A Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility.

Quick Links

Blog Roll
Althistory Multiply
Bull Spec
Everything Is History
History Blog
History is Funny
John Reilly's Alternate History
Old is the New New
Editor's Recommendations
Alt Hist Magazine
Althistory Wiki
Bloggapedia
Changing the Times
Editor's Postbag
Etys Artwork
For and Against It
Headlines
Iconic Photos
John Reilly's Blog
King and Country
MLK Memorial
New Statesman (What If..)
On This Friday
Selected Threads
This Day in AH
Today in History
Truth be Told
Voice Christian Worker
Zach Timmons AH
Reader's Favourites
Top 100 Ranked Stories
Site Construction
Archive Navigator
Clean DB
Community Journal
Facebook
Get Blogs
Newsfeed Update
Survey
Twitter

Selected threads

Guest Historian Andrew Beane
 Andrews Posts
Guest Historian Chris Oakley
 Apollo 1  Arnold Hiller
 Axis Spain  Baltimore Colts
 Barbaro 2006  Barbarossa 41
 Battle Alaska  Belgium 1940
 Biti Letter  Blackpool 40
 British X Files  Ceaucescu 90
 Chance Encounter  Charles Barkley
 Chicago19  Cimino
 Cleopatra  CSI
 Cuba '62  Curt Flood
 D.B. Cooper  Double Jeopardy
 Eternal City  Falklands
 France 44  Francis Urquhart
 Giant Surprise  God Save Queen
 Grey Cup  GZ Murmansk
 Hirohito@100  Houston 57
 Ice Bowl  Ill Wind
 Iraq NEO Impact  Jamaica Bay
 Japan45  Jay Sebring
 Johnny Damon  Kirk Prime
 Korea 53  Koufax 35
 Last Broadcast  Lusitania '15
 McCain 09  Middle East 67
 Moore 911  Necessary Evil
 New York Knights  O Tempora, ..
 Omega Man  Oswald63
 Parley  Roswell '47
 Salems Lot  Shirers WW2
 Shock  SL Rangers
 Surprise Attack  The Devourer
 Titanic 13  Tom Brady
 Tommies  Tommy Rich
 Trek49  Valkyrie
 Weebls  Worlds Collide
Guest Historian David Atwell
 Action Jackson  Hells Doors
 Hell on Earth  House Cromwell
Guest Historian David Cryan
 Swine Flu
Guest Historian Dirk Puehl
 Dirks Blog
Guest Historian Eric Lipps
 49th State  Bonaparte 2
 Cuba War  Da Vinci Engine
 Ford Killed  Gore Wins
 JFK Impeached  Liberty Fails
 Lifeterm  Linebacker
 No Chappaquiddick
 Whig Revolution
Guest Historian Eric Oppen
 Malcolm X  No Tolkien
 Trotsky's War
Guest Historian Gerry Shannon
 CSA Today  Godfather IV
 Hero Oswald  JFK Lives
 Seinfeld Movie
Guest Historian Jackie Rose
 Happy Endings
Guest Historian Jeff Provine
 Jeff Provine Blog
Guest Historian John J. Reilly
 John Reilly Blog
Guest Historian Jackie Speel
 Conjoined Crisis
Guest Historian Kwame Dallas
 African Holocaust
Guest Historian Mike Stone
 WJ Bryan
Guest Historian Raymond Speer
 Cuba War 62  Fall of Britain
 Fascist Flight
 Gettysburg Prayer
 Pacific and Dixie
Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor
 2nd Coming  Canadian Rev
 Chdo Democracy  King Arthur II
 Lucifer Falls  Pete Best Story
 Protocols  Richard Tolman
 Sockless  Soviet America
 Speakers Line  The Sheridans
 The Baron  The Claw
 Warp  Welsh Wizards
Guest Historian Scott Palter
 WW2 Alt
Todayinah Editor Todayinah Ed.
 1860 Crisis  20c Rome
 American Heroes  Anschluss
 Bomber Harris  Business Plot
 Canadian Heroes  China 4ever
 Communist GB  Communist Israel
 Comrade Hiller  Comrade Stalin
 Co presidency  Deepwater
 Fed Lost Cause  Flugzeugtrager
 Glorious45  Good Old Willie
 Gor Smugglers  Happy Hitler
 Hitler Waxwork  Intrepid
 Iron Mare  Islamic America
 Israel's 60th  Jewish Hitler
 Kaiser Victory  Liberty Beacon
 Lloyd George  LOTR
 Madagscar Plan  Manhattan '46
 McBush  Midshipman GW
 Moonbase  No Apollo 1 Fire
 Obama  Peace City One
 POTUS TedK  POTUS Nathaniel
 Puritan World  Resource War
 Sitka  Southern Cross
 The Miracles  Tudor B*stards
 Tyrants  US is Born Again
 US Heroes  War on Terror +
 WhiteHouse Wimp  Wolfes Legacy
 Zoroastria
Guest Historian Zach Timmons
 Alt Indiana Jones
 Brett as 007

Archive Navigator

January February March
April May June
July August September
October November December

Editor's Postbag     |     Feed

All Postbag Items
Reader's Favourites
Baron Jean de Batz
Upper Carolina
Tokhtamysh Victorious
Comrade Stalin 3
Defenestration of Prague
Margaret of Anjou
Comrade Stalin 4
Nova Roma
Nixon killed
President Heston dies
Happy Endings 20
POTUS Howard Baker
King Arthur II
Haunting Ruin
Concert of Europe
King Henry IXth
Farthest West
Battle of Nafels
Cosmonaut Leonov
Space Age and Dog Years
Siege of Siena Lifted
Fed Lost Cause 4
Fed Lost Cause 3
Fall of Aquileia
President Ferraro
Nieuw Zwolle
Steve Jobs, Google CEO
Battle of Lincoln
VP Herter
Plessy v. Ferguson
Malcolm X
Council of Pisa
Happy Endings 24
President Seward II
Breckinridge dies
President Seward
Fed Lost Cause 8
Mayor for Life
President Fonda
Fed Lost Cause 10
Madeleine Albright
Fed Lost Cause 7
Fast Heinz
Lewis and Clark
Fed Lost Cause 6
The Candyman
Fed Lost Cause 9
PM Beckett
Ellsberg Sentenced
PM Halifax
FBI Dir Burns
Fed Lost Cause 5
Sic semper tyrannis!
Lavoisier Survives
Monty in Berlin
Ethiopia Falls
3-term Truman
Fed Lost Cause 2
Orson Welles born
Happy Endings 23
The Oyster
Happy Endings Part 22
49th State, Redux
Birth of Flashman
Lake Peipus
Mission STS-51-L
Escape from Loch Leven Castle
Conte di Savoia
Fed Lost Cause 1
President Thornburgh
We, the People..
Maryland Secedes
Birth of Oliver Ellsworth
3-term Monroe
Happy Endings 21

Site Meter


July 2



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Amistad Mutiny had succeeded? muses Robbie Taylor. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1839, the Amistad, a Cuban slave ship, was overcome by the Africans aboard and pointed back towards Africa.

Amistad Mutiny Turns the TideAlthough the two Cubans left alive to steer the vessel had started pointing the ship north towards American waters, they were quickly found out by an African who knew the position of the stars, and the ship eventually made it back to their motherland, inspiring many other slave revolts on the lucrative slave trade.


Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Amistad, Slavery, America, Africa, African American.





Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Alexander Graham Bell was able to look in the right place? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1881, on this day the twentieth President of the United States James A. Garfield was shot once in the arm and once in the back by Charles J. Guiteau at the Sixth Street Station of the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad on the National Mall in Washington.

Induction Balance saves the life of President GarfieldAlthough the first bullet only caused a graze, the second was initially thought to have lodged near his liver. However the hopelessly incompetent Dr. Doctor Willard Bliss was completely wrong, and the bullet was actually located behind the pancreas, a discovery made by a metal detector devised by the brilliant Scottish inventor Alexander Graham Bell.

Aside from the creation of the mocking expression "Ignorance if Bliss", the event was quickly forgotten because Garfield, like many other veterans were unfazed by such an injury. In fact one of the detectives who took Guiteau to the district jail still had a Civil War bullet lodged in his head. However the consequence of his survival was huge; as soon as his recovered, he quickly resumed his radical programme of reform that would change Washington forever.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: James Garfield, Bliss, Alexander Graham Bell, Premature Death, Assasination.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality Garfield died of infection after twelve different doctors inserted unsterilized fingers and instruments in this wound in the president's back searching for this bullet. Later the detector was proved to work perfectly and would have found the bullet had Dr. Doctor Willard Bliss (who was a Doctor of Medicine but whose given name was also "Doctor") allowed Bell to use the device on Garfield's left side as well. In authoring this article we have repurposed content from Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-08-07 08:07:18 ~ Without Garfield's death and the impetus it provided, Civil Service reform would have likely come more slowly. A lot of the impetus behind it was because Guiteau was a disappointed office seeker. And in this TL, instead of being hanged, Guiteau could live the rest of his life in an insane asylum, where he should have been in the first place.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-08-07 11:58:49 ~ What "radical reforms" is President Garfield supposed to have introduced? He always struck me as a fairly mainstream ninetenth-century Republican.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-08-07 14:42:55 ~ Hope those reforms include ending widespread government corruption.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if a Fascist takeover had occurred in Lower Canada? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1940, on this day the Blue Shirts of Canadian Führer Adrien Arcand raised the Flag of Vichy France less than twenty-four hours after news of the formation of the Pétain Government reached the offices of the Parti National Social Chrétien in Montreal.

Canadian Führer Part 2Of course the continued existence of an independent Francophone state in Lower Canada had grown in significance with the collapse of French forces on the Western front. At first, Prime Minister Paul Reynaud had wanted to continue the war if necessary from North Africa, and Winston Churchill had gone so far as to propose a union of the two nations. But in the event, Reynaud had been outvoted in favour of a conditional surrender.

General Charles Huntziger then headed an armistice delegation with orders to break off negotiations if the Germans demanded the occupation of all metropolitan France, the French fleet or any of the French overseas territories. In the event, they did not and the armistice was signed in the Compiégne Forest on 22nd June. The formation of a successor state began in early July when the Parliament and the government gathered in the town of Vichy, their provisional capital in central France. And it was this pivotal event that was the catalyst for Arcand's declaration in Montreal. A moment timed to perfection by his trusted advisor, "The Rib".


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Adrien Arcand, Fascism, Wallis Simpson, Nazi, Canada.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this article we have sought to respond to reader Mark Taylor's comment "Never remotest possibility of Fascist takeover in Canada.". In so doing we have assumed that Montcalm triumphed on the Plains of Abraham, the sale of Louisiana never happened and yet the development of Germany followed essentially the same course.


Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2012-04-28 07:32:44 ~ If the UK retained it's naval dominance then it is not so much a question of if as when the Free French take over French North America. Presuming of course that it is not strong enough to blow off the surrender of the metropole to begin with.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-04-28 08:17:13 ~ I'm not sure that an independent Quebec would want to be so closely tied to European France.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-04-28 08:32:39 ~ This is unlikely to occur I'm afraid. Three alternatives are likely to happen;- (1) there will be French naval dominance, the franch Empire will be dominant and the French kings still rule in Paris. Germany is a confederation dominated by them. (2) Britain formed an alliance with Germany against France. (3) With no US. and US. economy to assist Britain the Great War ended in 1915. Willaim V and II reigns in London and Berlin.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-04-28 18:34:03 ~ And a complicated one to boot.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2012-04-30 21:47:15 ~ Civil War in Quebec, yet another theater for this TL's WW2 and would be much scarier for Americans at home. Maybe even enough to give clout to the American neutrality folks not to bring fight Germany, which would mean fighting Vichy, which would mean liberating just across the St. Laurence River.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Saladin's ruse had failed to tempt the Crusader Armies into a trap? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

In our timeline, the outcome of the Battle of Hattin was that the Muslim armies under Saladin captured or killed the vast majority of the Crusader forces, removing their capability to wage war. As a direct result of the battle, Islamic forces once again became the eminent military power in the Holy Land, re-conquering Jerusalem and several other Crusader-held cities. These Christian defeats prompted the Third Crusade, which began two years later.

This story was published in the November 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1187, on this day after months of bitter feuding the announcement in the Crusader War Council of a crazy, damn-fool decision to endanger the Frankish forces by moving the Army east of its defences triggered a fierce backlash against the eighteen months of misrule of the King of Jerusalem, Guy of Lusignan.

Victory of the CrossWith his fortress of Tiberius under siege, the troops under Raymond III of Tripoli had tried to sue for terms, provoking accusations of cowardice from Council members Gerard de Rideford and Raynald of Chatillon. Guy, who had only recently settled a major dispute with Raymond himself, wanted to attack immediately. But in fact, Raymond was willing to sacrifice his fortress for the sake of the Kingdom.

