A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Richard Tolman
 Sockless  Soviet America
 Speakers Line  The Sheridans
 The Baron  The Claw
 Warp  Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Fall of Aquileia
President Ferraro
Baron Jean de Batz
Upper Carolina
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Comrade Stalin 3
Defenestration of Prague
Margaret of Anjou
Comrade Stalin 4
Nova Roma
Nixon killed
President Heston dies
Happy Endings 20
POTUS Howard Baker
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
Concert of Europe
King Henry IXth
Farthest West
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Fed Lost Cause 4
Fed Lost Cause 3
James Bond
American Napoleon
Nieuw Zwolle
Steve Jobs, Google CEO
Battle of Lincoln
VP Herter
Plessy v. Ferguson
Malcolm X
Council of Pisa
Happy Endings 24
President Seward II
Breckinridge dies
President Seward
Fed Lost Cause 8
Mayor for Life
President Fonda
Fed Lost Cause 10
Madeleine Albright
Fed Lost Cause 7
Fast Heinz
Lewis and Clark
Fed Lost Cause 6
The Candyman
Fed Lost Cause 9
PM Beckett
Ellsberg Sentenced
PM Halifax
FBI Dir Burns
Fed Lost Cause 5
Sic semper tyrannis!
Lavoisier Survives
Monty in Berlin
Ethiopia Falls
3-term Truman
Fed Lost Cause 2
Orson Welles born
Happy Endings 23
The Oyster
Happy Endings Part 22
49th State, Redux
Birth of Flashman
Lake Peipus
Mission STS-51-L
Escape from Loch Leven Castle
Conte di Savoia
Fed Lost Cause 1
President Thornburgh
We, the People..
Maryland Secedes
Birth of Oliver Ellsworth

Site Meter

 Daily Headlines only
December 31



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Noah's Ark had been discovered? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1999, on this day an amazing discovery was made by a US expeditionary team operating at the summit of Mount Ararat in Turkey.
An installment from the Miracles thread.

Fourth MiracleThe wreckage of Noah's Ark had been located by a satellite. But amongst the debris, the American scientists discovered the skeletal remains of humans, animals and Nephilim, the giants who inhabited Canaan according to Numbers 13:33.

The mission was immediately upgraded from top secret to ultra secret. Because the US Government intended to reverse engineer the DNA in order to construct the super-soldier of the future. Ironically, the first deployment would be in Iraq, within close proximity of the location of the Garden of Eden.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jackie Rose, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: The Miracles Source: Wikipedia Labels: Noah's Ark, Deluge, Mount Ararat, Scotland, Stuart.

Google+ Comments Richard Byrd wrote on Google+ The would have found Gilgamesh.?

Facebook Comment Brian Gaugler on Facebook: A fascinating idea, it would definitely seem to confirm Christanity as being absolutely true, without a doubt, which I imagine would have a huge, huge, huge impact on the world.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-12-31 22:28:45 ~ Nephilim? Aliens in charge of the whole operation, obviously

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-31 22:56:58 ~ There really are giants in the world...suffering from a disease called gigantism, which is where the myth probably came from. If our government could engineer the DNA to make these giants stronger and longer-lived, well that would indeed be a boon to our country...although hardly a Biblical miracle.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-31 23:57:52 ~ that would knock a lot of theories into a cocked hat, wouldnt it?

Readers Comment Tom B commented on 2013-01-01 13:02:24 ~ Reminds me of "Monster Ark"

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-01-01 17:58:16 ~ So the sons of Anak would be in Canaan post-flood, but the Nephilim came up pre-flood, of which Noah and his sons were the male human survivors. Did they have Nephilim blood in 'em or was there another round of "God's sons and the daughters of man"?

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-01-02 13:34:47 ~ Superb movie outline.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2013-01-02 20:57:06 ~ Regardless of your religious affiliation, I think a lot of us would have paid some cash to see the look on the faces of Richard Dawkins, Chris Hitchens (RIP), and David Silverman once Christianity is confirmed in this fashion. :-D

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-01-02 21:06:45 ~ Actually, I don't think that the appearance of gigantism patients would have confirmed anything but the presence of the disease...causing the resulting legends.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Flora MacDonald had been the architect of the Stuart Restoration? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1720, on this day the Jacobite Pretender Charles Edward Stuart was born in the Palazzo Muti, Rome.
This article is a reversal of the Jackie Rose story Hard Man which focuses on Captain Francis O'Neill

Happy Endings Part 17
Hard Woman saves the Forty-Five Rebellion
Aged twenty-five he launched a bold attempt to restore the House of Stuart. Because in 1745 a five thousand man Jacobite army landed at Moidart in the Outer Hebrides. But of course it took a woman to save the forty-five rebellion from abject failure - the incomparable Highland rebel Flora MacDonald.

Hopes had built up rather quickly; at the Battle of Prestonpans they had soundly defeated the only government army in Scotland. But their hapless commander General John Cope would soon be replaced by the murderous Duke of Cumberland and the mood in the camp would drastically change. In despair the Young Pretender had left the still undefeated Jacobite Army in the hands of his trusted companion, Captain Francis O'Neill. Planning to flee Scotland forever, the Prince sought the incomparable Highland rebel Flora MacDonald for her assistance only to discover that the MacDonalds were secretly sympathetic with the Jacobite cause. She convinced the Prince to rejoin the Jacobite Army by promising to organize reinforcements from her own Clan. With fresh resolve, he inspired the "forty-five" rebels with a fiery new leadership that turned the tables on the Hanoverians.
The full novel is available for download at the Extasy Books web site.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jackie Rose, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Happy Endings Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charles Edward Stuart, Bonnie Prince Charlie, England, Scotland, Stuart.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, thanks to Jeff Provine, Jackie Rose and Jared Myers for their contributions to the development of this ongoing theme.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-31 15:40:54 ~ Would have put an interesting spin on the American Revolution...

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2012-12-31 17:12:47 ~ Either the American Revolution would have been a peaceful transition of power (BPC lets them go in peace), or there is no Revolution at all.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-31 18:17:59 ~ The Young Pretender would flee the field BEFORE the fatal Battle of Culloden? No way!

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-01-01 18:05:18 ~ Did any Englishman ever sit back to think "We have a Scottish pretender with French money fighting a German king who's fighting for Austria"?

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-01-01 18:20:02 ~ Jeff, there WERE good English Jacobites, who remembered that the Bonnie Prince was the grandson of an English king. They included Lady Primrose, one of those notorious "female rebels" who evolved into the modern feminists. You probably know already that "pretender" meant "claimant"...not "imitator."

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2013-01-02 13:38:29 ~ Thrilling, could have been, chapter to history. I hope there are some play or screen writers in the group here.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-01-02 16:59:45 ~ Well, Mike, there have been alternate histories about Charlie Victorious...most notably Prince Charlie's Bluff, where he comes to America.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Thomas Seymour had won out? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1548, on this day an extraordinary meeting of the Privy Council ordered the imprisonment of the vice-treasurer of the Bristol Mint, Sir William Sharington.

Baron of Sudeley
By Ed and Jacquelyn Friedlander
But they had caught the monkey and not the organ-grinder. Because via the word of an informant, the Lord Protector Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset had received a second-hand intelligence report that led him to suspect the possible involvement of his scheming brother, Thomas Seymour the Baron of Sudeley (who was currently serving as the Lord High Admiral). However, he was hesitant to openly accuse his brother at a Council meeting. Because their relationship had soured as Edward had received the more senior position as a result of their sister Anne's marriage to King Henry VIII in 1536. But Edward fatally misjudged the extent of Thomas jealous resentment, not able to believe that he had stumbled across the final stages of a dastardly act of high treason.

Sharington had indeed been debasing the currency and also fiddling the books for some time. When these acts of malfeasance were discovered by Thomas Seymour, he extorted monies from the Bristol mint. Initially these were small sums which he redirected to the eleven-year old King Edward VI who had childishly complained of receiving inadequate pocket money from the Lord Protector Edward Seymour. But events during the latter half of 1548 had forced the Baron to accelerate (and also expand) his plans to replace his brother Edward as Lord Protector. As a result, he was forced to extort much larger sums that he would use to finance an overthrow of the entire government.

In 1543, Thomas had developed a romantic interest in the widow Catherine Parr, but had been sent away from the Court by the jealous Henry VIII who then married her himself. After the King's death, Thomas secretly married Catherine, and this wedding gave him guardianship of the teenage Lady Elizabeth. At their Chelsea home, an inappropriate relationship developed with the forty-year old Thomas assuming the role of master.

The increasing likelihood of Sharington's arrest (and the discovery of his complicity in the corruption at Bristol Mint) forced Thomas Seymour to think bigger. He now decided that his interests were best served by installing Elizabeth as monarch as well as replacing his brother as Lord Protector. On the night of 16 January, Thomas broke into the Royal apartments at Hampton Court Palace and shot the King. The ruthlessness of this act of regicide set the tone for Elizabeth's rule, because Thomas Seymour had set his sights even higher - the mastery of Europe.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Thomas Seymour, Edward Seymour, Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Edward VI.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Thomas Seymour was beheaded for treason on March 10, 1549 and, of course, Elizabeth I never married anyone. Please note that we have respurposed content from Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-01-02 04:54:39 ~ Developing a romantic interest in Catherine Parr in 1843 would make one a necrophiliac. Fixed typo - thanks. Ed And shooting the King would put Mary on the throne...remember her? Assumption is Seymour forces Elizabeth onto the throne (somehow)

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-01-02 21:23:21 ~ A league of Germanic-based speakers would be interesting, and give a lot more strength for the Thirty Years War in the next century. http://bigthink.com/ideas/21061



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Rasputin had survived? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1916, in the early hours of the morning Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin was imprisoned at Yusopov's Moika Palace by the five noblemen who had spent the last twelve hours attempting without success to assassinate the holy devil who was planning to overthrow the Czar and establish his own satantic regime.

Cursed Muzhik 2The previous evening Prince Felix Yusupov, the Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich and the right-wing politician Vladimir Purishkevich had lured Rasputin to the same Palace cellar where they served him cakes and red wine laced with a massive amount of cyanide. Rasputin was unaffected, although Vasily Maklakov had supplied enough poison to kill five men.

Determined to finish the job, Yusupov became anxious about the possibility that Rasputin might live until the morning, leaving the conspirators no time to conceal his body. Yusupov ran upstairs to consult the others and then came back down to shoot Rasputin through the back with a revolver. Rasputin fell, and the company left the palace for a while. Yusupov, who had left without a coat, decided to return to get one, and, while at the palace, he went to check up on the body. Suddenly, Rasputin opened his eyes and lunged at Prince Yusupov. When he grabbed Prince Yusupov he ominously whispered in Yusupov's ear "you bad boy" and strangled him. At that moment, however, the other conspirators arrived and fired at him.

After being hit three times in the back, Rasputin fell once more. As they neared his body, the party found that, remarkably, he was still alive, struggling to get up. They clubbed him into submission and after binding his body and wrapping him in a carpet, they threw him into the icy Neva River. But somehow he worked his way loose and swum to a hole. And the conspirators decided to imprison the weakened Rasputin in the hope that a better plan would emerge.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Rasputin, Czar, Tsar Nicholas II, Russia, Russian Revolution.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in the original article Eric Oppen commented that there was a little known climax to the murder so we used that detail here to explain the point of divergence.


Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-08-07 22:29:04 ~ Any connection with Oswald Rayner and the British SIS?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-08-08 02:23:40 ~ "That's not a muzhik...that's the TERMINATOR!"



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if George Marshall succeeded as Robert E. Howard as Confederate President in the Two Americas timeline? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1880, on this day the sixteenth President of the Confederate States George Catlett Marshall, Jr. was born in Lexington, Virginia.

George Marshall
16th Confederate President
March 4, 1952 - 1958
He was a Confederate Army officer, former Secretary of State, under President Byrnes and the last Whig Party candidate to be elected president before the party broke up.

As President, Marshall kept up the pressure on the Soviet Union during the Cold War, made nuclear weapons a higher defense priority, began the Interstate Highway System and saw the start of the Confederate Civil Rights Movement.

At a time when the majority of the Whig party had grown more fiscally and socially conservative, Marshall was a Leeian Whig who gained support from moderates of both the Democrat and Whig party's. A new article from the "Two Americas" thread on Althistory WikiaHis push for an Interstate Highway System and his passing of the Confederate Civil Rights Act of 1955 were both popular with Liberals; however, these acts would eventually lead to a complete political realignment, with Conservatives from both the Whig and Democratic party's breaking away to form the Confederalist Party, while the remaining Democrats would eventually reshape themselves into the Liberal Party.
The whole alternate biography is available Althistory Wiki.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Alt Wikia Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alt History Wikia
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Two Americas Source: Althistory Wikia Labels: George Marshall, Richmond, Presidency, Confederacy, Election.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-04-23 04:57:14 ~ Pity that a liberal party could only exist in the Confederate States...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-04-23 07:05:06 ~ "Liberal" is a word with many meanings.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-04-23 17:00:04 ~ IHS oughta link up with the US for a smoother trade, if relations allow.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-04-23 20:48:03 ~ Re Eric Oppen's comment: True. The "Liberal Democratic Party" of Japan had very little in common ideologically with U.S.-style liberal Democrats; in fact, the LDP was deeply conservative from the start. Or to put it anothert way, a "Liberal" party need not be a liberal one as Americans understand such things.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, In 'Great Betrayal' trust between members of the British Government abrogates the principle of No Independence Before Majority African Rule. What if the Conservative British Government was still in power in 1965 and delivered Rhodesia her independence as promised? This story was published in the February 2009 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1980, Marxist leader Rob Mugabe published his controversial auto-biography The Great Betrayal. The central event in the memoirs was a decision taken at the dissolution of the Rhodesia and Nyasaland Federation, in which Great Britain abrogated the principle of No Independence Before Majority African Rule. The Great Betrayal

Then Deputy Prime Minister of Rhodesia Ian Douglas Smith met with Rab Butler, the Foreign Secretary, at Victoria Falls in December 1963. Butler grandly declared that Britain was "very happy to agree" to independence for Southern Rhodesia, at least at the same time as Zambia and Malawi. Smith asked Butler for the undertaking in writing. Butler demurred with: "There is trust between members of the British Commonwealth". Smith wagged his finger at Butler, and said: "If you break that, you will live to regret it".

There was no cause for concern in London or Salisbury, and Smith was being characteristically belligerent. Smith, who became the Prime Minister shortly afterwards, was of Scottish ancestry, and a war hero that had fought bravely for Britain during World War 2.

Ian Douglas Smith was born in the village of Selukwe in central Rhodesia, of a Scottish father, Jock, and Rhodesian-born mother, Agnes. He was educated at Chaplin School nearby with moderate academic achievement, captaining the first XV and running the 100 yards in 10 seconds. He began a bachelor of commerce degree at Rhodes University in South Africa in 1938, establishing an impressive academic record and rowing for the university.

War broke out in 1939 and in 1941 he joined the RAF Empire Air Training Scheme at Guinea Fowl in central Rhodesia. He was posted to 237 (Rhodesia) Squadron in the Middle East, flying Hawker Hurricanes.

Taking off from Alexandria on a dawn patrol in 1943, his throttle malfunctioned, he lost height and clipped the barrel of a Bofors gun. He crashed and rammed his face against the Hurricane's gunsight. He suffered severe facial injuries, broke his jaw, a leg and a shoulder, and buckled his back. Surgeons at the 15th Scottish Hospital in Cairo reconstructed his face and, after only five months, he rejoined his squadron in Corsica. He realised his dream to fly Spitfire Mark IXs, carrying out strafing raids and escorting American bombers.

In mid-1944 Smith was leading a raid on a train of fuel tankers in the Po Valley when he made the mistake of going back for a second run.The Spitfire was hit by an anti-aircraft shell, caught fire and he baled out. He was soon picked up by the partisans. The five months he spent with them near Sasello, learning Italian, reading Shakespeare and working as a peasant, he regarded as one of the best times of his life.>Near the end of the war, he and three other Allied fugitives made their way through occupied Italy to the Maritime Alps. At one point the conspicuously tall, fair-haired Rhodesian strode unhindered through a German checkpoint. He led his tiny group over the mountains, walking barefoot on ice, until they reached an American patrol on the other side.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Alternate Historian Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, The Great Betrayal, No Independence Before Majority African Rule, British Commonwealth.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, From the Institute of Commonwealth Studies ~ Southern Rhodesia had been part of the Central African Federation created by Britain in 1953. The Federation had been broken up in 1963 when Zambia (Northern Rhodesia) and Malawi (Nyasaland) gained their independence. Ian Smith maintained that at the conference at Victoria Falls that year, Rab Butler had privately promised to grant Southern Rhodesia independence on its own terms in return for cooperation over the break up of the federation. This would have effectively ruled out black majority rule indefinitely and Rab Butler categorically denied having given any such undertaking.


Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-01-18 21:19:06 ~ I'm interested to know what this would mean for future struggle between the minority whites & the African demanding their rights etc. In other words is the fighting worse, than the OTL, or does the Commonwealth club get on Smith's back & force him to accept majority rule regardless of colour?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-01-20 16:47:25 ~ Interesting. I don't know that much about British African colonial history, so the link to Wikipedia caame in handy. I suspect that if matters had proceeded as depicted here, Rhodesia would have endured a much greater amount of terrorism, and might also have become the subject of an international sanctions campaighn akin tgo thata launched against apartheid South Africa.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, What if the Cathars were right about their 2012 prediction?

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2012, on this day President George Weaver issues a cryptic order, in Latin: "Rex Mundi delenda est" - "The King of the World must be destroyed".

The King of the World must be destroyed by Eric LippsFollowing the order, a U.S. fighter-bomber armed with nuclear missiles is launched, flying across several U.S. states before heading out over the Atlantic Ocean.
Several hours later, horrifying reports come in that Rome has been destroyed by a nuclear explosion. Hundreds of thousands are feared dead, among them Pope Benedict XVI and many members of the College of Cardinals, which had been meeting to discuss improving relations with Egypt's Coptic Christian church.

Weaver had assumed the presidency following the death in July of 2009 of President John McCain from a heart attack. Weaver's ascendancy had come as a shock to many: an obscure member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Idaho, he had seemed an unlikely choice as McCain's running-mate in the 2008 election. Peculiar rumors had swirled around him, claiming he was associated with a shadowy survivalist group known as the Remnant of the Pure, which conspiracy theorists link to the medieval Cathar schismatics who had been nearly destroyed by Catholic crusaders. Nothing had been proven, however, and McCain and Weaver had gone on to win that November. In the wake of the Rome disaster, it will be charged that Weaver plotted the destruction of the Vatican in service to a modern-day Cathar movement dedicated to destroying the Catholic Church.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Watch the Video Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Cathars, Catharism, Weavers, 2012, Catholic Church.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


December 30



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Flight to Egypt had failed? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In AD 1, warned of the impending massacre of the innocents, Joseph and his wife Mary took flight to Egypt with the baby Jesus.
An installment from the Miracles thread.

