disappeared, and more than two years later his remains were found in the canal near Charlottenburg. There was some suspicion that he had committed suicide in a fit of mental depression.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-03-03 01:35:07 ~ Are you saying that in this TL this guy discovered magic? I'm not sure I understand what's going on.

Readers Comment John Braungart commented on 2013-03-03 20:14:10 ~ Magic is merely science that we don't understand as yet. (apologies to Arthur C. Clark)

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-03-13 17:53:31 ~ Great grounds for a hidden histories novel.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Bardiya had executed his treasonous Lords? muses Jeff Provine. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 330 BC, on this day Alexander of Macedonians sent the main force of his army to Persepolis.

The Glory that is PersepolisBut on the Royal Road, they were intercepted by Persian King Bardiya's elite troops, an army battle-hardened by years of warfare conquering Indian kingdoms. The young conqueror was killed, enabling the Persians to turn their attention westward again.

In time, they would reconquer Egypt and briought back their old allies in Phoenicia for a successful invasion of Greece. After putting the Greeks under control, they pressed westward in the Mediterranean, taking the defeated Carthage as a protectorate and conquering the upstart Latins in their village called Rome.

Eventually the Persian Empire would spread from what the Greeks called the Pillars of Hercules (Gibraltar) to the nestled southeastern edge of the Himalayas. And Persepolis would become the capital of the modern world that it is today.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Persepolis, Alexander the Great, Bardiya, Persia, Mede.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Alexander quickly captured Persepolis before its treasury could be looted. After several months Alexander allowed his troops to loot Persepolis. A fire broke out in the eastern palace of Xerxes and spread to the rest of the city. It is not clear if it was an accident or a deliberate act of revenge for the burning of the Acropolis of Athens during the Second Persian invasion of Greece. Many historiansargue that while Alexander's army celebrated with a symposium they decided to take revenge against Persians. In that case it would be a combination of the two.


Readers Comment Haleh Brooks commented on 2013-03-01 09:49:44 ~ hm...very interesting. I guess the expansion would have happen only if the Achaemenid court would have beeb brought to heel by a very strong ruler...which was lacking in that time, as the ruling houses were becoming more and more powerful. It might have led to a new organisation maybe...like a ruling council perhaps... All very interesting notions!

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-03-01 11:59:02 ~ Xerxes? He is often considered to be Queen Esther's husband in the Bible, in a story that presumaby ended before Alexander defeated him. This theory shows up in two movies on the subject: Esther and the King and One Night With the King. So religious people might say that burning their palace was not a great idea, since it was followed by Alexander dying very young.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-03-01 23:25:58 ~ I don't know but that something else would have happened to the Persian Empire. it was highly autocratic and depended heavily on having a strong King-of-Kings in Persepolis. Sooner or later, there'd have been a weakling, or several, on the throne, and then all sorts of things could happen.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Gruffydd ap Llywelyn Fawr had survived the fall? muses Marko Bosscher. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1244, Gruffydd ap Llywelyn Fawr fell from the Tower of London, where he had been held hostage by Henry the Third.

Gruffydd ap Llywelyn falls from the TowerThe next morning a Yeoman of the Guard found sheets hanging from his window and bloodstains on the ground below, Gruffydd had been too heavy for his improvised escape ladder.

Rumors soon spread. Some said that Gruffydd had died, others that he had been allowed to escape by King Henry to ferment a civil war against his half-brother Dafydd.

In fact Gruffydd had been badly injured in the fall (he would never regain the use of his left arm, and walked with a limp), but he was whisked away by men loyal to Daffyd and would publicly proclaim his loyalty in Daffyd's court several months later.

His relationship to his brother was difficult. Their father Llywelyn the Great had greatly expanded the old realm of Gwynedd and proclaimed the principality of Wales, but he had selected the younger brother Daffyd (the son of his new English wife Joan) to be his heir.

In exchange for peace and the acknowledgement of his claims by the English king Gruffydd had been given as a hostage to King John the First. Gruffydd would spend many long years as a "guest" to the English King, while in Wales his half-brother was being groomed to take over from their father, In 1237 Llywelyn suffered a stroke and Daffyd ruled on his behalf, and when Llywelyn died three years later he formally became the ruler of the Gwynedd. Gruffyd was allowed to return to Wales, where he was held in captivity by his brother, to prevent him from making a claim to the Gwynedd.