Raymond was right, Guy absolutely wrong. Saladin had calculated that because the Muslim forces were twice as big as the Crusader Army, his chances of success on an open battle field were much improved, even though the Franks had frequently won engagements despite being heavily outnumbered. Therefore his move against Tiberius was merely a feint to tempt the Crusaders out of their sound defences where they were protected from a much larger Army.

Just six years later, Saladin would die and while the Crusader states continued to face survival threats, at least one critical moment of danger had passed. Sensing this, Pope Urban II had almost died of shock when he received the news, and immediately took action to displace Guy from the throne.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Crusade, Kingdom of Jerusalem, Crusader States, Palestine, Israel.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this post we explore an article on Bulletin Boards and repurposed from the Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-10-23 15:12:17 ~ So would a Christian Jerusalem survive into modern times? If so, so much for the State of Israel. . . .

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-10-23 17:33:56 ~ The Crusader Kingdoms might have survived longer, but when the Ottoman Empire really came along, or the Seljuks, they'd likely be toast. Crusading zeal in Europe was beginning to die down; in Costain's words "The Crusades were running down like an unwound clock."

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-10-23 19:48:07 ~ Costain?

Readers Comment Christopher Lee commented on 2011-10-24 21:18:14 ~ In all honesty I think the days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem were numbered, Hattin or not Hattin. They were massively outnumbered and as time went on Muslim opposition was hardening. Saladin was a very intelligent and capable leader who would likely have come up with another strategy to cause damage. In some ways Hattin drew in the Third Crusade and led to Saladin having his power hampered. A lesser set of victories might not have galvanised European intervention and might have seen a total reconquest by Saladin, especially given the slowness of news travelling west. it was the loss of Jerusalem that brought over the crusade. Outremer was a hugely outnumbered outpost, dwindling away and doomed to die over time. Even if Europeans had had the will to pour in massive resources the means to do so were not really there. Divided opposition and problems such as Turkish assaults in the east were hampering initial Muslim reactions but a window of increased unity and purpose was opening in this period.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-10-25 23:08:36 ~ What if the Kingdom of Jerusalem lasted long enough for the Inquisition to strike it, attempting to "purify" like its bloody days in Spain?




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Lee had blundered in command of the Federals at Gettysburg? muses Jeff Provine on the This Day in Alternate History web site. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1863, Union General Robert E. Lee would face his darkest hour as his armies were broken up during an assault against the invading Confederate forces of General James Longstreet.

Lee Falls at GettysburgBy 1863, the Civil War had dragged on through three of its six Aprils, and times were difficult for the Union. Draft riots sent New York City up in flames, the presidency of Abraham Lincoln came under question, and the South intended to follow up victories in Virginia by an invasion of Northern territory, hopefully impressing foreign powers to recognize the Confederacy.

Times were also difficult for Robert E. Lee. A native Virginian, he had very nearly seceded along with his state, but a personal intervention by retiring General Winfield Scott convinced him that his duty was to the United States government. He was branded a traitor by many in the South, who quickly seized his wife's property at Arlington, looting furniture that had once belonged to George Washington, inherited through Lee's wife Mary Custis, great-granddaughter of Martha Washington. In the North, many suspected the accented general as a potential conspirator. Further questions were raised as Lee's campaigns in the East were slow, though knowledgeable officials recognized that he spent much of the early war assembling key supply lines and training a terribly green Union army.

The invasion of Maryland and Pennsylvania came as a surprise to many, but Lee seemed almost ready for the expedition, quickly maneuvering his armies to force a battle near the town of Gettysburg, PA. Here, however, his plans failed. He had long studied the effectiveness of an artillery bombardment followed by an infantry charge as used by Garibaldi in the wars of Italian unification, but his emulation in Pennsylvania would suffer problems of wet powder, crosswinds, and unshakable dug-in positions. When his army broke, Lee was reported to have rode among them and said, "I've lost this battle, not you".

Longstreet finished his plans of rooting his army at the rail center in Harrisburg, effectively cutting off Maryland and, more importantly, Washington, D.C. Despite the victory, it would be quickly overwhelmed by a reformed Union army under General Meade. Lee was shifted into a support position, where he would ride out the rest of the war, while command shifted to the new celebrity of Ulysses Grant, whose simultaneous conquest of Vicksburg, MS, would herald the beginning of the end of the war in the West.

After the war, Lee would be a proponent for reconciliation with the South, accepting a lecturing position at Washington College, now known as Washington University, in Lexington, VA.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: Gettysburg, Robert E. Lee, James Longstreet, Union, Confederacy.

Facebook Comment Comment from Tom Hickie on Facebook: He did every battle before he defended but this one he attacked and lost it was all about the rifles that could shoot 5 hundred yards

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-07-03 02:14:34 ~ And why not have Meade fight for the Confederates? Everything I've learned about the Civil War points to sheer luck as the cause of Confederate successes in the first two years of the war, from Buchanon's refusal to stop them, to the massive bumbling of the Penninsular campaign. When the Federals got their act together, and resources and talent mattered, the end was inevitable.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-07-03 06:10:47 ~ I think you mean a "proponent" for reconciliation with the South. Fixed - thanks. Ed And given US resources, Lee would have been even more effective than he was. One of the great defects of the CS war effort was lack of supplies, and rottenness in the QM corps...everybody wanted to be a dashing cavalry colonel, nobody wanted to be a plodding quartermaster.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-07-03 12:32:02 ~ I hardly think that with Lee on the Union side the war would have lasted through "six Aprils." It might not even have lasted until Aptil 1863. Lee was not only the best general the Confederates had, but also a psychological pillar of the CS army; without him, the South would have been hamstrung.

Readers Comment Mike commented on 2011-07-03 16:41:30 ~ Lee a Yankey? Augggg!!!

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-04 01:00:18 ~ I concur with Tom Hickie's point. Hate to cite a video game, but Civ makes a great display of the effective defensive capabilities of muskets rather than their attack. P.S., to give credit where due, the original idea came from our editor.

Readers Comment Sailorbarsoom commented on 2011-07-06 02:44:28 ~ Other than wonder why the war would last so long if one of the Confederacy's best generals is working for the Union, I don't have a problem with this. There's no reason Lee can't lose, whichever side he fights with. He was good, not infallible.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Jack Pershing had won the Presidential Election in 1920? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1919, sharing the understanding that Woodrow Wilson's hare-brained peace proposals have no domestic backing whatsover, Lloyd George, Clemenceau, Orlando and Senator David Cabot Lodge negotiate an alternative and permanent settlement that is eventually ratified after the election of President Pershing.

President John J. Pershing
29th US President
That nomination had been sealed in a smoke filled room by Republican grandees from New England, Middle Atlantic states and the big new industrial cities of the Midwest. Put simply their financial and commercials interest was finding some alternate way for the US to get the war debts to it paid and by avoiding an expensive naval arms race with UK and Japan.

Warran Harding might have been chosen had it not been for revelations of his philandering. In any case, the war hero Pershing was ideally suited to oversee the implementation of the US offer: four US divisions based on the Rhine as a security guarantee in return for a payment plan from France and UK which saw Germany paying reparations directly to the US. Germany itself was moved eastwards, losing the entire Rhineland to France but retaining Danzig and West Prussia, gaining the Sudetenland and Austria with its capital moved to Vienna with a Hapsburg Kaiser.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Scott Palter Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Armchair General Labels: David Cabot Lodge, David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau, Vittorio Orlando, Versailles.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this article we relied upon the plot development from Scott Palter


Facebook Comment Comment from Alan Abramowitz on Facebook: Pershing instead of Harding would have eliminated a Coolidge presidency. Would he have succumbed to "the Presidental curse"? Would he have picked Hoover as a sucessor?? I can't see Austria taking over the German Empire. a landlocked Poland (?), and a Francais Rhine. I would need to know more about this.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-07-04 02:50:19 ~ This is something I've never seen before. But would Pershing have wanted the Presidency?

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2011-07-04 06:43:51 ~ I suspect hanging onto the Rhénanie would work out as well as hanging onto the Bassin de la Sarre in the long term

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-07-04 10:46:20 ~ France didn't want a vast population of Germans. Are you stating that Carl is the German Emperor? Good choice. But where is Poland, here? And what happens to Poznan?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-07-04 13:44:20 ~ And, of course, Wilson's "hair-brained" (shouldn't that be "hare-brained"? Fixed - thanks. Ed) peace proposals did have substantial domestic backing--just not enough to overcome militant opposition form Republicans and some Southern Democrats in Congress.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-05 14:54:23 ~ I've always liked the potential puns of "hairbrained" and "harebrained"... History-wise, I'd vote for Pershing. Hope that he gets America prepped for the inevitable next war in Europe.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Continental Congress had voted for a declaration of representation? muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, with war raging in the American colonies for over a year and many whispering of independence, the Continental Congress voted to act on the idea of separating themselves from England.

Declaration of Representation Narrowly, the proposition failed, and the Congress would turn its attention to reforming its governmental relationship with the mother country.

Many argued that Parliament's Prohibitory Act's blockade against American shipping effectively cut off the colonies from home earlier that spring. With a blockade, an act of war, the Crown was removing the colonists from his protection, rather than a quarantine of nationals. Lord North had intended the act to destroy the American economy, but wording was interpreted differently by the Navy. Any ship bearing loyal British colors was free to pass and, in fact, under the protection of British ships.

While Thomas Paine's Common Sense stirred great eagerness for independence in the minds of the colonists, simple economics gradually wore away the enthusiasm. By June, as those still holding or at least feigning loyalty prospered, thoughts had turned back to the idea of representation. The public was indeed represented by their Continental Congress, who, after abandoning the idea of independence, created a formal declaration through a committee headed by philosopher Thomas Jefferson and lawyer John Adams, later an MP. They outlined Enlightenment ideals of what a government must to do for its people and what a people must do for its government.

The American Rebellion continued until 1778 when the capture of a British army at Saratoga, New York, prompted William Pitt to speak out in Parliament for peace. Though many were adamant against the notion of letting the rebels go unpunished, Parliament voted to end the war before it left its bounds of domestic affairs and injured their position as world leaders (such as if the French became involved). An armistice was proposed, accepted by the Americans, and envoys met to discuss terms, eventually deciding to give the Americans the representation they demanded.

The war was over, and the first American members of parliament arrived in 1780. Taxes were indeed levied, but the populace was happy to pay for the civilization they had fought hard to improve. Following the American success, representation flooded around the rest of the British Empire with towns like Manchester, outposts like the Falklands, and even parts of Canada soon holding their own positions in Parliament. These populist ideas even spread outside the borders of the empire, causing uproar throughout Europe, most notably in France's Revolutions of 1789 and 1792, establishing their peaceful and lasting constitutional monarchy.

In 1857, India emulated the American rebellion in success, and non-white colonials were given citizenship and representation unparalleled before. With prosperous colonies, Britain maintained world leadership throughout the Victorian and Modern Eras. Although the World War dragged in trenches for years through the 1910s, the Second World War (or "Hitler's Little War") was won handily by 1943. As Communism and the Post-Colonial movements began in the late '40s, England's might began to wane, and new talks of independence are spreading throughout the world where the sun cannot set on a British Empire.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: America, Colonies, Britain, British Empire, United States.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality, the Prohibitory Act was made against all American ships, and it was clear that the colonies had already been legally separated from Britain. The Declaration of Independence was approved unanimously and later signed with perfected wording on July 4.


Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-08-03 01:22:07 ~ Would the British really have been willing to accept Americans into Parliament?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-08-03 06:03:50 ~ Part of the trouble was that even a lot of British people weren't represented in Parliament (some large cities had no representation, while "rotten boroughs" with very few voters did send representatives---the reapportionment that came with Reform was centuries overdue) and another part was sheer distance.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-08-04 10:09:53 ~ England accepted the Irish in parliament 20 years later. The more interesting question is would the Americans have settled for a few seats at Westminster or insisted on something like Dominion status with their own parliament?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-08-04 16:28:23 ~ Could've gone either way as I see it. Representation and self-government are still two very different things, but if they didn't want a break from the mother country, they might be willing to join Parliament as it was.

Readers Comment Kirk Edwards commented on 2010-08-04 17:25:39 ~ Much more realistic than war.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2011-06-03 02:15:57 ~ I'm not sure the American revolutionaries ever truly wanted representation in Parliament. I think that was merely a rallying cry that Sam Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and John Hancock used to drum up support for ultimate independence -- which I believe was their actual goal to begin with.


Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1869, the world's first dirigible airship capable of carrying passengers, Frederick Marriott's Avitor1, made its maiden flight from San Francisco to San Jose and back. The inventor and a single observer, the writer Ambrose G. Bierce 2 were aboard.