The Second MiracleBut they are captured and casually executed by Herod's soldiers. The orphaned infant was then passed to the Roman trooper Tiberius Iulius Abdes Pantera [1]. His orders were to update the detailed records required by the Roman Client King Herod. Because he wanted to make absolutely sure that the baby king did not slip through the net, grow up to become a rival and supplant him.

But instead an angel spoke to Pantera and he fled with the child. His fellow officers only uncovered his absence because of a mysterious note he had left on the child register - Pantera wrote that something had been missing in this harsh world, but finally, it had been fulfilled [2].

Little is known of the fate Pantera although his tombstone was found in Bingerbrück, Germany in 1859. But the coming of Jesus to Western Europe was a different matter altogether, it was quite simply the greatest story ever told.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: The Miracles Source: Wikipedia Labels: Herod the Great, Jesus, Bethlehem, Magi, Judea.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, according to Matthew's account an angel appeared and warned Joseph to take Jesus and his mother into Egypt.
[1] Tiberius Iulius Abdes Pantera (c. 22 BC - AD 40) was a Roman soldier whose tombstone was found in Bingerbruck, Germany in 1859. Historically, the name Pantera is not an unusual name and had been in use among Roman soldiers in the 2nd century. A historical connection from this soldier to Jesus of Nazareth has been hypothesized by James Tabor, based on the claim of the ancient Greek philosopher Celsus that Jesus's real father was a Roman soldier named Panthera. Tiberius Pantera could have been serving in the region at the time of Jesus's conception. The hypothesis is considered extremely unlikely by mainstream scholars, given that there is no evidence to support it.
[2] Quote from the great man, Robbie Taylor.


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-14 23:16:41 ~ But why would Herod's men kill Joseph and Mary while leaving his rival "baby king" alive? He would have to kill the child too, if only to stop him from growing up and taking revenge.

Readers Comment Sailorbarsoom commented on 2012-12-14 23:24:28 ~ I was wondering the same thing. Perhaps Herod wanted to get some of that divine mojo working for himself?

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-12-15 04:09:22 ~ He moves in mysterious ways, my friends, His wonders to perform...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-15 07:24:36 ~ When Jesus rallies the Gauls to his side, the Roman Imperium goes down before the mad Celtic tide, and he creates a Gaulic Empire that lasts a thousand years.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-15 13:28:18 ~ Eric, I would think that Jesus would have been much more likely to rally the Jewish rebels, before finding allies among the Celts and other subjects of Rome.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-19 16:12:57 ~ Separating the child from a Jewish upbringing is an interesting twist. Would John the Baptist have to go looking for him?



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Henry VIII had married Anne Boleyn's older sister Mary? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1499, on this day future Queen of England Mary Boleyn was born in Blickling Hall, the family seat in Norfolk. But she grew up at Hever Castle, Kent alongside her less famous siblings Thomas and Anne (the wife of Percy of Northumberland).
An installment from the Happy Endings thread

Happy Endings Part 15
Henry VIII's Second Wife: Mary Boleyn
Because the Tudors was locked in conflict with elements the nobility, her origin amongst the "new men" of self-acquired wealth played well in the Royal court. Accordingly she was sent to the French court in the household of the queen, Henry VIII's younger sister Mary Tudor who was betrothed to King Louis XII.

A blond, blue-eyed, curvy beauty that was the era's belle idéale, she was greatly desired by the Valois monarch's son François I. However in 1515 Louis died, and the Tudor Household was recalled to England. And François's loss was King Henry VIII's gain. They remained happily married until her tragic death age just forty-three, having two children Henry and Catherine. Surely there was some irony in this choice of names, because of course the Pope refused to grant Henry a divorce for Catherine of Aragon, and their relationship caused a schism in the English Church that lasts until today. But then you can't have everything..


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jackie Rose Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jackie Rose, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Happy Endings Source: Wikipedia Labels: Mary Boleyn, Anne Boleyn, Henry VIII, Tudor, François I.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, thanks to Jackie Rose for her contributions and also some ideas explored in the various biographical publications of Alison Weir ("The Mistress of Kings" and "The Great and Infamous Whore") and History Hoydens.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-31 04:40:19 ~ No comment

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-31 12:35:20 ~ The good news is, Bloody Mary would never have come to power in her embittered and fanatical state. The bad news is, her brilliant half-sister Elizabeth would never have been born.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Jose Rizal had escaped execution in 1896, and lived, at least, another ten years? muses Mike McIlvain. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the October 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1896, on this day the life of Filipino patriot José Rizal was spared by the firing squad of sympathetic indigenous soldiers at Fort Santiago who turned their weapons on the backup force of regular Spanish Army troops standing ready to shoot the executioners should they fail to obey orders.

Part 1 of 3: José Rizal Escapes the Firing SquadHe escaped, but the patriot cause soon took the oddest of turns because only two years later the hated Colonial Overlords ceded the islands to American Imperialists. Following the payment of the $20m in compensation set down in the Treaty of Paris, Teddy Roosevelt replaced Queen-Regent Maria Cristina of Spain as principal hate figure of the patriots.

But of course this contextual change in the Colonial era presented few doctrinal problems for Rizal who immediately refocused on the task of preventing the Philippines from becoming a territory of the United States. And his amazing escape from death turned him away from reform towards a new militancy. Alongside Emilio Aguinaldo, he soon became a vital figure in maintaining the survival of the fledgling Philippine Republic. They are only partially successful; instead of a Colony, the Philippines becomes a protectorate that gains full independence during the 1920s.
This blog is an article from the Neutral Philippine thread conceived by Ed, Mike McIlvain and Scott Palter.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Mike McIlvain Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Mike McIlvain, 2012-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Neutral Philippine Source: Wikipedia Labels: Joze Rizal, Filipino, Phillipines, Spain, United States.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Sergeant commanding the backup force hushed his men to silence when they began raising "vivas" with the highly partisan crowd of Peninsular and Mestizo Spaniards.


Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-10-05 04:30:01 ~ Really good, imaginative, perspective on the possibilities. It could be much longer, if more of us had the time.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-10-05 14:14:23 ~ Americans might've done much better with a young Banana Republic ally rather than the territory. So much bloodshed...

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-10-09 06:03:17 ~ Much more bloodshed than there should have been, and most of it is rather hidden from Americans. I did not hear about the massacre on the island of Masbate until just a year ago when I was on the island of Samar. Apparently, a lot of the retired Indian fighters were sent to the Philippines, much like Arthur MacArthur with son Douglas in tow.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-10-09 14:25:07 ~ It's unlikely that TR would have allowed the Philippines their independence, Rizal or no Rizal. He had a thoroughly patronizing attitude toward "our little brown brothers" and did not consider Filipinos racially fit for self-government. Having escped death at the hands of the Spaniash, Rizal most likely would have been killed by U.S. forces, as Aguinaldo was.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Axis invasion of North-East India had succeeded? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1942, on this day Subhas Chandra Bose raised the flag of Indian independence at Calcutta.

Quit India, Part #2
Return of the Leaping Tiger, by Ed & Scott Palter
An unstoppable Japanese drive through Burma had made the occupation of the former Imperial Capital possible, if not quite inevitable due to logistical constraints and rivalry in the Imperial Japanese Army. And even though the rebel Indian National Army (INA) never completed their "March to Delhi", the fatal blow to British prestige had been struck. Because the Axis partition of the Raj would forever change the destiny of the Indian subcontinent. One that even Bose himself could never have imagined.

Of course the Fall of Calcutta transformed the fates of all engaged parties. After the fatal heart attack of Winston Churchill on 26th December 1941, British Prime Minister Anthony Eden had wisely re-focused the Government on sustainable war objectives that would not bankcrupt the home nation. A younger, less sentimental man than Churchill, he had no interest in British punching above its weight for a few short years only to become as impoverished as a defeated nation. Whereas Churchill had sought to ensure that the British Empire be "preserved for a few more generations in all its splendour", a phrase that surely excluded the famine in Bengal. And so Eden now downgraded the Far Eastern Campaign to a lower priority (with a restated future-proof objective of the defence of Australia and New Zealand). He called for the Allies to concentrate resources in Western Europe and North Africa, bringing forward an amphibious invasion of Normandy to 1943. And this decision would usher in the Fall of Vichy France, which ironically was one of the two Axis Puppet Governments that promised to send ambassadors to Calcutta.

But of course the largest consequence would be for the India people themselves. The door to this dramatically altered future had been opened by the revocation of a single, faulty command decision: to bypass the heavily defended town of Kohima. This encirclement forced the British commander Field Marshal William Slim to abandon the strategic towns of Dimapur and Imphal. The British withdrawal to positions on the western bank of the river Brahmaputra abandoned a huge area of Eastern Indian that would eventually become the territory of the two Muslim successor states.

This altered reality forced the imprisoned leadership of the Indian National Congress to suspend the non-violence campaign. And because they never actually endorsed an armed rebellion, Nehru and Gandhi unwittingly placed more power in the hands of the iconic figure of Bose, and also strengthened the arm of the Muslim separatists led by Jinnah. In short, sub-contintental belligerence received a welcome shot in the arm, which despite the widespread perception otherwise, had always been present throughout two centuries of British occupation.

Of course the headquartering of the Azad Hind government in Calcutta was fleeting. As the Japanese War Effort started to collapse, Bose was forced to retreat to Burma and face a horrible moment of truth. However his willingness to peacefully disband the INA saved him from being hung from a British noose. By mutual agreement, he withdrew to Port Blair, a tiny island in the Indian Ocean.

But five years later, he was recalled by an Indian Government unable to resist an invasion from its northern Muslim neighbour. Ironically, the man who had done most to integrate the ethnicities in the INA was being asked to rescue the Hindu successor state from destruction. Finally, he would complete his March to Delhi.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Quit India Source: Wikipedia Labels: Subhas Chandra Bose, Anthony Eden, India, British Raj, March to Delhi.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we an article called If the Tiger has Sprung web site and we have taken some liberties with the timescales to accomodate the POD of Churchill dying in 1941. In reality, on 30th December 1943 Subhas Chandra Bose raises the flag of Indian independence at Port Blair, a tiny island in the Indian Ocean.


Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2011-12-31 16:32:32 ~ For this to work the Japanese and their Indian 'allies' have to do a go for broke. They push over the mountains as a light infantry force using animal transport and porters for ammo and crew served weapons. They would be vastly outnumbered by the forces of the Raj and even more outgunned but would have command of the air as long as the Japanese carriers remain in the Bay of Bengal. So this means no Coral Sea/Pt Mosby/Midway/Guadalcanal. The British were also in command chaos coming out of Burma and dealing with local resistance from the Quit India movement. Ideally Yamashita would be in command as what is proposed here is Malaya on steroids where he uses a faster OODA loop and better field officers to beat a superior Commonwealth force.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-12-31 17:51:43 ~ Unless the Japanese were on much better behavior in India than they were anywhere else that I know of, the independence movement might be fatally compromised in Indian eyes by association with them.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-01-05 09:57:12 ~ No Comment



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if King Michael of Romania had refused to abdicate under Soviet pressure? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1947, in the singular event that began the conflict that would become known as World War III, King Michael of Romania gave an international appeal to stop the Soviet takeover of his country.

King Michael Calls for AidThe closing days of World War II saw the Russian occupation of Eastern Europe swallowing up Poland, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Albania, and East Germany. While the West had agreed to occupy until stability and then withdraw, the Soviets looked to stay and expand their power. Beyond occupation, the Soviets pressed remaining countries to join them by preying on them politically. In 1947, Hungary, having already abolished its monarchy, conducted a plebiscite manipulated by Soviets to bring about the People's Republic of Hungary. The same year, it looked as if Romania would be the next to fall.

A new story by Jeff ProvineKing Michael was unnerved by Soviet clout, but he had seen enough suffering from his people and gradually gave way in March 1945 when he appointed a government dominated by Soviet sympathizers. In 1947, he traveled to London to attend the wedding of his cousins Princess Elizabeth and Philip. There, rumors circulated that he did not wish to return to Romania, though Michael refused any offers of asylum. Seeing his plight, Winston Churchill encouraged Michael with, "above all things, a King must be courageous".

Michael returned to Romania and immediately felt the pressures of Soviet take-over. But, he was the same Michael that, at a mere 26 years old, had rallied with the pro-Allied leaders of Romania and overthrown the Nazi camp's stranglehold. The coup had invited in the Soviets, and now it was time for Michael to rebel again. He found his capitalist supporters, locked down the palace, and, on December 30, sent out by radio and telegram an appeal to the United Nations and individual governments of the United States, Britain, France, and others for support against what he called an invasion from the roots.

The diplomatic gamble would pay off as Stalinists overreacted. Prime Minister Groza had threatened to murder 1,000 students who had been arrested for speaking out against the Soviet Union. The massacre began and rallied the Romanian people against Soviet supporters. Declaring a state of unrest, the Prime Minister called for Soviet military aid, and an invasion began that sparked action from Western nations in early 1948. Dwight Eisenhower, again Supreme Commander in Europe, led his generals in the heaviest fighting in eastern Germany, then joining up with the Polish Resistance and sparking revolutions in the rest of the Eastern Bloc. Romania itself would be filled with guerrilla warfare against a vastly superior force until Allied tanks led the liberation of Bucharest in 1949. Michael, who had been spirited out of the country just after the Soviet invasion, returned from his government-in-exile in London shortly thereafter.

Meanwhile, Italy invaded the Julian March in 1948, which was ceded by Yugoslavia, and Tito sued for a separate peace. Mao Zedong in China was defeated by Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Army, who made certain that Communism was stamped out in the East. Socialist upstarts in India had been put down by Britain's agreement of independence, though French Indochina would see much bloodshed before native Vietnamese were given self-rule.

The Allies pressed into Russia through liberating Ukraine. From experience, they knew Stalin would never give up, despite the use of atomic weapons on his bases. The Cold War portion continued as the stalemated Allies waited until Stalin was finally assassinated and Moscow fell into civil war. Russia was Balkanized, and the exhausted Allies fell into retirement, letting loose their colonies over the '50s and '60s and settling into a new era of capitalistic rule under the American superpower.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: World War 3, Romania, King Michael, Abdication Crisis, Soviet.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Michael of Romania abdicated under Soviet pressure (what he referred to as "blackmail") in a radio address while troops surrounded his palace. He and his family went into exile, eventually settling in asylum in Franco?s Spain, while Romania would be under Soviet rule until it would finally see its violent revolution in 1989.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-12-30 15:11:02 ~ Who was it that whacked Stalin in this TL? :D

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-30 16:05:35 ~ Someone VERY brave...

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-12-31 00:26:37 ~ Chiang won how, exactly? In our history, Mao didn't get any significant Soviet help in overthrowing the Nationalists, and didn't need it, as Chiang's people proved quite capable of defeating themselves via incompetence and corruption.

Readers Comment Andrew Beane commented on 2010-12-31 00:26:37 ~ This would have been the best time for the West to take on the USSR. And my guess would be that Beria had Stalin taken out

Facebook Comment Comment from Evan Miller on Facebook: In this timeline, my father insted of sitting stateside during the Korean War was sent to Eastern Europe to fight and was killed, thus I was never born and wouldn't write this - so you wouldn't be reading it.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-31 16:33:27 ~ I'd imagine Chiang getting Allied support, perhaps enough to stop the Liaoshen, Huaihai, and Pingjin Campaigns in late '48. Maybe enough enough for the OSS to straighten out corruption.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-01-01 03:44:05 ~ This would have been a better world---but there were more than enough Soviet-sympathizing people in positions of power to severely hamper the Allies; something that the Nazis had never had.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


December 29



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the magi had kept their promise to King Herod? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In AD 1, on this day Herod the Great (pictured) entered the town of Bethlehem at the head of a column of heavily armed troops.
An installment from the Miracles thread.

The First MiracleThe magi from the east had travelled to Judea in search of the newborn king of the Jews, having "seen his star in the east". The King, Herod the Great, directed them to Bethlehem, and asked them to let him know who this king was when they found him. They found Jesus and honored him [1], before returning to Herod as promised.

Set upon a ruthless act of infant homicide from the outset, Herod firmly intended to eliminate his rival. But as he was bathed by the holy light of the Star of Bethlehem, God's voice spoke gentle words of peace to him. He fell upon his knees with hot tears of joy racing down his cheeks, before rising to enter the stable and honour the Lord. Because something had been missing in this harsh world, but finally, it had been fulfilled [1].


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: The Miracles Source: Wikipedia Labels: Herod the Great, Jesus, Bethlehem, Magi, Judea.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, according to Matthew's account an angel tells them not to alert Herod, and they return home by another way.
[1] Quote from the great man, Robbie Taylor.


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-13 17:39:42 ~ Then presumably Herod would have raised Jesus to a high government post, and he would be known and revered throughout the centuries as the model of a wise and caring official.

Readers Comment Allen W. McDonnell commented on 2012-12-13 18:01:14 ~ Several problems with this scenario, for one thing the date of Christmas comes from the Catholic church decision to co-opt the winter solstice festival. Evidence suggests the birth was in a much warmer time of year, late spring or early fall depending on the scholar you chose to believe. Secondly the monk who calculated 1 AD is known to be off by several years, the birth might have been as early as 7 BC but could not have been later than 3 BC based on things like Herod's death which has been calculated as being as early as 4 BC and as late as 1 BC. If you believe the record in the New Testament then the Christ child was born and as much as 2 years old when the Wise men appeared. After the wise men departed Herod ordered all the male children age 2 and under slaughtered in Bethlehem. Joseph fled before then with his family to Egypt. Herod died while the family was in Egypt and they returned to Israel but turned aside from Bethlehem to live in Nazareth. We are not told exactly how long they resided in Egypt but it was long enough for Herod to die and news of his death to be spread to Egypt. Oh and lastly Herod did not see the Christ child as his rival, but rather as the rival to his heirs mirroring the way that Saul saw David as a threat to his blood line heir Johnathon.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-12-13 18:15:05 ~ A very good reply. I'm not sure if bethlem was in Judaea, Herod's kingdom The calender is at least four years out, when the present system was set up around 610 AD. The original calendar was based on APC, after the passion of the Christ, set at 28 AD. But the birth may have been in 7 BC.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2012-12-14 03:58:34 ~ This might actually not change the end-result of the Gospel accounts that significantly -- the only difference being a greater poli-socio acceptance of Christianity during the life of Christ due to Herod's influence. Could the crucifixion of Christ have been the precursor to a Herodian rebellion against the Roman rulers and Jewish religious leaders who put him to death?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-14 06:05:45 ~ Turning Herod _good?_ Look, this is only God we're talking about---there are limits on what even HE could do!