But trouble was brewing on the horizon, the English King would not recognize Daffyd's claim outside the Gwynedd, and things came to a head in 1241. King Henry invaded Wales and forced Daffyd to accept a treaty that involved giving up his claims to the lands outside, and sending his half-brother to England as a hostage. Which is how Gruffydd came to be locked up in the Tower in 1244.

With his half-brother by his side and unrest brewing in the English half of Wales Daffyd formed an alliance with the other Welsh nobles and invaded the English lands. During 1245 he dealt King Henry several defeats, but in february 1246 he suddenly died.

Because Daffyd had left no heirs his older brother succeeded him, with one of his sons still held hostage by the English and the military campaign floundering because of the death of his half-brother Gruffyd agreed to negotiations. Because he was unwilling to yield the gains made by Daffyd hostilities soon broke out again.

In order to bolster his support Gruffyd proclaimed himself Prince of Wales the following year. He himself was was no commander, but he had the luck that his son Llywelyn was a great military leader and Henry suffered several defeats before finally agreeing to a treaty. By the time of his death in 1257 Gruffyd had been acknowledge as Prince of Wales by all the Welsh nobles, if not the English King. He was succeeded by his younger son Llywelyn.

A new article by Marko BosscherHenry released Owain, who had been in English captivity all this time, in the hopes of fostering civil war. Despite his strong claims Owain found little support among the war-weary Welsh, and his small army was quickly routed. He was imprisoned by his brother and lived in captivity for most of the rest of his life.

In 1264 the Baron's Revolt broke out in England, Llywelyn saw an opportunity. Proffering his fealty to Henry he offered to send an army in his support. Henry reluctantly accepted and recognized the title of Prince of Wales. Although this plan seemed to backfire when the Barons scored several victories, in the end Henry won and his son Edward I would further strengthen the position of the Prince of Wales in exchange for soldiers to fight the Scots.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Marko Bosscher Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Marko Bosscher, 2013-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Gruffydd ap Llywelyn Fawr, Henry the Third, Henry III, Tower of London, Premature Death.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Gruffydd fell to his death trying to escape from the Tower. His son Llywelyn would be recognized as Prince of Wales by the Welsh and the English, but Edward I quashed the nascent principality.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2013-03-01 01:29:02 ~ I know as much about Welsh history as Uwe Boll does about making movies....absolutely nothing.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2013-03-01 02:08:34 ~ And with the rise of the Welsh in the British Empire, the use of vowels faded from the language...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-03-02 05:28:08 ~ This would make Sharon Kay Penman's Welsh trilogy of novels come out different, wouldn't it?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Latin Towns combined to defeat Rome at its very birth? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 752 BC, the ancient experiment of building a new city upon the backs of outcasts came to an end when the allied armies of the Latins stormed Roma.

End of RomaLed by King Acron of the Caeninenses, the armies had joined upon the suggestion of fighting to end the city of Rome once and for all after its treachery at the festival of Neptune Equester. The enormous unified armies of the Latins crushed the Romans despite heavy losses with their king Romulus executed for crimes against womanhood.

It was an end to a tragic life. Romulus and his twin brother Remus had been born sons of the god Mars by the Vestal Virgin Rhea Silvia, daughter of Numitor, the deposed king of Alba Longa and descendant of the Trojan Aeneas. Amulius, who had deposed his brother Numitor, had Rhea executed and the boys exposed to ensure his place on the throne, but they were discovered by a she-wolf, who suckled them to health. They would then be found by shepherds, who would raise them to adulthood.

A new story by Jeff ProvineAs shepherds, they came into arguments with the shepherds of King Amulius, who captures Remus and discovers his identity. With the reality known, Romulus and Remus killed Amulius, restored their grandfather Numitor to the throne, and set off to make their own kingdom by building a city. The brothers argued almost immediately about which hill to build upon, and Romulus won via augury. As construction began upon the Palatine Hill, Remus criticized the work and, for final insult, jumped over the half-built wall. Romulus killed his brother and declared famously, "So perish every one that shall hereafter leap over my wall!"