Flight of the AvitorMarriott's flight followed eighteen years of work and a number of trials involving first partial-scale and then full-scale unpiloted vessels guided by tethers. Others had also been working along similar lines, notably in France, where the research helped inspire the author Jules Verne to write his novels Master of the World and Robur the Conqueror, featuring one of his trademark obsessed scientist-villains3.

Marriott's work had originally centered on steam-driven vessels. However, the work of French civil engineer Alphonse Beau de Rochas, who in 1862 demonstrated a four-stroke gasoline-powered engine he had patented, inspired Marriott to shift to internal combustion, which promised grester power for the same weight of engine4. His adaptation of de Rochas's design worked, and the Avito's historic flight was powered by two gasoline engines driving outboard screw propellers. The aairship inventor had devised an ignition system which allowed both engines to be started or stopped simultaneously, which was important for stability.

Ironically, however, Marrott's very success would be his undoing. In 1873, German engineer Paul Haenlein would make the first successful heavier-than-air flight outside Vienna, exploiting the same type of gasoline engine Marriott had used in the Avitor, and within a few years ithe advantages of heavier-than-air craft would have begun to push their gas-lifted cousins into the shade5.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Avitor, Frederick Marriott, Dirigible , Paul Haenlein, Fllight.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-07-17 23:27:38 ~ This reminds me of an AH of mine where I had dirigibles & proto-zepplins fighting over Paris during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-07-18 02:15:42 ~ I'm a big Bierce fan, and would have loved to read what he wrote about this.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-07-18 22:53:34 ~ Eric, have you been reading my SSBE series by any chance? ;)

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-07-20 17:02:21 ~ Your what? ;)




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if James Wolfe survived the Plains of Abraham and twenty years later unleashed the same genocidal methods in the thirteen colonies that he had planned for French Canadians? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 2010, on this day at the Bonhams auction house in London, an unnamed Canadian collector paid $635,000 for Joseph Highmore's iconic painting of Governor General James Wolfe, pictured at the defining moment of his greatest triumph on the Plains of Abraham at Quebec with British North America symbolically subdued under his feet.

Old MasterThe battle was famously won by leading his troops up the wooded cliffs at night and catching his opposition unprepared. And yet the secret to his success was ruthlessness rather than tactical genious. In a letter to Major General Jeffrey Amherst titled "Wolfe's manifesto" he said ~

"If, by accident in the river, by the enemy's resistance, by sickness or slaughter in the army, or, from any other cause, we find that Quebec is not likely to fall into our hands (persevering however to the last moment), I propose to set the town on fire with shells, to destroy the harvest, houses and cattle, both above and below, to send off as many Canadians as possible to Europe and to leave famine and desolation behind me. But we must teach these scoundrels to make war in a more gentleman like manner".

It was a harsh lesson that Wolfe would teach the American rebels twenty years later.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Joseph Highmore, Portrait of Gen. Wolfe, created posthumously, probably between 1760 and 1780)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: James Wolfe, Joseph Highmore, Plains of Abraham, America, Canada.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2010-07-10 03:43:29 ~ So did the streets of Boston run red with rebel blood? What did Wolfe do twenty years later?

Facebook Comment Comment from Tom Hickie on Facebook: "This was a long war, the French lost Canada but eventually the British lost America. Americans owe a bit of gratitude to France because they fought the English to a standstill while the colonies revolted"

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-07-10 06:24:21 ~ If he'd done that, relations between the Colonies/US and Britain would have been deeply poisoned for a very long time. Even in OTL, it was possible to become Mayor of Chicago in the 1920s by running against "King George."

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2010-07-10 15:30:52 ~ "Did the streets of Boston run red with blood?" I'd be interested to hear the answer to that myself...

Facebook Comment Comment from Terry Jardine on Facebook: GET EVEN WITH YOUR ENAMEYS... MAKE THEM YOUR FRIEND.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Oliver Cromwell accepted the crown?

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1754, on this day Andrew Cromwell II was crowned King of England. Andrew reigned during a difficult period for Britain. He witnessed the Industrial Revolution in Britain thoroughly change both the physical & cultural landscape. America was also effected, but more so by higher standards of education, a booming domestic economy & a growing population, which eventually led to calls for independence. Andrew, though, was not at all keen on letting the Americans have any reforms, even though Parliament was prepared to allow some new arrangements in America. In the end, however, nothing got done in American political reform.

The Royal House of Cromwell, Part 8 - Andrew (1754-1788) by David AtwellThe impasse in American reform came about due to the complete conquest of India. The British Parliament, however, kept India as a separate political entity & a Viceroy was appointed to govern the country on behalf of the Crown. Furthermore, to ensure that the world understood who was in charge of India, the British Monarch accepted the Indian Throne. King Andrew was thus crowned Emperor of India in 1785. All future British Monarchs (until Indian independence in 1947) would automatically gain the Indian Title as well.

As a consequence of the British presence in India, Australia was rapidly colonised during this period in an effort to ensure that the French, Dutch, or anyone else for that matter, did not assert control over this recently discovered continent. The result of all this activity for Britain was that it was the most powerful nation on Earth. Furthermore, Andrew was the Earth's most powerful Monarch. It is no wonder, then, that he refused American requests for political reforms, regardless how conservative these requests may have been.


Entry posted by Guest Historian David Atwell Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © David Atwell, 2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: House of Cromwell Source: Wikipedia Labels: House of Cromwell, Great Britain, Republic, Puritan, Revolution.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, David Atwell's series can be read in full on the Changing the Times Web Site in Part One and Part Two.






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if a moralistic US President challenged the violent lifestyle of inner-city youths that is given expression in Gangsta Rap Music?

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1989, a series of arrests in South Central Los Angeles followed the rejection of a letter from the FBI protesting the fiery lyrics to Straight Outta Compton. Because the Priority Record Company refuted accusations that the label had been selling an album that encouraged violence against law enforcement agencies.
Click to watch on Youtube

Dr King's Dream turns into a Gangsta Rappers's nightmare, "Straight Outta Compton"In a carefully co-ordinated law enforcement action, Gangsta Rappers Ice Cube, Doctor Dre, Eazy-E, M.C. Ren and Yella would be subsequently arrested in South Central Los Angeles were taken into police custody. A blanket ban was also placed upon listening to the album which the rappers had recorded in six weeks with USD $8,000 and sounded like nothing that had come before it.

"You are now about to witness the strength of street knowledge"The consequences for America proved profound and deep-reaching. President Jesse Jackson described the lyrics as disturbing and unhelpful to those members of the community who had worked hard since Selma to build Dr King's dream.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Personalities Source: Wikipedia Labels: Straight Outta Compton, NWA, Dre, Ice Cube, Civil Rights.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-07-02 05:58:27 ~ It'd be a lot harder for them to scream about racism with Jesse Jackson in the White House, wouldn't it? And I know a lot of blacks are good and sick of the "authentic black=ghetto black" thing.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2009-07-02 08:52:57 ~ Likely to backfire. It is the whole freedom of expression bit and there is only so far protecting the black man would can be taken even in the eyes of the black electorate. Worst Case Scenario, black populism/political power is associated with random attempts at censorship with the nastiest possible fallout for black elected officials.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-07-02 21:34:51 ~ So why wouldn't the FIrst Amendment apply here, ie freedom of speach?

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-07-02 22:07:58 ~ Jackson had no chance of becoming president. None whatsoever.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-07-02 22:10:37 ~ Let me elaborate. He couldn't have won on his own--he just didn't have enough white support. And if "Mr. Hymietown" had browbeaten Mondale in '84 or Dukakis in '88 into putting him on the ticket, the Democrats would have done even worse than they actually did, so he couldn't have hoped for a convenient death to propel him into the Oval Office.

Facebook Comment Comment from Tracy Milai on Facebook: I truly wonder about that sometimes. So much rap is just angry, bitter people sharing their misery and bringing others down with them. I wonder if it wasn't encouraged, if that would help?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-01-22 16:56:08 ~ Ever seen the Boondocks episode with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, surviving his assassination, but in a coma for thirty years? "BET is the worst thing I've ever seen!" Very different cultural perspectives, and there would definitely be a lot of negative fallout from the generation gap.


In 1881, on this day Charles J. Guiteau shot and fatally wounded U.S. President George Armstrong Custer, who eventually died from infection on September 19.

Stalwart of the LakotaGuiteau lay in wait for the President at the Baltimore and Potomac Rail road Station, getting his shoes shined, pacing, and engaging a cab to take him to the jail later. As President Custer entered the station, looking forward to a vacation with his wife in Long Branch, New Jersey, Guiteau stepped forward and shot him twice from behind, the second shot piercing the first lumbar vertebra but missing the spinal cord. As he surrendered to authorities, Guiteau fired with the exulting words, repeated everywhere: "I am a Stalwart of the Lakota... "'.

Custer died on September 19, eleven weeks after being shot, after a long, painful battle with infections brought on by his doctors poking and probing the wound with unwashed hands and unsterilised instruments. Most modern physicians familiar with the case state Custer would have easily survived his wounds with the medical care available even 20 years later.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Crises Source: Wikipedia Labels: Charles J. Guiteau, U.S. President George Armstrong Custer, George Armstrong Custer, Baltimore and Potomac Rail road Station, Assasination.



On this day in 1973, Johnny Smith got a premonition that the Lawnmower Man would commit his next murder in Stratford, Connecticut. He turned out to be right; the next day the body of Stratford High teacher Jim Norman was found in a deserted alley less than two blocks from the school. In his book The Lawnmower Man author Stephen King would describe the Norman case and the Lawnmower Man's hidden connection to one of Norman's students in a chapter titled `Sometimes They Come Back`.

 - Stephen King
Stephen King

Variant entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site original content has been repurposed to celebrate the author's genius © Stephen King, Salem's Lot, 1976.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Salem50 Source: Internet Movie Database Labels: Salems Lot, Maine, Murder, Stephen King, America.



In 1942, the defeated remains of the British Eighth Army wheel towards Alexandria. Claude Auchinleck is replaced and the British Eighth Army is restructured, as Bernard Montgomery was appointed Head of British Central Command. With the Western Desert and the North African Campaigns lost, Monty is charged with organizing Churchill's Last Stand in the remaining Theatre of War, the Middle East. His first step is to meet with Jewish General Moshe Dayan and offer him the keys to the British Mandate in Palestine.

 - Moshe Dayan
Moshe Dayan

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Moshe Dayan, Middle East, World War 2, Britain, Israel.



On this day in 2014 Jerry Bruckheimer's big-screen adaptation of his hit crime TV series CSI officially topped the 300 million USD mark at the box office. Only a month after its US theatrical release, the movie had already secured its place among the all-time North American theatrical hits and was on its way to challenging the worldwide box office profit record which had been held since 1997 by James Cameron's historical romance Titanic.

 -

The CSI movie would officially break Titanic's US box office record during the 4th of July weekend, at which time Bruckheimer would hold a press conference to confirm that a sequel had been greenlighted.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: CSI:Crime Scene Investiga Source: Wikipedia Labels: CSI, Crime Scene Investigations, Finale, Movie, Jerry Bruckenheimer.



In 1965, a rally against the war in Cuba, held in Washington D.C., attracts 10,000 demonstrators. It is the largest such protest to date, and its size alarms the Johnson administration, which fears public support for the U.S. occupation may be eroding. While the stigma of Oswald remains, it is fading as time passes and the war goes on with casualties mounting and Castro still at large.

 - LBJ
LBJ

President Johnson's concerns are amplified by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who insists the growing anti-war movement is controlled by Communists. In late July, acting on his own initiative, Hoover will order a massive expansion of the FBI's COINTELPRO operation. Established in 1956 to sabotage the U.S. Communist Party, it was expanded in 1961 to go after the Socialist Workers Party and has been used since 1964 to infiltrate the Ku Klux Klan. Now it will be employed against opponents of the Cuban war.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Cuba War Source: Wikipedia Labels: Lyndon Baines Johnson, John F Kennedy, Assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald, Cuba.



In 1935, on this day in Regina, Saskatchewan ~ the day after the Canadian Army fired upon workers from British Columbia and the rest of western Canada that were making their way to Ottawa, a group of protesters, RCMP officers, and soldiers met in the town center where the shootings had taken place. The Protesters carring the red flag of revolution. One of the soldiers carring the Red Ensign of the Canadian nation. After talking, till after the sun rose and people started to gather around the group of men. It was decided, the workers, and all others tired of teh deprestion, the soldiers never wanting to fire again onto the civilians. They went back to thier respected homes and lodges, to tell thier commrads that the Canadian Revolution had come.

 -

Entry posted by Guest Historian Amotue Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Different Worlds, c/o Amotue
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Canada, Revolution, North America, Golden Leaf Flag, Socialism.