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-14 13:29:01 ~ But if Jesus had won Herod's favor, then Jesus might be remembered as a wise and generous government official, as I suggested before.. assuming of course, that he was remembered at all. That's no way to start a major religion.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-19 16:02:52 ~ "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's," he said. Jesus would make a good official, but he'd have a lot of connections to stop a crucifixion... or maybe all the more enemies.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Mexico had challenged Texan Statehood? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1845, rather than see their former possession join the United States, Mexico invades Texas with an overwhelming large force, capturing most of the Republic's leadership just as they were completing the transformation of Texas into a state.

Texan Statehood Crushed by Robbie TaylorSince several U.S. officials were caught in this attack, the U.S. declared war against Mexico. The two mighty nations were evenly matched, and the war dragged on for years as they each sought to enlist aid; America from Europe, Mexico from Latin America, and both from the native populations of the west.

The war ended in stalemate in 1856, with tens of thousands dead and Texas turned into a wasteland.


Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Rasputin had survived? And who might finally have killed him? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1916, on this day the heads of Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich, Prince Yusupov, Vladimir Purishkevich, Captain Suhotine and Stanislaus de Lazovert were placed on spikes outside the Yusopov's Moika Palace where the five nobleman had sought to "end the career of the blackest devil in Russian history", Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin.

Cursed MuzhikIt was not the first time that an attempt had been made on the master's life. Because On June 29, 1914, Rasputin was attacked suddenly by Khionia Guseva, a former prostitute who had become a disciple of the monk Iliodor. Iliodor, who once was a friend of Rasputin but had grown absolutely disgusted with his behaviour and disrespectful talk about the royal family, had appealed to women who had been harmed by Rasputin to form a mutual support group. Guseva thrust a knife into Rasputin's abdomen, and his entrails hung out of what seemed like a mortal wound. Convinced of her success, Guseva supposedly screamed, "I have killed the antichrist!". After intensive surgery, however, Rasputin recovered. It was said of his survival that "the soul of this cursed muzhik was sewn on his body".

"I have killed the antichrist!"On December 16, 1916, having decided that Rasputin's influence over the Tsaritsa (pictured) had made him a far-too-dangerous threat to the empire, a group of nobles led by Prince Felix Yusupov and the Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich and the right-wing politician Vladimir Purishkevich, lured Rasputin to the Yusupovs' Moika Palace. The group led him down to the cellar, where they served him cakes and red wine laced with a massive amount of cyanide. Rasputin was unaffected, although Vasily Maklakov had supplied enough poison to kill five men.

Determined to finish the job, Yusupov became anxious about the possibility that Rasputin might live until the morning, leaving the conspirators no time to conceal his body. Yusupov ran upstairs to consult the others and then came back down to shoot Rasputin through the back with a revolver. Rasputin fell, and the company left the palace for a while. Yusupov, who had left without a coat, decided to return to get one, and, while at the palace, he went to check up on the body. Suddenly, Rasputin opened his eyes and lunged at Prince Yusupov. When he grabbed Prince Yusupov he ominously whispered in Yusupov's ear "you bad boy" and strangled him. At that moment, however, the other conspirators arrived and fired at him. After being hit three times in the back, Rasputin fell once more. As they neared his body, the party found that, remarkably, he was still alive, struggling to get up. They clubbed him into submission and after binding his body and wrapping him in a carpet, they threw him into the icy Neva River. He broke out of the his bonds and the carpet wrapping him, to wreck his bloody vengeance on the conspirators.

Rasputin would finally meet his nemesis in the form of the Graf Von Dracula, the vampire who dominated the Imperial German Court in a similar manner, as described by the historian Kim Newman in "Anno Dracula".


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Kim Newman, "Anno Dracula" (1992)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Rasputin, Yusopov, Russia, Tsar, 1916.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that to explore this controversial issue, extensive amounts of content have been repurposed from the source article.


Facebook Comment Comment from Jeff Mayers on Facebook: Regarding the situation in Russia at the time of this occurance, I don't know if it would have ultimately changed anythin had Rasputin Survived. I also have a feeling that the Communists would probably have him killed.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-13 05:29:18 ~ Some versions of this story have Rasputin being found, dead, _above_ the Neva ice...having worked his way loose and swum to a hole. I imagine the conspirators, had that been true, would have slept with the lights on and behind locked doors for the rest of their lives.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-31 16:17:32 ~ Rasputin leading a spiritualist counter-revolution to the atheist communists... there's an idea.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Kruger Telegram had led to war? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

If you can make one heap of all your winnings and risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss, yours is the Earth and everything that's in it, and - which is more Doctor Jim, - you'll be a Man my son! ~ Rudyard Kipling

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1895/6, over the New Year weekend Paul Kruger's Transvaal Republic was raided by Rhodesian and Bechuanaland policemen led by the British "Doctor Jim" Jameson and as planners of the sortie had intended the primarily British expatriate workers (known as "the Uitlanders") of Johannesburg were deliberately provoked into an armed uprising.

Imperial Pitch and TossAfter the discovery of gold in Johannsburg, the Governor of the Cape Colony (and Managing Director of the British South Africa Company) Cecil Rhodes dreamt of incorporating the Transvaal and the Orange Free State in a federation under British control. But the Johannesburg gold mining industry was located in territories which had been settled by the Boer Voertrekkers after the British Parliament outlawed slavery throughout the British Empire in 1833. His plan to support an uprising of Uitlanders with the goal of taking control was approved by the British Foreign Secretary Austin Chamberlain, a decision that the British Government was soon to regret.

Because the seizure of the Boer armoury in Pretoria resulted in a wave of international condemnation. But it was the "Kruger Telegram" that escalated the Johannesburg conspiracy into an international conflict in which Great Britan and Germany would fight a decade-long proxy war over the mineral wealth of South Africa. Because the Kaiser responded in kind by offering the Boers military support in order to provoke Kruger into declaring war upon the Cape Colony.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Jameson Raid, South Africa, Transvaal, Boer, Cecil Rhodes.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the raid was a botched fiasco dupliciously condemned by Chamberlain, the uprising failed to happen and Rhodes was forced to resign both of his posts. The Kaiser did send the Kruger Telegram but it did not lead to war. Jameson's sufferings inspired Rudyard Kiping to write the poem "If" which we have modified somewhat to better suit the context.


Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-12-04 01:13:09 ~ A colonial war in Africa between Britain and Germany would make it even more of a mess. Though maybe they might have blood-glory out of their system and there'd be no need to let the Austria-Serbian question get out of hand in 1914.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-12-30 00:17:09 ~ The British might find themselves diplomatically isolated---the Boers were seen as brave plucky underdogs by a lot of Europe at the time of the Second Boer War.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Andrew Johnson was forced out in the Two Americas Timeline? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1808, on this day the sixteenth Vice President of the United States Andrew Johnson was born in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Andrew Johnson
16th Vice President of the United States
March 4th, 1865 - March 5, 1868
When the Southern states seceded, Johnson was a U.S. Senator from Greeneville in East Tennessee. As a Unionist, he was the only Southern senator not to quit his post upon secession. He became the most prominent War Democrat from the South and supported Lincoln's military policies during the American Civil War of 1861-1865.

In 1862, Lincoln appointed Johnson military governor of occupied Tennessee, where he was energetic and effective in fighting the rebellion and beginning the transition to Reconstruction.

A post from the Two Americas Timline on Alt WikiaJohnson was nominated as the vice presidential candidate in 1864 on the National Union Party ticket. He and Lincoln were elected in November 1864 and inaugurated on March 4, 1865. Johnson succeeded to the presidency upon Lincoln's assassination on April 15, 1865.

In an attempt to bring peace to the region the United Kingdom and France intervened in the civil war during early 1866. On August 8 the Union and the Confederacy agreed to a ceasefire. The states of Missouri and Kentucky retained U.S. troops, and are claimed by both sides. The Confederacy kept troops in parts of Maryland and New Jersey, though not claiming them.

Being from Tennessee, Johnson was a "foreigner" in the white house after the cease fire. Factions from both the CS and the US attempted to remove him from office. After an attempt on his life by a disgruntled Tennessan on November 21, 1867, Johnson remained out of sight for months.

His lack of activity, though, did not keep his enemies in the US Senate from accusing him of being soft on the CS. This was trumped up as treason, and articles of impeachment were drawn up. As Congress debated, but before the House was able to impeach him, Johnson resigned the office, leaving Washington on March 5, 1868 for retirement in Maine.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Two Americas Source: Alt Wikia Labels: Andrew Johnson, Abraham Lincoln, America, Confederacy, Civil War.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-04-26 19:49:44 ~ Could have happened...AJ was not real popular.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-04-27 18:33:10 ~ Lucky there wasn't more than one assassination. Settling in Maine might seem far enough, but I'd be surprised if he weren't hounded to Canada or even the UK.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Thomas a Becket survived his arrest? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1170, on this day Bishop Thomas Becket was arrested in Canterbury Cathedral.

Bishop Thomas Becket Arrested After a career of working tightly together as Chancellor and King, upon Becket's appointment as Archbishop of Canterbury by Henry II of England, the two discovered a rift that drove them to be bitter enemies. They had once been close; Henry even placed his son in Becket's household for his education. Henry sought control of his lands, both through Church and State. When Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury died, Henry took it as an opportunity to establish a trusted ally in one of the most powerful positions in the English Church.

A new story by Jeff ProvineThomas Becket had grown from a fortunate position and constant guest in lordly houses, learning to ride and joust and receiving an excellent legal and canonical education. Upon his installation as archbishop, however, Becket shed his glamorous secular life and became something of an ascetic, even reportedly wearing the penitent hair shirt under his priestly robes. He immediately worked to strengthen the position of the Church, retaking lost land, disallowing Henry from collecting offerings, and excommunicating a royal tenant-in-chief after he refused to acknowledge Becket's appointment of a clerk. The political rift split wide when Henry called a meeting with the Church heads to discuss canonical customs, and Becket led the bishops in refusing to attend.

Henry pulled his son from Becket's house and lifted Becket's many honors, and the diplomatic war erupted with Henry attempting to win favor of the bishops while Becket called on international support from Louis VII. Henry won as the bishops, even Becket, agreed to the customs of the Constitutions of Claredon, and then Becket broke favor by attempting to leave for France without permission. Becket fled into exile for six years. The Pope finally intervened, and Becket returned while many of his excommunications were absolved.

Only a few months later, Becket began a new round of excommunications as Henry's son had been crowned junior-king by the Bishop of York, which was the right of the Bishop of Canterbury. Upon hearing the news, Henry said from his sickbed, "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" Four knights took his words as an order and hurried to Canterbury. Placing their weapons under a tree, they entered the cathedral and demanded Becket return with them to see the king. He refused, turned to run, and tripped over his vestments. The knights apprehended Becket and brought him back to Winchester.

Henry had Becket imprisoned and was found guilty of disobeying customs in trial in 1171. Becket was placed into a monastic cell, and, in 1173, Henry's sons Henry the Younger and Richard rebelled against him in hopes of achieving their inheritances early (as well as at the mentoring of Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine). Becket escaped and worked his way into Henry the Younger's court. While the young brothers were strong in France with their mother's lands, they did not have the guile to manage England, and Becket gave them the advice and subterfuge they needed to undercut their father's support. The initial rebellion in 1173 had been met with failure, but 1174 won the rebellion for the brothers. They treated Becket literally as a godsend, and he was restored to Canterbury with great new powers.

Henry II went into forced retirement, and Henry the Younger (now III) went about repairing his father's strained relations with the other Catholic kingdoms, especially France. Richard (called "The Lionhearted") went on crusade to the Holy Land, liberating Cyprus and staying with his armies while Henry III ruled politically. Much of England's social power, however, went into the hands of Becket, who set up his nation as a new stronghold and even persuaded Prince John to become Bishop of Canterbury upon Becket's death in 1189.

The Church continued its firm ecclesiastical position in England as kings and bishops continued to vie for legal power, as did the many barons of the kingdom, though the former two kept the latter in place. One hundred years later, the two would grow even closer as Edward I would be sainted, much like the French St. Louis (King Louis IX). The Church would be instrumental sources of power for Richard III in the Rebellion of 1484. England remained a strong Catholic nation, acting against the Protestant armies of other northern Europe kings. In the 1700s, bids for religious freedom would deprive England of its colonies in North America as well as the Protestant lands of Scotland.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Thomas Becket, Canterbury, Henry, Bishop, Assasination.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Thomas a Becket was assassinated as the knights returned with their weapons and reportedly dashed out his brains. He would be revered among Catholicism as a martyr and sainted soon after. In the Rebellion of 1173, Henry II would come to Canterbury and do penance for his part in the murder. He would defeat his sons; Henry the Younger died a decade later of dysentery while still in rebellion, and Richard and John later would become kings themselves. John would yield to the powers of the Church as well as the barons, for whom he would sign the Magna Carta.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-12-30 01:17:43 ~ "Prison Break: The Medieval Years." :D

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-12-30 12:55:34 ~ Prince John would have been a ghastly choice for any clerical appointment, let alone that of "Bishop" (Archbishop?) of Canterhbury. His reign as king after Richard the Lion-Hearted died at Chaluz in 1199 was a disaster except for the Magna Carta, which he signed only under duress (and which originally was intended to protect the rights only of the barons, not on all English subjects).

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-01-01 03:27:41 ~ The ironic thing was that Henry II was right...clergy (including minor orders who lived much like everybody else) were literally getting away with murder.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the ranting remnants of the British Fascist movement had fled to the Falklands in 1958? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1937, on this day Eamon de Valera, the leader of the Fianna Fail Party of Ireland, sat in his empty offices awaiting a telephone call from Sir Oswald Mosley. That day, de Valera had publically announced the upcoming new Constitution of Ireland. That document had stated that all Irish counties (including those in the Ulster enclave of Northern Ireland) were part of the country run from Dublin.

The Fascist Flight to Falklands Part 3At 6 PM exactly, Dublin time, de Valera's telephone rang and he picked it up. "This is Oswald Mosley," the authoritative voice on the telephone said. "Notify the Prime Minister of Ireland that the Leader of Great Britain is on the telephone to speak with him".

"Thank you for your punctuality, Prime Minister Mosley," said Eamon da Valera. "I am here".

"Good, _Taoiseach_," Mosley said, saying the Celtic version of Prime Minister crisply. "I have heard that Ireland claims to be able to unilaterally alter its Governing Documents at will".

"We never wanted London to mistakingly assume that the British king and Parliament was in any way needed to shape Irish decisions," de Valera said. "That is why we have insisted from the beginning that we rule ourselves completely".

De Valera studied a photograph on the front page of the TIMES of London. Mosley, dressed in black from head to toe, wearing a tunic and pants, black boots and a wide black belt, the caption was tagged: "The Leader addresses an assembly in London". In de Valera's opinion, Mosley was dressed up as a student would in playing a role in ROMEO AND JULIET.

It was all so absurd, yet that man was in control of Great Britain. "_Taoseach_, you speak as if you have not heard of the popular revolution which has transpired as of November 1936. The _ancien regime_ of England is now as dead as the system of Louis Sixteenth and Marie Antoinette".

"I have heard that Stanley Baldwin is dead," de Valera said bluntly. "He has not been seen or photographed since the 11th of November when your stormtroopers invaded Ten Downing Street".

"Mr. Baldwin remains in protective custody," said Mosley smoothly. "Is your Government still allowing Neville Chamberlain a hundred thousand pounds yearly for the Dublin CLARION? That really is quite a waste for a rag such as that ".

"Here in Eire, we really do value free thought and association," de Valera said.

Mosley laughed. "You do everything the Pope suggest, outlawing divorce and conceding that Roman Catholicism will be the only view point that can be tolerated in Ireland.

"Your assertion that Rome Rule will be imposed on his Majesty's subjects in Ulster is a mistake that I did not expect you to repeat. Your pathetic gangs of druggists and ploughboys will be wiped out in a month by Fascist Britain, because we will do whatever police work is needed. Whatever is needed".

"If you make further threats against the Irish, there shall be complaints as far away as the Vatican, and I understand that neither Herr Hitler or Signor Mussolini will want to confront the Holy Father on your behalf, Mister Mosley".

Mosley said: "You are a silly fellow, Eamon da Valera. The fact that the old regime respected you shows only how weak they were".

Later that evening, de Valera was wakened for news that an assailant had walked behind Neville Chamberlain and had shot Chamberlain dead through the heart. The killer had put his gun away in a holster and ran off to a waiting car. De Valera took the lesson seriously and disbanded any political organizations from Ireland working for the ouster of Edward VIII and Wallis.

In cinema palaces such as the Odeans, Regals, Roxys, Queen Ws, and Granadas that are popping out all over Britain in 1938, typical features depict large studies of the King and Queen's face on cinema walls, and three reel long newreels always praising Wallis and her husband.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Raymond Speer Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Raymond Speer, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Fascist Flight Source: Wikipedia Labels: Oswald Mosley, Eamon de Valera, Stanley Baldwin, Fascist, Britain.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-06-20 00:07:53 ~ The Irish never really realized how much their "success" was due to British forbearance.

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-06-20 02:23:10 ~ The brits had pretty much burned themselves out with WWI and Ireland was able to cash in. Had it not been for the blood and suffering in places like the Somme Ireland would still be part of the United Kingdom. Too many empty chairs whose owners now lay under six feet of french soil and too many maimed young men pretty much crushed the life out of their willingness to go to war. If Ireland had anything to worry for it would be for Churchill trying to reclaim territory by getting them into the mess with Hitler and then occupying them on th e pretext of Keeping the Germans Out..

Readers Comment Rurri Heakin commented on 2010-06-20 23:57:36 ~ Scenario is absurd anyway. (1) Irish did realise they won on British foreberance. Dev basically gamed the system before ww2. That was all he did. Other side of the coin is that the UK did not want the Irish influencing them After WW2, WTF did it matter (2) You cannot shoot down Dublin, and win elections, in Glasgow, or liverpool or dublin (3) Dev would not have allowed Neville chamberlain, to play provo, he may have sent him to the dominions. Ireland, is 12 miles away, Canada, and the Anzacs are thousands of miles away, Both are safe behind the USN. My guess is Ireland, is bullied quite simply into quiet. Also terminology used here is wrong.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


December 28



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if VP Calhoun had served out three terms? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1832, on this day Andrew Jackson dissuaded John C. Calhoun (pictured) from becoming the first Vice President (VP) of the United States to resign.

Jackson talks Calhoun out of quittingBecause he had already served for four years under his predecessor John Quincy Adams, he became the first VP to serve for three consecutive terms.

This record was beaten by Al Gore who served four terms 1993-2009 under Bill Clinton and then Bill Bradley who had narrowly beaten him (Gore) to the Democratic nomination in 2000.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Andrew Jackson, John C. Calhoun, Vice President, President, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, this article explores ideas from AHC: 3+ term Vice-President and Wikipedia. It is assumed (somehow) that Calhoun agrees to postpone his fight for nullification until the end of Jackson's second term.