When his city (named Roma after himself) was completed, Romulus selected the best one hundred men, naming them Patricians and creating a senate structure to aid him rule as fathers of the city. He organized the fighting men into his newly invented "legion" and depended more heavily on infantry than cavalry. The revolutionary city exploded in population, attracting exiles, criminals, runaways, ne'er-do-wells, and general vagrants. Most of these were males, and so the boomtown became grossly disproportionate with the sexes.

Taking Numitor's advice, Romulus decided to celebrate the festival of Neptune and invited the Latin people of the surrounding cities. Many came, particularly the Sabines. At Romulus' signal, the men of Rome pounced, carrying off as many virgins as they could - 683 according to ancient sources. Rather than sexual rape, the kidnapped women were invited to marry Roman husbands and granted shared property and civil rights in a city of free men. The women agreed to these progressive ideals, but the cities of their fathers rallied to take back their daughters. As they began to march, the Caeninenses held as spies detected the strength of the Roman army. Deciding to use cunning to deliver might, their king Acron called for a council with the other kings of the Antemnates, Crustumini, and the Sabines. Their unified army overwhelmed the Romans and decimated the city, punishing any woman who wept for her lost husband (and rights). Romulus, who had committed the sin of fratricide, was deserted by Mars and punished by Juno.

As per the ancient prophecy that the descendants of Aeneas would lead to a great nation, the truth came as Acron used the opportunity to create a permanent military confederation with the other cities. Unlike many of the Greek empires where dominant cities ruled over weaker ones and demanded tribute, the confederation was one of equals, usually only seen under the duress of war against a common enemy. The Italian Confederation would spread over the peninsula and create many colonies in the west while successfully defeating Greek attempts to colonize from the east.

Despite centuries of success, the Confederation would eventually be broken by the strength of the Carthaginian Empire, the embodiment of the curse of its ancient queen and abandoned lover of Aeneas, Dido. Carthage would go on to build a widespread merchant empire through Europe, the Mediterranean, and Africa until its own fall by invasion of the German Vandals. Even with its ultimate failure, the Italian ideals of confederation and equality would be a landmark looked back upon by political thinkers in the Enlightenment, serving as groundwork for breakaway Angle colonies of the New World (giving freedom to men but notably ignoring liberties of slaves and women).


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Roman Empire, Rome, King Acron, Caeninenses, Romulus .

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Latin towns attacked Rome one by one, and Romulus soundly defeated each in turn. The first were the Caeninenses with their king Acron killed in battle. Romulus returned to his city to hold the first "triumph", a parade celebrating victory in battle and containing many thankful sacrifices to the gods, primarily Jupiter. Rome would have many more triumphs over its years of transforming from a kingdom to a republic to an empire and conquering the known world from the Pillars of Hercules (Spain) to the Euphrates (Mesopotamia) as well as serving as a model for renewed theories of government in the 1700s.


Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-03-01 23:51:58 ~ Actually, the end of Roma will come when a new variety of long, thin tomatoes is developed.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-03-02 00:17:19 ~ What have tomatoes got to do with this? ;)

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2011-03-02 00:42:33 ~ I prefer Truss tomatoes myself... lol

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-02 02:02:36 ~ The end of Roma will arrive when the last gypsies give up wandering and petty crime.

Facebook Comment Comment from Alan Abramowitz on Facebook: This is a good one. But I dont see any meaningful survival of the Italian culture making it through the Dark Ages without Rome. Christianity needed Rome as well. I also doubt any long lasting organized Carthaginiam Empire. Maybe If Alexander conquered Italy as he panned to do (?) I see an organized Greco Roman West.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if no - controversial amendment to the Scottish devolution referendum? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

The Scotland Act 1978 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom intended to establish a Scottish Assembly as a devolved legislature for Scotland. At a referendum held in the following year, the Act failed to gain the necessary level of approval required by a controversial amendment, and was never put into effect...

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1979, on this day 51.6% of the Scottish electorate voted YES to the post-legislative devolution referendum on the Scotland Act 1978 providing sufficient support for the creation of a devolved deliberative assembly in Edinburgh.

Prayer of Saint Francis
The Scots Save the United Kingdom from Thatcherism by Ed & Bagpipelover
The referendum was immediately followed by a second political earthquake, this time south of the border. Out went "Sunny Jim" Callaghan and his mostly benign, consensus Labour Administration and in came the most radical right-wing administration in the history of British politics.