In 2001, after an eight week trial Barry George was acquitted of charges relating to the murder of television presenter Jill Dando. George, 41, was found not guilty of shooting Miss Dando through the head with a single bullet on the doorstep of her home in Fulham, west London, on 26 April 1999. The jury deliberated for 32 hours before giving their majority verdict at 1613 BST (1513 GMT) at the Old Bailey in London. Much of the evidence that guided the jury of six women and five men was circumstantial, supported by witness accounts.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Personalities Source: Wikipedia Labels: Jill Dando, Barry George, London, Assassination, Premature Death.



In 1964, on this day the Civil Rights Bill - one of the most important piece of legislation in American history - became law. US President John F Kennedy signed the bill creating equal rights in voting, education, public accommodations, union membership and in federally assisted programmes - regardless of race, colour, religion or national origin. The bill has caused much controversy since it was introduced last year. It was signed tonight in the White House five hours after the House of Representatives passed it by 289 to 126 votes. After the signing, John F Kennedy shook hands with civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King. In a television address to the nation he called on US citizens to 'eliminate the last vestiges of injustice in America'. 'Let us close the springs of racial poison,' he said.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Society Source: Wikipedia Labels: Civil Rights, America, John F Kennedy, Legislation, Congress.



In 1991, Axl Rose of the grunge metal group Guns ?n' Roses is killed when he sparks a riot by leaping into the crowd at a concert in St. Louis and attacking a fan who is videotaping his performance. The death of the notoriously hot-headed Rose closes the chapter on his musical style, as well; softer, gentler music makes a dramatic comeback in the 90's.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Personalities Source: Wikipedia Labels: Axl Rose, Guns n Rose, Rock n Roll, America, Music.



In 1947, a small glowing disk lands into the desert outside of the small town of Roswell, New Mexico. The occupants make their way to Alamagordo, then they report back to the Congress of Worlds.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Earth Source: Wikipedia Labels: Roswell, Congress of Worlds, Nuclear, Alamagordo, America.



In 2009, Microsoft Corporation announced that for the quarter just ended, Windows Livemail user fees represented over 40% of sales for the first time. Eight years before on 25 February 2001, unconsidered comments were made by a Microsoft executive, who said the company was considering introducing fees for its free Hotmail service. It was one year after the dotcom crash and everybody, even mighty Microsoft, was pondering how to make some money on the internet. A stroke of genius, Hotmail now represents over 30% of Microsoft revenue. The Seattle giant had suffered from loss of revenue from software piracy for many years, and this services-led innovation enabled the corporation to grow sales explosively in the consumer market.

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Data Loss Source: Wikipedia Labels: Hotmail, Internet Charges, Microsoft, Service Revenues, End-user Computing.



In 1978, Lynette Fromme, a former hippie from California, attempted to murder President Nixon. Obviously insane, she claimed in her trial that the President had committed some sort of crime in the election of 1972 and was supposed to have resigned. She was found guilty and remanded to an insane asylum for life. President Nixon was reported to have said of her, "Crazy drugged-out hippies. That's what they get for messing with Nixon".

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Crises Source: Wikipedia Labels: Lynette Fromme, Richard Nixon, America, Assassination, Premature Death.



In 1890, Congress narrowly defeats a measure sponsored by Senator John Sherman to prohibit trusts and monopolies. This paved the way for the eventual merger of all U.S. corporations in 1921 to form US GlobalCorp. From multimillion-dollar highway networks to the biscuits on your table, everything's done better by US GlobalCorp!

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Society Source: Wikipedia Labels: US GlobalCorp, Senator John Sherman, Trust, Monopoly, America.



In 1566, Michel de Nostradame died in Salon, France. He saw it coming, but left no quatrains about it.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Religion Source: Wikipedia Labels: Michel de Nostradame, Quadrans, Prophecy, Prediction, Europe.



In 1172 AUC, Valentinian III is born in Rome. Although born into a divided empire, he will eventually unite the two halves and lead Rome to greater glory.

Entry posted by Alternate Historian Robbie Taylor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Robbie Taylor, 2004-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Generals Source: Wikipedia Labels: Valentinian III, Ancient Rome, Byzantium, Constantinople, Roman Empire.





July 1



Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Oliver Cromwell had never invaded Ireland? muses Marko Bosscher. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the April 2013 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1649, the Earl of Ormonde marched a combined force of English Royalists and Irish Confederates on Dublin, the last major foothold of parliamentary forces in Ireland. Ironically Ormonde himself had held Dublin two years prior when it was besieged by Irish Confederates, before abandoning it to English parliamentary forces.

The Fall of IrelandThe Confederate/Royalist coalition had been forged in blood, the years since the Irish Rebellion in 1641 had been years of bloody and ruthless wars. Even as a peace agreement had been reached in 1648, after a series of defeats for the confederates at the hands of parliamentarian forces, fighting continued against those Catholics who could not stomach submitting to the protestants who had inflicted massacres on Catholics only a few years prior.

In 1649 things were going well for the coalition, the parliamentary forces received almost no support from England, where Cromwell had his hands full with the second English Civil War.

At the end of July Ormonde had camped his troops at Rathmines near Dublin, with the intent to besiege the city. On the second of August his troops started fortifying the half-demolished castle of Baggotrath on the outskirts of Dublin. Michael Jones, the defender of Dublin, decided to move against this danger with an army of 5.000.

Although Ormond's army had stood to arms for just such an eventuality Jones quickly captured Baggotrath, and turned towards the main Royalist camp. Although the royalist forces were thrown in disarray, they were able to fall back on a line formed by Lord Inchiquin's infantry. Despite suffering heavy losses Ormonde was able to hold the line long enough for Lord Dillon to march against the parliamentarian rear.

Chaotic fighting raged on throughout the day, until at the start of the evening the remaining Parliamentarians forced themselves past Dillon's battered forces and retired to Dublin.

The parliamentarians had inflicted heavy losses on the Royalists, but at the cost of most of their own force. Lord Inchiquin who had been stationed in Munster with three regiments of horse had marched North upon hearing the news, and linked up with Ormonde the next day. With Ormonde's troops occupying the countryside and his artillery dominating the harbour, the siege of Dublin continued for another 6 weeks. Cut off from England and with no remaining allies in Ireland Jones surrendered Dublin and was allowed to return to England with his troops, leaving behind most of their weaponry.

With no port open to him Cromwell called of his planned invasion of Ireland until spring. But the intended invasion of Ireland was overtaken by events, as the Scots proclaimed Charles II their king. The bulk of the New Model Army marched north against the Scots, leaving only a small army to invade Ireland and attempt to gain a foothold there.

Because the English navy still commanded the Irish sea parliamentarian forces could land unopposed near Drogheda. Needing to to take Drogheda before the Royalists could send reinforcements the walls were quickly broken by artillery and the city taken by assault.

The royalist garrison was massacred to a man, along with hundreds of civilians. The victory of parliament was short-lived as Ormonde marched the main royalist army against Drogheda, while Dillon marched troops from Dublin past Drogheda to block the parliamentarians from the north. With most defensible positions destroyed in the Parliamentarian attack the city was soon assaulted and it's defenders given no quarter.

The massacre of Drogheda did much to strengthen Irish resolve. The defense of Ireland was strengthened by new fortifications in coastal towns and a reorganization of the Royalist army into three armies tasked with guarding Ireland against any invasion. Although English Royalists remained in command of these armies, with Ormonde in overall command, the Irish nobility was incorporated into the army as well. Parliamentary propaganda tried to make the best of it's failure to recapture Ireland by casting Charles II as "the Irish King", hoping to fuel anti-Irish and anti-Catholic resentment in England, even though the monarch did not so much as set foot on Irish soil during these years.

Upon the restoration of the Monarchy in 1660 the Irish Confederacy was dissolved and the Irish Parliament instituted. The confederacy had achieved most of it's goals, with self-government of Ireland assured and religious equality for Catholics (in Ireland) granted by Charles II.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Marko Bosscher Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Marko Bosscher, 2013-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politics Source: Wikipedia Labels: Earl of Ormonde, Ireland, Charles II, Stuart, England.

Todayinah Editor Editor says,


Readers Comment Rurri Heakin commented on 2013-03-17 15:05:39 ~ Wonderful piece. Not the historical Ormonde though. The best thing for Charles is the Irish are nearly beat

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2013-03-17 16:27:30 ~ No Comment

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2013-03-25 02:42:25 ~ Would Charles have been able to make religious liberty for Catholics anywhere in his domains stick? At this time, the Gunpowder Plot wasn't that far in the past.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2013-04-01 21:43:45 ~ The English would be back, probably as part of the increasing world wars of the eighteenth century.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Adolf Hitler had committed more resources to Plan Z? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). NB Peter Strasser was the chief commander of German Imperial Navy Zeppelins during World War I. This story was published in the July 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1940, on this day the German Kriegsmarine aircraft carrier codename Flugzeugträger B was christened the Peter Strasser (in honour of the World War I leader of the naval airship) and launched from the Deutsche Werke in the port of Kiel. Deployed in a carrier group alongside the Tirpitz, her main war-time role was to wreck havoc amongst the Arctic convoys.

Flugzeugträger Part 2: Launching of the Peter StrasserThis strategic mission objective was laid down by Grand Admiral Erich Raeder (and after some angry exchanges) finally signed off by the Fuehrer who exercised his supreme authority through the Oberkommando der Marine. Not only did this approval ensure that Plan Z received the necessary level of resourcing, but it also enabled the German naval architects1 to overcoming immense difficulties despite their inexperience in building such vessels. The design challenges included a complement of cruiser-type guns for commerce raiding and defense against British cruisers, American and Japanese carriers, designed along the lines of task-force defense, used supporting cruisers for surface firepower, which allowed flight operations to continue without disruption and kept carriers out of undue risk of damage or sinking from surface action.
This post shares some commonality with the sister articles in the Flugzeugträger thread.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Flugzeugtrager Source: Wikipedia Labels: Graf Zeppelin, Kriegsmarine, Aircraft Carrier, Iceland, Second World War.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this bluesky scenario we have collaborated with guest historian Scott Palter and have repurposed content from Wikipedia. 1) Wikipedia reports ~ a combination of political infighting between the Kriegsmarine and the Luftwaffe, wrangling within the ranks of the Kriegsmarine itself and Adolf Hitler's waning interest all conspired against the carriers


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-06-14 16:02:14 ~ Forgive the ignorance on my part, but who's Peter Strasser? Chief commander of German Imperial Navy Zeppelins during World War I

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2012-06-15 01:50:21 ~ In my opinion, this is definitely what a German carrier would have been used for: starving England and the Soviet Union. Here's something to ponder: how would Plan Z have changed U-boat allocation? After all, one fleet carrier would have taken the resources of perhaps 20 U-boats.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2012-07-12 13:59:13 ~ I agree: this is what a Nazi carrier would most likely have been used for, certainly at that point in time. Even in World War I, the Germans recognized the vulnerability of Britain, as an island nation, to being starved into submission by having its sea trade blocked; that was the chief point of its submarine blockade in that war. It failed then primarily because the U.S. became involved--which suggests that Germany would have to be careful not to create a Lusitania-type incident with its carrier.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if a Union takeover of Canada had occurred at the time of Confederation? muses Ed and Stan Brin. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the May 2012 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1867, on this day the Confederation of Canada started the inevitable countdown to the final Union invasion north across the 41st parallel.
A variant ending to "Railroaded into the Union: Part #1"

Railroaded into the Union #2Perhaps the only way that the outcome to the Charlottetown Conference could have been designed to be more offensive would have be to have postponed the decision by three days for co-timing with Independence Day.

Nevertheless the response was radical. Perhaps most significantly in the long-term was the decision taken in Washington to scrap plans for an inter-colony railroad which would improve trade, military movement, and transportation in general. Because despite the objections of the newly incorporated West Coast state (formerly known as the Colony of British Columbia), it was strongly argued by integrationalists that it was more cost effective to use barges to trans-ship up the Red River. In reality, the future-proofed "up-down" decision (instead of a "left-right") transport solution was driven by the pressing need to vertically integrate the hub of the two nations across the Prairies. On these terms, it was an unqualified success, particularly for the development of Winnipeg; instead of being the meeting point between East and West Canada, "the Peg" actually became the Heart of the Continent that its planners had originally dreamt of.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Canada, United States, Alaska, Railroad, Union.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in authoring this article we explore an idea originally proposed by Stan Brin.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2012-05-01 00:42:27 ~ Could we have a few more details on the POD? :D

Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2012-05-01 00:45:58 ~ Now, all we need is Mexico, and our conquest is complete...

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2012-05-01 20:05:03 ~ I did honors at university in US-British relations during that period. Americans felt badly abused by extremely nasty and violent neighbors to the north who went out of their way to aid the Confederacy. Nobody wanted Mexico. Mexicans were furriners.