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-28 22:30:06 ~ Calhoun is best known for his fanatically pro-slavery views, including his ardent defense of the Fugitive Slave Law and his equally ardent defense of a state's right to secede. So who knows what could have happened if he had somehow gone on to being president, perish the thought!

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-28 23:31:07 ~ Was it even possible in those days for a VP to serve three terms?

Readers Comment Andrew Beane commented on 2012-12-29 16:27:07 ~ When did the presidential runner-up stop automatically becoming VP? Twelfth Amendment in 1804, which directed the electors to use separate ballots to vote for the President and Vice President



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Queen Mary II did not die of the pox on December 28th 1694? muses Dirk Puehl. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1694, on this day joint Sovereign of England, Scotland, and Ireland, Queen Mary II made a miraculous recovery from smallpox.
This post was written by Dirk Puehl the highly recommended author of #onthisday #history Google+ posts.

Queen Mary II survives the poxWhen King Billy fell victim to "the little gentleman in the black velvet waistcoat" [1] in July 1702, his wife Mary took over the responsibilities of governing the kingdom for good - a role she had actually filled since 1690, with dwindling success and support, both from parliament and the English population. Besides a strict adherence to Protestant morals unheard of since the days of Cromwell, she had estranged almost all of her subjects by inexplicable personnel decision - leaving England without capable leaders at the outbreak of the War of Spanish Succession.

After continuous military failures on the continent, Queen Mary II decided to leave her late husband's Grand Alliance and withdrew England from the war in 1702, spending the countries military resources to quell various rebellions and leaving the door open for the landing of James II's son James Francis in Torbay with no opposition from the Royal Navy but almost full support from the Tories. James was not willing to renounce his Catholic faith, but granted the largest possible religious freedom for England, Scotland and Ireland. Queen Mary II was forced to resign, establishing James III as the next Catholic Stuart monarch on the English throne, facing not only the coming Protestant uprisings but the united Bourbon France and Spain.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Dirk Puehl Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Dirk Puehl, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Dirks Blog Source: Wikipedia Labels: Queen Mary II, William III of England, King Richard I, Holy Roman Empire, Lord Chancellor.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, [1] in 1702, William died of pneumonia, a complication from a broken collarbone following a fall from his horse, Sorrel.[128] Because his horse had stumbled into a mole's burrow, many Jacobites toasted "the little gentleman in the black velvet waistcoat".


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-28 11:50:40 ~ So then Bonnie Prince Charlie will become King Charles III! Good deal! But then...he won't be around to lead his famous 1745 revolt, which launched the modern war of national liberation, the historical romance genre and perhaps even the women's movement, due to all his "female rebel" followers. And that's not even mentioning the Walker's Shortbread logo, showing him with his most famous female follower, Flora MacDonald.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-28 12:34:58 ~ But would the Irish potato famine have happened anyway, John, still leading to the mass emigration in the 19th Century?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-28 15:40:14 ~ Ireland might be better off in this TL, but the Blight would still happen biologically. But, that might help the strength of the Empire with so many Stuart-loyalists heading out to the colonies.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-12-28 15:51:41 ~ Really, this series of events could have served to set England up to eventually be invaded -- successfully, by France and Spain. Assuming that they could get together just long enough to invade. Spanish zone, and a French zone? Who knows what might have hit England then? And then what of the colonies?

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-28 15:54:10 ~ Good questions all....



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Spanish Conspirators had won out? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1825, on this day Kentuckian Hero General James Wilkinson died in Frankfort, the capital of the Independent Commonwealth that he had fought so hard to establish. He was sixty-eight years old.

General Wilkinson passes awayAnd yet the catalist of that nationhood was not the implausible Yankee myth of a shadowy Spanish Conspiracy, but rather the failure to achieve statehood under the old Articles of Confederation.

Wilkinson's contribution was to persuade Spanish Governor Esteban Rodríguez Miró to grant the exclusive rights to trade on the Mississippi River (previously, the Union had those rights but paid a hefty tariff) [1]. Free navigation opened the door to outright independence, as it allowed Wilkinson and his supporters to argue forcefully against admittance to the Union under the new constitution.

As a result, the dream of westward expansion was checked even before General Washington took office as Union President. Ironically, under different circumstances, Washington might even have appointed Wilkinson as Commanding General of the United States Army but fate had decided that they would be peers and perhaps rivals.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: James Wilkinson, Spanish Conspiracy, Kentucky, Mississippi, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, this article explores idea from the Price of Cide, AH: Prevent US Expansion West of the Mississippi and Wikipedia.
In OTL it was never signed and the Union agreed a separate treaty. Wilkinson served in the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, but was twice compelled to resign. He was twice the Commanding General of the United States Army, appointed first Governor of the Louisiana Territory in 1805, and commanded two unsuccessful campaigns in the St. Lawrence theater during the War of 1812. After his death, he was discovered to have been a paid agent of the Spanish Crown.


Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-12-20 13:42:28 ~ The Kentucky purchase of Louisiana from the French sealed the doom of the young United States...

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-20 14:27:38 ~ It'd be war VERY soon.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-12-20 15:13:02 ~ But, could the U.S. have turned that money into a purchase of a great chunk of French claimed lands elsewhere? Napoleon just wanted money.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-12-20 15:57:48 ~ I don't seriously believe Kentucky would have remained independent. Either it would have been absorbed by the U.S. (peaceably or not) or it would have become a dependency of Spain or some other European power. As for a Kentucky purchase of Louisiana, what would it have used for money? the Purchase in our own history strained the limited finances of the young USA; Kentucky, standing alone, would have been in a worse position.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-20 17:03:51 ~ This could have put a whole new spin on the slavery question...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-22 00:41:22 ~ With Wilkinson around, things would have been interesting.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Woodrow Wilson had lived? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1856, on this day 28th President of the United States, Nobel Prize laureate Thomas Woodrow Wilson was born in Staunton, Virginia.

"Open Covenants, Openly Arrived At"
Co-written with Jeff Provine
A leader of the Progressive Movement, he served as President of Princeton University from 1902 to 1910, and then as the Governor of New Jersey from 1911 to 1913. Running against Republican incumbent William Howard Taft, Socialist Party of America candidate Eugene V. Debs, and former President Progressive ("Bull Moose") Party candidate Theodore Roosevelt, Wilson was elected President as a Democrat in 1912.

During his second term a conspiracy to prevent the ratification of the Covenant of the League of Nations was foiled in the nick of time when First Lady Edith Wilson prevented the White House physician Dr. Cary Grayson from adminstering a stroke-inducing poison to her husband Woodrow Wilson.

A coast-to-coast public speaking tour in support of the League had over-exerted the President. He collapsed from exhaustion in Pueblo, Colorado on September 25th and was forced to return to the White House for medical attention.

Almost overwhelmed by the force of opposition, Wilson was fully aware that the list of Grayson's possible conspirators was endless including inter alia:

Refusing to waste further energy on investigating the conspiracy, Wilson devised a fresh strategy to sell the League to America and the rest, as they say, is alternate history..


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Woodrow Wilsin, League of Nations, Covenants, Foreign Policy, America.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, inspired by David A. Robbins excellent novel "Assassins Gallery" (2006) in which British Agents poison FDR.


Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2012-12-28 19:12:53 ~ No Comment

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-12-28 19:31:08 ~ Unhappily there was no conspiracy. The stroke was brought on by Wilson's discovery of what the public really thought on his foolish tour now the C Espionage and Sedition Acts had ended and control of the press no longer existed. In particular the german-Americans and Irish. He refused to believe the reaction of public opinion and violent demonstrations and continued his tour. Wilson was not used to demonstrations against himas a reactionary and the rejection of the idealist self-righteous retoric which were his stock in trade. Significant were the large demonstrations at Minneapolis and the railroad depot and outside the hall. Read The Illusion of Victory. However, if he did not have his stroke he would have had a third term with FDR as thev youngest Vice-President. Ps. British agentes poison FDR, as you crazy? He was the best thing we had, BRITISH AGENTS HELPED SECURE HIS 1940 REELECTION, and he was entirely pro-British.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-28 20:15:52 ~ Wilson was not used to beieng called a reactionary? Hey, I would have thought that he was used to that, thanks to his lavish praise for "Birth of a Nation." He said that it "told the truth" in making heroes out of the Ku Klux Klan...and was equally enthusiasatic in defending segregation. It's reached the point where some people are calling on the government to re-name the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, and I can see their point.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-12-28 21:43:32 ~ Yes, I know. He did not see anything incompatible with his "Liberal" views any more than British colonial administrators in Africa or India at the time of the Raj - they were not if you accepted the assumptions. What did Kipling write? "take up the White Man's burden....". he wrote a history book based on Birth of a Nation. But in public the image of the Starry Eyed idealist was strictly maintained.

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2012-12-28 21:43:34 ~ Actually "The Clansman"-later Birth of a Nation-gave credit to Wilson's history as a source.Thomas Dixon was an old classmate of his.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-28 22:07:28 ~ And don't forget Kipling's less known masterpiece..."Ulster will fight and Ulster will be right." He didn't like Irishmen, either.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-12-29 04:35:11 ~ This era of desired isolation in several places, like the U.S., still serves up some good novel possibilities. Mostly all best read from a novel. But, it does point out an indication of reluctance on the part of people and nations to stay out of somebody else's problems. "Maybe they will go away if we look the other way?" Since then most of us have learned that that is a near impossibility even if some places, possibly like the U.S., would still like to be isolationists. Wilson's era, including its maybe nutty possible offshoots, deserves further scrutiny in that. We might be able to see the naked us more clearly in that time's slower life pace.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-01-01 17:35:42 ~ Very cool What If, but getting those three to work together would've been as miraculous as instant recovery from his stroke.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what price a present-day Kingdom of David? We have taken the liberty of assuming a series of pre-conditions that eliminate Great Power influence from the War of Independence. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the March 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1948, following stunning victories at the Battles of Bir 'Asluj and 'Auja, Israeli Defence Forces from the Negev and 8th brigades enter the Sinai at night capturing Umm Katef and Abu Ageila.

Zionist Dystopia
Greater Israel Captures the Suez Canal
The Egyptian expeditionary force in Palestine was encircled at the decisive Battle of Rafahand and by early January the war is over.

The architect of Operation Horev was the brilliant IDF Southern Commander Yigal Allon (pictured). His personal triumph succeeded in trapping the Egyptian Army in the Gaza Strip. Against very long odds, this remarkable feats of arms had assured the creation of a viable State of Israel.

And Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was bequeathed not only a Jewish State that included as its capital the disputed City of Jerusalem, but unexpectedly, the glittering economic prize of the Suez Canal. The Jewel in the Crown of the Kingdom of David.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Suez, Israel, Yigal Allon, Sinai, Egypt.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality these Forces continued north to al-Arish, which Allon planned to capture, in order to encircle the Egyptian expeditionary force in Palestine and end the war. However, due to political and diplomatic considerations, all Israeli forces retreated from the Sinai on January 2, 1949. Another attempt to encircle the Egyptian forces was made on the next day in the Battle of Rafah, but Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion ordered the IDF to turn back, ending military engagements in the war. On 25 October 1949, while he was out of the country, Yigal Allon was replaced as OC Southern Command by Moshe Dayan. Most of his Staff Officers resigned in protest. He retired from active service in 1950.


Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-03-28 00:00:00 ~ There were huge political considerations in the establishment of the state of Israel. Ben Gurion's American backers would not have allowed an advance to the Suez Canal - needing not to cause a reaction by Britain and France, as well as having plans to make the Arabs clients. They would allow moves to take over Jerusalem and the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Agreed sir I think the context is a different WW2 ending where Britain and USSR defeated, US and Germany still fighting (but exhausted), Egypt a German ally. Thats my thinking..? If so the US. would have to arrange a Jewish revolt earlier than 1949 as there would be no British in Palestine till 1948. Also HITLER WILL HAVE THE BOMB.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-03-28 14:26:21 ~ This could have created all kinds of headaches for Nasser....

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-03-28 23:53:08 ~ And the Kingdom of David begins...

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-03-28 23:56:39 ~ And the S hits the F. Like Richard Roper, I don't think the U.S. would have allowed Israel to seize the Canal. As for the "Kingdom of David," the mere hint that Israel's leaders were heading in that direction would have alienated millions of Diaspora Jews even as it excited fundamentalist Christians eager for Armageddon.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2012-03-29 08:19:13 ~ This is my area of expertise (I have interviewed both Allon and Ben Gurion, as well as Dayan's daughter, a famous novelist in her own right). Allon's aim in 1948 was to cut off the Egyptian army, a strategy followed earlier at Beersheva (which isolated the Egyptian artillery and infantry units trying to capture Jerusalem from the south) and at Faluja (an Egyptian brigade was surrounded and besieged). Allon had no interest in occupying the Sinai. He saw it only as a battlefield. The occupation of the Sinai in 56 and 67 were the result Nasserite threats and violence. Richard Roper is incorrect when he refers to "Ben Gurion's American backers" -- the Truman administration simply recognized Israel de facto when the mandate expired. To Robbie Taylor, both Allon and Ben Gurion were social democrats, although in truth Allon was further to the left. They weren't interested in a kingdom, or an empire. Ben Gurion would have wanted East Jerusalem, which the British and the Jordanians had cut off during the siege. Allon would have been happy to retain a narrow cordon sanitaire along the lower Jordan River as a buffer against invasion, and both would have wanted the Sinai neutralized.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-25 21:36:06 ~ I think the UK would have had a good few things to say...IIRC they still owned/operated the Canal at that time, and while they'd been badly weakened by WWII, they would have been able to throw the Israelis back. There was no love lost between the UK and Israel; a lot of Britishers saw the Israelis as ungrateful while the Israelis saw the British as colonial occupiers.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-12-26 10:38:26 ~ Would have been a good bargaining chip, or a lightning rod for more violence -- or both!?

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2012-12-26 12:27:30 ~ With hindsight,would have been a god thing..



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Presidents were sworn-in with one hand on the Jefferson Bible? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1826, to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and the recent (coincidental) passing of principal author Thomas Jefferson, Chief Justice John Marshall announced a minor change to the Presidential swearing-in ceremony.

Jefferson Bible
by Ed & Jeff Provine
Henceforth, Presidents would be required to place their left hand on the Jefferson Bible during the oath of office (although Article Two of the US Constitution placed specific requirements on the wording of the oath, the choice of Bible was not mandated).

Formally known as the "The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth", the twenty-six page document was extracted from the doctrine of Jesus during 1819. Sections of the New Testament containing supernatural aspects (as well as perceived misinterpretations Jefferson believed had been added by the Four Evangelists) were removed, the end result being a compiled (but not edited) statement of the principles of pure deism.

Across Catholic Europe, Marshall's announcement was widely considered an endorsement of sacrilege. But in Washington, these Old World opinions were rejected in order to nurture the Jeffersonian dream of a nation of libertarian Gentleman Farmers.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: John Marshall, Thomas Jefferson, Constitution, Presidency, America.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-12-30 00:04:01 ~ This would have required a major change in the national culture, which was even more Bible-besotted then than now. What's the POD?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-12-30 00:50:04 ~ What did Protestant Europe think?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-01-02 21:19:09 ~ Such dedication to Deism might cause a backlash knocking the Virginians out of power instead of the Federalists waning out of existence.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Galileo had paid more attention to the planet Neptune, the "dim star" he noticed in 1612? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1612, on this day the Italian physicist, mathematician, astronomer and philosopher Galileo Galilei discovered a new planet. Known as the "Father of Modern Astronomy," "Father of Modern Physics," and "Father of Modern Science," Galileo led mankind in a great many discoveries, even that there were more planets to the cosmos than the five that had been charted since ancient times.

Galileo Discovers a New Planet While principally supported by patrons, he also had side-incomes from improving compasses and building telescopes. It was with his telescopes that Galileo would discern many secrets of the universe.

In January of 1610, Galileo discovered the four Galilean moons of Jupiter, the first solid description of a celestial object orbiting another. He at first took them for stars, but careful calculation proved that they were, in fact, moons like our own. It called into question the Aristotelian geocentric cosmos that has always been accepted, even with the understanding of a round Earth. That September, he discovered the phases of the planet Venus, which would fully discredit Aristotle and launch a new design by astronomical Tycho Brahe with a fixed Earth being orbited by the Sun, around which Mercury and Venus orbited.

A new story by Jeff ProvineGalileo became a celebrity around Europe and received many graces in Rome, especially from the Catholic Church who applauded his study of the wonders of Creation. Galileo, however, had opinions outside of the Church-recognized Tychonic system and pushed for recognition of a heliocentric universe. He searched for a way to prove the theory and constantly studied the skies.

In late 1612, Galileo came across another celestial object he took as a dim fixed star. A month later, he observed it again, and the star came to fascinate him. Over coming months, he watched it carefully, seeing it move ever so slightly that he could not be certain of his instruments. After some time, it became obvious that the star was moving in retrograde, meaning it had to be a planet like Mars or Jupiter. While Galileo felt certain that was the cause, his principles of observational science forced him to note that it may also have been a comet.

He busied himself with studies of sunspots and lunar mountains, but the strange "star" haunted him. Swallowing his pride, he took to the German Johannes Kepler's suggestion of a convex lens as the eyepiece rather than Galileo's concave one. The viewer suffered an inverted image, but the improved image astounded Galileo. During their correspondence on light refraction, Kelper was also able to convince Galileo of the lunar cause of tides, something Galileo always found fictitious as the tides were supposedly due to the movement of the Earth.

As Galileo was coming to appreciate the works of other scientists in his age and being baffled by what he would later recognize as the rings of Saturn, he wrote of new humility in letters to his daughter Virginia, now Sister Maria Celeste. Still, he felt that science must be kept pure, and he approached Rome in defense of Copernican ideals. Galileo was ordered by Cardinal Bellarmine and the Inquisition not to hold or defend heliocentrism. Admitting that without solid proof both were guesses, Galileo decided to treat the Sun-centered universe as a hypothesis, just as he would hold the Earth-centered one.

In 1619, Galileo came into a long discussion with Father Orazio Grassi of the Jesuit Collegio Romano about the nature of comets. While he felt great frustration with what he saw as incorrect science, Galileo methodically and politely arranged the discussion until finally admitting the planet he had been charting for nearly seven years. The Jesuits were shocked at the news, and Galileo conceded that the universe was much deeper than he had imagined, even accepting that comets were more distant than the moon.

Astronomers checked on Galileo's planet, and confirmation came from various astounded sources. Rome again applauded the great Galileo, who named the planet Uranus after Saturn's father. Riding his fame, Pope Urban VIII asked Galileo to write a discussion of heliocentrism, which he did in 1632's Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. The book stands as a model for fair and objective science to this day, ending with the conclusion that, excepting to fly up into the sky and look down on Earth's foundations (if any), the question would be solved by discerning parallax of the fixed stars in the sky as Earth rotated around the Sun.