The incoming Prime Minister of Great Britain was Margaret Hilda Thatcher who arrived at Downing Street on May 4th paraphrasing the words of the Prayer of Saint Francis "Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope".

Political arithmetic suggested otherwise. Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) were certain to be left-wingers. Full independence for Scotland would lead to permanent conservative super-majorities in England. And the forces of resistance, in particular the Greater London Council and the Metropolitan County Councils had been gifted precious moral reinforcements that would save Great Britain from the nightmare of Thatcherism.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Scotland, Devolution, Edinburgh, Margaret Thatcher, Election.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we explore a point of divergence proposed on the Alternate History discussion board and have repurposed a significant amount of content from Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-09-29 02:50:28 ~ The Scots save the world again! (And I thought it was only in Highlander...)

Readers Comment Todayinah Ed. commented on 2011-09-29 03:10:06 ~ Disappointed supporters of the bill later claimed that the 40% rule was undemocratic.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-09-29 05:44:02 ~ Some of my relatives in the Green and Pleasant Land would have liked this, and liked it even more if Scotland could be walled off behind an impenetrable force field. Their views on the Tartan Menace are---explosive. If there were more people like them, I could make a mint coming up with and printing _The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Edinburgh._

Readers Comment Gordon Davie commented on 2011-09-29 10:03:57 ~ It's tempting to say that had the Scottish Assembly been set up in 1979 there would have been no Thatcher government but that isn't the case. The electorate had had enough of Callaghan and the vote of no confidence which brought him down merely made this happen five months sooner. However the Assembly as proposed was a pale shadow of the Scottish Parliament which sits today, a quarter of a mile from my house. So in hindsight the amendment to the 1979 Bill was a good thing for Scotland. In May this year the Scottish National Party shocked everybody - even themselves - by winning an outright majority in the Scottish Parliament, something the electoral system was specifically designed to prevent. However many former Labour voters were unhappy with the political situation in the wake of the General Election the previous year and while normally most would likely have switched to the Liberal Democrats, they were seen as having sold themselves out to the Conservatives, particularly with leader Nick Clegg utterly reversing one of his campaign promises, so they went to the SNP instead, with the result that a referendum on independence will be held some time in the next four years. None of this would have been possible under the 1979-style Assembly.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-09-29 15:21:12 ~ Eerie how well St. Francis translates into 1984-speak.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2011-09-29 18:01:12 ~ Interesting to see how English Tories might be some of the most outspoken supporters of Scottish independence.....




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Charlie Sheen had been interviewed by Katie Couric (rather than Andrea Canning)? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the April 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2011, to prove that "dying is for fools" the "Malibu Messiah" survived a hail of gun-fire from CBS News security officers after he stubbed a cigarette out and shot Katie Couric dead at the climax of a hostile interview held in his Los Angeles home.

Hot Shots Part ThreeStrategically placed nearby on a Papal Stake Out, Catholic Priests race to the scene on push-bikes and quickly set about performing an emergency rite of exorcism.

After a titanic struggle they caste out the evil being. Eyes flashing open, he explains that he is the moderately misbehaved demon Baal that has been possessed by a crazed party animal called Charlie Sheen..


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charlie Sheen, Katie Couric, Interview, Abuse, Carlos Estevez.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, thanks to Jeff Provine for his contribution to the development of this article.


Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-03-19 19:18:07 ~ Huh?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-20 00:49:21 ~ How terrifying! That poor demon, being possessed by an Avatar of Ultimate Silliness! He'll never live it down---even Screwtape will kick sand in his face on the beach!

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-03-20 19:57:49 ~ Perhaps not too far off... an exorcism might do some good. At least a bath's worth of holy water, anyway.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2011-03-20 20:59:27 ~ lmao...




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if FDR's father had backed down over his graduate education? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1933, arriving in Washington to take up the post of Chief of Naval Operations Franklin D. Roosevelt fulfilled a dream that he had cherished ever since enrolling at Annapolis instead of his father's preference of Harvard.

Fleet Admiral RooseveltBorn into a fabulously wealthy aristocratic family in Hyde Park, New York fifty-one years before, he was an eighth generation American of Dutch origin.

But it was the tabloid headlines of William Randolph Hearst that raised the family name to true celebrity status when his fifth cousin died at the head of a small regiment in Cuba in 1898.