Readers Comment Richard Roper commented on 2012-05-12 09:09:57 ~ The answer is simple, it would mean war with the British Empire, This had long been planned, in London that is, and the 124,000 troops would have alraedy been sent to Halifax. Palmerston has died, but his disciples will now be rubbing their hands that they will getthe Forward foreign policy he was always denied. Oh one other thing, they will swiftly start intriguing with former CSA supporters.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2012-05-12 17:33:24 ~ A US-British Empire war at that time would have been seriously bad news for everybody involved. The British could probably not land troops in North America if Canada had been taken, but US shipping would be swept from the seas. At the same time, the US, or North America, had at least the potential to be autarkic, so blockades wouldn't matter a great deal, and with the US ironclad fleet in existence, attacking US ports would be a very dangerous proposition. And the French and Russians would be delighted to fish in those troubled waters, too.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Edward VI had lived and the Treaty of Greenwich had held? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the December 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1543, on this day the two warring realms of Protestant England and Catholic Scotland were finally brought together in indissoluble union by the betrothal of Mary Stuart and Edward Tudor.

Treaty of Greenwich
By Ed, Jackie Speel and Jared Myers
The betrothal of the seven-month-old Queen of Scots to the six-year old heir to the English throne was more or less forced upon the Scots. In a weak bargaining position after their defeat at Solway Moss the previous November, Henry VIII made them sign the Treaty of Greenwich and sealed the peace with the dynastic union, stipulating that Mary be handed over to him to be brought up in England.

There was a reaction of course and it was on a truly massive and unimaginable scale. The Scots considered a renewal of their alliance with France in 1543, but in the event thought better of it. Instead, Edward VI died under mysterious circumstances that have never been properly explained. And the ascension of Mary Stuart not long after the natural demise of the King's half-sister Mary Tudor, was soon followed by the beheading of Elizabeth I. Ironically, this bloody period in the nation's history began and ended with a betrothal. Because in 1558, the sixteen year-old queen regent of England and Scotland was betrothed to Phillip II, King of Spain. And that was it.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Edward VI, Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, England, Reformation.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in this article we explore a suggestion from Jackie Speel, ideas from Yahoo! Answers and NWLink, repurposing content from Wikipedia which concludes: When the Scots repudiated the treaty in December 1543 and renewed their alliance with France, Henry was enraged. In April 1544, he ordered Edward's uncle, Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford, to invade Scotland and "put all to fire and sword, burn Edinburgh town, so razed and defaced when you have sacked and gotten what ye can of it, as there may remain forever a perpetual memory of the vengeance of God lightened upon [them] for their falsehood and disloyalty". Seymour responded with the most savage campaign ever launched by the English against the Scots.


Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-12-23 01:38:59 ~ This would have forced Charlie Stuart to rethink his career plans, that's for sure...

Readers Comment Gordon Davie commented on 2012-01-02 10:03:37 ~ Well, if nothing else, I like the flag, with the Saltire (St. Andrew's Cross) on top for a change! To many, the 'real' Union Flag, with the cross of St. George superimposed on top of the other two, symbolises how England is the dominant partner in the United Kingdom and the other two countries merely afterthoughts...With this one, the red of St, George lies between the blue and white of St. Andrew, indicating more of an equal partnership. A union of the UK & Ireland and Spain would be extremely powerful - Catholic, of course - so interesting to see how this would play out...

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2012-01-02 20:38:12 ~ But Mary Suart wasn't in the English line of succession. There is no reason why the crown would go to her after the death of Bloody Mary.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-10-01 12:48:10 ~ I might add that the Queen of Scots had a son while Bloody Mary was childless. In fact, Mary Stuart's son went on to become King James.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Lincoln assassination had been bungled? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1837, on this day military officer, diplomat, conspirator and would-be assassin Major Henry Reed Rathbone was born in the city of Albany in the U.S. State of New York. His father Jared L. Rathbone was a merchant and businessman, who later became Albany's mayor. At the time of his father's death, Rathbone inherited the very considerable sum of two hundred thousand dollars from his family's estate. His widowed mother, Pauline Rathbone, remarried Judge Ira Harris, who was appointed U.S. Senator from New York after William H. Seward became Abraham Lincoln's Secretary of State.

Sic Semper Tyrannis On Good Friday 1865 Rathbone and his daughter Major Rathbone and Clara Harris attended a performance of the play Our American Cousin at the Ford's Theatre.

During the intermission Presidential bodyguard John Parker left the theatre and went for a drink in a nearby saloon, ending the evening in the arms of the well-known prostitute Lizzie Williams. As a result the madman John Wilkes Booth was able to enter the Presidential box unchallenged.

In the ensuing struggle, Rathbone grappled with the madman, and a shot was fired which narrowly missed the President's head. Attempting to make his escape, Booth lept towards the stage, but his riding spur was caught in a Treasury flag decorating the box and he landed heavily breaking his leg.

Yelling out the Virginia state motto "Sic semper tyrannis!" ("Thus always to tyrants") Booth was restrained by men in the audience - who soon discovered that he was unarmed.

In fact the only weapon he had brought to the Ford's Theatre was the knife used to stab Rathbone, and it was the Major who had used a deringer to pull off the shot during the struggle. Rathbone would spend the rest of his life in a lunatic asylum due to the quick thinking of the President's other companion, the always dependable Ulysses S. Grant. But despite the obvious connection to William Seward, evidence of a wider conspiracy was never proven although many suspect that Lincoln knew the truth but chose to conceal it on order to protect the Union. Or his tyranny, if you will.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Henry Rathbone, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Assassination, Presidency.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, considerable amounts of content have been repurposed from Wikipedia.


Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-07-06 05:12:25 ~ A little hard on Lincoln? Why?

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-07-06 05:27:26 ~ This is the sort of conspiracy more often seen in fiction than reality---they'd have to have incredible luck to pull it off.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-07-06 11:31:19 ~ "Or his tyranny, if you will"? Thank you, I won't. Ironically, the evidence suggsts that had he lived, Lincoln would have pursued a mild Reconstruction in order to soften Southern resistance. That said, it's posible Lincolj might have chosen to conceal evidence of a wider conspiracy in order to make it easier to "bind up the nation's wounds."

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-07-06 13:30:42 ~ To paraphrase a line from "Star Trek: The Next Generation", when a conspiracy's real practically no one knows about it, and when it's suspected it's almost never real.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-06 23:07:53 ~ Reconstruction would have been very much different, and we'd see a very different US even by 1868. Calculate the butterfly effect on that, someone.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Robert E. Lee had run for US President in 1868? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the July 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1868, on this day The New York Herald observed that the Democrats had to name a soldier to defeat General Grant, the Republican choice, putting forward the name of his greatest Civil War adversary, the Confederate General Robert E. Lee:

American Heroes 4: The Marble Man"But if the Democratic Committee must nominate a soldier - if it must have a name identified with the glories of the war - we will recommend a candidate for its favors. Let it nominate General R. E. Lee. Let it boldly take over the best of all its soldiers, making no palaver or apology. He is a better soldier than any of those they have thought upon and a greater man. He is one in whom the only genius of this nation finds its fullest development.

Here the inequality will be in favor of the Democrats for this soldier, with a handful of men whom he had moulded into an army, baffled our greater Northern armies for four years; and when opposed by Grant was only worn down by that solid strategy of stupidity that accomplishes its strategy by mere weight. With one quarter the men Grant had this soldier fought magnificently across the territory of his native State, and fought his army to a stump.

"this General is the best of all for a Democratic candidate"There never was such an army or such a campaign, or such a General for illustrating the military genius and possibilities of our people; and this General is the best of all for a Democratic candidate. It is certain that with half as many men as Grant he would have beaten him from the field in Virginia, and he affords the best promise of any soldier for beating him again".

After Appomatox, Lee had faced indictment for treason. But he had won widespread admiration in the North by swearing renewed allegiance to the United States an act which brought tens of thousands of his former soldiers peaceably back into the Union.

As the President of Washington College at Lexington, he had established a modern University which set "an example of submission to authority". It was an example that Lee might set as a key unifying leadership figure in post-war America:

"True patriotism sometimes requires of men to act exactly contrary, at one period, to that which it does at another, and the motive which impels them the desire to do rightis precisely the same".


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: University of Chicago Labels: Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, 1868, Presidency, White House.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality, Lee was not even a Union citizen at this junction, and also he was suffering from a heart ailment that would kill him in 1870.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-07-02 02:58:59 ~ The question of his citizenship would stop this, and it would blow up the Northern Democratic party for good and for ever. They had a lot of living-down to do already, what with quite a few of them having been far too cozy with the South.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-07-02 13:31:50 ~ Lee's citizenship might not have been a show-stopper, since the Constitution stipulates that "native-born" citizens are eligible and Lee had certainly been born to citizenship. One wuld think, though, that the fact that he was, by constitutional definition, a traitor would put him off limits. Then there was his age, and the heart condition mentioned above: if elected, he'd have died less than halfway through his term. I can't see it happening.

Facebook Comment Comment from Michael Patrick on Facebook: The 14th amendment barred former Confederates from holding office. " No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or ...under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

Facebook Comment Comment from Kevin Bechtold on Facebook: Section 3 prohibits the election or appointment to any federal or state office of any person who had held any of certain offices and then engaged in insurrection, rebellion or treason. However, a two-thirds vote by each House of the Congress can override this limitation. In 1898, the Congress enacted a general removal of Section 3's limitation.[44] 44. ^ "Sections 3 and 4: Disqualification and Public Debt". Caselaw.lp.findlaw.com. 1933-06-05. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment14/37.html. Retrieved 2010-08-01.

Facebook Comment Comment from Michael Patrick on Facebook: Yes, you're right, Kevin. Do you think in 1868 2/3 of Congress would have over-ridden this section to allow Lee to run for President?

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-03 01:02:51 ~ This announcement would have come out eight days before the adoption of the 14th Amendment, and it might have been enough to get the wording changed for a more benevolent Reconstruction. Or, it could have riled up the Radical Republicans even more and gotten a lot of ex-Confederates effectively exiled.

Readers Comment Brian Hartman commented on 2011-07-30 01:27:32 ~ I could certainly be wrong, but was Lee in any position, in terms of public opinion, to run for president after the war? It seems to me that the North wouldn't have voted for him because they fought against him, and the South wouldn't have voted for him because his failure was arguably what put them in the position they were in.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if Jefferson Davis had accepted Judah Benjamin's challenge to a duel? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1862, with Grant's capture of Nashville and McClellan at the gates of Richmond, the drunken wretch of a Confederate President Robert Toombs (pictured) fled to Cuba leaving the defeated South to pay a heavy price for losing Jefferson Davis in an unnecessary duel with Judah P. Benjamin.

Bottled Out
Co-written with Scott Palter
The dispute began when the two southern politicians clashed at a session of the Senatorial Finance Committee on June 8th 1858. Considering an army appropriations bill for $100,000 worth of breech-loading guns, the Senator for Lousiana had queried whether the request was actually for new guns, or simply to rework old ones. Taking exception to this line of inquiry, the Secretary of War made the offensive remark that he "had no idea that he was to be met with arguments of a paid attorney in the Senate Chamber". Benjamin took this statement as a personal insult because he believed that it implied he was a corrupt official being paid to represent the interests of a well-known gun manufacturer.

Asking Davis to repeat the remark in case he had heard it incorrectly, the Secretary of War was sufficiently angered to affirm (rather snappily) that indeed he had. By the time he reached the Senate cloak room, his anger had subsided, but by then it was too late because Davis was given notice of a challenge to a duel.

Benjamin had never fired a shot in his life whereas Davis had served as a Colonel in the Mexican-American War. But a cataract had caused almost total blindness in his right eye and his shot at his opponent missed the mark. Benjamin fled to England in disgrace only to discover from the post-humous publication of Davis diary that the Secretary of War had been pained by his misbehaviour in stepping across a boundary.

"Defend yourselves, the enemy is at your door ... !" ~ Robert ToombsAnd so neither were present on the floor of the Senate on January 24, 1860 when the then Senator for Georgia Robert Toombs famously declared "Defend yourselves, the enemy is at your door ... !". And from afar the guilty Benjamin was forced to read reports of Toombs rise to the Southern Leadership where has was to squander the Presidency that surely would have been far better served by Jefferson had he not wasted his life over a simple misunderstanding.

And yet Benjamin would still play a final part in the conduct of the war. World famous as the first practicing Jewish Cabinet Member of a North American Government, he convinced Benjamin Disraeli1 to act as an advocate for his southern comrades. And so just before the collapse of the Confederacy, the Royal Navy whisked die hard Confederates off to exile in South Africa. A final act of seemingly little significance that would ultimately have huge implications for the long-term future..


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Alternate Historian, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Judah Benjamin, Jefferson Davis, Robert Toombs, Presidency, Confederacy.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, 1) this faith based connection should not be constructed as an anti-semitic conspiracy which it is not. We postulate that such a connection was the only method of advocacy available to the disgraced Judah Benjamin.


Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2011-02-13 03:38:26 ~ That'd explain South Africa now wouldn't it? lol

Readers Comment Matthew Dattilo commented on 2011-02-13 03:39:59 ~ "McClellan at the gates of Richmond" made me laugh for a minute...but I digress. Would Toombs as Confederate President have meant that Lee would not have played the role he did in the early victories of the Confederate Army? I think that questions determines if the South would have lost the war at such an early date. The Royal Navy angle is interesting. It's very possible that the British would have helped key Confederates leave the country had the war come to a bad end for the South in 1862. However, I believe this effort would have been private and not officially condoned by London.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2011-02-13 04:49:15 ~ Absent Davis Lee is left on coast defense duty after his West Virginia 1861 fiasco.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-02-13 06:31:14 ~ Toombs' name would have seemed very appropriate. Davis was a stiff-necked martinet and micromanaged his way to defeat, but Toombs would have crashed-and-burned the CSA a lot quicker.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2011-02-13 14:17:34 ~ CSA South Africa? Doubt we could get a Drakia of any sort....

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-02-13 19:20:50 ~ Ending in 1862 would leave out the Emancipation Proclamation in '63. At least there'd be a lot fewer dead Americans, though the question of slavery would still be a debacle.

Readers Comment Jackie Rose commented on 2012-07-01 17:50:19 ~ Benjamin Disraeli was a practicing Anglican and not very likely to advocate for a Jewish cause...which the Confederacy was certainly not, in any event. On the contrary, twice as many Jews fought for the Union. Abraham Lincoln pointed this out, when Grant tried to ban all Jewish merchants from selling goods to the Army.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Spanish General Arsenio Linares had reinforced San Juan Hill?, muses Jeff Provine on This Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1898, on this day American forces suffered a sharp defeat at San Juan Hill, losing many of the Rough-riders including the Bear Moose, Colonel Theodore Roosevelt himself.

Defeat at San Juan Hill A great loss that could have ended the Spanish-American War earlier came at San Juan Hill. American General William Rufus Shafter's plan to take Santiago de Cuba depended upon securing the San Juan Heights overlooking the city. Also seeing the importance of the heights, Spanish General Arsenio Linares held only a small number of men in reserve in Santiago, placing nearly 10,000 troops to defend the heights.

The American direct attack on Kettle Hill with two divisions was pushed back at great cost of American life. A second assault successfully took Kettle Hill thanks to heavy fighting by buffalo soldiers of the 10th Cavalry, but nearby San Juan Hill would not be taken, despite the assault lasting late into the evening. Eventually the Americans would fall back, regroup with Lawton's 2nd Division (which had been dispatched to take the stronghold at El Caney) on July 2, and take the lesser-defended Santiago despite its precarious position. The threat of assault from San Juan would keep the American defenders pinned, and the war in Cuba would stagger on through many more months.

During the fighting, an amiable and excitable New Yorker named Theodore Roosevelt led a group of volunteer cavalry, the Rough Riders, collected from cowboys and Ivy League polo players. The men were held in reserve until the second assault, when Col. Roosevelt led the charge up the hill himself (arguably misinterpreting orders to reinforce as orders to advance). Roosevelt was killed in a counterattack on his north flank along with many of his comrades, a story that was much reproduced in the American newspapers, furthering the growing dissatisfaction with the war.

With the war not yet over in 1900, angry and dispassionate voters turned many of the Republicans out of office in the elections, instead favoring the Democratic nominee William Jennings Bryan. President Bryan would be credited with ending the war, though the Spanish had already begun to show desires of peace under McKinley's administration. Tragedy struck the nation in September of 1901 when anarchist Leon Czolgosz assassinated Bryan at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, NY. Vice-President Adlai Stevenson succeeded the president, taking up his policies of giving independence to the Philippines and busting up many of the nation's corrupt monopolies and trusts.

The American public's distaste with the Spanish-American War furthered its sense of isolationism. In the next decade, the United States would not participate in Europe's Great War (1914-1920), except in increasing American Naval power after the sinking of the RMS Lusitania. Instead, the US focused on domestic affairs such as Women's Suffrage and the Prohibition Movement. The 1920s brought strong, but not unparalleled, economic growth to the US as Europe rebuilt, only to fall into the Second Great War in 1939. Meanwhile, the US enjoyed two decades of domestic peace, with newspapers desperate for any interesting event, even the short 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial in which Clarence Darrow successfully defended the teaching of evolution on grounds of Free Speech.

Although giving aid to Allied Powers, the United States would remain out of the war until 1942, despite public outcry over 1941's British Landing where German troops devastated southern England before finally being rebuffed in a reversal of Dunkirk. Japan, which had conquered nearly unchecked in the Pacific through the 1930s (such as its speedy defeat of the Philippines), would draw in America with its Invasion of Hawaii on June 2, despite continuing guerrilla combat in British Australia. Eventually, Hitler's 1943 Operation Barbarossa would bring the USSR onto the side of the Allies, and GWII would be won with combined atomic arsenals of the United States and Soviet Union in 1945.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Jeff Provine Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Jeff Provine, 2010-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Jeff Provine Blog Source: Jeff Provine’s Blog Labels: San Juan, Teddy Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, Rough Riders, Spanish-American War.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, in reality,General Arsenio Linares did not reinforce San Juan Hill, meaning only 760 Spanish troops held the heights against nearly 15,000 Americans and 4,000 Cubans. The Americans won the decisive battle handily, giving a great deal of positive press for the war as well as young Colonel Roosevelt, who would eventually be given the Medal of Honor. With TR's gusto, skill, and fame, the Republican party would add him as vice-president to the 1900 ticket with McKinley.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-07-31 02:35:59 ~ The twentieth century without TR would be almost unimaginable.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2010-07-31 11:37:12 ~ You sure we would have had a WWII with such changes to WWI? If the latter stretched to 1920 I suspect the peace would either be less punitive (all parties too tired to continue) or Germany would have no 'Stab In The Back' legend (very defeated, possible red revolution).

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-07-31 15:40:13 ~ It's hard to imagine the Spanish-American Wat lasting so long: in our history, it was a creampuff affair. The Spanish Empire was by 1898 a shell, while the U.S., even then, had an industrial capacity superior to that of any other nation, including Britain, and--grim thanks to the Civil War and the Indian wars--no shortage of trained military officers around which to build an army. But the death of Teddy Roosevelt might well have changed things dramatically even in the context of a short war. It would mean (as indicated here) no President Teddy Roosevelt; no "Bull Moose" candidacy to split the GOP in 1912, probably meaning no President Woodrow Wilson, which might have meant an earlier U.S. entry into the European war rather than nonparticipation (which might have meant no Second World War, if peace came earlier and on less onerous terms); and probably no presidency for FDR, who benefited from his connection to the earlier President Roosevelt and from having served as Assistant Secretary of the Navy under Wilson.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2010-07-31 15:48:06 ~ As for the Scopes trial, neither Clarence Darrow nor anyone else could have won it for the defense. Point one, Scopes was guilty: he had, without a doubt, violated Tennessee law by teaching that man had "descended from a lower order of animals," in the statute's words. (Ironically, it would have been legal--technically--for him to have taught about the evolution of other life forms, though I'm sure he'd have gotten in trouble for that, too.) Point two, as the unfolding of the trial made clear, he'd been judged guilty before the trial began, and the presiding judge (an elected official) would have been risking his job and perhaps his personal safety by allowing his acquittal. The defense team knew this and was prepared from the start to go to appeal. (Scopes's conviction was, I understand, later overturned on a technicality.)




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the Union army had been forced to withdraw from Gettysburg? muses Zach Timmons. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1863, on this day Confederate and Union forces begin the battle of Gettysburg, PA. Robert E. Lee had no intention of becoming engaged, but his III Corps under Gen. A.P. Hill ran into Union General John Buford's cavalry division north of the town.

GettysburgBuford skillfully held off Hill until the Union I Corps under John Reynolds was able to relieve him, but as the Confederate army began to converge on Gettysburg, the I Corps was forced to fall back to the town itself, where they met up with O.O. Howard's XI Corps. As senior commander, Reynolds decided to make his stand on the hills south of the town, ordering his I Corps to fortify Cemetary Hill on his left and the XI Corps to move onto Culp's Hill on the right. The XI Corps had just started to move into position when "Allegheny" Johnson's division of the Confederate II Corps marched up.

Johnson, immediately grasping the importance of the heights, ordered his division to take the hill at all costs. Although the mostly German XI Corps put up a tough fight, they were no match for the likes of the Stonewall Brigade, and Johnson soon sent Howard's men running south. Within an hour, Johnson was reinforced by Jubal Early's division, but the commander of the II Corps, Dick Ewell, hesitated to attack Cemetary Hill, now only held by a badly beaten I Corps and fragments of the XI Corps.

However, an officer arrived from General Lee, with a message stating "carry the hill occupied by the enemy, if he found it practicable, but to avoid a general engagement until the arrival of the other divisions of the army". Ewell, recently promoted and eager to show his mettle, assaulted Cemetary Hill and rapidly drove the Union forces off, sending them racing down the Baltimore Pike, where they ran into Henry Slocum's XII Corps. Slocum immediately sent a courier to Gen. Meade, commander of the Union Army of the Potomac, who ordered his forces to establish a defensive line on Pipe Creek, well to the south of Gettysburg.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Zach Timmons Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Zach Timmons, 2008-
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Zachs Blog Source: Zach's Blog Labels: Abraham Lincoln, George Meade, Gettysburg, American Civil War, Confederacy.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-05-20 18:19:45 ~ If the Confederates had taken those hills and forced the AotP to come to them when they were entrenched, they might have been able to break or bleed the AotP enough to ruin it.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2010-05-20 18:43:02 ~ 1. Meade had no intention of fighting at Gettysburg or [Gingrich's novel aside] of fighting on the offensive. Meade would have stood on the Pipe Creek Line and if necessary retired into the DC fortifications 2. XI Corps fought well at Gettysburg. They had two small divisions [Howard had left the third behind to hold Cemetery Hill on his deployment march. They were flanked by Early when he arrived and the line rolled up. This happened because the coward Slocum sat on his orders and refused to march to the sound of the cannons. See Coddington's Gettysburg for details. The same 'German' regiments fought well with Sherman through and past Atlanta and on into the Carolinas [and before anyone asks, yes I can family who served with them although the oral history is too sketchy to say which regiment/s].

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-05-20 18:45:47 ~ All Meade has to do is find good ground to block Lee's line of communications South to contain and starve him into submission.

Facebook Comment Comment from Ben Camo on Facebook: Then England and/or France might have joined in to help the south and the good guys might have won. God bless Robert E. Lee.

Facebook Comment Comments from Robbin Francis on Facebook: Considering the whipping they took, they probably should have with drawn.Yes Henry Heth of Hill`s corps was told NOT to bring on a major engagment.But they thought they were up against cavalry only.So they kept pouring men into the fight.But southern leaders ( mostly Richard Ewell) failed to take Cemetery ridge.This at least despite terrible losses... See More, gave the Union soldiers a strong foothold which they never relinqueshed.Because of a stretched supply line Lee could stay in the north for very long.Robert E. Lee had no preset objective other than taking the fight to the north and hopefully drawing troops away from Vicksburg.I always thought that instead of spreading out like they did,the Rebel forces should have made a main thrust straight at Washington.Especially while "Fighting"Joe Hooker was stumbling around in the dark.Who knows the panic it probably would have caused.
that should read Lee could NOT stay in the north for very long.1/4 or more of his men had no shoes!They were living off of captured rations and ammunition.Never has an army who had so little achieved so much!

Facebook Comment Comment from Mark Alan Armstrong on Facebook: Due to the difference in population, industry and blockades in the south the north would win the war not matter what happened at Gettysburg. The south had better top ranking officers but attrition would get them in the end.

Facebook Comment Comment from Tom Hickie on Facebook: I think if it was not gettysburg then it would have been some other place, the south lacked both the human and material resources to fight a prolonged war. it was incredible that they did as well as they did, the early victories probably instilled a sense of false confidence

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-02-22 16:49:09 ~ I agree with Mr. Ryan. Even if Lee won at Gettysburg and made his goal of Harrisburg to tie up the rail lines, it'd become a very powerful Union siege. The only hope would be diplomatic leverage.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, John Adams triumphs in 1800 but the task of saving the Union rests with the leader of the Federalist Party, Alexander Hamilton. Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1804, on this day Colonel Aaron Burr took office as the third Governor of New York with the immediate intent of seceding the State out of the Union and into a newly created Northern Confederacy.