Such a feat would require a telescope of incredible magnitude and precision, and astronomers would quest for another century to find one. In the meantime, yet another planet would be discovered, this one closer than Galileo's Uranus. English astronomer John Flamsteed would dub it "Nox" in 1690.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Galileo, Neptune, Astronomy, Science, Discovery.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Galileo would note the "dim star" but not notice it sufficiently. He would be notoriously bigoted about his scientific opinions, scoffing at Kepler and Grassi, even though they were correct about tides and comets, respectively. His opinions clashed with those of the Church, and Galileo would be forced to recant heliocentrism and spend the rest of his life under house arrest. Uranus would be mistaken by John Flamsteed as a star and not determined as a planet until William Herschel in 1781. Neptune, though observed by Galileo, would not be discovered until 1846 by Johann Galle.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-28 19:33:26 ~ Galileo was a great scientist, but a PITA as a human being...he'd have ended up in trouble no matter what planets he discovered.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-12-29 00:28:25 ~ Probably right. Gslileo had practically no people skills, and even managed to alienate other scientists by sniping at them when they happened to disagree with him, even when they happened to be right.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Woodrow Wilson tried to take the Confederacy into the League of Nations? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1856, on this day the tenth President of the Confederate States, Thomas Woodrow Wilson was born in Staunton, Virginia.

Woodrow Wilson
10th Confederate President
March 4, 1915 - March 4, 1921
Thomas Woodrow Wilson (December 28, 1856 - February 3, 1924) was the 10th President of the Confederate States. A leading intellectual of the Progressive Era, he served as President of the University of Virginia from 1902 to 1910, and then as the Governor of Virginia from 1911 to 1913. In a surprisingly close race against Constitution Party candidate Oscar Wilder Underwood. Wilson was elected as a Democrat in 1914.

A new article from the "Two Americas" thread on Althistory WikiaWilson persuaded a Democratic Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act, Federal Trade Commission, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Federal Farm Loan Act and a progressive income tax in the Revenue Act of 1917, as he saw the inevitability of the Confederacy entering into the hostilities in Europe. Though much of his election campaign around the slogan "he will keep us out of the war," CS neutrality was challenged in early 1917 when the German government proposed to Mexico a military alliance in a war against the CS, and began unrestricted submarine warfare, sinking without warning every American merchant ship -- both Union and Confederate - its submarines could find. Wilson in April 1917 asked Congress to declare war.

He focused on diplomacy and financial considerations, leaving the waging of the war primarily in the hands of the Army. On the home front in 1917, he began the first draft since the war for Confederate independence, raised billions in war funding through Liberty Bonds, set up the War Industries Board, promoted labor union growth, supervised agriculture and food production through the Lever Act, took over control of the railroads, enacted the first federal drug prohibition, and suppressed anti-war movements. Though national women's suffrage was already achieved in the U.S., Wilson was unable to persuade Congress to consider a similar amendment to the C.S. constitution.

In the late stages of the war, Wilson took personal control of negotiations with Germany, including the armistice. He issued his Fourteen Points, his view of a post-war world that could avoid another terrible conflict. He went to Paris in 1919 to create the League of Nations and shape the Treaty of Versailles, with special attention on creating new nations out of defunct empires. Largely for his efforts to form the League, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. In 1919, during the bitter fight with the Constitutionist-controlled Senate over the C.S. joining the League of Nations, Wilson collapsed with a debilitating stroke. He refused to compromise, effectively destroying any chance for ratification. The League of Nations was established anyway, but the Confederate States never joined. Wilson's idealistic internationalism, now referred to as "Wilsonianism", called for the Confederate States to enter the world arena to fight for democracy.

While "making Europe safe for democracy," back home Wilson's administration was occupying much of the Caribbean in attempts to put democratically minded leaders in unstable areas. Decisions made in Nicaragua, for instance, would lead to Communism - which arose as an indirect result of the "Great War" in Europe - getting a stronghold in the western hemisphere. The stress of the peace process worsened the president's health, and he spent several months out of the public eye after his stroke. He was assisted by his second wife through this tough time.

After leaving office, Wilson retired to his home in Richmond, where he died on February 3, 1924. In his six years he had lead the Confederate States onto the world scene as a powerhouse militarily and economically. Though the CSA had not become a member of the League of Nations, he died knowing that his nation had made a difference in the world.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alt History Wikia
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Two Americas Source: Althistory Wikia Labels: Woodrow Wilson, World War 1, Presidency, Confederacy, Election.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-22 20:17:03 ~ What a guy. Setting up the CSA internationally would ready for major income over the 1920s with the reconstruction of Europe, which might lead to a really REALLY bad Great Depression come 1929. No FDR from NY to bail 'em out, either.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-11-23 02:39:28 ~ One problem: the Confederacy's first presidential election occurred in 1861, and CSA presidents were supposed to have served 6-year terms. (Jefferson Davis served as "provisional president" prior to being formally elected in 1861.) That means CS presidential elections would always have occurred in odd-numbered years; there wouldn't have been one in 1914. The closest would have been 1915.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if by circumstance VP Calhoun was forced to prevent disunion by force in the American 1833 crisis? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1832, in order to dissuade his hot-headed, rebellious comrades from prematurely seceding from the Union, John C. Calhoun (pictured) resigned the Vice Presidency and returned post-haste to his home State of South Carolina on this day. Of course his own position was a matter of timing rather than principle. Because from Washington he could clearly see that there was insufficient support from neighborough states to create the Southern Confederacy that he hoped to head as First President.
.. continued from Part 1

Forcing Charleston Harbour, 1833 Crisis
Part 2 by Ed., Eric Lipps & Scott Palter
His arrival was none to soon. Because unbeknown to the Vice President, agents provocateurs of Her Majesty's Government had been stirring up some real trouble in South Carolina for the previous month. Because he was shocked to be presented with medals emblazened with "John C. Calhoun, First President of the Southern Confederacy".

Those medals had been manufactured in London under orders from the Prime Minister of Great Britain, Marquis Richard Wellesley. Worse, the Royal Navy vessels upon which the medals were transported had just forced upon Charleston Harbour. The USS Natchez would soon arrive upon the scene. Dispatched by US President Andrew Jackson for the purpose of seizing by force the federal tarrifs by South Carolinians, this vessel would soon become entangled in the first shots of the 1833 Anglo-American War. And the matter of South Carolina's nullification of those federal tarrifs became, rather rapidly, something of a non-issue.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © American Lion, Andrew Jackson in the White House by John Meacham
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: War of 1833 Source: Wikipedia Labels: Andrew Jackson, John C. Calhoun, America, South, Confederacy.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, The facts and sentences are from the source article with the exception of course that whilst Richard Wellesley did write these words, wasn't the Prime Minister.


Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-11-09 23:45:33 ~ Quite well done. USN would have done no better against the RN in 1833 than they did in 1812-15. However they would have been able to run enough guns in to enable SC's independent government to hold the lowlands around Charleston. Holding the Piedmont is of course quite another story. Wrapped in the flag and fighting the British Jackson could have raised enough troops to take them. The funny part is that the war destroys slavery in SC.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-10 06:27:48 ~ The second that British involvement becomes generally known, even a lot of SCarolinians would balk...anti-British feeling was still very common and bitter for almost all the 19th century.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-03-10 16:13:12 ~ Civil War 1833, great possibilities. Probably see Jackson as President leading the troops, a first for America.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, What if the British Minister had refused to repatriate the Cossacks at Lienz in May 1945? This story was published in the February 2009 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1986, Lord Stockton, the former Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, died peacefully on this day aged 92. Members of his family were by his bedside at Birch Grove House, at Horsted Keynes, East Sussex, when he died at 1820 GMT following a short illness.Supermac Dies

Tributes began flooding in for the former Conservative leader nicknamed 'Super Mac'. The Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said his death left a void in politics which could not be filled. Fellow former Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath described Lord Stockton as one of the most creative minds in British politics.

Count Nikolai Tolstoi said Supermac would always been remembered fondly by the Cossack nation of Russia, referring of course to his decision at Lienz, Austria not to repatriate troops to the Soviet Union where they would face imprisonment and death.

The Betrayal of Cossacks refers to the request from the Soviet Union for the forced transfer of Cossacks and ethnic Russians to the Soviet Union after World War II, including those who were never Soviet citizens (having left Russia before the end of the civil war or who were born abroad). Ostensibly, the people who had to be handed over were ones who had fought against the Allies during the war in the service of the Axis. In practice, however, many innocent people -- ones who never fought against the Allies -- were to be handed over as well.

The Cossacks who fought against the Allies saw their service not as treason to the motherland, but as an episode in the Russian Revolution of 1917, part of the ongoing struggle against Moscow and Communism. This relatively little known event, as well as other events that are results of Yalta, is referred to by Nikolai Tolstoy as 'The Secret Betrayal' because of its lack of exposure in the Western hemisphere. The most recognized of these events was that which took place in Lienz, Austria. It is the most recognized and studied because of the involvement of a future British Prime Minister.

The British arrived in Lienz, where over 2,700 Cossacks resided, on 28 May 1945. They arrived to tell the Cossacks that they were invited to an important British conference with British officials and would return to Lienz by 6 o'clock that evening. Some Cossacks began to worry but were assured by the British that everything would be fine. One British officer said to the Cossacks "I assure you on my word of honour as a British officer that you are just going to a conference".

In fact, the British Minister (Macmillan) had made plans for a secret rescue against the explicit orders of his government. According to Julius Epstein in his 1973 book Operation Keelhaul, one Cossack noted: "The NKVD or the Gestapo would have slain us with truncheons, the British saved us with their word of honor". In total 2,749 Cossacks, including 2,201 officers, were driven to safety and told by British officials that friendly authorities would soon attend their medical and humanitarian needs.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Count Tolstoi Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Count Tolstoi, The Secret Betrayal (1977)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Truth Seeker Labels: Supermac, Cossacks, Harold Macmillan, Count Tolstoi, Victor's Justice.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-01-15 01:29:37 ~ Now this is an interesting twist to early Cold War history. I wonder what the effects may have been for the Cold War as a result...

Facebook Comment Comment from William Peter-Ball on Facebook: No Goldeneye then? Very good sir, I had forgotten Agent 006 (Trevelyan) was a Cossack. Ed



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


December 27



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Adolf Hitler had committed more resources to Plan Z. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1922, on this day the Japanese aircraft carrier Hōshō ("phoenix in flight") became the first purpose built aircraft carrier to be commissioned in the world. Her aircraft group participated in the Shanghai Incident in 1932 and in the opening stages of the Sino-Japanese War in late 1937.

Flugzeugträger Part 13:
Commissioning of Hōshō
The small size of the ship and her assigned airgroups (usually around 15 aircraft) limited the effectiveness of her contributions to combat operations. As a result, the carrier was placed in reserve after her return to Japan from China and she became a training carrier in 1939.

During World War II, Hōshō participated in the Battle of Midway in June 1942 in a secondary role. The narrow Japanese victory was assured by the support of the German double aircraft carrier group that had been stranded in the Far East at the outbreak of war.
This article is a post from the Flugzeugträger thread in which Adolf Hitler had committed more resources to Plan Z.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Flugzeugtrager Source: Wikipedia Labels: Battle of Midway, Hōshō, Aircraft Carrier, Far East, Second World War.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the United States Navy decisively defeated an Imperial Japanese Navy attack against Midway Atoll, inflicting irreparable damage on the Japanese fleet


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-12-27 20:21:03 ~ This is some scary shiznit right here...

Readers Comment Allen W. McDonnell commented on 2013-02-07 11:53:51 ~ it does not take much of a change for Japan to win the Battle of Midway, the three American aircraft carriers and the aircraft stationed on Midway Islands themselves completly failed to co-oridinate their attacks. It was only by pure luck that the three dive bomber squandrons all searching independently for the Japanese arrived on the scene within moments of the torpedo bomber attacks having taken place and drawing the Japanese fighters away. If the American dive bombers had arrived as little as ten minutes later, or if they had arrived one by one like the Torpedo bombers, the outcome would have been significantly changed.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-02-07 15:38:33 ~ Japan could've seized a lot more of the Pacific: Australia, maybe even moving around to harass India.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Ginger Alden had succeeded in resuscitating the dying Elvis? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1979, on this day an unmarked private jet was given special authorization to land at the Mehrabad International Airport.

Presley ends American Malaise Part #1The sole passenger on-board was the born again Christian Elvis Aaron Presley. He was requesting permission to join the hostages held in the American Embassy in Tehran.

Just two years before, he had been suffering the American condition in microcosm, an energy crisis and a deepening malaise. Certainly his resuscitation on the bathroom floor was the lowest moment of life, but recognizing that truth he had been able to seek the support he needed to end his cycle of drug abuse.

Two years later, his medical problems were even more acute and he had only months to live. He decided to seize that final opportunity to make another lasting imprint upon the American psyche.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Heroes Source: Wikipedia Labels: Elvis Presley, Tehran Hostage Crisis, Iran, Premature Death, Jimmy Carter.

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2011-12-01 12:36:44 ~ And, if a few of those hostages somehow end up disguised as part of his entourage and get on the plane with him... well, mistakes happen

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-12-01 14:23:24 ~ Indeed.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-12-01 15:08:12 ~ If anything had happened to the King in Iran, it would've been war.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, the Sarajevo crisis was suposed to ignite the world into a 4 year war that would devastate much of Europe. But what if it didn't? muses Steven Fisher. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1917, on this day Emperor Karl I abdicated the throne of the Habsburg Monarchy, heralding the dissolution of the Dual Monarchy.
Article continues from Part #2.

The Last Chance for Peace #3 By Steven FisherDomestic turmoil in Austria-Hungary had been steadily increasing ever since the signing of the Treaty of Berlin on August 2. The devastating Austrian defeat in the Third Balkan war, and the harsh terms given to it by the Russians, had greatly increased peoples dissatisfaction with the government. This, combined with a faltering Austro-Hungarian economy had turned people against the Habsburg Monarchy.

An unusually harsh winter, combined with the already existing economic deprivation, finally lit the tinderbox of revolution. On December 19, people took to the streets of Vienna, calling for an end to the Monarchy. The army and police were sent to stop them, but to the governments horror, some army units and policemen began siding with the rebels. The riots quickly spread from Vienna to the other parts of the Empire. Clashes began between protesters and army troops. But defecting troops managed to turn the tide in favor of the protestors, since many in the army blame the current government for getting them into a losing war, and having them fight for nothing. A loyalist Army group moving to attempt to rescue the King from his palace in Vienna is defeated in heavy street fighting.

Finally, the Republican forces break into the palace in Vienna, and force Karl I to abdicate the Habsburg throne. The Austro-Hungarian Empire is dissolved, with Austria and Hungary both breaking off and forming the Austrian Federation and the Republic of Hungary. Ethnic minorities in both nations attempt to break off and form their own nations, such as the Czechs in Austria, but their attempts fail. The Austrians are more compromising, and form a federation within which the Czechs have some autonomy.

The peace was not to last though. On January 2, 1918, the Italians announce the annexation of Trentino, and march troops into the region. International condemnation of the move does occur, but the Italians brush it off by saying that they are taking this action to protect the Italaians living in the region, who they claim are suffering oppression from the Austrian authorities. The Austrians vehemently oppose this act, but cannot do anyhting, as their people are unwilling to fight a war.

Their inability to prevent the annexation of Trentino would spell the end of the Austrian government. On May 19, the Austrian military coups the government, establishing a German backed military dicatorship under Conrad Von Hotzendorf. It heralds the beginning of the poalrization around the powers of Russia and Germany, a situation that will inflame tensions between the two nations, and be a cause of World War 1 in 1921.
The whole thread is available at the Alt History Wikia.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Steve Fisher Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Steven Fisher, 2011-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Last Chance Source: Wikipedia Labels: Franz Ferdinand, Sarajevo, Kaiser, Great War, World War 1.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-12-01 07:24:27 ~ Conrad would never betray his crown. Never. Trust me, this is my period. Austria collapsed because it was defeated on the Salonika front -- something we're not supposed to talk about anymore.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-12-01 15:16:17 ~ A later WWI might work out very much in Germany's favor, especially if they kept at the edge of the war-technology race.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-12-02 00:42:14 ~ I'm not sure that most nationalities wanted the Empire dissolved---it had a lot of useful things about it, like a big de-facto customs union in S. Central Europe and a brake on German expansionism.

Readers Comment Steven Fisher commented on 2011-12-02 15:19:51 ~ Stan, Conrad didn't betray the crown. He took over the Republic in a coup. The army had marched out to prevent the revolution, but parts of the army defected to the side of the rioters. The Republic tiself fell because the Italians had seized Trentino and the Republic didn't do anything about it. And Eric, you might be right about that. But I was just thinking of the fact that the Empire just got it's butt kicked by the Russians. A lot of Hungary got ruined in the war, and they're angry at the Monarchy for that happening. The economy is going down the drain due to inflation from massive spending to fund the war. They just lost land to the Russians, the Serbians, and the Romanians, and they have to pay some handy reparations. And then there's the weather.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Incan Emperor Atahualpa had overcome the Spaniard Francisco Pizarro y Gonzalez? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1530, on this day the Lost Expedition of Francisco Pizarro y Gonzalez left Panama.

Pizarro's Lost Expedition Leaves PanamaFor hundreds of years, no one was quite certain what happened to the hundreds of men under the command of Francisco Pizarro y Gonzalez. Pizarro (pictured) seemed an apt commander and loyal Spaniard, but many theories have arisen about failures in battle, overwhelming armies of Punians, or the Spanish going native and joining the Inca's court to deliver them with firearms and horses. After much contention, the truth has gradually been assembled by historians piecing together Spanish chronicles with legend recorded by the Incan Nation.

A new story by Jeff ProvineThe initial biographical information about Pizarro is clear beyond his questioned birth date. A somewhat distant relative of Cortes, conqueror of the Aztecs, Pizarro sailed to the New World along with Governor Nicolas de Ovando and some 2,500 colonists. He traveled with Balboa on the explorer's trek across Panama and was one of the first Europeans to see the Pacific Ocean. His loyalty to Spain was displayed as Pizarro later arrested Balboa for his trial and execution. In good position with the government and spurred by stories of Cort?s' success conquering the Aztecs, Pizarro made company with the priest Hernando de Luque and the soldier Diego de Almagro to explore south and conquer the great wealth of an empire rumored to be there.