Of course FDR would ultimately confront a threat from an island posing a much greater danger to America. And an incident much bigger than the blowing up of the USS Maine. But on this day in 1933, those fears were far into the future, and his immediate focus was to drive Naval reform in his "First Hundred Days". Ironically, for a man with no shortage of funds, his priority now was to save money on behalf of a Federal Government that was tottering on the brink of bankruptcy.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Navy, Annapolis, Admiral, Fleet.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-03-01 06:44:37 ~ Without TR, how would American history be different? And how would FDR have been different if he'd made a career of the Navy? Could he have mentored a young Robert Heinlein on his way to his own inevitable admiralcy?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-03-01 15:56:54 ~ For one, the Progressive Movement would lose a big voice. It'd be a very different US economically and legally.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-03-01 19:39:30 ~ I'm inferring that in this timeline FDR never contracted polio. That would have made a big difference all by itself.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-03-04 02:24:11 ~ Ah, but who is he CNO for? Without the redoutable Roosevelts in the presidency, is there another dynasty that has come to the White House?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the disgraced Vice President Aaron Burr was actually an unrecognised hero that had safeguarded liberty at a dangerous time for the Republic?. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1805, in the first impeachment of a Justice of the Supreme Court, the Jeffersonian Republicans-controlled Senate voted to convict Samuel Chase of charges of political bias that had resulted in the treatment of defendants and their counsel in a blatantly unfair manner.

Impeachment of Justice ChaseThe outcome represented a decisive setback for the Federalist Party because Chase was a well-known firebrand states-righter and revolutionary. At a stroke, Thomas Jefferson had seized control of the judiciary from the Federalists and also prevented Chase from running for President in 1808.

"Ought the seditious and official attack [by Chase] on the principles of our Constitution . . .to go unpunished?" ~ JeffersonPerhaps more significantly, conviction of an original signatory of the declaration of independence symbolised the final defeat of the sense of brotherhood amongst the remaining founding fathers. Infighting had been begun inside Washington's cabinet, developed during the elections of 1796 and 1800 and climaxed dramatically when Vice President Aaron Burr and former Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton had shot each other dead in a duel at Weehawken.

The beneficiary was unquestionably Jefferson, who could now enter his second term without equal, or indeed the inconvenience of an independent judiciary.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, Samuel Chase, Thomas Jefferson, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, Wikipedia ~ The Jeffersonian Republicans-controlled United States Senate began the impeachment trial of Chase in early 1805, with Vice President Aaron Burr presiding and Randolph leading the prosecution. Historian Forrest MacDonald has credited Burr's judicial manner in presiding over the impeachment trial of Justice Samuel Chase with helping to preserve the principle of judicial independence that was established by Marbury v. Madison in 1803. It was written by one Senator that Burr had conducted the proceedings with the "impartiality of an angel and the rigor of a devil".


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-04-28 04:52:06 ~ If this had happened, Burr might have been convicted.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-04-28 14:15:19 ~ I'm guessing you're a Libertarian. :)

Facebook Comment Comment from Charles Booth on Facebook: Man, you guys really don't like Hamilton, huh? WOOOW...Is it the whole central bank thing?

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-04-28 15:53:53 ~ If the impeachment had succeeded the inclination by the courts to misbehave indiviudally and to collectively abuse power from the bench would be severely curtailed. It would simply achieve on a rogue court what Magna Carta pushed upon the British Monarchy. This would be a major wanring shot against activist judges inclined to misbehave from the bench under the protection of 'judicial independence'. Legislating agendas from the Bench would become less tempting to the judiciary once precedent for removing them from the bench is set. Might this effect future supreme courts such as the Warren Court, I do not know. Might this corrupt politicians who have achieved political monopoly if their party takes the congress and the white house is possible but that would simply cause voters to push reforms in a different direction. Perhaps it might inpspire stronger States Rights movements and then a strong People Power movement. Overall, it would be a good and positive thing for the Republic and for American society.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-04-29 11:12:16 ~ Of course, one man's "misbehavior" can be another's matter of principle; the same goes for judcial "activism." Technically, you know, it is in any case not true that Supreme Court Justices serve for life: they serve indefinite terms "during good behavior." Congress, however, has been reluctant to impeach them for fear of cxompromising the independence of the judiciary, or of appearing to do so. And after the failed social experiment of the 1860s, "stronger States Rights movements" don't look all that appealing to me.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-05-05 06:18:51 ~ Impossible -- The Supreme Court is a higher court of appeals. It judges matters of law, only. Defendants don't appear.
Since the Supreme Court actually considers so few of the cases brought to it, it is generally understood that if a criminal case is heard, it is because the judges find it especially interesting. And as there are always eight other judges present at a Supreme Court session, it is unlikely that any justice, not even the chief justice, can behave so badly as to cause an impeachment.
I don't think that this has ever happened on the federal bench.