First PlaceBelieving that the Louisiana Purchase had destroyed their chances of controlling the government, a group of New England Federalists, led by Timothy Pickering had originated the dastardly plot. But it was soon discovered by Alexander Hamilton who immediately sought to foil it by published a series of articles that were highly critical of Burr. "I consider Napoleon, Fox, and Hamilton the three greatest men of our epoch, and if I were forced to decide between the three, I would give without hesitation the first place to Hamilton" ~ Charles Maurice de Talleyrand

And yet the electoral impact of those articles was neutralised by the widely written "Antifederalist Papers" which had been published anonymously throughout the gubernatorial election bearing the unmistakeable penmanship of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The result was that Hamilton's preferred opposition candidate Morgan Lewis lost by a mere thousand votes.

Hamilton made a second, and more successful attempt to foil the plot ten days later when he met Burr for an "interview" at Weehawken. Only yards from the spot where his son had died three years before, Hamilton reserved both shots, humilitating Burr with the implication that he wasn't worth shooting, a tactic British Primie Minister William Pitt the Younger employed against George Tierney.

After missing Hamilton with his own shot, Burr fled to the south-west where he executed a variant of Pickering's plot by creating the breakaway republic of Gloriana which ironically enough detached the territory acquired by the Louisiana Purchase.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Founding Fathers by Brion McClanahan (2009)
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: Abraham Lincoln, Cooper Union, Presidency, 1860 Election, Stephen Douglas.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-05-09 02:21:53 ~ Burr was prone to being talked into wild schemes, but this sounds a bit too wild even for him.

Readers Comment Michael N. Ryan commented on 2010-05-09 15:14:19 ~ Considering what a pariah Burr was by this time, the Federal government's diverse political factions unify to crush him.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2010-05-17 02:43:28 ~ The Great Pig War, Minnesota Militia aids the Metis.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-04-09 16:37:48 ~ I have to agree with Messrs. Oppen and Ryan on this one...

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-04-11 00:28:14 ~ Hamilton taking charge of government so early, we'd see borderline revolution with Jacksonian ideals.


In 1520, on this day the semi-divine deity Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin was murdered in the city of Tenochtitlan. This precipative action was recorded with great detail by Aztec pictograms in the Codex Mendoza, a hurriedly created contemporary account of the genicide that the Spanish Conquistadors were then visiting upon the ordered society of the Mexica Tenochca.

Montezuma's RevengeActing in the name of his white god, Hernan Cortéz poured molten gold down the throat of the tlatoani, thus simultaneously drowning, suffocating, and burning him. This psychotic act of violence revealed Cortéz system of thinking, because he rightly feared Motecuhzoma's revenge, both in this world, and the next.

"I have spoken of the sorrow we all felt when we saw that Motecuhzoma was dead. We even blamed the Mercederian friar for not having persuaded him to become a Christian".In fact, soon after he arrived on the city-in-the-lake, Cortéz had been shocked to discover the frightening idols of the Aztecs. And this disquiet soon led to mortal terror when he first witnessed the human sacrifice practiced at the Great Temple.

Because Cortéz understood fully that the Aztec's form of worship celebrated a connection with the spirit world that was utterly alien to the Catholic mindset. To re-establish this proper connection between the temporal and spiritual worlds, the night jaguar Quetzalcoatl (pictured) reanimated Motecuhzoma - but with a new infusion. And so a deadly disease was unleashed upon the accused invaders, who fled Mexico both with the Codex, and also the "Spanish Influenza" that would ravage the civilization of Western Europe.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: Wikipedia Labels: Montezuma, Aztec, New Spain, Catholic Church, Americas.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-23 22:51:18 ~ So Motecuhzoma revived...as what? A vampire, a zombie, or a revenant?

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2009-11-24 00:20:44 ~ All three. Maybe as a Zompire or as a Vambie. In fact, there are many ways in which the Spaniards could have been defeated, mainly by killing their horses and attacking them at night in mass numbers.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if James II had won out, how might we now define the Glorious Revolution - as a Catholic restoration perhaps? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1690, on this day at Drogheda on the east coast of Ireland, the future of Catholic supremacy in England was secured with victory at the Battle of the Boyne when Protestant King William was defeated by the rightful monarch, James Stuart (pictured) who the Williamites had unlawfully deposed some two years before.

Glorious Revolution of 1690The high point in the so-called "Glorious Revolution", this violent series of event is seen in retrospect as the springboard for Britain's eventual global dominance.

In late 1685 the King had crushed the rebellion of his nephew, the Protestant Duke of Monmouth, executing hundreds of traitors of the English West Country in the Bloody Assizes. Determined to improve the social and political status of his Catholic co-religionists, James rewrote English law. He insisted on his right to defy parliamentary statute and awarded Roman Catholics military and naval commissions. In 1687 he used his newly formed and illegal Ecclesiastical Commission to force England's Protestant universities to accept Roman Catholic fellows. When the fellows of Magdalen College, Oxford resisted their king's demands, he had the dons stripped of their fellowships and their institution turned into a Catholic seminary.

After the King had failed to persuade the House of Commons or the House of Lords to repeal England's laws against Roman Catholicism, he reduced the power of Parliament. He first asserted his right to nullify the Test Acts and Penal Laws. These parliamentary statutes -- requiring, in the case of the Test Acts, that all political or military office-holders take the sacrament according to the rites of the Church of England and, in the case of the Penal Laws, punishing those who officiated at or attended non-Church of England services--had successfully insulated the English from continental Catholic practices. Then James determined to have his royal fiat ratified by a Parliament packed with men whom he knew would do his bidding. In June 1688, seven bishops of the Church of England defied James by refusing to have his Declaration of Indulgence, emasculating the Penal Laws and Test Acts, read from England's pulpits on the grounds of its illegality. James had the seven men dragged into court for a show trial. That even a carefully picked English jury acquitted the bishops tested the limits to which the English were willing to go in support of their King.

Soon after the trial, the English invited the Dutchman William III, Prince of Orange, to England to restore their religious and political liberty.William rules for two short years until his defeat at the Battle of the Boyne.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Pincus, Steven. "A fight for the future: the Glorious Revolution was the result of a contest between two competing visions of the modern state, argues Steven Pincus. The springboard for Britain's eventual global dominance, this surprisingly violent series of events became a model for change the world over" published in the October Editor of History Today, Magazine.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Beasts Source: History Today Magazine Labels: James II, William III, Glorious Revolution, Catholic, Protestant.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, please note that to explore this controversial issue, extensive amounts of content have been repurposed from the source article.


Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-13 05:26:58 ~ You'd have to have some serious, ongoing pressure to turn Englishmen against Protestantism. By James II's time, Catholicism was _seriously_ unpopular...thanks to Bloody Mary, the Gunpowder Plotters, and the main "enemy" powers (Spain and France) both being very Catholic.

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-11-13 06:08:57 ~ Presume William loses at the Boyne. Presume he dies there. Now get Mary of the throne of England and Scotland. More likely the English come back with a bigger army in a few years and land in Ireland. The same higher nobility that staged the Glorious Revolution would not back down because a Dutch bisexual died.

Readers Comment David Atwell commented on 2009-11-13 08:20:19 ~ I'm in total agreement with Scott on this one. Parliament, now that it's supreme, would never reliquish power back to the man they kicked out, a mere two years before, who acted as a tyrant so bad I don't think anyone in England had a nice word say about him.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-11-13 15:25:46 ~ Assuming no Protestant comeback after 1690, one would expect, among other things, that it would still be illegal for a non-Catholic to take the crown of England, as in our timeline Catholics hgave been disqualified since 1701 by the Act of Settlement. the list of monarchs might have been entirely different in that case, and with succession different, the hemophilia in Queen Victria's family line might not have been transmitted to the Romanov dynasty in Russia--in which case, rasputin remains a back-country nutcase, Nicholas II perhaps focuses more on doing his job as Russia's ruler, and maybe there is no Bolshevik revolution.

Facebook Comment Comment by Patricia Williams-King on Facebook: I presume the Irish Catholics & Protestants wouldn't be fighting like cats & dogs as they do today?


In 2009, on this day political satirist Al Franken ended his bid to unseat incumbent Minnesota senator Norm Coleman.

Joke Candidacy by Eric LippsFranken, running as a Democrat, had been assailed as a "joke candidate" prior to the election, but the November balloting had ended essentially in a tie. When the recount mandated by state law had seemed to go in Coleman's favor despite polls hinting that support was trending in Franken's direction, the Democrat had gone to court seeking a further examination of the votes. Over the next seven months, the two candidates traded allegations of fraud, while Minnesotans essentially functioned with only one seated senator.

Finally, on June 30, the Minnesota high court handed down its decision, in favor of Coleman. The court's ruling meant an end to Mr. Franken's legal options unless he chose to take the case before the U.S. Supreme Court, with its strong Republican majority. Late in the evening of June 30, a Franken spokesman announced the candidate would be formally conceding the following morning and had already placed a call to Senator Coleman to inform him of that decision.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Politicians Source: Wikipedia Labels: Al Franken, America, Senate, Joke Candidate, Norm Coleman.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-07-01 23:55:46 ~ Would that it had happened this way. As things stand, I am very suspicious of that election...they kept "turning up" "lost votes," which, by an amazing co-inky-dink, all happened to be in strongly Democratic districts...and were all for Franken!

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-07-02 00:27:46 ~ Something does seem a mite off kilter...


In 1966, on this day the Australian newspaper published a speech delivered in Washington, D.C. by the New South Walesian imperialist reactionary, Harold Edward Holt.O Tempora, O Mores Part 2 - All the Way with LBJ
Holt articulated unquestioning support for US President Lyndon Baines Johnson, for America's Vietnam policy and for continued Australian military involvement in the conflict ~ "You have in us [the Australian Liberal delegation] not merely an understanding friend but one staunch in the belief of the need for your presence in Vietnam. We are not here because of our friendship, we are here because, like you, we believe it is right to be there and, like you, we believe American forces should stay there as long as it seems necessary to achieve the purposes of the South Vietnamese Government and the purposes that we join in formulating and progressing together. And so, sir, in the lonelier and perhaps even more disheartening moments which come to any national leader, I hope there will be a corner of your mind and heart which takes cheer from the fact that you have an admiring friend, a staunch friend that will be all the way with LBJ".
Controversially, Johnson was present for the speech, effectively giving his support to Holt (both pictured) as the de facto Head of the Australian Government in Exile.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: O Tempora O Mores Source: Wikipedia Labels: Harold Holt, Communist Australia, America, Vietnam War, Communism.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, the infamous 'All the Way with LBJ' speech was delivered in T0 by Holt as the Australian Prime Minister.






Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the English had revolted in the late eighteenth century? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1796, the so-called "Whig Revolution" begins in England.

Whig Revolution by Eric LippsIt will eventually end in the forced abdication of England's King George III (pictured) and the installation of his son, Prince George, as a constitutional monarch with sharply limited powers, as Parliament assumes de facto supremacy.

Twenty years ago on this date, dissident American colonists assembled at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia voted down a proposed "declaration of independence" following the refusal of its drafter Thomas Jefferson to remove a hostile reference to the African slave trade.

The armed rebellion which had begun with the battle of Breed's Hill the previous year had quickly fallen apart after that, and King George III, determined to squash the spirit of rebellion once and for all, had slammed down a mailed fist upon the thirteen disobedient colonies.

But his harsh response, which included the creation of a red-shirted "Order Police" empowered to use any means it chose to combat alleged sedition and subversion, has not produced peace so much as sullen submission. Rebel groups of one sort or another, many receiving aid from foreign powers such as France, Spain and the Netherlands, still carry out sabotage and seek through propaganda to stir up sentiment for a second attempt at revolution. The economy of the colonies continues to stagnate, too, under policies designed to keep America dependent upon Britain for manufactured goods; only shipping, which produces the vessels needed to carry raw goods from America to Britain and finished ones back, has been allowed to flourish.

Even in England itself, dissatisfaction has grown steadily. Growing public awareness of the ways in which the colonists are being deprived of what British subjects see as basic rights guaranteed by the Magna Carta and centuries of tradition has given rise to the fear that what has been done across the water may be done in the home islands. And influential figures in commerce and politics are increasingly dissatisfied with what they see as a costly and destructive occupation. Calls for reform, however, have been ignored or defied by the king, who appears to feel that as monarch by "divine right" he need not listen to critics. In fact, he has lashed out at several of them publicly, and on May 3, 1800, had threatened to dissolve Parliament outright if it again raised the issue of his American policies.

It was this outburst which would prove to be the final straw. Meeting privately at the country home of William Pitt, a cabal which included Pitt himself, Edmund Burke and Charles James Fox, along with several other lesser figures, discussed what Burke would describe in his diaries as "the direction of the country," reluctantly agreeing that King George's continued reign and the continuation of the policies he supported would prove harmful to Britain's "best interests".