Their first expedition went out in 1524, but it quickly returned due to harsh weather, failing supplies, and battles with natives. 1526 saw another attempt, this one twice the size of the first and sailing much farther south. While Pizarro explored jungles, a ship sailed on past the equator and captured a native raft loaded with trade goods of pots, textiles, and, most importantly, gold and jewels. They explored further, but they found new hostilities in a land recently conquered by the Inca and decided to turn back. Pizarro stayed with thirteen men and awaited more provisions. A ship arrived to evacuate them, but Pizarro and his comrades pushed on in exploration, eventually coming across friendly natives at Tumbes and continued south. Finding irrefutable proof of the wealth of the empire to the south (as well as discovering llamas), the explorers returned to Panama to prepare for a third expedition.

The governor refused to allow it, so Pizarro sailed for Spain and returned with the Queen's signature on the Capitulaci?n de Toledo approving conquest. Pizarro left that December of 1530 and sent back further treasure to Almagro, who was gathering more recruits. Almagro would leave to join him, as would conquistador Hernando de Soto, the only man to return from the expedition. De Soto came back to Panama three years later, sunburned and sporting numerous battle scars, and told vague stories of the Inca attacking and overwhelming the conquistadors without provocation. Others assumed he escaped from a military defeat before reaching the Inca or leaving the expedition once it had changed allegiance to Atahualpa. While his word was debated, de Soto encouraged Spain not to waste human life by sending explorers south again.

From Incan records, it is told that the emperor Atahualpa, newly secured to the throne by defeating his brother Huascar, feared what white-skinned interlopers might do. He gathered survivors of the Battle of Puna and anyone with knowledge about the Spanish while Pizarro was away. Studying their tactics and the tales of conquest in the north, he determined that they were hardly demigods, clearly mortal though greatly powerful. When they appeared at his city of Cajamarca, Atahualpa invited them to feast and then killed the Spaniards in a great ambush, calling out, "My lands shall be no man's tributary!" It is suspected that de Soto was sent back to Panama as a warning to the Spanish.

With conquest out of the question, the Spanish largely turned east and north, securing the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico as well as moving around Portuguese land in Brazil to Argentina. Trade with Europe would build with the Inca, first in secret as the smallpox plague swept through the empire and then marginally promoted by Atahualpa's descendant Tupac. It is with Tupac that Francis Drake would make a treaty during his circumnavigation of the Earth in 1578. Trade blossomed, exchanging gold and exotic flora for weapons and manufactured goods, eventually turning the west coast of South America into an economic dependency under English influence as had been seen in parts of India and East Asia.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Pizarro, Atahualpa, Inca, America, Spain.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Atahualpa underestimated his opponents. Agreeing to an audience with Pizarro, Atahualpa was ambushed and captured. The Spanish demanded a roomful of gold and two rooms of silver as ransom and, receiving it, still had Atahualpa executed as murderer of his brother. Placing puppet-emperors upon the throne, Pizarro effectively conquered the Inca and added yet more land and riches to the growing Spanish Empire.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-27 18:16:00 ~ Between disease and unrest in the Incan lands, I think the Spaniards would have eventually conquered them, Pizarro or no Pizarro. Even so, having this happen to him would have been _sooo_ just...

Facebook Comment Comment from Norton James on Facebook: Maybe, the rise of a new Japan in America

Facebook Comment Comment from Alan Abramowitz on Facebook: And then we might have more information as to who Viracocha or Kon Tiki was. We would have a better understanding of what Tiawanaku is as well.

Facebook Comment Comment from Joe Mwangi on Facebook: Another conquistador would have come later.The old world's insatiable thirst for Gold would have inevitably doomed the Inca Empire and it would suffer the same fate as the Aztecs and Maya

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-29 20:07:48 ~ Between the Aztecs and the Inca, we lost so much culture.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, What if Sam finally forgives Dave for shooting his wife in 1970? This story was published in the March 2009 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2005, Samuel David Moore finally spoke about his relationship with David Prater.
Both American Soul and Rhythm & Blues (R&B) singers were members of the soul vocal duo Sam & Dave. They recorded and performed together from 1961 through 1981; Sam Moore was the tenor (higher) vocalist and Dave Prater was the baritone/tenor (lower) vocalist. Click to watch the duo perfoming "Hold On, I'm Coming" live in 1967.

Sam Forgives DaveAlong with 'Wicked' Wilson Pickett the leaders of the second tier of Atlantic/Stax's mighty '60s soul roster (first division: Aretha Franklin and Otis Redding), the team of Sam Moore and Dave Prater produced some of the sweatiest, grittiest soul music ever waxed.

Nicknamed "Double Dynamite", "The Sultans of Sweat", and "The Dynamic Duo" for their sweaty, gritty, gospel-infused performances, Sam & Dave were one of the greatest live acts of the 1960s. Phil Walden, Otis Redding's manager, said "I think Sam and Dave will probably stand the test of time as being the best live act that there ever was. Those guys were absolutely unbelievable. Every night they were awesome". An October 1968 Time article reads: "Of all the R & B cats, nobody steams up a place like Sam & Dave ... weaving and dancing (while singing!), they gyrate through enough acrobatics to wear out more than 100 costumes per year". Click to watch the duo performing "Soul Man" live in 1967. Both were also serious drug addicts.

An increasingly volatile personal relationship between the two performers, Sam reached a breaking point in their personal relationship in 1968. After Dave shot his soon-to-be second wife in 1970, Sam told Dave "I'll sing with you, but I shall never speak to you again".

Dave was killed in a freak car accident in 1988, in which his body shot into a tree, severing his head from his torso. Later, Sam stated that " He didn't think of Dave, didn't think of him at all ".

In his Christmas broadcast, he admitted this was a mistake. Their sweatiest, grittiest soul music was the result of their harsh life experiences, and now, as an old man, finally he could find it in his heart to forgive him.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Play the tune Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Personalities Source: Wikipedia Labels: Sam & Dave, Soul, Sixties, Tragedy, Forgiveness.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, we watched a Top 10 songs from the sixties, hosted by Smokey Robinson - all of the stars had some form of tragedy in their lives including of course Smokey himself. To celebrate the genius of the duo's talent, we have repurposed content from Wikipedia and told a happier tale.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-02-09 03:30:08 ~ I don't know enough about this branch of music to make an intelligent comment.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-02-09 14:53:43 ~ Great story.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


December 26



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Arthur P. Hinman had discovered evidence that Chester A. Arthur was not a native-born citizen of the United States? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1886, on this day 23rd President of the United States John Alexander "Blackjack" Logan (pictured) died aged sixty.

Death of President LoganHe served in the Mexican-American War and was a general in the Union Army in the American Civil War. He served the state of Illinois as a state senator, congressman and senator and was an successful candidate for Vice President of the United States with Solomon Foot in the election of 1884.

But he had served for only nine months since the demise of President Foot who as the President pro tempore of the Senate had closed-out the disgraced Chester A. Arthur's term with out a VP but had then chosen Logan at the 1864 Convention.

Logan's own brief tenure was the shaky conclusion to a series of truncated Presidencies from James A. Garfield (assassination after 200 days), Chester A. Arthur (resignation after three years), Solomon Foot (death after three years) and finally Logan (death after six months). The unsteadiness of the succession over six years demonstrated that a Constitutional Amendment was clearly needed to require a sitting President to nominate a VP following his own ascension to that post.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Chester A. Arthur, Solomon Foot, America, Presidency, John A. Logan.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, thanks to Facebook user Michael William Stone for his valued suggestion - why it shouldn't still be John A Logan? OTL he was paired with Blaine, another New Englander, so he still makes just as much sense.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-11-20 14:09:07 ~ Question: what kind of vvidence are we talking about here?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-01-28 18:32:58 ~ Don't know enough about the guy to make much comment, but Gilded Age presidents weren't generally very big on moving-and-shaking.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2013-01-30 03:36:43 ~ Could I make a pun about his campaign...namely, "Logan's Run."

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-02-03 14:32:05 ~ The US would need solid leadership quickly to reaffirm executive power, otherwise we'd see a very different 20th century.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Richard Nixon had been more crafty? muses Robbie Taylor. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1996, in one of his final executive actions, President Paul Tsongas authorized the early release of Daniel Ellsberg.

Ellsberg ReleasedTsongas died just three weeks later and his successor Bill Clinton was in office when Ellsberg actually left prison.

A consultant at the Pentagon, he was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison for treason. Ellsberg had been caught trying to peddle classified papers to various news organizations through a fortuitous tip from his psychiatrist. President Nixon said, "Filthy traitors aren't welcome in our America".
Note - This article is a continuation of Robbie Taylor's post 31 July 1974: Ellsberg sentenced as explained by Michel Vuijlsteke on the The Annotated Today in Alternate History web site.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: American Heroes Source: Wikipedia Labels: Daniel Ellsberg, Richard Nixon, Paul Tsongas, Bill Clinton, Sentence.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality, he was caught in June 1971 after an extensive manhunt, and would have been been imprisoned for life it hadn't been for Nixon's manic desire for revenge. Amongst a load of other things, Nixon had Ellsberg's psychoanalyst's office burgled by Howard Hunt and Gordon Liddy (two of the Watergate burglars!) and tried to bribe the judge by offering him the directorship of the FBI. The trial had to be abandoned and Ellsberg was acquitted.


Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-26 22:33:04 ~ One could argue that Ellsberg could have been executed or imprisoned for a life, on a charge of espionage, so perhaps Nixon wasn't acting so crazy after all...in this instance, at least.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-12-26 22:52:20 ~ Well, a lawyer (Nixon) who trashes a big-time political case by tampering with the judge and illegally searching for evidence isn't exactly 100 percent on the beam.

Readers Comment Mike McIlvain commented on 2012-12-27 03:40:45 ~ An early release could have either galvanized the desire to do something similar later, or served to quash it -- depending on how the next secret paper pusher might have seen it. Such action would affect the perception of the risks.

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2012-12-27 15:30:44 ~ Did the papers do any harm? 7,000 paegs-did anyone read them?



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Chiang Kai-Shek had gambled by abandoning northern China? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1893, on this day Communist revolutionary, guerrilla warfare strategist and Marxist political philosopher Mao Zedong was born in Shaoshan in South-Central China.

Birth of Mao ZedongHis life-long struggle with Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek was a textbook example of how seemingly contrary forces are interconnected and interdependent, a binary concept that is deeply rooted in Taoist philosophy (pictured). Because as Chiang's nationalist forces expanded to possess the greater whole, they also triggered a counter-reaction inside a dynamic system. And the end result was inevitably bipolar in nature.

Having overcome the Warlords, the Kuomintang (KMT) launched a series of extermination campaigns that drove the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) out of the urban areas and into the countryside. Mao then rose to power by commanding a Long March to the Soviet border. But the Japanese invasion of Manchuria created a strategic pause putting the conflict into a state of suspension for a decade. And yet the CCP might even have won this Civil War if the KMT had not managed to hang on until the Korean War, a moment of truth that demonstrated that the West simply could not afford to lose China.

The perceived wisdom of Chiang in abandoning the territory north of the Great War might well have saved his regime, but the long-term consequence was the creation of two systems of government separated by a ready-made Iron Curtain. The People's Republic of China (PRC) was then ruled by Mao from the north-eastern city of Changchun right up until his mysterious death in 1966. The mixed results of his application of Marxist thought was then transformed by his successor, the "Great Helmsman" Deng Xiaoping. Over the next twenty-five years, his dynamic leadership would see the economy move in a great leap forward. He re-energized the Communist model at a decisive moment in history when the West appeared to be entering a period of ascendancy. Instead the KMT would stubbornly refuse to embrace democratic reform until it was forced upon them by the Tianenmen Square Student Protests of 1989.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, China, Communism, Marx.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we explore some ideas from Rooksmoor and repurpose content from Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-01-02 21:16:48 ~ I wonder if Mao would have continually attempted to push southward, at least ideologically, creating a mirror of the Korean War for the '60s (i.e. Vietnam, but a few hundred miles north).



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, What if Winston Churchill's heart attack at the White House was fatal? This story was published in the February 2009 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1941, on this day British Prime Minister Winston Churchill suffered a fatal heart attack.

Quit India, Part #1
The Death of Churchill
But a few hours before, Churchill had addressed a joint meeting of the US Congress, asking of Germany and Japan, "What kind of people do they think we are? Is it possible they do not realize that we shall never cease to persevere against them until they have been taught a lesson which they and the world will never forget?". Click to watch the address to Joint Session Of Congress

That evening as a guest of President Franklin D. Roosevelt at the White House, Churchill rose to open a window sash, and experienced a tremour from his heart through his left arm.

In public, he had seemed to epitomize the bulldog fighting spirit but in private, the strain was taking its toll. And that strain had become intolerable since the events of 10th December. The killer blow was unwittingly delivered by telephone to Churchill's bedside by Sir Dudley Pound, the First Sea Lord - so distressed that the Prime Minister had great difficulty to discerning his message.

Pound: Prime Minister, I have to report to you that the Indomitable, Prince of Wales and the Repulse have been sunk by the Japanese - we think by aircraft. [a trusted friend of Churchill, British Admiral] Tom Phillips is drowned.
Churchill: Are you sure it's true?
Pound: There is no doubt at all.

"In all the war, I never received a more direct shock... As I turned over and twisted in bed the full horror of the news sank in upon me. There were no British or American ships in the Indian Ocean or the Pacific except the American survivors of Pearl Harbor, who were hastening back to California. Over all this vast expanse of waters Japan was supreme, and we everywhere were weak and naked".

The news of Churchill's death would have profound implications for Mohandas K. Gandhi, who ironically enough had been described by the Prime Minister as a half-naked fakir. By December of 1941, the view of the Indian National Congress had changed sharply - British would probably not lose the war. Unable to rely upon the Axis Powers to force the British to "Quit India" Gandhi devised a new proposal. Click to watch the video. Whilst British forces might remain in India, their Government should depart. The key opponent of this proposal was now dead; Churchill had denied that the Atlantic Charter principle that the "right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live" applied to (his words and those of the Daily Mail) "the darker races". In a final act of irony, the successful defence of India would build a new multi-faith nation, subduing the calls for a breakaway Muslim state.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Gandhi & Churchill : the epic rivalry that destroyed an empire and forged our age / by Herman, Arthur, 1956-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Quit India Source: Wikipedia Labels: Prince of Wales, Repulse, HMS Indomitable, Winston Churchill, Gandhi.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, From Churchill and the Great Republic Addressing Congress on December 26, 1941, Churchill won over his audience by telling them, 'I cannot help reflecting that if my father had been American and my mother British, instead of the other way round, I might have got here on my own.' He added that the distressing pattern of recent events might persist for an extended period: 'Many disappointments and unpleasant surprises await us.' Shortly after the speech he suffered a mild heart attack, a diagnosis that his personal doctor concealed from everyone, including Churchill himself.
The Indomitable arrived too late to save Singapore - a weakened Force Z was dispatched to the Far East, and the Prince of Wales and the Repulse were sunk on 10th December 1941 gifting the Japanese the keys to Britain's Far Eastern possesions. The original British plan had called for a larger fleet which included the new Illustrious-class aircraft carrier HMS Indomitable for air cover, although the plan had to be revised when Indomitable was damaged en route.


Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-10-23 16:28:18 ~ "...subduing the calls for a breakaway Muslim state." That would be either massive political movement of understanding and friendship or a military pogrom.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-10-23 16:35:25 ~ By this time, the "Pakistan" movement had a lot of momentum of its own, and there'd have been fighting no matter what.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2010-10-23 19:25:11 ~ IIRC Jinnah was the main driving force in the Muslim League. Reconciling him and his loyalists would go a long way toward marginalizing the rest.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-10-23 21:27:13 ~ But with Churchill dead before the end of 1941, following a "distressing series of [other] events," Britain's will to fight might have been weakened and the hand of those calling for a separate peace strengthened--at the very least, putting strains upon the alliance between Britain and the U.S. which were avoided in our history.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-10-26 08:03:47 ~ The UK making a separate peace in January of 1942 seems unlikely. The more likely result of a Halifax government would be the UK refusing to exert itself as much in the war. Churchill bankrupted Britain for victory. I doubt Halifax would have.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what would it take for Charlie Sheen to be fired from that dreadful show? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2010, on this day bad-boy actor Charlie Sheen blamed a medical reaction to a cocktail of drugs and alcohol he consumed over the festive season as the cause of a shooting incident in which he accidentally gunned down a white haired, bearded man in a red costume as he emerged from the chimney on the set of "Two And A Half Men - A Christmas Special".

Charlie Sheen kills Father ChristmasA spokesman for CBS said that the homicide would not prevent Sheen from continuing to play the part of hedonistic bachelor, jingle/children's song writer Charles Francis "Charlie" Harper on the Top 20 program.

A minority of television viewers continue to question whether the free-wheeler presents an appropriate role model to his divorced brother Alan's growing son, Jake both of whom co-habit his beach-front house. Or whether the show is simply a parody of the continuing breakdown of American society.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Hollywood Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charlie Sheen, Bad Boy, Weapons, America, Violence.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Charlie Sheen is an upstanding member of the acting community.


Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2010-12-26 19:44:53 ~ LOL!

Facebook Comment Comment from Joe Annaruma on Facebook: to be stabbed to death by a cracked-out hooker in a motel 8.that's all I have. he'd only be re-animated for a next series of one-man-and-a-baby-and-their-zombie-uncle

Facebook Comment Comment from Thermonuclear Fusionista on Facebook: I have two degrees dont do drugs and I cant buy a job but Charlie Sheen gets paid fat cash!

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-26 23:12:32 ~ The fact that idiots like this continue to thrive convinces me that there is no God.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2010-12-27 00:34:54 ~ Well they arrested Santa in the Australian outback. Looks like he had a tough year...

Readers Comment Brian Wall commented on 2010-12-27 16:10:04 ~ So is this alternate history or future history? ;)

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-12-27 17:30:45 ~ Good question. :)

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-29 19:55:40 ~ At least there's still hope for Hot Shots: Part Tres



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Continental Army was defeated at Trenton? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, on this day General Washington's Continental Army suffered a disaster at Trenton in New Jersey.

Washington's Disaster at Trenton After successes in 1775 in Lexington, Massachusetts Colony, and the taking of Fort Ticonderoga in New York, 1776 was a bleary year for the American Revolutionists. Their Continental Congress struggled to find money and support while the Continental Army faced a string of defeats across New York and New Jersey. Knowing that the cause was nearly lost, Commander-in-Chief General George Washington made a last-ditch effort at attacking Hessian soldiers already in winter quarters across the Delaware River at Trenton.

A new story by Jeff ProvineColonel Johann Rall, a 56-year-old veteran with ample experience in battle as a mercenary, was to be placed in command at Trenton reluctantly by his superior Carl von Donop. Rall was loud, did not understand English, and, though he was known to fight well, did not thrive in the between-battle times of war. He avoided work and was lax on the discipline of his troops, inspiring little confidence. Donop, however, came down with a bitter cold and decided not to march with his soldiers rooting out New Jersey militia. He sent Rall instead, who fiercely pursued the rebels, scarcely stopping in Mount Holly as they pursued Samuel Griffin and his men.