In 2002, After a savage firefight inside the Tora Bora cave complex, a mangled body is recovered which U.S. forces identify as that of Osama bin Laden.

 -

The death of Osama leads the network news that evening. Within hours, however, the Internet is buzzing with rumors that bin Laden's demise is a Gore administration hoax concocted for political gain. These speculations are encouraged by the fact that the condition of the body as seen in TV footage makes it difficult to recognize as that of the terror mastermind.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Gore Wins Source: Wikipedia Labels: Al Gore, Tony Blair, Desert Storm, September 11, War on Terror.



In 1939, Bulgarian sympathizers of the German Underground take over the country and expel the Greater Zionist Resistance. They become a great nuisance to the G.Z.R.'s southern flank during the war. The majority of the population, though, remains fairly sympathetic to the G.Z.R.'s cause.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Protocols Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Elders of Protocols of Zion, Robbie A. Taylor, Greater Zionist Resistence, GZR, Nazi.



In 1961, Navy pilot Alan Shepard becomes the first American in space.

Unlike his Russian counterpart Yuri Leonov, who had gone up the previous October, Shepard will make only a partial orbit before returning to Earth. That point will be carefully obscured in press releases until the Soviets succeed in pointing it out to the international media.

 - Dyna-soar
Dyna-soar

It is not lost on President Kennedy that Shepard has gone aloft atop a conventional rocket rather than the much-hyped Dyna-Soar, which remains years from launch. Although he had been enthusiastic about the space plane while in the Senate, Kennedy is beginning to doubt that it can be made to work. And with the Soviets continuing to forge ahead in space, the President is now considering an array of options to regain the initiative. Many of the alternatives resemble those considered by his opponent in the 1960 election, Vice-President Richard Nixon. Nevertheless, there is now too much money and political capital invested in Dyna-Soar to simply abandon it, barring some disaster.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Dyna-soar, Space Race, Soviet Union, America, Cold War.



In 2004, Charles Meriweather, commander of the Titan mission, finds the methane crabs, a strange species that lives at the shore of one of the moon's methane seas. The discovery of this species leads the team to the teeming life inside the methane seas.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1954, Puerto Rican nationalists, having assassinated President Truman just 4 years earlier, strike another blow against the United States by taking a dozen Congressman captive in the Capitol Building. When President Alben Barkley refuses to meet them or grant their demand of independence for Puerto Rico, they execute their captives, and are then killed by police.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 1939, Bulgarian sympathizers of the German Underground take over the country and expel the Greater Zionist Resistance. They become a great nuisance to the G.Z.R.'s southern flank during the war.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Protocols Source: Robbie Taylors Blog Labels: Elders of Protocols of Zion, Robbie A. Taylor, Greater Zionist Resistence, GZR, Nazi.



In 4630, Kang Teh, imperial governor of Manchuria, secedes from China in an attempt to grab the crown for himself. Within the month, the Emperor's soldiers convince him to rejoin the empire.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Chdo Democracy Source: Wikipedia Labels: Chdo_Democracy, Robbie A. Taylor, China, 4648, Emperor Dao-Ming.



In 1932, Charles Lindbergh discovers an intruder in his home and subdues him. The German man, who only identifies himself as John Smith, reveals under intense police interrogation that he was there to kidnap Lindbergh's infant son. Even after 10 years in prison for attempted kidnapping, 'Smith' never gave his real name.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor



In 12-8-3-14-9, the Susquehannock, an autonomous people allied with the Oueztecan Empire, abolish slavery within their borders. This causes runaway slaves across the continent to seek it out, swelling its borders. When the Oueztec come to reclaim their slaves, they find a people grown more powerful in their freedom than they had expected, and decide to leave them be.

Stub Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor





Older Posts 




© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.