Burke had emerged as a sharp critic of post-rebellion colonial policy, which he saw as siphoning British resources while interfering in the natural operation of the marketplace. Before the American rebellion, Charles Fox had denounced the taxation of the colonies without their consent, and once actual fighting erupted he had called for a negotiated settlement; the collapse of the revolt had very nearly meant the collapse as well of his political career, which it had taken him years to rebuild. Pitt, who had once been much less sympathetic to the colonies than his father, the elder William Pitt, had come to believe that the king's policies after the rebellion were all but guaranteeing another uprising at some point, this one perhaps backed by foreign powers as the first had not been.

Pitt and Fox had more personal motivations: both believed they had seen evidence that the king, who had contracted porphyria, was showing signs of mental instability. They shared that concern with their fellow conspirators, who acknowledged that if the king were indeed losing his faculties he must be removed for the good of the nation, quite apart from specific considerations of policy.

The actual coup required months of planning, during which measures were taken to line up both political and military support for the plan. The timing of the strike itself, two decades to the day after the rejection of the attempted declaration of American independence, is pure coincidence, but conspiracy theorists will insist that the plotters were working with colonial subversives - perhaps even with the hated Jefferson himself, believed to be in exile in New Orleans under Spanish protection.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Whig Revolution Source: Wikipedia Labels: Edmunde Burke, William Pitt, James Edward Fox, War of Independence, King George III.

Todayinah Editor Editor says, The September 2008 Edition of History Magazine included a feature article 'Trouble in Parliament' in which William Stroock looks at the Whigs' opposition to King George III on the eve of the American Revolution. In this post we look at a changed scenario for William Pitt, Edmund Burke and Charles James Fox where the American Revolution inspires the Whigs to challenge for the mastery of the British State itself.


Readers Comment Robbie Taylor commented on 2008-09-21 21:03:18 ~ Lovely! Down with the monarchy! :)

Readers Comment Scott Palter commented on 2009-09-28 06:29:16 ~ I would say the timing is off. Once revolution means Paris it is a hard sell in England. 1786 makes more sense IMO."

Facebook Comment Comment from J Michael Antoniewicz II on Facebook: Why? The most overlooked thing that moved all levels of Society in the Colonies to Revolution was that they were *NOT* being treated as Englishmen.

Facebook Comment Comment from Stoney Compton on Facebook: Read L.E. Modesitt, Jr. whose AH stories encompass this premise. Excellent work.

Facebook Comment Comment from J Michael Antoniewicz II on Facebook: Why would the English revolt? Even a tart in the worst area of London could call someone on not treating her as an English(wo)man and Highest Society would agree with *her*. There were principles to follow my good man.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2010-10-30 18:38:10 ~ Rather unlikely, and most Englishmen had a lot of affection for their poor old mad king. Now, his idiot son, OTOH...that was another matter entirely.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2010-11-01 15:48:31 ~ Wonder what becomes of Victoria in this TL. Nice unheard of aristocrat, perhaps writing books on manners, generally not being amused.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what is the South had rebelled from the British Empire in 1838, muses Eric Lipps? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1838, at a hastily convened convention in Raleigh, North Carolina, six Southern colonies - Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Georgia - pass a resolution declaring themselves "free and independent States". The Raleigh resolution borrows language from the Declaration of Philadelphia defeated by Southern veto exactly 62 years earlier.Southern Rebellion of 1838 by Eric Lipps

The Southerners proclaim themselves the United Commonwealths of America and declare fiery pro-slavery speaker John Calhoun (pictured) provisional president. British troops move to quell "Southern rebellion".

Southerners, who have long feared that the Crown might someday abolish their cherished institution of Negro slavery, rise en masse. Northerners, remembering how Southern intransigence had doomed the earlier attempt to secure independence for all the colonies, watch from the sidelines, ignoring Southern appeals to "our fellow Americans".

In August, inspired by sensational reports of British atrocities, the colonies of East and West Florida, Burgoyne and Louisiana will join the rebellion. On the eighth of that month, however, Massachusetts becomes the first colony to formally offer its support to the Crown to suppress the rebellion. It will be followed in short order by all of the colonies north of Virginia and Maryland, sparking expectations that the conflict will be short-lived. It will not be; major military operations will not end until March 1841, and guerrilla activity will continue for years thereafter under the aegis of a shadowy organization known as the Cyclops Legion.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Liberty Fails Source: Wikipedia Labels: Abolitionism, America, France, British Empire, John Calhoun.

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2009-11-08 05:25:14 ~ They would SO get squashed. Against the might of the entire British Empire, those independent states or Confederacy wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell.

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2009-11-08 11:31:12 ~ Quite right. This event is part of my "Continental Congress Collapses" thread, and the Southerners do get "squashed"--though it takes longer than you might expect. As we're seeing in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, even powerful nations can have a hard time crushing guerrilla insurgencies if the guerrillas remain committed to their cause.

Readers Comment H. Torrance Griffin commented on 2009-11-08 14:40:49 ~ Of course the strongest sectors of rebellion have a built-in pro-Crown fifth column. Black Tory regements will be formed quite swiftly and the hillmen have little use for the Plantation Aristos to begin with.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2009-11-08 17:45:32 ~ Interestingly enough, I've got a Southern Rebellion ATL of my own in progress at CTT; the difference between that one and this TL is my version starts in 1851.

Readers Comment Stan Brin commented on 2011-07-02 19:15:22 ~ Interesting, well seasoned, provacative.

Readers Comment Mark Taylor commented on 2012-05-01 12:56:18 ~ America staying British would've meant slavery ending in 1834 with rest of British Empire.


In 1971, Dien Bien Phu, which had been serving as the emergency capital of North Vietnam since the fall of Hanoi in March, is captured by U.S. and ARVN troops. Once again, however, the surviving North Vietnamese leadership manages to escape.

Fall of Dien Bien Phu by Eric LippsIn the U.S., opponents of the wars in Southeast Asia and Cuba are freshly branded as "defeatists". John F. Kerry, a returned Vietnam veteran who had delivered a two-hour antiwar speech to Congress on April 22, is singled out for particular scorn. "Mr. Kerry told us how bad the war was," columnist and Nixon speechwriter Patrick J. Buchanan thunders in an op-ed piece in the Washington Post. "Well, it's certainly turned bad for the Communists. Perhaps he cares more about that than about how, despite all the naysayers, this country is winning. If so, perhaps this isn?t the country he ought to call home".


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: US Congress, America, Patrick Buchanan, Dien Bien Phu, Vietnam War.





Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the founding fathers had quarrelled about a paradox in the Declaration of Independence? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). This story was published in the August 2011 edition of Changing the Times Magazine.

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1776, reacting to Thomas Jefferson's refusal to excise a paragraph condemning the slave trade in the proposed declaration of independence from Great Britain under debate in the Continental Congress, the delegations of South Carolina and Georgia vote "no" on its adoption. Since it had earlier been agreed that adoption required a unanimous "yes" vote, the resolution fails.

Collapse of the Revolt by Eric LippsFollowing the vote, the Georgia and South Carolina delegations walk out. Other Southern delegates follow soon after, causing the Continental Congress to disintegrate. News of the political disaster soon reaches the armies in the field and, predictably, ignites a wave of desertions. By the end of September, the Continental Army has been reduced to disorganized bands of guerrillas.

The leaders of the revolution find themselves forced to flee; Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin arrive in Paris in December and seek the protection of King Louis XVI. With the collapse of the revolt, British control tightens, backed up by a huge infusion of fresh troops sent to "restore order" in the rebellious colonies. One of their assignments is to identify and hunt down remaining "rebels".

Before the year is out, the so-called Order Police, a paramilitary organization charged with suppressing dissent, will have been established, with offices in every colonial capital.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Liberty Fails Source: Wikipedia Labels: Declaration of Independence, America, Slavery, Georgia, Thomas Jefferson.

Readers Comment Chris Oakley commented on 2011-07-22 01:11:47 ~ Somebody's been reading Orwell again... :D

Readers Comment Eric Oppen commented on 2011-07-22 05:33:59 ~ The "order police" would have been extremely alien to British usages at the time, and would have almost certainly set off new rebellion.

Readers Comment Jared Myers commented on 2011-07-22 06:44:49 ~ The Order Police? Sounds like an AH forerunner to the Black and Tans...

Readers Comment Eric Lipps commented on 2011-07-22 11:34:50 ~ Actually, the "Order Police" are merely an extrapolation of the repressive measures already being used in the colonies--measures which would have been rejected in the British Isles but which London saw as appropriate for dealing with the unruly colonials, whom it considered a lesser breed.

Readers Comment Jeff Provine commented on 2011-07-22 17:17:15 ~ The more the king tightens his fist, the more colonies will slip through his fingers.




Todayinah Editor Editor says, what if the identity of the fourth man in the famous British spy ring had revealed at the time?

Share this Article on: Facebook Twitter

In 1963, former Foreign Office official Harold Philby (pictured) admitted he was the "third man" in the case of British diplomats Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean. Security services were aware that using information he gained while working for the MI6 in Washington, Mr Philby warned the pair that intelligence services were on their trail. This information enabled them to escape to the Soviet Union.

It was now apparent Mr Philby was a double agent working for the Soviet authorities during his time with the foreign office. The news was announced in the House of Commons by the Lord Privy Seal Edward Heath. "This information, coupled with the latest message received by Mrs Philby, suggested that when he left Beirut he may have gone to one of the countries of the Soviet Block" he said.

MI6 Names the Fourth ManBritish authorities had always suspected there was a "third man" and asked if this new evidence confirmed it to be Mr Philby the reply from Mr Heath was, "yes". Mr Philby, often known as Kim, had been working as a journalist in Beirut when he disappeared four months ago. When Mr Burgess and Mr Maclean defected to the Soviet Union in 1951 Harold Philby was singled out as someone who could have warned them.

As a result of this he was forced to resign from his post at the Foreign Office by the then Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden. The investigation into the case was never closed.Today's revelations have been ridiculed by Mr Burgess, speaking from Moscow he maintained that Mr Maclean had been alerted when "over-eager MI5 sleuths" bumped into his car. Mr Maclean refused to comment. The identify of the "fourth man" former Minister of War John Profumo, emerged shortly afterwards.


Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Today in Alternate History, 2004-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Conspiracy Theories Source: Wikipedia Labels: Kim Philby, Guy Burgess , Donald Maclean. , Communism, Spy Ring.



In 1984, on this day U.S. and ROK advance troops entered North Korea's capital Pyongyang amid heavy NKPA resistance.                                                                                                  

 -

The North Korean embassy in Moscow pleaded with the Soviets to send troops to relieve Pyongyang's beleaguered defenders, but with the Kremlin's own military position in the Far East becoming more precarious every day there was little that could be done, and within 48 hours after the first shots were fired most of Pyongyang was under U.S.-South Korean control.


Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Battlefield Alaska Source: Wikipedia Labels: Ronald Reagan, Russia, America, 1984, Cold War.



In 2015, on this day Argentina's neo-Peronista regime conducted its first test launch of a nuclear ballistic missile.

 -

Entry posted by Todayinah Editor Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: GSTQ Source: Wikipedia Labels: David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Gordon Brown, Conservative, Charles Windsor.



In 1836, New Hampshire's Daniel Webster is proposed as a candidate for President by members of the Federalist Party in Congress. The Federalists, whose power has diminished considerably since the days of President Hamilton, hope to regain their former prominence by placing one of their own in the presidency once more. The Whig Party will put forward John Calhoun of South Carolina. Both men are serving in the Senate, but have agreed to leave their seats to become eligible for the presidency, as required under the Constitution's provision that no member of Congress, which elects the president, can be a candidate for that office. The legislatures of their home states will name replacements.

US President
US President - Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster

Entry posted by Guest Historian Eric Lipps Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Eric Lipps,2007-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Alternate Nations Source: Wikipedia Labels: US Congress, America, Daniel Webster, Presidency, White House.



On this day in 2002, thirty Iraqi dissidents were hanged at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison as punishment for their involvement in the June 24th anti-Saddam rallies in Baghdad.

 - Saddam Hussein
Saddam Hussein

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: MN15 Iraq Source: Wikipedia Labels: Asteroid 2002 MN 15, Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Asteriod, Strike.



On this day in 1968, thousands of Czech citizens marched through Prague's Wenceslas Square in support of Alexander Dubcek's "Prague Spring" reform movement; in response pro-Soviet Czech Communists held a counter-protest outside Dubcek's office. After hours of harsh verbal exchanges between the two sides, a riot broke out at the height of which a group of anti-Soviet fanatics stormed the Soviet embassy in Prague and wrecked a third of the embassy complex.

 - Alexander Dubcek
Alexander Dubcek

Entry posted by Guest Historian Chris Oakley Email the AuthorVisit the Authors Web Site © Chris Oakley,2008-.
Story Tags Click on the hyperlinked metadata to surf the site! Permalinks: Post, Day. Browse Thread: Ground Zero Murmansk Source: Wikipedia Labels: Russia, Great Britain, America, Soviet Union, Nuclear.





Older Posts 




© Today in Alternate History, 2013-. All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.