In Trenton, despite his illness, Donop was vigorous in his orders for the men. He followed suggestions by his engineers at fortifying the town and ensured round-the-clock posts for guards despite the horrible weather. On the night of the 25th, rain turned to sleet, and guards were shocked to see initial American skirmishers on the morning of the 26th. Donop called out his men, and Washington was forced to attack the defended high ground. The Americans broke, and Donop took up pursuit, capturing Washington and many of his cannon. Few soldiers returned to ranks, the rest disappearing into the New Jersey wilderness.

With the harsh blow at Trenton, much of the fervor for independence died over the winter and into the spring. Horatio Gates succeeded Washington as Commander-in-Chief and led strong defenses against British General Burgoyne's campaign to separate New England from the rest of the colonies. On October 7, 1777, defeat at Saratoga sounded the death knell for the Revolutionary War. Gates claimed he could easily have won with more men, but the support for actual war was waning. It stood as the last major battle in the north, though backwoods rebels would string out the war for years with harrying attacks and withdraws laden with ambushes. The Southern Colonies would also cause continual frustration for the British Army, but the taking of Charleston on May 12, 1780, would end major battles there as well, but hardly the fighting. Nathanael Greene, Commander-in-Chief after Gates, carried his famous motto, "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again".

While the rebels continued to drag on the war, the question fell to Parliament of what to do with those they had captured. Washington had been shipped to London soon after Trenton and stripped of his land, though the government could not see fit to execute him and create a martyr like General Benedict Arnold, who had died leading his men in a charge at Saratoga. Offers were made to return him to status quo ante bellum, but the general refused. He, like his countrymen, simply refused to give up. Washington remained a prisoner for the duration of the war, though many others such as John Hancock, Thomas Paine, and Samuel Adams would be publicly hanged as treasonous instigators.

Gradually, the American leadership would destroy itself through infighting and abandonment. Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin would attempt to create a government-in-exile in Paris, but they simply became novelties at the French Court. Their writings and arguments would contribute to the French Revolution that would happen some years later. The Americans, meanwhile, slipped farther and farther west, and, in 1785, the Colonies came back under firm control.

Worn out politically, diplomatically, and economically by what seemed to become a war of attrition, Britain came under its own revolutions in the 1790s. King George III was blamed for the long-lasting and, being deemed unfit for the throne by act of Parliament, was removed. Britain again became a parliamentary republic, and Washington was sent back to Virginia to live out the rest of his life as a poor, though admired, man.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Washington, Independence, Great Britain, America, 1776.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Rall stayed in Trenton while Donop took to the field. He viewed the Revolutionary army with contempt and did not bother building defenses. Not even posting guards, the Hessians were taken by surprise and their retreat cut off; Rall would be mortally wounded in the battle. While tactically a minor victory, the show of success by Washington's audacity to attack in an ice storm as well as the proving of American troops over regulars gave the Revolution much needed clout to go on toward victory at Saratoga, which would lead to a French alliance.


Facebook Comment Comment from Beth Belgard Crader on Facebook: we'd be drinking tea.....God or whatever put Washington, Jefferson, Monroe etc in our country at that time for a reason...

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-26 23:09:56 ~ I wonder if, in this TL, Jacobitism might revive?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-12-27 02:17:56 ~ King George was simply "removed" by Parliament? Could it really have been that easy? That would seem to be the basis of a new English civil war.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Charles Dickens was an over-zealous welfare reform advocate who sugar-coated the weaknesses of the working class? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1836, on this day at the City of London Police Station the thieving accountant Bob Cratchit was charged with embezzling funds from his employers, Ebeneezer Scrooge and Jacob Marley.

But Fifteen BobIn the local business community, Cratchit was generally considered to be a near-impoverished clerk who received a pittance from the miserly business partners for copying letters by hand in an underheated "dismal little cell" or "a sort of tank" which was his miserable place of work. Perceived as a member of the "little people" he clothed himself in a tattered white comforter since he could not afford a coat.

Feeling pity that his employee's weekly salary of "but fifteen bob" was insufficient to feed his family a proper Christmas dinner, Mr Scrooge visited the clerk's home to deliver a prize turkey - however he was shocked to discover the Cratchit Family already enjoying a sumptous banquet. Puzzled, he investigated further, only to discover that "Tiny Tim" was in fact an adopted child falsely claiming invalidity welfare benefit to supplement the money being taken by his father from his munificient employers. Bah, humbug!

This disturbing experience motivated Mr Scrooge to campaign as a Member of Parliament for the City of London Constituency, the position from which he would be chosen to represent the Crown during the American Civil War.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Christmas Carol, Charles Dickens, Redemption, Capitalism, Victorian.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, many thanks to "the Governor" Stan Brin for his intriguing ideas in developing this rather left-field post


Facebook Comment Comment from Bea Warren on Facebook: Ha,ha,ha!!! I would have loved to see this new revolution coming from Dickens.

Facebook Comment Comment from Thermonuclear Fusionista on Facebook: OMG that is deep. I need to think about this a little while

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2010-12-21 05:52:43 ~ That's the poor for you; always trying to get one over... ;)

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-21 05:54:44 ~ A lot of Victorians were suspicious of charity for just this reason---there were a lot of scamsters about.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-12-21 17:05:00 ~ Were and are. A lot of people genuinely need help, and a lot need a kick in the behind to get motivated to legitimacy.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, What if Robert Gabriel Mugabe was an angel of democracy? This story was published in the February 2009 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1966, following a severe attack of malaria Nhamodzenyika Mugabe died in Ghana. He was just three years old, the first and only son of Robert Gabriel and Sally Francesca (Hayfron) Mugabe (they had lost a child in pregnancy in 1963). With her husband in prison, Sally was left to bear the emotional burden of the loss alone - confidential papers show that she later suffered a mental breakdown while living in London.The Love that made Robert Mugabe a democrat

A fateful moment now arrived in Zimbabwean politics, revealed in full for the first time in Mugabe - Birth of a Democrat: From desperate fugitive to Rainbow leader (© Economist, 2008)1.

The author, Heidi Holland, a South African author and journalist was brought up in Zimbabwe. She first met Mr Mugabe in 1975, when a friend brought him to her house for a secret dinner as he was about to commence negotiations with the Rhodesian Government. Mr Mugabe had spent the previous decade in a Rhodesian jail for a subversive speech he made in 1963. The polite and considerate fugitive telephoned the next day to inquire about her toddler. During the meeting Mr Mugabe described two events that changed his life forever. With the perspective of hindsight, it is now possible to see how easily himself and the South African dictator Nelson Mandela could have switched the contrasting roles of demon and angel in southern african politics.

The two events occured in Salisbury and London three years apart. At issue was the expediency of British Foreign Policy. Relenting to pressure from the international community, Prime Minister Ian Smith reversed his decision and allowed Mugabe to travel to Ghana to attend his son's funeral.

There is no doubt that Sally Mugabe's support for her husband helped sustain him during his time as a prisoner in Salisbury. But, in 1970, while still locked up, Mugabe discovered his wife's immigration status was at risk and that the British government was planning to throw her out of the country because her visa had expired. A letter from Robert Mugabe to Prime Minister Harold Wilson was responded to in the positive. The letters showed that Mugabe was prepared to plead with the British authorities for his wife's citizenship.

In his letter, Mugabe had told Wilson of the effect the death of his son had had on his wife, explaining that: "My wife, whose health has never been satisfactory since the loss of our son in 1966, is at present suffering serious emotional upset as a result of the decision by the Home Office. Surely then, the fact of my detention is enough suffering for her already. As I stated in my letter to Mr Callaghan, the reason my wife decided to work for the year (September 1969-June 1970) was to enable her to earn a little money for herself until October when she should enter university to do a degree in Household Science. The Home Office decision wrecks even this wholesome plan".

Later he asked Wilson to reconsider the decision to refuse Sally permission to stay in Britain by politely explaining that his wife had a right to British citizenship because of their marriage, 'under Christian rites', in 1961. He added that it was 'sheer force of circumstance' that meant his wife had had to use a Ghanaian passport to enter Britain, proclaiming, 'She is first and foremost a Rhodesian citizen.'

Mr Mugabe explained that, "When I and other nationalist leaders decided in 1963 to return from our temporary exile in Tanganyika, I could not bring my wife, who had just given birth to our late son, back with me as she was liable for imprisonment for a political offence she is alleged to have committed... I therefore decided to take my wife to Ghana, where she was to remain with her parents until our son was about four... When our son died in December 1966 the whole purpose of her stay no longer existed so I arranged that she should go to Britain for her studies".

"Since the British government asserts that it has legally assumed administrative authority for Rhodesia,' he added, 'then it must place at the disposal of those who come under that authority, as my wife and I do, the procedures it considers valid for the acquisition of nationality as British Rhodesians... More than that, sir, I hold that the British government owes definite moral responsibility not only to persons in my circumstances but their wives and dependents as well... Am I to conclude that merely by virtue of the technicality of her possessing a Ghanaian passport, my wife's Rhodesian citizenship by virtue of her being married to me must cease? Has she ceased being my wife merely because she... cannot produce Rhodesian papers in support of her being Rhodesian?"

The British Government did take moral responsibility and the result was the 1975 agreement in the Governor's lodge at Salisbury. During his first month in office, Mr Mugabe summoned Smith to Government House and Smith was surprised to be greeted with a warm handshake and a broad smile. At that meeting, Mugabe told Smith he was acutely aware that he had inherited from his old adversaries, the whites, a jewel of a country, and he praised its superb infrastructure, its efficient modern economy, and promised to keep it that way. Smith, completely disarmed, rushed home in a state of excitement, and, over lunch, told his wife, Janet, that perhaps he had been wrong about a black government being incapable of running his beloved Rhodesia. As he told Graham Boynton years later: "Here's this chap, and he was speaking like a sophisticated, balanced, sensible man. I thought: if he practises what he preaches, then it will be fine. And it was fine. 2"


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Robert Mugabe, Ian Smith, Harold Wilson, Great Britain, Zimbabwe.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, 1) The article from the Economist is the key source of this post.
2) In OTL the statement was qualified by Smith 'for six months'.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-01-14 15:41:27 ~ Very clever. And it suggested an idea to me: what if Ronald Reagan had remained the liberal Democrat he was in the 1930s? Reagan became a conservative under the influence of right-wingers in the movie industry once he went to Hollywood, but suppose he never became a movie actor?

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-01-14 22:33:39 ~ If only the real Mugabe had been this way...

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-01-15 01:26:50 ~ I second Chris's comment. If only...



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


December 25



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the scribe and the pharisee had joined the Dance? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

On 12th of Tevet, 3761, Zechariah's cousin Yeshua was born in Galilee. He had Elijah's spirit, and turned many to the Lord.
An installment from the Miracles thread.

Third MiracleBut the truth of their birth stories was withheld from them by their foster parents. Only years later while serving as a Rabbi did Zechariah finally discover that his mother Elizabeth had pleaded with his dumb-struck father to name him John - but to no avail, even though he had lost his voice because he questioned the will of Jehovah. The angel had said "I am Gabriel. I stand in the presence of God, and I have been sent to speak to you and to tell you this good news. And now you will be silent and not able to speak until the day this happens, because you did not believe my words, which will come true at their proper time" (Luke 1:19-20).

But as a result, when he did proclaim the arrival of the Messiah he did so from within the very heart of the Orthodox Jewish community. And took his rightful place amongst the Great Prophets of the Tanakh.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: The Miracles Source: Wikipedia Labels: John the Baptist, Jesus, Elizabeth, Zechariah, Bible.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, thanks to Jared Myers for his contribution to the development of this story. The idea was originated from this rendition of Lord of the Dance.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-12-25 21:42:55 ~ ??? I can't make head or tail of this. Explanation follows - Ed
1) The lyrics to Lord of the Dance: I danced for the scribe and the Pharisee, but they would not dance and they would not follow me;
2) John the Baptist is in some circles considered the last prophet of the Old Testament insofar as he was prophesying the coming of the Messiah
3) But of course JtB only features in the New Testament and Jesus was not accepted as the Messiah and is therefore excluded from the Tanakh
4)In the Gospel of Luke 1:19-20 Gabriel tells Elizabeth to call her son John and not Zechariah like his his father
5)Therefore, to get a Jewish Jesus, we assume that his father calls him Zechariah thus grounding him in the Orthox Faith. So that when the Ministry begins, it does so with him as a Rabbi, thus keeping Jesus in the same company as the scribe and the Pharisee
6) The foster parents reference is an airbrush change based on our AH Miracles One and Two

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-25 21:45:52 ~ I must say I agree with Eric. I don't know what difference their names would have made, especially since they were both good old names from the Old Testament...namely, Joshua and Jonathan.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-12-26 15:10:37 ~ We'd have a very different modern system of Judaism, certainly. Perhaps even not a revolt in 70 AD if "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's" encourages obedience to earthly kings.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-12-26 22:18:18 ~ Jeff, I have heard an interesting numismatic theory about that famous quote. As I recall, Jesus looked at a Roman coin when he said that it should be given unto Caesar..meaning that Israel should honor only Israeli currency...making it an independent nation.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, would Jesus have been crucified under Cleopatra and Antony? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In DCCLIV A.U.C., on this day the great Jewish Rabbi Yeshua was born in Galilee.

The Birth of YeshuaThroughout the brief tenure of his ministry he benefitted from religious freedoms granted by the Eastern Roman Empire to the provincial citizens of Iudaea, summarised by his simple truth "Pay Alexandria what is due to Alexandria, pay God what is due to God".

Because after their dramatic victory at the Battle of Actium, co-rulers Marc Anthony and Cleopatra had loosened the tight Roman grip on the Eastern Mediterranean region. Their largely benign governance philosophy was based on the Greek, Egyptian, Persian, and Asian idea of allowing local economies and religion to flourish.

But Yeshua had an even bigger and bolder strategic vision, of a "Kingdom of Heaven" which his follower Saul encourage hime to take to Rome, where he was crucified in DCCLXXXVI A.U.C.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Egyptian Fancy Dress Labels: Marc Antony, Cleopatra, Jesus, Christian, Judaism.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we explore an original idea from the Egyptian Fancy Dress web site.


Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2011-12-21 03:11:22 ~ Depending on who you ask, He DID take Rome. Some folks think His HQ is still there. :-D

Readers Comment Tom B commented on 2011-12-21 04:55:52 ~ Hmm if the Eastern Empire was centered on Alexandria TTL wouldn't it make more sense for Yeshua to go there to establish his Kingdom of Heaven esp. as it had a large Jewish community at the time? Thanks, agreed changes made Tom - Ed.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-12-21 05:24:24 ~ OTL's Roman Empire did leave local religions pretty much alone. About the only things they were down on were anti-Roman agitation and human sacrifice---anything else pretty much went. And up to the outbreak of the Jewish Rebellion the Roman government paid for daily sacrifices to the God of Israel in the name of the Senate and the People of Rome, to ensure the God of Israel's favor for them. The Rebellion started because of Greek-vs.-Jewish rioting.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-12-21 17:43:06 ~ One of the few things we know for sure about Jesus' life (the Gospels differ significantly on many details of it) is that he was NOT born on Dec. 25, 754 AUC (1AD). Herod is supposed to have ordered the death of Jesus, but Herod died in what we now call 4 B.C. (750 AUC). Moreover, it's unlikely that Jesus was born in midwinter, if shepherds were herding their flocks outdoors at the time. Hot as it can get in Palestine during the day even in December, it gets DAMN cold at night. Moreover, attempts to locate references to anything seen in the sky which could have served as the Star of Bethlehem turn up nothing later than 7 B.C., unless, as some authors have argued, the "star" wasn't a single object at all but some rare planetary conjunction which the astrologer "wise men" would have noticed even though most people wouldn't.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-12-21 20:33:35 ~ The Jewish War was not inevitable. If the Senate hadn't seen Judea (there was no "Palestine" -- the term hadn't been invented yet) as a cash cow, and if it hadn't assigned such incredibly greedy and ruthless governors, the country would have gone on much as it had during Persian and Alexandrian times. It should be remembered that Judaism was a proselytizing religion at the time. (Paul was a proselyte, but was unlikely to have been formally converted -- he knew no Hebrew.) What if instead of Pauline Christianity, a traditionally Jewish sect took over Rome, either Peter's Jesus Movement (known to Christians, inaccurately, as the "Apostolic Church) or mainstream Pharisees.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-12-23 23:13:36 ~ We might see the Coptic Church as the major basis of world Christendom. There'd be a few differences, perhaps mostly stylistic, but if Cleopatra continued Egyptian power, we might see more problems of forced integration rather than bids for extinction as per Nero and other Caesars.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if a Second Christmas Truce had enabled the Kaiser to demand an armistice? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site.Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the January 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1915, on this day the Kaiser demanded an armistice after a second Christmas Truce took hold in the trenches. The words of Chief of Staff Hulmuth von Moltke from 1914 rang in the Kaiser's ears, "Your Majesty, this war cannot be won".

Second Christmas Truce Takes Hold Wilhelm II had initially rejected the view of Moltke and fired him, but as 1915 dragged on, it became possible that the German fate was sealed. There were new developments such as air warfare and poison gas, leading to whole new aspects of battle. A further innovation was mass-propaganda, and the Kaiser decided this may be the method to come out ahead in an unwinnable war.

In 1914, the soldiers in the field began what was to be known as the Christmas Truce. On Christmas Eve, the German troops decorated their trenches and sang carols. The English troops, who recognized many of the tunes from their own carols, joined in singing. The artillery bombardments on both sides ended for the night, allowing soldiers to collect their dead, and joint services were held honoring the fallen on both sides. Once-enemies approached each other across the "No Man's Land", exchanging gifts, sharing food, and engaging in games of football. Commanders on both ends reacted with disgust at the fraternization, but the unofficial truce lasted until after New Years' Eve in many places along the lines.

A new story by Jeff ProvineThe cases of fraternization had continued despite the horrors of war by attrition. A German unit attempted a truce over Easter, but were warned away by their British opponents. Later that November, units from Saxony and Liverpool successfully fraternized. The soldiers in the trenches obviously did not care for the war; the Kaiser merely had to convince them to take a stand against it. While the Allied command issued orders against fraternization that upcoming Christmas, German orders encouraged the possibility and handed out gifts to exchange (including reasons for the war to be ended). Despite the orders, the soldiers in the trenches met and joined again in their small feasts and games of football. The Allied commanders erupted at the news and began court martial proceedings for hundreds, possibly thousands. Rebellion broke out among the ranks. Wilhelm was urged to attack while the Allies were weak, but he intended to win the war rather than a few battles before the Allies had propaganda material to regroup.

Seizing the diplomatic initiative and ensuring that word of the Christmas Truce spread past censorship, Wilhelm capitalized on the friendly spirits among the common soldiers. He demanded an armistice in the West, which the Allies agreed only along with an armistice in the East. Talks began, and the politicians finally conceded under pressure from the soldiers and their families. Lists of demands were drawn up, and, for each point, games of football and other athletic events would decide the victor. While troops remained in station during an armistice, Germany hosted the 1916 Olympics in Berlin that summer as it had planned to do before the war. Fighting for honor as well as diplomatic success, athletes built value with gold, silver, and bronze medals to be used in agreements during what would be a precursor to the League of Nations.

The notion was considered ludicrous by many, but war weariness kept naysayers from the majority opinion. Germany did not fair as well as the Allied nations, and most of the world expected the Kaiser to turn against his own idea and restart the war. To their surprise, he did not and ordered the removal of troops from France and Belgium as part of the agreement, though he kept Alsace-Lorraine. Reparations were traded, and war was formally outlawed in 1918.

Europe celebrated the War to End All Wars, though the name was hardly apt. Wars went underground, constantly fed by international espionage, support for uprisings (such as the Russian Civil War that would eventually stomp out notions of communism), and sabotage of other nations' teams. Tempers flared over each scandal, but war did not come back to the world stage until Ireland's fight for independence in 1928 was found to be supported overtly by the Germans. The Irish Revolt exploded outside of British borders with a Royal Navy blockade of Germany to cease supplies. The Germans countered with an invasion of Belgium to secure new ports, and Europe was swallowed up in the Second World War.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: World War 1, Peace, Moltke, Germany, Britain.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality the Christmas Truces were suppressed. Following the 1914 truce, orders were followed for the most part opposing informal truces in 1915. A few examples were seen in 1916, but continual artillery fire ended most chances for fraternization. World War I would drag on until Armistice Day, November 11, 1918, after the deaths of some ten million and twenty million more wounded.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-12-25 15:09:09 ~ It seems unlikely that the Russian Civil War, even if won by the Whutes, would "stomp out notions of Communism" entirely, given that catastrophic defeat of the Axis in World War II did not stamp out fascism (which persisted openly in Franco's Spain and elsewhere, and covertly in the form of assorted terror groups such as Turkey's "Grey Wolves."

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-12-25 18:41:13 ~ Interesting concept. WWI was an absolutely crazy accident. But it wasn't about to end with a Christmas truce. Such things happened during the American Civil War as well.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-12-25 19:36:11 ~ And Edmund Blackadder had a chance for revenge---"I was NEVER offside! That ref's BLIND!"

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-12-25 19:42:15 ~ LOL. :)



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Confederate Commanders immediately followed-up the victory at Bull Run? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1863, President Hannibal Hamlin confirmed the Declaration of Emancipation that General John C. Fremont had proclaimed in Tennessee when he had occupied that State earlier in the year.

Crucifixion Day Part 6 by Raymond SpeerFrom the start of the war, which Fremont spent stationed in Missouri, that general had realized that the institution of slavery was the motivation of secession and the engine that worked the economy of the South. Accordingly, Fremont had abolished slavery In Missouri.

Hannibal Hamlin, a convinced Abolitionist from childhood and the possessoor of a dark complexion that gossips attributed to some Negro ancestors, had been told by his Attorney General that Fremont's liberation policy would alienate the border states and drive them all into the Confederacy.

"If our loss of the capitol city has not doomed us," Hamlin told his advisor, "I doubt that adding Missouri to the free states will substantially worsen our condition". The Attorney General, an appointee of the dead Lincoln, resigned and Fremont's move was approved.

In the summer of 1863, Fremont lead the Army of Missouri east and conquered Kentucky and Tennessee that season. In keeping with his program in Missouri, Fremont refused to let slavery continue in areas controlled by the Union, and Fremont's action roused discontent at Montauk Point, Long Island, New York, where the US Congress met by right in December 1863. A resolution that criticized Fremont was voted down in each House, and a counterdraft (praising the move) was passed through the support of President Hamlin.

The buildings at Montauk Point were raw and crude owing to their hurried construction. With no attendents from the Cotton South or Border States among the members of that Congress, a bill to relocate the capitol from Washington DC to Montauk was passed by both Houses, and money was appropriated for more buildings.

Thaddeus Stevens, the Speaker of the House, met with the President on a yacht offshore Nantucket Island when Hamlin signed the decree that approved Fremont's second emanicipation program. "Mr. Speaker, when Congress is as far sighted as General Fremont, it will pass laws that will tear the guts out of the Confederacy".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Raymond Speer Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © "How the South Could Have Won the Civil War: the Fatal Errors that Led to Confederate Defeat" by Bevin Alexander (2007)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Southern Cross Source: Amazon Labels: Abraham Lincoln, Lew Armistead, Stonewall Jackson, Hannibal Hamlin, General Winfield Scott Hancock.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, The problem wiith critics of the scenario for Part 5 is that they insist on the logistics restraints of a year previous when nothing had been pre-arranged. The overriding realty of the situation was that the abandonment of the Federal capitol by troops with a lack of organization has been a "breather" for both sides which permitted a complete revisal of offensive and defensive patterns, In this installment, the Grand Army of the Republic is gigantic, tuned to an offensive invulnerability by George McClellan, who has reclaimed Washington DC from the Rebels. And the complaints against that will be from people upset that a year's hiatus in the War made any changes at all to the Union Table of Organization.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-04-22 00:43:02 ~ Emancipating Missouri's slaves would have driven most of Missouri straight into the Confederate camp, which the Union did NOT need.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the first Battle of Trenton had been a catastrophe for the Continental Army and George Washington had been killed? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, during a howling nor-easter Colonel Johann Rall and his Hessian mercenaries repelled a bold American attack on Trenton that left Commander George Washington and many of his troops from the decimated Continental Army dead or dying in the freezing Delaware River on this bitterest of Christmas Days.

One-way trip across the Delaware RiverSince the heady days of the summer, Washington had lost ninety percent of his command and had already admitted both to his diary and in confidence to his colleagues that "I think the game is pretty near up".

And yet his successors would carry the germ of an idea that Washington had conceived on the eve of Battle. That concept was a breakthrough in organisational planning for irregular forces, that "a people unused to restraint must be led, they will not be drove". In effect, Washington had blended the best ideas of the American revolution with the War of Independence. His advocacy of open councils in a proletariat army was his gift to the future, a Union of Socialist Republics in America that would have been unimaginable to Washington as a member of the landed gentry.

Sharing his dead comrade's "full persuasion of the Justice of our cause" Thomas Paine returned to Great Britain after the so-called "black times of '76". The War of Independence might have ended in defeat, at least for now, but the Revolution had not, and Paine would ensure that it spread across the fertile ground of his homeland, Great Britain itself.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © "The Black Times of '76", by David Hackett Fischer, published in Winter 2010 Edition of American Heritage Magazine
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Trenton, George Washington, 1776, Revolution, War of Independence.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-03-25 01:34:47 ~ Are you saying that the defeat of the Continental Army led to guerrilla warfare? I hadnt thought that actually but its interesting idea, how about Henry Knox leads the insurgency, is that possible?

Readers Comment Scott Eiler commented on 2010-03-25 01:34:47 ~ The article seems to have its own answer already. But it doesnt consider the possibility that Britain would let up on the Colonials after a war Britain found unpopular anyway, and the Colonies would develop Dominion status.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-03-25 07:27:40 ~ Guerilla does not work in this setting. Absent a colonial field army the British can spread their forces into small garrisons that then serve as the basis around which a Tory militia is organized. Washington used a three level war - the regulars forced the British to concentrate, the militia kept the bulk of the population from seeking an accomodation with the Crown and the partisans made life difficult enough for Tories that they fled to the British lines, conceding the territory they formerly lived in. It was nasty and expensive but it worked. Think of it as an army in being like the Mahan fleet in being doctrines of the early 20th century. However the segue here to a Soviet US is simply silly. The wiff of class war with Shay's Rebellion scared the US ruling class silly and led to the Constitution. Given a choice of a US 1789 or reunion with the crown the patriot leadership- would have sworn allegience to George III.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-03-25 13:17:43 ~ George wouldn't have given them that choice--he'd have just hanged them.

Readers Comment Scott Eiler commented on 2010-03-25 15:48:47 ~ People who would normally resist Dominion status and be guerrillas against the Crown, would just go west. If over the Appalachians weren't far enough, they'd go over the Mississippi River next. This raises some interesting possibilities for Spanish Louisiana.

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-03-25 15:48:47 ~ Having read every book on the subject I have found, I must say that it is pretty much cut and dried that if Washington's desperate gamble at Trenton had failed then the American War of Independance would have died. It literally was Victory or Death for the American Cause. There are no other scenerios that form up. It is one of the very few occasions when the American war would have been won by Britain on a single throw of the cards. On the other hand if we look at the previous conflict, the French and Indian war, there is one event that leads to many scenerios. What if Thomas Hutchinson had gone sick and Ben Franklin was able to manage and succeed in creating a centralized colonial government for the British Americas during the Albany Congress? For starts though the French would certainly not have got the good end of this for obvious reasons, The reason for this one having so many scenerios is that the English did not want a centralized colonial Alliance between its colonies. The English military leaders, both Braddock and Lawdon were hardly model diplomats just as they were not very good at wilderness warfare.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if christianity had not been outlawed in Japan? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the February 2010 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1999, Hideko Cardinal Tokugawa of Kyoto presided over a Christmas celebration of nearly one million Japanese Catholics.

Kirishitani by Eric LippsChristianity had been introduced into Japan in the sixteenth century. The shogun Oda Nobunaga (pictured), in particular, had embraced the new faith, both for the technologies its missionaries brought with them, which included firearms, and as a political tool against Buddhism. Although Nobunaga never converted to Christianity, he allowed Christians to proselytize and permitted the construction of the first Catholic church in Kyoto in 1576, on the site of the present Watanabe Cathedral.

After his death, some powerful Japanese came to view Christianity not as beneficial but as a threat to the state, and pressed for its restriction or even outright banning. Among them would be Toyotomi Hideyoshi, responsible for the Feb. 5, 1597 massacre of twenty-seven Christians at Nagasaki and a vocal proponent of laws restricting not only Christianity but all contact with the West. Support for such "seclusion laws" remained limited, however, and although some restrictions were imposed beginning in 1614, the Nobunaga Shogunate would lift them four decades later under Oda's great-grandson Toyo Nobunaga. By the end of the Nobunaga shogunate in the late nineteenth century, there would be twenty million Christians in the island nation. At the close of the twentieth, the number would have risen to forty million.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Japan, Catholicism, Church, Rome, Shogan.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, In our history, Oda Nobunaga never attained the rank of shogun. Instead, under the Tokugawa Shogunate, Christianity was outlawed and trade with the West reduced to a trickle; Western innovations such as firearms were abandoned. Not until Commodore Perry's gunboat expedition in 1855 would Japan be reopened to the West. Today, there are an estimated one million "Kirishitani" in Japan, most following an eccentric version of the faith evolved during the centuries of suppression, when Japanese could practice Christian worship only in secret.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-02-06 16:44:42 ~ Interesting POD...

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2010-02-06 17:06:16 ~ The question is if the Buddhism and Shinto are suppressed or if Christianity becomes just one part of the whole syncretist melange that is Japanese religion. Of course the fate of the Spanish alliance and efforts on thier part to dominate the place is also a factor.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-02-06 18:57:05 ~ I'm assuming that Christianity exists side by side with other Japanese religions, as happened in some other Asian countries.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-02-07 05:27:48 ~ One big factor working against Christianity was its prohibition on divorce, which was accepted in Japan. Get rid of that little problem, and find a work-around to allow continued ancestor veneration (see the "Rites Controversy" in contemporary Chinese Christian missionary efforts) and you might have seen something like this...

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-02-07 16:21:22 ~ This was the Reformation. The Jesuits were notorious for 'modifying' doctrine when they translated. The Dominicans and Fransciscans were equally notorious in combatting this. All we are postulating is that the Jesuits win the fights in Rome and are allowed to keep making 'local accomodations' as the price of keeping the true heretics out. The mpre interesting spin-off from this is that a semi-Catholic Japan probably takes Manila and at least contemplates taking Peru.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the 1991 coup plotters had executed Gorbachev? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1991, former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev was executed in front of a Soviet Army firing squad in Red Square this morning, according to the USSR's Interior Ministry. Gorbachev had been arrested on August 18th of this year for crimes against the Soviet Union, including undermining the Soviet economy and giving military secrets to the West. Soviet President Gennady Yanayev used the occasion to reassure the Soviet people that the Communist Party (CPSU) remained firmly in control, and the damage caused by Gorbachev's Glasnost and Perestroika programs would be swiftly rectified.

Gorbachev Executed in Red Square on Christmas Day A story by Andrew Beane This ended a series of high-profile executions, starting on August 21st with the assassination of Boris Yeltsin, then the newly elected President of the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic. Yeltsin had been arrested on August 17th after his return from a trip to Kazakhstan, though he had yet to be charged with a specific crime. Yeltsin's assassin was an unidentified man that shot himself before he could be subdued.

Efforts to remove Gorbachev from power and restore the nation to its once-mighty status began in December of 1990, when members of Gorbachev's government quietly conspired to create the need for the declaration of a state of emergency in the USSR. The State Committee of the State of Emergency, headed by Yanayev and seven other former members of Gorbachev's administration, seized upon the instability caused by the slow break-up of the union and ordered the arrest of Gorbachev and other "western conspirators". At the height of the crisis, the Soviet Army invaded and recaptured the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania).

American President George Bush condemned the execution, saying that Gorbachev had been the greatest hope for peace between the USSR and the West, and that the dead leader would live on "the hearts and minds of the people who so long had to strive for their God-given rights". Deng Xiaoping, leader of the Peoples' Republic of China, applauded the "halt of the USSR's capitulation to the West," and expressed hope that Moscow would follow China's example of "market socialism".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Andrew Beane Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Andrew Beane
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Andrews Posts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Gorbachev, 1991, Soviet Union, Coup, Execution.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, I hope that the significance of the actual day was not lost, that's when Gorbachev dissolved the USSR.


Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-12-26 19:09:53 ~ Gorby dead or alive doesn't matter. The KGB Alpha commandos defecting to Yeltsin instead of executing him was key. The coup plotters had lost the mandate of heaven and were too out of it to be aware of it.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus

In 1977, legendary silent-film star Charlie Chaplin died at his home in Hollywood. He was 88.

Death of ChaplinIn 1952, following a visit to his native country, the British-born actor had been barred from re-entering the U.S. due to his left-wing political associations. Popular outcry forced the U.S. government to relent, and Chaplin returned to Hollywood on December 6 of that year. Like other actors whose politics resulted in their blacklisting, he would eventually return to films; he would make a brief appearance as a mute servant in the movie version of A Funny Thing Happened on the Way To the Forum alongside the former blacklistee Zero Mostel. In his last years, however, he would become increasingly reclusive, avoiding contact even with family members.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Movies Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charlie Chaplin, Holywood, America, Communism, Films.



Yes I want to receive email alerts for subsequent comment(s) on this article.



comments powered by Disqus


Older Posts 

Related posts from the same era that you may also like
In 2013 on the day at the inauguration of Romney-Biden, both office holders pledged to work together to build the bipartisan support necessary to stop America going over the &quotFiscal Cliff". <span class=EditorText>An article from the <a href=http://www.todayinah.co.uk/index.php?thread=Deadlock_2012>Deadlocked 2012 Election</a> thread.</span>Deadlocked Election prevents America going over Fiscal Cliff: "Part 1"In 1933 on this day Germanys Reichstag passed the Enabling Act of 1933 ("Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich"), President Paul von Hindenburg signed it into law and made Reichskanzler Anton Drexler (pictured) dictator of Germany.Enabling Act makes "Drexler" dictatorIn 1941 five months after President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Lend-Lease bill into law (pictured), Operation Schraubenschlüssel was dismantled and US aid to Britain and China finally began in earnest.Flugzeugträger "Part 11": Operation Schraubenschlüssel
In 2010 due to unavoidable timetabling clashes with the filming of Sherlock, Martin Freeman advised director Peter Jackson that regrettably he would be unable to play Bilbo Baggins in the two-part "Lord of the Rings" prequel "The Hobbit".Freeman Pulls Out of "the Hobbit"In 1757 post-creation Noahs great-grandson the arrogant tyrant Nimrod resolved to build a city with a tower "with its top in the heavens...lest we [unified humanity] be scattered abroad upon the face of the Earth".God punishes man for building the "Tower of Babel"In 1860 on this day at the "Wigwam" in Chicago, delegates to the second Republican National Convention nominated former New York Governor William H. Seward for the Presidency.Harry Turtledove's pro confederacy organisation "America Will Break" try something more subtle
In 1798 on the anniversary of the declaration of independence, and taking an expeditious decision that would ultimately destroy the careful constitutional checks and balances laid down at the Philadelphia Convention, President John Adams commissioned a Commander-in-chief of the armies. Accordingly, George Washington was ordered to prepare for a war with France that Adams hoped to avoid by "showing his teeth" in making a talismanic appointment they both considered largely as symbolic as his ill-fitting dentures.In a fateful decision, President John Adams appoints "his predecessor" C-in-C.In 1963 during the course of a New York taxi ride, Richard M. Nixon learns that his opponent in the Presidential Election John F. Kennedy has been assassinated. In an article for Readers Digest he recalled hailing a cab after his Dallas-New York flight: "We were waiting for a light to change when a man ran over from the street corner and said that the President had just been shot in Dallas" (however in a subsequent article for Esquire he later said that his cabbie "missed a turn somewhere and we were off the highway .. a woman came out of her house screaming and crying. I rolled down the cab window to ask what the matter was and when she saw my face she turned even paler. She told me that John Kennedy had just been shot in Dallas").John V. Lindsay: "Kennedy's Heir"In 1962 on this day at 10:00 AM, President John F. Kennedy met with Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara and approved the plan to threaten preemptive nuclear strike. Tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union had never been tauter. Kennedy approves nuclear action over "Cuba".
In 1941 on this day the Red Army launched a full-blown attack on Northern Germany and Romania that confirmed the worst Nazi fears about the true extent of Stalins military buildup.Kriegsmarine: "The Zhukov Plan" In 1919 on this day Russian troops crossed the border into Socialist Hungary after the rejection of a Russian ultimatum, marking the beginning of the Ten Week War.<span class=EditorText>Article continues from <a href=http://www.todayinah.co.uk/index.php?story=39809-Z1>Part #3</a>.</span>Last Chance for Peace: "Part 4"In 1955 on the second night of Independent Television (ITV), twenty-nine year old Lizzie Windsor became the first female reader on prime-time television news.Liz Windor becomes the first "female newsreader" on British Television.







© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.